Adoption of Intramedullary Nail Fixation for Proximal Humerus Fractures: Assessment of Surgical Efficiency and Complications.

Fixation of proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) with intramedullary (IM) nails potentially is a newer, less invasive technique. The purpose of this study was to report on the early adoption results of IM nail use for PHF. Retrospective chart reviews were performed on the first 60 patients treated with IM nails for acute PHFs by two shoulder surgeons. The first 15 patients treated by each surgeon were compared with the subsequent 15 patients. Surgical and fluoroscopic times, fracture type, union, and varus collapse were compared. The average operating time decreased (p = .002). Fluoroscopy time, radiographic alignment, union rate, complications, and reoperations were not influenced. Three- and four-part fractures had a higher complication rate than two-part fractures (53% vs. 20%). When considering implementing use of IM nails for treatment of PHFs, initial cases can have outcomes and complications similar to those performed with greater experience. IM nailing appears a good treatment option for two-part PHFs. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 28(2):121-126, 2019).

Determining glenoid component version after total shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Glenoid component loosening after total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) may occur if retroversion is not corrected to <10°. However, accurately measuring postoperative glenoid component version has been difficult without postoperative computed tomography (CT), adding cost and radiation exposure outside of the standard radiographic follow-up. We present a new method to assess glenoid component version after TSA using only routine preoperative CT and postoperative radiographs (x-rays). METHODS: Preoperative glenoid version was measured using established methods with an axillary x-ray, 2-dimensional CT, and Glenosys software (Imascap, Plouzané, France). Postoperative glenoid component version and inclination were measured for 61 TSA patients using Mimics software (Materialise, Leuven, Belgium) with preoperative CT and postoperative x-rays. Four patients also had postoperative CTs. Glenoid implantation and imaging were performed on 14 cadavers, allowing validation of results against the gold standard postoperative CT glenoid retroversion measurement. RESULTS: Compared with the gold standard, retroversion and inclination measurement error was 2° ± 1° and 2° ± 1°, respectively. Average postoperative version correction was 6° ± 7°, with 35 of 61 patients (57%) corrected to <10° of retroversion. Correlation between preoperative version measurement methods was good to very good, except on the axillary x-ray. Patients not corrected to <10° of retroversion had significantly higher preoperative retroversion (14° ± 6°) than those corrected to <10° (6° ± 7°; P < .00001). CONCLUSIONS: Glenoid component retroversion after TSA can be accurately measured with a method using only routine preoperative CT and postoperative x-rays, validated to within 1.9° of the gold standard postoperative CT measurement. Future studies using this method may correlate glenoid retroversion correction with glenoid component longevity to help optimize shoulder arthroplasty outcomes.

Outcomes of lesser tuberosity osteotomy in revision anatomic shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Lesser tuberosity osteotomy (LTO) is a common surgical approach during anatomic shoulder arthroplasty. Outcomes of LTO have been shown to be similar to subscapularis tenotomy and peel techniques, but little is known about the outcomes of LTO during revision arthroplasty. METHODS: This retrospective case series included 10 consecutive patients who underwent LTO during revision shoulder arthroplasty at a single institution from 2012 to 2016. Patients underwent a preoperative computed tomography scan to evaluate the lesser tuberosity bone stock. Demographic information, radiographic evidence of LTO healing, outcomes of range of motion, subscapularis strength, and visual analog scale pain scores were analyzed. RESULTS: Revision total shoulder arthroplasty with LTO was performed for glenoid arthritis after hemiarthroplasty in 10 patients. Average age at surgery was 59.8 years, and no humeral stems were revised. Eight of 10 patients had prior subscapularis tenotomy. Average follow-up after revision surgery was 9.2 months. LTO union was documented in 80% and nondisplaced nonunion in 20%. At follow-up, 50% reported mild pain. Subscapularis strength testing was graded normal in 80% and weak in 20%. Average visual analog scale pain improved from 9.4 prerevision to 4.8 postrevision (P < .05). On average, range of motion improved in active forward elevation from 123° to 141° and remained unchanged in active external rotation from 42° to 42°. CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing LTO during revision anatomic shoulder arthroplasty demonstrate successful LTO bony healing, improvement in pain, and improved forward elevation. In select patients not requiring humeral stem revision, LTO is a safe and effective surgical approach to subscapularis management during revision anatomic shoulder arthroplasty.

Management of the Failed Arthroplasty for Proximal Humerus Fracture.

A variety of reasons exist for failure of arthroplasty performed for management of proximal humerus fracture. Revision surgery for these failures is complex and has a high likelihood of inferior outcomes compared with primary arthroplasty. Successful management requires consideration of various modes of failure including tuberosity malunion or resorption, rotator cuff deficiency, glenoid arthritis, bone loss, component loosening, stiffness, or infection. Although revision to a reverse shoulder arthroplasty is an appealing option to address instability, rotator cuff dysfunction, and glenoid arthritis, there are concerns with higher complication rates and inferior results compared with primary reverse replacement. Any treatment plan should appropriately address the cause for failure to optimize outcomes.

Factors Affecting Appropriateness of Interfacility Transfer for Hand Injuries.

BACKGROUND: Transfers of patients with higher acuity injuries to trauma centers have helped improve care since the enactment of Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act. However, an unintended consequence is the inappropriate transfer of patients who do not truly require handover of care. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of all patients transferred to our level I trauma center for injuries distal to the ulnohumeral joint between April 1, 2013, and March 31, 2014; 213 patients were included. We examined the records for appropriateness of transfer based on whether the patient required the care of the receiving hospital's attending surgeon (appropriate transfer) or whether junior-level residents treated the patient alone (inappropriate transfer) and calculated odds ratios. We performed logistic regression to identify factors associated with appropriateness of transfer; these factors included specialist evaluation prior to transfer, age, insurance status, race, injury type, sex, shift time, distance traveled, and median income. RESULTS: The risk of inappropriate transfers was 68.5% (146/213). Specialist evaluation at the referring hospital was not associated with a lower risk of inappropriate transfers (odds ratio 1.62 [95% CI: 0.48-5.34], P = .383). Only evening shift (15:01 to 23:00) was associated with inappropriate transfers. Amputations and open fractures were associated with appropriate transfers. CONCLUSION: Second shift and type of injury (namely, amputations and open fractures) were significant factors to appropriateness of transfer. No significant association was found between specialist evaluation and appropriate transfers. Future studies may focus on finding reasons and aligning incentives to minimize inappropriate transfers and associated systems costs.

Maximizing Surgical Skills During Fellowship Training.

Orthopaedic surgery fellowship provides an opportunity to further develop skills in a particular subspecialty. However, the condensed time frame, complex skill acquisition, and clinical demands require efficient and effective learning techniques to achieve mastery. As with any advanced task, success during fellowship training can be achieved with active participation and a goal-directed approach. Skill acquisition can be successfully achieved by following a framework that includes preparation, execution, and reflection for every surgical case.

Mesenchymal Progenitor Cells and Their Orthopedic Applications: Forging a Path towards Clinical Trials.

Mesenchymal progenitor cells (MPCs) are nonhematopoietic multipotent cells capable of differentiating into mesenchymal and nonmesenchymal lineages. While they can be isolated from various tissues, MPCs isolated from the bone marrow are best characterized. These cells represent a subset of bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) which, in addition to their differentiation potential, are critical in supporting proliferation and differentiation of hematopoietic cells. They are of clinical interest because they can be easily isolated from bone marrow aspirates and expanded in vitro with minimal donor site morbidity. The BMSCs are also capable of altering disease pathophysiology by secreting modulating factors in a paracrine manner. Thus, engineering such cells to maximize therapeutic potential has been the focus of cell/gene therapy to date. Here, we discuss the path towards the development of clinical trials utilizing BMSCs for orthopaedic applications. Specifically, we will review the use of BMSCs in repairing critical-sized defects, fracture nonunions, cartilage and tendon injuries, as well as in metabolic bone diseases and osteonecrosis. A review of www.ClinicalTrials.gov of the United States National Institute of Health was performed, and ongoing clinical trials will be discussed in addition to the sentinel preclinical studies that paved the way for human investigations.