RESUMO
The clinical courses of COVID-19 in children are often mild and may remain undiagnosed, but prolonged intestinal virus shedding has been documented, thus potentially enabling fecal-oral transmission. However, the infectious potential of SARS-CoV-2 viruses excreted with feces has remained unclear. Here, we investigated 247 stool specimens from 213 pediatric patients to assess the prevalence of intestinal SARS-CoV-2 shedding in hospitalized children without or with COVID-19 and determined the infectious capacity of stool-borne viruses. Upon RT-qPCR screening, the infectivity of virus-positive samples was tested in cell culture using the Vero-E6 permissive cell line. SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected by RT-qPCR in 32 (13%) stool specimens, but the analysis of virus-positive samples in cell culture revealed no cytopathic effects attributable to SARS-CoV-2-related cell damage. Our findings do not support the notion of potential fecal-oral SARS-CoV-2 spreading, thus questioning the role of hygienic measures designed to prevent this mode of viral transmission.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To present emergency cerclage (EC) as a safe and effective therapeutic option for prevention of prematurity in women with advanced cervical dilation in second-trimester pregnancy. It is focused on seemingly futile situations like cervical dilation >5 cm, bulging membranes and multifetal pregnancies. The outcomes of interest are the prolongation of pregnancy, gestational age at delivery and neonatal morbidity and mortality related to distinct risk factors. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective monocentric cohort study involving 130 pregnancies (105 single and 25 twin pregnancies) and 155 neonates by using a standardized protocol. Women between 18 and 28 gestational weeks with cervical shortening of <10 mm + cervical dilation >2 cm and/or bulging membranes were included. Analyses of maternal and neonatal parameters were done by chart review. RESULTS: The medium gestational age at delivery was 35 5/7 week with a medium interval from cerclage placement to delivery of 83 days. Overall, 46.5% (72/155) neonates were born beyond 37 weeks, extreme prematurity of less than 28 gestational weeks was observed in 14.8% (23/155), no miscarriage before 22 weeks was documented. The neonatal mortality was 1.9% (3/155). Neonatal deaths and morbidity was related to severe prematurity exclusively. The association of amnion-infection syndromes and failing therapy was significantly with respect to bulging membranes and advanced cervical dilation >5 cm. CONCLUSIONS: Even in futile cases EC can be an option to save the pregnancy and prevent severe prematurity. However, a standardized protocol is imminent for successful therapy and every indication has to be a case by case decision.
Assuntos
Cerclagem Cervical , Nascimento Prematuro , Incompetência do Colo do Útero , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Idade Gestacional , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Gravidez , Resultado da Gravidez/epidemiologia , Nascimento Prematuro/epidemiologia , Nascimento Prematuro/prevenção & controle , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: There is no approved second-line treatment for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). On the basis of promising early results, pembrolizumab was used off-label in Switzerland and Australia. We investigated outcomes in association with clinicopathological features and expression of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1). METHODS: Registry data in Australia and Switzerland were pooled. Patient characteristics, including age, sex, histological subtype, and previous treatments were captured. Outcomes were assessed locally. PD-L1 expression was categorized as negative (<5%), intermediate (5%-49%), and high (≥50%). RESULTS: A total of 93 patients (48 from Switzerland and 45 from Australia) were treated; 68 patients (73%) had epithelioid MPM, and 67 (72%) had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. Pembrolizumab was the second-line treatment in 48 of 93 patients (52%). PD-L1 expression results were available for 66 patients (71%). Most (68%) were negative, 18% were intermediate, and 14% were high for PD-L1 expression. In the full cohort, the overall response rate (ORR) was 18%, the median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 3.1 months, and the median overall survival was 7.2 months. In patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 and only one previous systemic treatment (n = 35), the ORR was 37%, the mPFS was 3.7 months, and the median overall survival was 10.2 months. The nonepitheloid histological subtype showed an improved ORR (24% versus 16% [p = 0.54) and mPFS (5.6 versus 2.8 months [p = 0.02]). Compared with intermediate and negative PD-L1 expression, high PD-L1 expression was associated with an improved ORR (44% versus 42% versus 11% [p = 0.01]) and mPFS (6.2 versus 3.9 versus 2.7 months [p = 0.04]). Toxicity was as expected. CONCLUSION: These real-world data demonstrate similar response rates but inferior survival compared with those in early-phase trials. High PD-L1 expression and nonepitheloid histological subtype were associated with greater activity. Anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy is a reasonable second-line therapy in patients with MPM.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , Antineoplásicos Imunológicos/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamento farmacológico , Mesotelioma/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pleurais/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Imunoterapia/métodos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/imunologia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patologia , Masculino , Mesotelioma/imunologia , Mesotelioma/patologia , Mesotelioma Maligno , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Pleurais/imunologia , Neoplasias Pleurais/patologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Patient satisfaction with in-patient treatment and other aspects of process quality is usually examined cross-sectionally (e.g. at discharge). Therefore, the knowledge about changes in patient satisfaction and related issues, such as participation and motivation during the treatment period, is limited. This study describes the development of a questionnaire covering these topics and the course and variability in these domains for different subgroups. METHOD: The study group comprises 88 adolescents (48 females, 40 males; aged 13 to 18 years) who delivered altogether 1,003 data points (median per person is 8). The questionnaire consisted of 16 items that were administered to them by computer twice a week at adolescent wards in two psychiatric departments. Statistical analysis was done using hierarchical linear modeling (growth curve models), which is well suited for the analysis of data with different numbers of assessment points and missing data. RESULTS: Psychometric properties of the questions were good. The trajectories for all items are very heterogeneous with regard to the level.. The trends (slope of the growth curves) are around 0 in general satisfaction, i.e. the adolescents stay on their different levels during the treatment period. Concerning participation, however, there are diverging trends, in particular between the two departments, which may reflect the difference in the treatment experience of the teams, whereas age, gender and diagnosis (internalizing vs. externalizing) play a minor role. CONCLUSION: Evaluation of process characteristics has turned out to be feasible in clinical routine and promising for further insights into process quality.