RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic affects all aspects of human life including their food consumption. The changes in the food production and supply processes introduce changes to the global dietary patterns. SCOPE AND APPROACH: To study the COVID-19 impact on food consumption process, we have analyzed two data sets that consist of food preparation recipes published before (69,444) and during the quarantine (10,009) period. Since working with large data sets is a time-consuming task, we have applied a recently proposed artificial intelligence approach called DietHub. The approach uses the recipe preparation description (i.e. text) and automatically provides a list of main ingredients annotated using the Hansard semantic tags. After extracting the semantic tags of the ingredients for every recipe, we have compared the food consumption patterns between the two data sets by comparing the relative frequency of the ingredients that compose the recipes. KEY FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: Using the AI methodology, the changes in the food consumption patterns before and during the COVID-19 pandemic are obvious. The highest positive difference in the food consumption can be found in foods such as "Pulses/ plants producing pulses", "Pancake/Tortilla/Outcake", and "Soup/pottage", which increase by 300%, 280%, and 100%, respectively. Conversely, the largest decrease in consumption can be food for food such as "Order Perciformes (type of fish)", "Corn/cereals/grain", and "Wine-making", with a reduction of 50%, 40%, and 30%, respectively. This kind of analysis is valuable in times of crisis and emergencies, which is a very good example of the scientific support that regulators require in order to take quick and appropriate response.
RESUMO
We present six datasets containing telemetry data of the Mars Express Spacecraft (MEX), a spacecraft orbiting Mars operated by the European Space Agency. The data consisting of context data and thermal power consumption measurements, capture the status of the spacecraft over three Martian years, sampled at six different time resolutions that range from 1 min to 60 min. From a data analysis point-of-view, these data are challenging even for the more sophisticated state-of-the-art artificial intelligence methods. In particular, given the heterogeneity, complexity, and magnitude of the data, they can be employed in a variety of scenarios and analyzed through the prism of different machine learning tasks, such as multi-target regression, learning from data streams, anomaly detection, clustering, etc. Analyzing MEX's telemetry data is critical for aiding very important decisions regarding the spacecraft's status and operation, extracting novel knowledge, and monitoring the spacecraft's health, but the data can also be used to benchmark artificial intelligence methods designed for a variety of tasks.
RESUMO
The task of biomarker discovery is best translated to the machine learning task of feature ranking. Namely, the goal of biomarker discovery is to identify a set of potentially viable targets for addressing a given biological status. This is aligned with the definition of feature ranking and its goal - to produce a list of features ordered by their importance for the target concept. This differs from the task of feature selection (typically used for biomarker discovery) in that it catches viable biomarkers that have redundant or overlapping information with often highly important biomarkers, while with feature selection this is not the case. We propose to use a methodology for evaluating feature rankings to assess the quality of a given feature ranking and to discover the best cut-off point. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed methodology on 10 datasets containing data about embryonal tumors. We evaluate two most commonly used feature ranking algorithms (Random forests and RReliefF) and using the evaluation methodology identifies a set of viable biomarkers that have been confirmed to be related to cancer.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Embrionárias de Células Germinativas , Neoplasias , Algoritmos , Biomarcadores , Humanos , Aprendizado de MáquinaRESUMO
In this article, we propose a method for evaluating feature ranking algorithms. A feature ranking algorithm estimates the importance of descriptive features when predicting the target variable, and the proposed method evaluates the correctness of these importance values by computing the error measures of two chains of predictive models. The models in the first chain are built on nested sets of top-ranked features, while the models in the other chain are built on nested sets of bottom ranked features. We investigate which predictive models are appropriate for building these chains, showing empirically that the proposed method gives meaningful results and can detect differences in feature ranking quality. This is first demonstrated on synthetic data, and then on several real-world classification benchmark problems.