Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Thorax ; 79(9): 842-852, 2024 Aug 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38964860

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Interstitial lung disease in children (chILD) are rare and mostly severe lung diseases. Very few epidemiological data are available in limited series of patients. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence and incidence of chILD in France. METHODS: We performed within the RespiRare network a multicentre retrospective observational study in patients with chILD from 2000 to 2022 and a prospective evaluation of chILD's incidence between February 2022 and 2023. RESULTS: chILD was reported in 790 patients in 42 centres. The estimated 2022 prevalence in France was 44 /million children (95% CI 40.76 to 47.46) and the computed incidence was 4.4 /million children (95% CI 3.44 to 5.56). The median age at diagnosis was 3 months with 16.9% of familial forms. Lung biopsy and genetic analyses were performed in 23.4% and 76.9%, respectively. The most frequent chILD aetiologies in the <2 years group were surfactant metabolism disorders (16.3%) and neuroendocrine cell hyperplasia of infancy (11.8%), and in the 2-18 years group diffuse alveolar haemorrhage (12.2%), connective tissue diseases (11.4%), hypersensitivity pneumonitis (8.8%) and sarcoidosis (8.8%). The management included mainly oxygen therapy (52%), corticosteroid pulses (56%), oral corticosteroids (44%), azithromycin (27.2%), enteral nutrition (26.9%), immunosuppressants (20.3%) and hydroxychloroquine (15.9%). The 5-year survival rate was 57.3% for the patients diagnosed before 2 years and 86% between 2 and 18 years. CONCLUSION: This large and systematic epidemiological study confirms a higher incidence and prevalence of chILD than previously described. In order to develop international studies, efforts are still needed to optimise the case collection and to harmonise diagnostic and management practices.


Assuntos
Doenças Pulmonares Intersticiais , Humanos , França/epidemiologia , Doenças Pulmonares Intersticiais/epidemiologia , Doenças Pulmonares Intersticiais/diagnóstico , Doenças Pulmonares Intersticiais/terapia , Feminino , Masculino , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Adolescente , Incidência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Lactente , Prevalência , Estudos Prospectivos
2.
Respir Med ; 231: 107726, 2024 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38950683

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Airway clearance (ACT) and lung volume recruitment (LVR) techniques are used to manage bronchial secretions, increase cough efficiency and lung/chest wall recruitment, to prevent and treat respiratory tract infections. The aim of the study was to review the prescription of ACT/LVR techniques for home use in children in France. METHODS: All the centers of the national pediatric noninvasive ventilation (NIV) network were invited to fill in an anonymous questionnaire for every child aged ≤20 years who started a treatment with an ACT/LVR device between 2022 and 2023. The devices comprised mechanical in-exsufflation (MI-E), intermittent positive pressure breathing (IPPB), intrapulmonary percussive ventilation (IPV), and/or invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV)/NIV for ACT/LVR. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-nine patients were included by 13 centers. IPPB was started in 83 (60 %) patients, MI-E in 43 (31 %) and IPV in 30 (22 %). No patient used IMV/NIV for ACT/LVR. The devices were prescribed mainly by pediatric pulmonologists (103, 74 %). Mean age at initiation was 8.9 ± 5.6 (0.4-18.5) years old. The ACT/LVR devices were prescribed mainly in patients with neuromuscular disorders (n = 66, 47 %) and neurodisability (n = 37, 27 %). The main initiation criteria were cough assistance (81 %) and airway clearance (60 %) for MI-E, thoracic mobilization (63 %) and vital capacity (47 %) for IPPB, and airway clearance (73 %) and repeated respiratory exacerbations (57 %) for IPV. The parents were the main carers performing the treatment at home. CONCLUSIONS: IPPB was the most prescribed technique. Diseases and initiation criteria are heterogeneous, underlining the need for studies validating the indications and settings of these techniques.


Assuntos
Ventilação não Invasiva , Humanos , França , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Lactente , Masculino , Adolescente , Feminino , Ventilação não Invasiva/métodos , Ventilação não Invasiva/instrumentação , Infecções Respiratórias/terapia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Serviços de Assistência Domiciliar , Pulmão/fisiopatologia , Tosse/fisiopatologia , Respiração com Pressão Positiva/métodos , Medidas de Volume Pulmonar , Terapia Respiratória/métodos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa