Hepatitis delta virus propagation enabled by hepatitis C virus-Scientifically intriguing, but is it relevant to clinical practice?

In vitro cell culture experiments and animal models have demonstrated that hepatitis delta virus (HDV) can theoretically propagate being enveloped by human pathogenic viruses other than hepatitis B virus (HBV), namely hepatitis C virus (HCV) and dengue virus. However, the clinical relevance of these findings and whether HDV replication occurs in real-world hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-negative HCV patient cohorts remain unknown. To this aim, we analysed 323 HCV-RNA-positive and HBsAg-negative sera for the presence of HDV-RNA and anti-HDV antibodies (anti-HDV). All 323 (100%) samples were negative for HDV-RNA. Interestingly, 8/316 samples tested positive for anti-HDV. The HBV serology of these eight patients showed a positive result for HBV core antibodies (anti-HBc) indicating a seroconversion of an acute HBV infection in the past. None of the anti-HBc-negative patients were positive for anti-HDV. Our results indicate a distinctly low probability of replicative HDV infection in HCV mono-infected patients in Germany. Current German clinical guidelines rightly recommend performing HDV screening only in HBsAg-positive patients. However, larger studies on this subject should be performed in regions that are endemic for chronic HBV/HDV as well as HCV infections.

Method for Quantitative HDV RNA Detection: I, Manual Workflow (Serum and Liver Tissue) and II, Fully Automated High Throughput Workflow for Diagnostic Use.

The hepatitis delta virus (HDV) is a small RNA virus (1700 base pairs), which uses the surface proteins of the hepatitis B virus (HBV) as an envelope. Accurate and reliable quantitative detection of HDV RNA is central for scientific and translational clinical research or diagnostic purposes. However, HDV poses challenges for nucleic acid amplification techniques: (1) the circular genome displays high intramolecular base pairing; (2) high content of cytosine and guanine; and (3) enormous genomic diversity among the eight known HDV genotypes (GTs). Here, we provide step-by-step instructions for (A) a manual workflow to perform a quantitative HDV reverse transcription (RT)-PCR from serum and liver tissue and (B) a quantitative HDV RT-PCR assay with whole process control to be used for serum or plasma samples run on a fully automated system. Both assays target the conserved ribozyme region and demonstrate inclusivity for all eight HDV GTs. The choice of assay depends on the experimental needs and equipment availability. While the former is ideal for scientific research laboratories, the latter provides a useful tool in the field of translational research or diagnostics.

Analytical and clinical validation of a multiplex PCR assay for detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis including simultaneous LGV serotyping on an automated high-throughput PCR system.

For effective infection control measures for Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG), a reliable tool for screening and diagnosis is essential. Here, we aimed to establish and validate a multiplex PCR assay on an automated system using a dual-target approach for the detection of CT/NG and differentiation between lymphogranuloma venereum (LGV) and non-LGV from genital and extra-genital specimens. Published primer/probe sets (CT: pmpH, cryptic plasmid; NG: porA, opa) were modified for the cobas 5800/6800/8800. Standards quantified by digital PCR were used to determine linearity and lower limit of detection (LLoD; eSwab, urine). For clinical validation, prospective samples (n = 319) were compared with a CE-marked in vitro diagnostics (CE-IVD) assay. LLoDs ranged from 21.8 to 244 digital copies (dcp)/mL and 10.8 to 277 dcp/mL in swab and urine, respectively. A simple linear regression analysis yielded slopes ranging from -4.338 to -2.834 and Pearson correlation coefficients from 0.956 to 0.994. Inter- and intra-run variability was <0.5 and <1 cycle threshold (ct), respectively. No cross-reactivity was observed (n = 42). Clinical validation showed a sensitivity of 94.74% (95% confidence interval (CI): 87.23%-97.93%) and 95.51% (95% CI: 89.01%-98.24%), a specificity of 99.59% (95% CI: 97.71%-99.98%) and 99.57% (95% CI: 97.58%-99.98%), positive predictive values of 89.91% (estimated prevalence: 3.7%; 95% CI: 80.91%-95.6%) and 88.61% (estimated prevalence: 3.4%; 95% CI: 80.18%-94.34%), and negative predictive values of 99.81% (95% CI: 98.14%-100%) and 99.85% (95% CI: 98.14%-100%) for the detection of CT and NG, respectively. In conclusion, we established a dual-target, internally controlled PCR on an automated system for the detectiwon of CT/NG from genital and extra-genital specimens. Depending on local regulations, the assay can be used as a screening or a confirmatory/typing assay.IMPORTANCEChlamydia trachomatis (CT) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) represent a major global health burden, with the World Health Organization estimating that >128 million and >82 million people, respectively, were newly infected in 2020. For effective infection control measures, a reliable tool for sensitive diagnosis and screening of CT/NG is essential. We established a multiplex PCR assay for the detection of CT/NG and simultaneous discrimination between lymphogranuloma venereum (LGV) and non-LGV strains, which has been validated for genital and extra-genital specimens on a fully automated system. To increase assay sensitivity, a dual-target approach has been chosen for both pathogens. This strategy reduces false-positive results in oropharyngeal swabs due to the detection of commensal N. species that may harbor NG DNA fragments targeted in the PCR due to horizontal gene transmission following previous infection. In sum, the established assay provides a powerful tool for use as either a screening/diagnostic or a typing/confirmatory assay.

Clinical establishment of a laboratory developed quantitative HDV PCR assay on the cobas6800 high-throughput system.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Currently available HDV PCR assays are characterized by considerable run-to-run and inter-laboratory variability. Hence, we established a quantitative reverse transcription real-time PCR (RT-qPCR) assay on the open channel of a fully automated PCR platform (cobas6800, Roche) offering improved consistency and reliability. METHODS: A primer/probe-set targeting a highly conserved region upstream of the HDV antigen was adapted for use on the cobas6800. The lower limit of detection (LLOD) was determined using a dilution panel of the HDV WHO standard (n = 21/dilution). Linearity and inclusivity were tested by preparing 10-fold dilution series of cell culture-derived virus (genotype [GT]1-8; n = 5/dilution). Patient samples containing a variety of bloodborne viral pathogens were tested to confirm exclusivity (n = 60). RESULTS: The LLOD of the HDV utility-channel (HDV_UTC) assay was determined as 3.86 IU/ml (95% CI 2.95-5.05 IU/ml) with a linear range from 10-10ˆ8 IU/ml (GT1). Linear relationships were observed for all HDV GTs with slopes ranging from -3.481 to -4.134 cycles/log and R2 from 0.918 to 0.994. Inter-run and intra-run variability were 0.3 and 0.6 Ct (3xLLOD), respectively. No false-positive results were observed. To evaluate clinical performance, 110 serum samples of anti-HDV-Ab+ patients were analyzed using the HDV_UTC and CE-IVD RoboGene assays. 58/110 and 49/110 samples were concordant positive or negative, respectively (overall agreement 97.3%). Quantitative comparison demonstrated a strong correlation (R2 0.8733; 95% CI 0.8914-0.9609; p value <0.0001). CONCLUSION: The use of highly automated, sample-to-result solutions for molecular diagnostics holds many inherent benefits over manual workflows, including improved reliability, reproducibility and dynamic scaling of testing capacity. The assay we established showed excellent analytical and clinical performance, with inclusivity for all HDV GTs and a limit of quantification of 10 IU/ml, making it a sensitive new tool for HDV screening and viral load monitoring. LAY SUMMARY: The hepatitis delta virus (HDV) causes a severe form of inflammation in the liver. We developed a tool for molecular diagnostics, a polymerase chain reaction HDV assay that showed great performance. It can be used to improve diagnosis of HDV, as well as for monitoring treatment responses. The assay allows for quantification of the virus in the tested samples and is performed on a fully automated platform (cobas6800), which provides various benefits including less hands-on time and excellent comparability of test results.

Clinical evaluation of five different automated SARS-CoV-2 serology assays in a cohort of hospitalized COVID-19 patients.

BACKGROUND: The global market for SARS-CoV-2-immunoassays is becoming ever more crowded with antibody-tests of various formats, targets and technologies, careful evaluation is crucial for understanding the implications of individual test results. Here, we evaluate the clinical performance of five automated immunoassays on a set of clinical samples. METHODS: Serum/plasma samples of 75 confirmed COVID-19 patients and 320 pre-pandemic serum samples of healthy blood donors were subjected to two IgG and three total antibody SARS-CoV-2-immunoassays. All test setups were automated workflows. RESULTS: Positivity of assays (onset of symptoms > 10 days) ranged between 68.4 % and 81.6 % (Diasorin 68.4 %, Euroimmun 70.3 %, Siemens 73.7 %, Roche 79.0 % and Wantai 81.6 %). All examined assays demonstrated high specificity of >99 % (Euroimmun, Diasorin: 99.1 %, Wantai: 99.4 %) but only two reached levels above 99.5 % (Roche: 99.7 %, Siemens 100 %). Interestingly, there was no overlap in false positive results between the assays. The strongest correlation of quantitative results was observed between the Diasorin and Euroimmun IgG tests (r2 = 0.76). Overall, we observed no difference in the distribution of test results between female and male patients (p-values: 0.18-0.87). A significant difference between severely versus critically ill patients was demonstrated for the Euroimmun, Diasorin, Wantai and Siemens assays (p-values:0.041). CONCLUSION: All assays showed good clinical performance. Our data confirm that orthogonal test strategies as recommended by the CDC can enhance clinical specificity. However, the suboptimal rates of test positivity found at time of hospitalization in this cohort underline the importance of molecular diagnostics to rule out/confirm active infection with SARS-CoV-2.