RESUMO
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: (I) To identify the opinion and practices of nursing professionals regarding the presence of family members during invasive procedures in hospitalised children; (II) to determine the knowledge of nursing professionals about the patient-and family-centred care model. BACKGROUND: Family presence in invasive procedures benefits the patient and their relatives, but varied attitudes exist among healthcare personnel, with some being favourable and others unfavourable toward family presence. DESIGN: Observational, descriptive, cross-sectional study. METHODS: Study population: Nurses from paediatric critical care services, emergency services, hospital wards, day hospitals and outpatient clinics at a Catalan tertiary hospital who participated voluntarily between September 2021 and July 2022. Data collection instrument: A questionnaire prepared by the researchers, based on the literature and reviewed by experts. REDCap link with access to the questionnaire was sent out to potential respondents through the institutional email. Bivariate analysis was performed with the R 4.2 program. The study was approved by the hospital's Clinical Research Committee and participants gave informed consent before responding to the questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 172 nurses participated, and 155 valid responses were obtained. All respondents consider the family as a key element in paediatric care and report inviting family members to participate in the care given to their child. However, 12.0% of nurses do not invite the family to be present in invasive procedures. Almost all respondents note the need for training to acquire communication skills and improve the management of emotions. CONCLUSIONS: The results show a favourable opinion towards the presence of family members and highlight the need to train nurses to develop communication skills. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The data provided can favour the design of measures to improve and promote the presence of parents during invasive procedures, reinforcing the patient-and family-centred care model and improving the quality of care provided. One example is the creation of family care protocols where the inclusion of parents and the roles of each individual involved in the care process appears.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Physical restraint is applied in pediatric intensive care units to carry out certain painful procedures and to ensure the maintenance and continuity of life support devices. There is a need to analyse the factors that influence the behaviour or intention to use physical restraint. AIM: To create and test psychometrically a paediatric version of the Physical Restraint-Theory of Planned Behaviour Questionnaire to assess paediatric critical care nurses' intention to use physical restraint. STUDY DESIGN: A psychometric study. Five medical-surgical Paeditric Intensive care Units from five hospitals in Spain. The study took place in three phases. In phase 1, the questionnaire was adapted. In phase 2, the content validity of each item was determined, and a pilot test was conducted. In phase 3, we administered the questionnaire and determined its psychometric properties. RESULTS: The assessment of the intention to use physical restraint was extended to all critical paediatric patients, two items were eliminated from the initial questionnaire, four new items were included, and the clinical scenarios of the intention subscale were expanded from three to six. Overall content validity index for the full instrument of 0.96 out of 1. The Paediatric Physical Restraint-Theory of Planned Behaviour Questionnaire is made up of four subscales (attitude, subjective norms (SN), perceived behavioural control (PBC), and intention) subdivided into 7 factors and 51 items. The internal consistency for the attitude subscale obtained a Cronbach's Alpha of 0.80 to 0.73, for the SN it was 0.72 to 0.89, for the PBC it was from 0.80 to 0.73 and for the intention subscale it was 0.75. CONCLUSIONS: The Paediatric Physical Restraint-Theory of Planned Behaviour Questionnaire is an instrument composed of seven factors and 51 items that validly and reliably assesses the intention of paediatric nurses to apply PR in PICUs. RELEVANCE FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE: Having this instrument will help health centres move towards restraint-free care by allowing managers to assess professionals' attitudes, beliefs, and intentions around the use of PR in PICUs.
Assuntos
Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Pediátrica , Psicometria , Restrição Física , Humanos , Inquéritos e Questionários/normas , Restrição Física/psicologia , Espanha , Feminino , Masculino , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Criança , Intenção , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Enfermagem de Cuidados Críticos , Adulto , Teoria do Comportamento PlanejadoRESUMO
The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of presurgical interventions for promoting smoking cessation in terms of achieving smoking abstinence and reducing surgical complication rates. A systematic review of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) published from March 2009 to April 2021 was performed following the PRISMA guidelines. References were found in MEDLINE (via PubMed), Web of Science (WOS), and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL). RCTs comparing the efficacy of a smoking cessation program directed at an intervention group (IG) versus the usual intervention or another directed at a control group (CG) were included. No language restrictions were applied in the search. All approaches to smoking cessation were admitted (face-to-face, telephone, group, individual, multicomponent, etc.), as were all methods for assessing abstinence, follow-up times, surgical specialties, definitions of smokers, and all types of surgical complications. Four hundred forty-four references were pulled out, and 79 duplicates were discarded. We excluded 346 records that were after application of the inclusion/exclusion criteria. In addition to the remaining 19 articles, 1 article obtained from citation searches was also assessed. We finally included 11 original articles in this systematic review, corresponding to 9 studies, because 2 of the RCTs had 2 different articles referring to different aspects of the same study. The results showed long-term postoperative (6 to 12 months) abstinence rates between 25.0% and 36.4% in RCTs with intensive multicomponent interventions, versus rates about 13.0% in brief interventions. Two multicomponent interventions obtained significant improvements regarding the reduction of short-term postoperative surgical complications. In conclusion, presurgical multicomponent smoking cessation interventions are more effective than brief interventions in terms of achieving abstinence and reducing surgical complications. The follow-up time and the intensity of the interventions were predictors of dropout.
Assuntos
Abandono do Hábito de Fumar , Humanos , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar/métodos , Fumar , Complicações Pós-OperatóriasRESUMO
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To explore women's emotional responses throughout the process of terminating a pregnancy for medical reasons. BACKGROUND: Making the choice to terminate a desired pregnancy for medical reasons has a negative impact on women's health, as it is a distressing process that involves making hard decisions and readjusting one's expectations of an idealised pregnancy. METHODS: A qualitative phenomenological study was conducted following the COREQ checklist. Fifteen semi-structured interviews and two focus groups were conducted with women who had terminated their pregnancies for medical reasons, previous to and during the COVID-19 lockdown. Subsequently, we analysed the content. RESULTS: One main category, emotional journey during the process of terminating the pregnancy, and six subcategories were identified: (I) representation and desire to become a mother, (II) main concerns, (III) impact of the news, (IV) decision-making, (V) emotional responses before termination for medical reasons and (VI) emotional responses after termination for medical reasons. All contributed to understanding the specificities of the different phases that make up the emotional journey of terminating a pregnancy for medical reasons. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study suggest that there are a number of predominant emotions that professionals need to be aware of in order to help women work through them and lessen the impact of pregnancy termination on their mental health. COVID-19 had different connotations depending on the women's experiences. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Our results highlight how important the role of healthcare staff is in caring for these women and their partners, which involves recognising their emotions throughout the process. Our results also underline how useful it is to conduct qualitative studies in this context, since they constitute a set of activities and interventions that result in the administration of nursing care in itself. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: The ultimate goal of the action research study is to design a positive mental health intervention. Participants will contribute to the design and final approval of the intervention.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Mães , Gravidez , Masculino , Feminino , Humanos , Mães/psicologia , Tomada de Decisões , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis , Emoções , Medo , Pesquisa QualitativaRESUMO
AIM: To investigate factors that influence the assessment of postoperative pain in children and adolescents with cerebral palsy (CP) and the tools available to determine pain intensity. METHOD: The search was performed in January 2022 using six databases. Articles focused on paediatric patients with CP; we included instruments for postsurgical pain assessment in this population published in the last 11 years. RESULTS: Eight of 441 studies were included. Males and females behave differently; their families can be called on to describe their pain responses. Seven instruments for pain assessment were identified: the Non-Communicating Children's Pain Checklist and its Postoperative Version; the Paediatric Pain Profile; the revised Face, Legs, Activity, Cry and Consolability (FLACC) pain scale; the Douleur Enfant San Salvador scale; the Pain Indicator for Communicatively Impaired Children; the University of Wisconsin Children's Hospital Pain Scale; and the Individualized Numeric Rating Scale. INTERPRETATION: The revised FLACC pain scale is suited to postsurgical units because of its ease of use and the fact that parental collaboration is not required. More studies are needed to demonstrate the clinical utility of these scales in postsurgical units and the factors that influence pain assessment. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: Families should be asked to collaborate when assessing pain in children and adolescents whenever possible. Larger studies that focus on the factors influencing pain assessment in this population are required.
Assuntos
Paralisia Cerebral , Adolescente , Paralisia Cerebral/complicações , Paralisia Cerebral/cirurgia , Lista de Checagem , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Perna (Membro) , Masculino , Medição da Dor , Dor Pós-Operatória/diagnóstico , Dor Pós-Operatória/etiologiaRESUMO
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The study investigated clinical nurses' critical thinking levels in public hospitals and related factors. BACKGROUND: Since health care environments have become more complex, the critical thinking skills of clinical nurses are more important in daily problem-solving and decision-making processes. However, little research was conducted on this topic among clinical nurses. METHODS: It was a cross-sectional study at five public hospitals between December 2018 and January 2019. The study followed the STROBE guideline. Data were collected from 559 nurses by a survey consisted of a data form and the Turkish version of the Nursing Critical Thinking in Clinical Practice Questionnaire. RESULTS: Nurses' mean critical thinking scores were moderate level. Total critical thinking scores of the clinical nurses significantly differed according to education, hospital type, shift work, professional category and role. There was a significant effect on the total critical thinking scores of the clinical nurses according to variables. CONCLUSION: This study found that critical thinking levels of nurses' working in clinical settings in public hospitals were moderate level. Hospital type, shift work, professional and educational level and role were significantly associated with clinical nurses' critical thinking levels. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: This study provides evidence related to the levels of critical thinking of clinical nurses working in public hospitals. Since the critical thinking scores of the manager nurses, daytime working nurses' and nurses with bachelor's and master's degree education are higher, hospital managers may benefit from the study to implement effective strategies to improve the competence of critical thinking levels of nurses.
Assuntos
Competência Clínica , Enfermeiras e Enfermeiros , Estudos Transversais , Hospitais Públicos , Humanos , Inquéritos e Questionários , PensamentoRESUMO
This study aims to describe patients' and family caregivers' hospitalization experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic. Using qualitative exploratory descriptive methods, 13 patients admitted to the largest hospital in Barcelona (Spain) due to COVID-19 were interviewed by telephone once discharged, as were eight primary caregivers. Data were analyzed using the content analysis method proposed by Krippendorff. Two main themes were identified: (i) Acceptance of mandatory isolation for patients and family caregivers, which refers to the verbalization of a feeling that justifies the imposed isolation and the need for the use of personal protective equipment by the health team for everyone's safety; and (ii) Limited autonomy during hospitalization for patients and family caregivers, which describes participants' perceptions of autonomy during hospitalization. Patients and caregivers experienced feelings of loneliness, which negatively affected their emotional health. In addition, they experienced reduced autonomy due to new habits and routines intended to control the pandemic for the benefit of public and global health.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Humanos , Cuidadores/psicologia , Espanha , Pandemias , Hospitalização , Pesquisa QualitativaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To report the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the activity of nurses working on an inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) unit and to identify reasons for telehealth care and its relationship to certain characteristics. BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic had led to an increase in demand for remote care in patients with inflammatory bowel disease who require monitoring and frequent access to health services. DESIGN - METHODS: A retrospective study of all activity (in person and by phone call or email) done on the unit during the acute phase of the pandemic at a reference hospital in Spain. Numbers of activities done by nurses, reasons for telehealth care and sociodemographic and clinical data were collected. Statistical analysis was performed using frequency, chi-squared and analysis of variance tests. RESULTS: A total of 1095 activities for 561 patients who received care were reported. Among them, 1042 (95.2%) were telemedicine activities, amounting to a 47.3% increase over the prior year. COVID-19-related activities numbered 588 (59.5%). Consultations due to disease flare-up numbered 134 (13.7%), representing a 145% increase compared to 2019. Significant differences were found between reasons for using telemedicine and diagnosis, occupational status, contact week and treatment. CONCLUSION: The acute phase of the pandemic has changed the activity managed by the nursing staff on the unit. Identifying and analysing these changes has yielded valuable information to achieve more efficient management and better care quality for patients in special situations.
Assuntos
COVID-19/epidemiologia , Colite Ulcerativa/enfermagem , Doença de Crohn/enfermagem , Correio Eletrônico/estatística & dados numéricos , Pandemias , Telemedicina/estatística & dados numéricos , Telefone/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Análise de Variância , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Espanha/epidemiologia , Exacerbação dos Sintomas , Telemedicina/métodosRESUMO
Critical thinking is a complex, dynamic process formed by attitudes and strategic skills, with the aim of achieving a specific goal or objective. The attitudes, including the critical thinking attitudes, constitute an important part of the idea of good care, of the good professional. It could be said that they become a virtue of the nursing profession. In this context, the ethics of virtue is a theoretical framework that becomes essential for analyse the critical thinking concept in nursing care and nursing science. Because the ethics of virtue consider how cultivating virtues are necessary to understand and justify the decisions and guide the actions. Based on selective analysis of the descriptive and empirical literature that addresses conceptual review of critical thinking, we conducted an analysis of this topic in the settings of clinical practice, training and research from the virtue ethical framework. Following JBI critical appraisal checklist for text and opinion papers, we argue the need for critical thinking as an essential element for true excellence in care and that it should be encouraged among professionals. The importance of developing critical thinking skills in education is well substantiated; however, greater efforts are required to implement educational strategies directed at developing critical thinking in students and professionals undergoing training, along with measures that demonstrate their success. Lastly, we show that critical thinking constitutes a fundamental component in the research process, and can improve research competencies in nursing. We conclude that future research and actions must go further in the search for new evidence and open new horizons, to ensure a positive effect on clinical practice, patient health, student education and the growth of nursing science.
Assuntos
Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Pensamento , Educação em Enfermagem/métodos , Humanos , Processo de Enfermagem , Pesquisa em Enfermagem/métodosRESUMO
AIM: To identify factors underlying ethical conflict occurring during the current COVID-19 pandemic in the critical care setting. BACKGROUND: During the first wave of the COVID-19 outbreak, Spanish and Italian intensive care units were overwhelmed by the demand for admissions. This fact revealed a crucial problem of shortage of health resources and rendered that decision-making was highly complex. SOURCES OF EVIDENCE: Applying a nominal group technique this manuscript identifies a series of factors that may have played a role in the emergence of the ethical conflicts in critical care units during the COVID-19 pandemic, considering ethical principles and responsibilities included in the International Council of Nurses Code of Ethics. The five factors identified were the availability of resources; the protection of healthcare workers; the circumstances surrounding decision-making, end-of-life care, and communication. DISCUSSION: The impact of COVID-19 on health care will be long-lasting and nurses are playing a central role in overcoming this crisis. Identifying these five factors and the conflicts that have arisen during the COVID-19 pandemic can help to guide future policies and research. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding these five factors and recognizing the conflicts, they may create can help to focus our efforts on minimizing the impact of the ethical consequences of a crisis of this magnitude and on developing new plans and guidelines for future pandemics. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE AND POLICY: Learning more about these factors can help nurses, other health professionals, and policymakers to focus their efforts on minimizing the impact of the ethical consequences of a crisis of this scale. This will enable changes in organizational policies, improvement in clinical competencies, and development of the scope of practice.
Assuntos
COVID-19/terapia , Tomada de Decisões/ética , Ética Institucional , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/ética , Pneumonia Viral/terapia , Assistência Terminal/ética , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Humanos , Itália/epidemiologia , Pandemias , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , Pneumonia Viral/virologia , SARS-CoV-2 , Espanha/epidemiologiaRESUMO
AIM: To compare the patient acuity, nurse staffing and workforce, missed nursing care and patient outcomes among hospital unit-clusters. BACKGROUND: Relationships among acuity, nurse staffing and workforce, missed nursing care and patient outcomes are not completely understood. METHOD: Descriptive design with data from four unit-clusters: medical, surgical, combined and step-down units. Descriptive statistics were used to compare acuity, nurse staffing coverage, education and expertise, missed nursing care and selected nurse-sensitive outcomes. RESULTS: Patient acuity in general (medical, surgical and combined) floors is similar to step-down units, with an average of 5.6 required RN hours per patient day. In general wards, available RN hours per patient day reach only 50% of required RN hours to meet patient needs. Workforce measures are comparable among unit-clusters, and average missed nursing care is 21%. Patient outcomes vary among unit-clusters. CONCLUSION: Patient acuity is similar among unit-clusters, while nurse staffing coverage is halved in general wards. While RN education, expertise and missed care are comparable among unit-clusters, mortality, skin injuries and risk of family compassion fatigue rates are higher in general wards. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: Nurse managers play a pivotal role in hustling policymakers to address structural understaffing in general wards, to maximize patient safety outcomes.
Assuntos
Recursos Humanos de Enfermagem Hospitalar , Admissão e Escalonamento de Pessoal , Estudos Transversais , Unidades Hospitalares , Humanos , Recursos HumanosRESUMO
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the opinion of hospital nurses on a group of recommendations aimed at reducing low-value nursing care and, based on these results, to detect low-value practices probably existing in the hospital. BACKGROUND: Low-value nursing care refers to clinical practices with poor or no benefit for patients that may be harmful and a waste of resources. Detecting these practices and understanding nurses' perceptions are essential to developing effective interventions to reduce them. METHODS: We conducted a survey in a tertiary hospital. STROBE guidelines were followed. The questionnaire appraised nurses' agreement, subjective adherence and perception of usefulness of a group of recommendations to reduce low-value nursing care from Choosing Wisely and other initiatives. Practices described in recommendations with an agreement over 70% and a subjective adherence under 70% were categorised as low-value practices probably existing in the hospital. RESULTS: A total of 265 nurses from eight areas of care participated in the survey. The response rate by area ranged between 2%-55%. From the 38 recommendations evaluated, agreement was 96% (95% confidence interval [95%CI], 95%-97%), median subjective adherence was 80% (95%CI, 80%-85%), and usefulness was 90% (95%CI, 89%-92%). Based on these results, we detected seven (0-15) low-value practices probably existing in our hospital, mostly on general practice, pregnancy care and wound care. CONCLUSIONS: We found a great understanding of low-value care between nurses, given the high agreement to recommendations and perception of usefulness. However, several low-value practices may be present in nursing care, requiring actions to reduce them, for instance, reviewing institutional protocols and involving patients in de-implementation. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Hospitals and other settings should be aware of low-value practices and take actions to identify and reduce them. A survey may be a simple and helpful way to start this process.
Assuntos
Recursos Humanos de Enfermagem Hospitalar/normas , Estudos Transversais , Atenção à Saúde/normas , Humanos , Processo de Enfermagem/normas , Padrões de Prática em Enfermagem/normas , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Polymorphisms in Interleukin-6 (IL6) and its receptor (IL6R) have been associated with bone mineral density. In this work, the G-174C and G-572C polymorphisms in IL6, G-208A, and Asp358Ala in IL6R were analyzed in Mexican women with hip fracture. METHODS: Postmenopausal Mexican women (60 years or over) with hip fragility fracture (77.97 ± 8 years) and without hip fracture (70.5 ± 7.02 years) were genotyped by real-time PCR. RESULTS: The rs1800796 GG genotype was associated with low risk of fracture (p = 0.05), while GC genotype was associated with high risk of fracture [p = 0.047, OR 2.3 (95% CI 1.013-5.2)]. The AA genotype of the rs2228145 SNP (IL6R) was significantly different [p = 0.033, OR 1.94 (95% CI 1.01-3.75)], but when data were adjusted by age and body mass index, there were no differences (p = 0.9). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that the IL6 rs1800796 SNP is a good marker for hip fracture risk in Mexican women.
Assuntos
Fraturas do Quadril/genética , Interleucina-6/genética , Polimorfismo de Nucleotídeo Único , Receptores de Interleucina-6/genética , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Índice de Massa Corporal , Densidade Óssea , Feminino , Genótipo , Fraturas do Quadril/etiologia , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-IdadeRESUMO
AIM: To analyse the levels of critical thinking among nurse managers and registered nurses and to explore the association between these levels and socio-demographic and occupational factors. BACKGROUND: Critical thinking is an essential skill in advanced clinical nursing. However, few studies to date have explored critical thinking levels in nurse managers or compared them with those recorded in registered nurses. METHODS: A randomized sample of 44 nurse managers and 295 registered nurses from a tertiary hospital in Barcelona participated in this study. The Nursing Critical Thinking in Clinical Practice Questionnaire was used to measure the level of critical thinking. The data were analysed using multivariate analysis by logistic regression. RESULTS: Levels of critical thinking were higher in nurse managers than in registered nurses. Age, work shift schedule and educational level were associated with a higher level of critical thinking in nurse managers and were predictor factors. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified age, work shift schedule and educational level as factors that impact on the acquisition of critical thinking skills among nurse managers. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: This study provides substantive evidence of the levels of critical thinking among nurse managers. When introducing strategies to enhance these skills, the associated occupational factors should be taken into account.
Assuntos
Enfermeiros Administradores/normas , Enfermeiras e Enfermeiros/normas , Pensamento , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Enfermeiros Administradores/psicologia , Enfermeiras e Enfermeiros/psicologia , Psicometria/instrumentação , Psicometria/métodos , Espanha , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
INTRODUCCIÓN: El uso frecuente de reproductores de archivos de música y la intensidad del volumen son factores de riesgo para el desarrollo de hipoacusia. OBJETIVO: Validar el Cuestionario de Tamizaje Auditivo Escolar (CUTAE) para identificar alteraciones auditivas en adolescentes usuarios de reproductores de archivos música comprimida (RPAMC). MÉTODO: Se estudiaron adolescentes usuarios de RPAMC, sin hipoacusia ni patología de oído medio. Se aplicó el CUTAE y se realizó audiometría. Se determinó reproducibilidad (coeficiente correlación intraclase-CCI), consistencia interna (alfa de Cronbach), validez de apariencia (técnica Delphi), validez concurrente CUTAE-audiometría (correlación de Pearson) y validez predictiva (regresión múltiple) del cuestionario. RESULTADOS: Se evaluaron 59 adolescentes (118 oídos), 66 % del sexo femenino, con edad promedio fue de 13 años; 90 oídos con parámetros normales, 18 con umbral menor de 20 dB con morfología de trauma acústico (TA) en la frecuencia de 6 KHz y 10 con TA. El cuestionario tuvo CCI de 0.788, alfa de Cronbach de 0.807, correlación de Pearson de 0.290 a 0.368 (p < 0.05); las variables predictivas fueron horas de uso del dispositivo, dificultad para escuchar a las personas (p < 0.05) y tipo de zumbido (p = 0.07). CONCLUSIÓN: El CUTAE tiene propiedades clinimétricas para considerarlo una prueba de tamizaje en la detección de alteraciones auditivas en adolescentes usuarios de RPAMC. INTRODUCTION: Frequent use of audio file players and volume intensity are risk factors for the development of hypoacusis. OBJECTIVE: To validate the school-age hearing screening questionnaire (CUTAE, by its Spanish acronym) for hearing disorders detection in teenage users of compressed audio file players (CAFP). METHODS: Adolescent CAFP users without hypoacusis or middle ear pathology were studied. The CUTAE was applied and audiometry was carried out. Reproducibility (intraclass correlation coefficient-ICC), internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha), face validity (Delphi technique), CUTAE-audiometry concurrent validity (Pearson's correlation) and predictive validity (multiple regression) of the questionnaire was assessed. RESULTS: Fifty nine adolescents (118 ears), 66% females, average age of 13 years, were assessed. Ninety ears had normal parameters, 18 showed a threshold decrease < 20 dB, with morphology associated with acoustic trauma (AT) at 6 kHz and 10 with AT. The questionnaire had an ICC of 0.788, a Cronbach alpha-value of 0.807, Pearson's correlation values of 0.290 to 0.368 (p < 0.05); the predictive variables were usage hours, difficulty hearing others (p < 0.05) and type of buzzing (p = 0.07). CONCLUSION: The CUTAE has adequate clinimetric properties to be considered as a screening test in the detection of hearing disorders in adolescent users of CAFP.
Assuntos
Perda Auditiva Provocada por Ruído/diagnóstico , Perda Auditiva Provocada por Ruído/etiologia , Música , Autorrelato , Adolescente , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Reprodutibilidade dos TestesRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND AIM: A complex healthcare environment, with greater need for care based on the patient and evidence-based practice, are factors that have contributed to the increased need for critical thinking in professional competence. At the theoretical level, Alfaro-LeFevre () put forward a model of critical thinking made up of four components. And although these explain the construct, instruments for their empirical measurement are lacking. The purpose of the study was to develop and validate the psychometric properties of an instrument, the Nursing Critical Thinking in Clinical Practice Questionnaire (N-CT-4 Practice), designed to evaluate the critical thinking abilities of nurses in the clinical setting. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey design was used. A pool of items was generated for evaluation by a panel of experts who considered their validity for the new instrument, which was finally made up of 109 items. Following this, validation was carried out using a sample of 339 nurses at a hospital in Barcelona, Spain. Reliability was determined by means of internal consistency and test-retest stability over time, although the validity of the construct was assessed by means of confirmatory factor analysis. RESULTS: The content validity index of the N-CT-4 Practice was .85. Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the whole instrument was .96. The intraclass correlation coefficient was .77. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the instrument was in line with the four-dimensional model proposed by Alfaro-LeFevre (). LINKING EVIDENCE TO ACTION: The psychometric properties of theN-CT-4 Practice uphold its potential for use in measuring critical thinking and in future research related with the examination of critical thinking.
Assuntos
Enfermeiras e Enfermeiros/psicologia , Enfermeiras e Enfermeiros/normas , Psicometria/instrumentação , Pensamento , Adulto , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Estudos Transversais , Prática Clínica Baseada em Evidências/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Psicometria/métodos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Inquéritos e Questionários , Recursos HumanosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the evaluation and intervention thresholds using FRAX® in Mexican population. METHODS: Probabilities for a mayor fracture using the Mexican FRAX® version to estimate the evaluation and intervention thresholds using clinical scenarios were obtained in both sexes 40 years and over. Projections for 2020 were done to estimate the number of patients at the intervention level taking the osteoporosis prevalence in Mexicans aged 50 years and over. RESULTS: The cutoffs for the intervention thresholds were 2.6%-20.0%. Individuals with thresholds above these probabilities are amenable for intervention. The assessment thresholds range from 1.2-3.2% to 12.5-24.4% for 40 to 90 years. According to projections of our population, approximately three million people are susceptible to intervention by 2020. CONCLUSION: The use of FRAX® thresholds of intervention and evaluation developed in this study will be useful in the primary care level for case detection at high risk of fragility fracture.
Assuntos
Fraturas Espontâneas/diagnóstico por imagem , Osteoporose/diagnóstico por imagem , Absorciometria de Fóton , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Algoritmos , Densidade Óssea , Feminino , Fraturas Espontâneas/epidemiologia , Fraturas Espontâneas/etiologia , Humanos , Masculino , México/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Osteoporose/complicações , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Prevalência , Probabilidade , Valores de Referência , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fatores SexuaisRESUMO
This article seeks to analyse the current state of scientific knowledge concerning critical thinking in nursing. The methodology used consisted of a scoping review of the main scientific databases using an applied search strategy. A total of 1518 studies published from January 1999 to June 2013 were identified, of which 90 met the inclusion criteria. The main conclusion drawn is that critical thinking in nursing is experiencing a growing interest in the study of both its concepts and its dimensions, as well as in the development of training strategies to further its development among both students and professionals. Furthermore, the analysis reveals that critical thinking has been investigated principally in the university setting, independent of conceptual models, with a variety of instruments used for its measurement. We recommend (i) the investigation of critical thinking among working professionals, (ii) the designing of evaluative instruments linked to conceptual models and (iii) the identification of strategies to promote critical thinking in the context of providing nursing care.
Assuntos
Educação em Enfermagem , Pensamento , HumanosRESUMO
PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the frequency of psychosocial aspects of basic nursing care, as e-charted by nurses, when using an interface terminology. METHODS: An observational, multicentre study was conducted in acute wards. The main outcome measure was the frequency of use of the psychosocial interventions in the electronic nursing care plans, analysed over a 12 month retrospective review. FINDINGS: Overall, 150,494 electronic care plans were studied. Most of the intervention concepts from the interface terminology were used by registered nurses to illustrate the psychosocial aspects of fundamentals of care in the electronic care plans. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The results presented help to demonstrate that the interventions of this interface terminology may be useful to inform psychosocial aspects of basic and advanced nursing care. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The identification of psychosocial elements of basic nursing care in the nursing documentation may lead to obtain a deeper understanding of those caring interventions nurses consider essential to represent nurse-patient interactions. The frequency of psychosocial interventions may contribute to delineate basic and advanced nursing care.
Assuntos
Comunicação , Enfermagem de Cuidados Críticos , Registros de Enfermagem/estatística & dados numéricos , Psicoterapia/estatística & dados numéricos , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Humanos , Pesquisa em Avaliação de Enfermagem , Planejamento de Assistência ao Paciente , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To measure the impact on the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of a sample of Mexicans with vertebral fractures. MATERIAL AND METHODS: One hundred fifteen subjects with vertebral fractures were interviewed and compared with 135 subjects similar in age without the fracture. Subjects were men and women > 50 years of age with osteoporosis confirmed by bone mineral densitometry and with at least 1 vertebral fracture verified by vertebral morphometry and Xrays. The sample was recruited from two sources: The Clínica de Osteoporosis at the Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación and a random sample from the Latin American Osteoporosis Study. The Quality of Life Questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis (QUALEFFO) validated in Spanish for the Mexican population was applied. Descriptive statistics were used for demographic and clinical aspects of the sample, as well as χ2 for categorical variables and Student t test for independent samples for continuous variables. A multiple linear regression (LR) was conducted to characterize predictive variables related to quality of life. RESULTS: Two hundred fifty subjects were interviewed; 64% of them were women. The average age of those interviewed was 73.4 ± 11.4 years; 46% of the sample had vertebral fractures; of them 43% of were lumbar and 57% thoracic; the most frequent site was L1-T12. Significant changes were found in the group with fractures in pain, physical function, social function, and mental function (p < 0.05); in women, pain and social function were different between groups (p < 0.05); and those over 70 years also presented differences in physical, social, and mental function (p < 0.05); differences were found associated with the place of recruitment being worse in their quality of life those coming from the Clínica de Osteoporosis. Two or more fractures, age, being female and widowed were significant predictors for greater deterioration of HRQoL with the LR. CONCLUSION: This is the first study looking at the HRQoL in osteoporosis related fractures in Mexicans were quality of life deterioration on physical, social, and emotional functioning was demonstrated in subjects with two vertebral fractures. Age is a determining factor for greater deterioration in all studied domains. Differences between the samples obtained at the Clínica de Osteoporosis at the Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación and the random population exemplifying that asymptomatic fractures are common and not diagnosed. It is important to scrutinize vertebral fractures at the first level because their timely detection allows for their evaluation and treatment and diminishes the probability of a second fracture. Our results can be generalized to men and women over 50 who live in the central megalopolis and in other states of the Valley of México.