Glycaemic Variability and Risk Factors of Pregnant Women with and without Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Measured by Continuous Glucose Monitoring.

Background: The aim of the study was to compare the continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)-determined glycaemic variability (GV) of pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and without GDM (CG; control group). The secondary aim was to evaluate the association between risk factors of diabetes in pregnancy and parameters of glyceamic control. Methods: Demographic, biometric and biochemical parameters were obtained for pregnant women (20-38 years old) who after an oral glucose tolerance test were examined by 7-day continuous glucose monitoring using a iPro®2 Professional CGM. Results: The differences in GV between women with GDM and CG compared by total area under glucose curve (total AUC, (mmol·day/L) was statistically significant (p = 0.006). Other parameters of glycaemic control such as mean glucose, standard deviation, coefficient of variation, J-index, % time-above target range 7.8 mmol/L (%TAR), % time-in range 3.5-7.8 mmol/L (%TIR), time-below target range 3.5 mmol/L (%TBR), glycated haemoglobin were not significantly different in the study groups. Risk factors (a family history of diabetes, pre-pregnancy BMI, higher weight gain and age) correlated with parameters of glycaemic control. Conclusions: We found a significant difference in GV of women with and without GDM by total AUC determined from CGM. TIR metrics were close to significance. Our work points at an increased GV in relation to the risk factors of GDM. Pregnant women with risk factors have higher probability of severe GV with its consequences on maternal and fetal health state.

Reversal of functional disorders by aspiration, expiration, and cough reflexes and their voluntary counterparts.

Agonal gasping provoked by asphyxia can save ~15% of mammals even from untreated ventricular fibrillation (VF), but it fails to revive infants with sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS). Our systematic study of airway reflexes in cats and other animals indicated that in addition to cough, there are two distinct airway reflexes that may contribute to auto-resuscitation. Gasp- and sniff-like spasmodic inspirations (SIs) can be elicited by nasopharyngeal stimulation, strongly activating the brainstem generator for inspiration, which is also involved in the control of gasping. This "aspiration reflex" (AspR) is characterized by SI without subsequent active expiration and can be elicited during agonal gasping, caused by brainstem trans-sections in cats. Stimulation of the larynx can activate the generator for expiration to evoke the expiration reflex (ExpR), manifesting with prompt expiration without preceding inspiration. Stimulation of the oropharynx and lower airways provokes the cough reflex (CR) which results from activating of both generators. The powerful potential of the AspR resembling auto-resuscitation by gasping can influence the control mechanisms of vital functions, mediating reversal of various functional disorders. The AspR in cats interrupted hypoxic apnea, laryngo- and bronchospasm, apneusis and even transient asphyxic coma, and can normalize various hypo- and hyper-functional disorders. Introduction of a nasogastric catheter evoked similar SIs in premature infants and interrupted hiccough attacks in adults. Coughing on demand can prevent anaphylactic shock and resuscitate the pertinent subject. Sniff representing nasal inspiratory pressure and maximal inspiratory and expiratory pressures (MIP and MEP) are voluntary counterparts of airway reflexes, and are useful for diagnosis and therapy of various cardio-respiratory and neuromuscular disorders.

Do differences in sleep architecture exist between persons with type 2 diabetes and nondiabetic controls?

BACKGROUND: It has been shown previously that the suppression of slow-wave sleep (SWS) markedly reduced insulin sensitivity and led to an impairment of glucose tolerance. We hypothesized that a decreased amount of SWS is a feature peculiar to subjects with type 2 diabetes. METHOD: A retrospective case-control study analyzed polysomnographic recordings and covariate data of 22 type 2 diabetic and 22 nondiabetic subjects [n = 44; 8 women, 36 men, aged 57.5 +/- 5.5 years, body mass index (BMI) 33.8 +/- 5.9 kg/m(2), apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) 29.6 +/- 22.2 episodes/hr] matched individually for sex, race, age, BMI, and severity of sleep-related breathing disorders (SRBD). We assessed differences in sleep architecture between the study group and the control group. Primary end points included the percentage of total sleep time spent in each sleep stage. RESULTS: Despite similar age and severity of SRBD, subjects with type 2 diabetes demonstrated a significantly decreased amount of SWS (3.9 +/- 5.95% vs 8.4 +/- 4.57%; p = 0.012), increased percentage time in rapid eye movement sleep (24.1 +/- 12.14% vs 13.8 +/- 6.96%; p = 0.005), and higher arousal index (44.3 +/- 19.53/hr vs 35.7 +/- 12.67/hr; p = 0.037) compared to nondiabetic controls. After adjustment for sex, BMI, AHI, and smoking, age and presence of type 2 diabetes were independent predictors of the decreased SWS percentage (p = 0.001). Variables in this model accounted for 34% of the variance in the SWS percentage in our cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Results demonstrated distinct differences in sleep architecture in our cohort with decreased amounts of SWS in type 2 diabetes. These findings suggest that polysomnographic recognition of altered sleep architecture may be partially implicated in the early detection of persons with type 2 diabetes.