Evidence of platelet sensitization to ADP following discontinuation of clopidogrel therapy in patients with stable coronary artery disease.

Epidemiological studies have linked clopidogrel discontinuation with an increased incidence of ischemic events. This has led to the hypothesis that clopidogrel discontinuation may result in a pharmacological rebound. We evaluated the impact of clopidogrel discontinuation on platelet function. Platelet aggregation was measured by light transmission aggregometry (LTA) in response to adenosine diphosphate (ADP) 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2.5, 5 and 10 µM and by VerifyNow® P2Y12, in 37 clinically stable coronary artery disease (CAD) patients scheduled to discontinue clopidogrel treatment, and 37 clinically stable CAD patients not taking clopidogrel. Platelet function was assessed the day before clopidogrel cessation and 1, 3, 7, 14, 21 and 28 days after. Clopidogrel had been initiated a median of 555 days (ranging from 200 to 2280 days) before the treating cardiologist recommended its discontinuation. All participants were taking aspirin, most commonly 80 mg daily although a minority was prescribed 325 mg daily. Following clopidogrel discontinuation, VerifyNow® P2Y12 did not detect any rebound platelet activity, but ADP-induced LTA showed platelet sensitization to ADP, particularly at low ADP levels. Increased platelet activity was detectable seven days after clopidogrel cessation and remained higher than in controls 28 days after discontinuation. No clinical event occurred in any of the participants during the 28 days following clopidogrel cessation. In conclusion, platelet sensitization to ADP as a consequence of chronic clopidogrel administration may partially explain the recrudescence of ischemic events following clopidogrel discontinuation in otherwise stable coronary artery patients.

Response to aspirin in healthy individuals. Cross-comparison of light transmission aggregometry, VerifyNow system, platelet count drop, thromboelastography (TEG) and urinary 11-dehydrothromboxane B(2).

Variable biological effect of aspirin is suggested to be related to pharmacological resistance. The incidence of this so-called "resistant" state varies with the study population and the assay used. We determined performance features of five assays used to assess aspirin effects in non-smoking healthy volunteers not taking any drug known to interfere with platelet function. Blood and urine samples were obtained immediately before and after 8-10 days of aspirin 80 mg intake. Forty-five participants 19-59 years old were enrolled. The sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), and optimal cut-off (CO) value to detect the effect of aspirin were: light transmission aggregometry (LTA) with 1.6 mM arachidonic acid (AA) - SE 100%, SP 95.9%, CO 20%; LTA with adenosine diphosphate (ADP) 10 microM - SE 84.4%, SP 77.8%, CO 70%; VerifyNow Aspirin - SE 100%, SP 95.6%, CO 550 ARU; platelet count drop - SE 82.2%, SP 86,7%, CO 55%; TEG((R)) - SE 82,9%, SP 75,8%, CO 90%; and urinary 11-dehydrothromboxane B(2) levels (11-dHTB(2)) - SE 62.2%, SP 82.2%, CO 60 pg/ml. AA-induced LTA and the VerifyNow assay reliably detected aspirin intake in all subjects; there was wide overlap in pre- and post- aspirin results with ADP-induced LTA, platelet count drop, TEG((R)) and urinary 11-dHTB(2) assays. These results suggest that some of the variability in the reported incidence of "aspirin resistance" is unrelated to aspirin intake but related to inherent limitations of some assays to detect aspirin mediated effects or to underlying platelet reactivity variability independent of aspirin-mediated cyclooxygenase-1 inhibition.

Week-long high-maintenance dose clopidogrel regimen achieves better platelet aggregation inhibition than a standard loading dose before percutaneous coronary intervention: results of a double-blind, randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Adequate platelet inhibition before percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) reduces periprocedural and long-term ischemic complications. Reduced response to clopidogrel has been associated with subsequent major adverse cardiovascular events. Strategies to optimize platelet inhibition pre-PCI are under investigation. This study evaluated the effect on platelet aggregation of four different dosing regimens of clopidogrel given before elective PCI in a randomized, prospective, double-blind, and placebo-controlled design. METHODS: One hundred twenty participants were randomized to one of four groups of clopidogrel: (a) 300 mg on the day prior to angiography; (b) 600 mg on the day prior to angiography; (c) 300 mg followed by 75 mg daily started 1 week prior to angiography; and (d) 300 mg followed by 150 mg daily started 1 week prior to angiography. Platelet aggregation was assessed by light transmission aggregometry (LTA) after stimulation with adenosine diphosphate 20 microM at baseline and at the time of diagnostic coronary angiography. The absolute change in platelet aggregation between these two time points was considered the main outcome measure. RESULTS: At the time of diagnostic coronary angiography, the 300-mg/150-mg daily regimen achieved the greatest decrease in platelet aggregation (37 +/- 19%), while the 300 mg regimen provided the smallest (20 +/- 22%), an absolute difference between the two groups of 17.2 +/- 5.1% (P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: A 300-mg loading dose of clopidogrel followed by 150 mg daily for 1 week prior to coronary angiography provides more effective platelet inhibition, as defined by LTA, compared to the standard 300-mg loading dose regimen at the time of coronary intervention.

Comparison of four tests to assess inhibition of platelet function by clopidogrel in stable coronary artery disease patients.

AIMS: We investigated the comparability of platelet function tests in quantifying platelet inhibition achieved by clopidogrel. METHODS AND RESULTS: This pre-specified substudy of a randomized, double-blind trial included 116 patients with stable coronary artery disease requiring diagnostic angiography. Patients received clopidogrel for 1 (300 or 600 mg) or 7 days (300 + 75 or 150 mg daily) before the procedure. Blood samples obtained before clopidogrel initiation and before diagnostic coronary angiography were assayed using light transmission aggregometry [adenosine diphosphate (ADP) 5 and 20 microM as the agonist], whole-blood aggregometry (ADP 5 and 20 microM), PFA-100 (Collagen-ADP cartridge), and VerifyNow P2Y12. Although all assays studied were found sensitive to clopidogrel ingestion, none could distinguish categorically between patients who had, or not, ingested clopidogrel. Agreement between assays to identify patients with insufficient inhibition of platelet aggregation by clopidogrel was low. CONCLUSION: The assessment of platelet function inhibition by clopidogrel is highly test-specific. Decision to increase clopidogrel dosage may vary on the basis of the assay used, thus highlighting the need for unambiguous guidelines with respect to assay selection, as platelet function assays are not interchangeable. At present, platelet function testing evaluating clopidogrel efficacy cannot be recommended in routine clinical practice.

Aspirin resistance: truth or dare.

Acetylsalicylic acid, or aspirin (ASA), is widely used in patients with cardiovascular disease to prevent acute ischemic events. However, platelet response to ASA is not equal in all individuals, and a high variability in the prevalence of ASA resistance is reported in the literature (0.4-83%). Actually, ASA resistance is poorly understood; this stems from the fact that its definition is unclear, its presence can be evaluated by a number of assays that are not equivalent, and its prevalence may vary widely based on the population studied. This article (1) exposes the difficulties in defining ASA resistance; (2) discusses the mechanisms by which ASA resistance may occur; (3) presents the characteristics that may put patients at greater risk of exhibiting ASA resistance; and (4) discusses the clinical impact of ASA resistance in patients requiring chronic therapy.

Resistance to clopidogrel: a review of the evidence.

Current available data show that about 4% to 30% of patients treated with conventional doses of clopidogrel do not display adequate antiplatelet response. Clopidogrel resistance is a widely used term that remains to be clearly defined. So far, it has been used to reflect failure of clopidogrel to achieve its antiaggregatory effect. The interpatient variability in clopidogrel response is multifactorial. It can be due to extrinsic or intrinsic mechanisms. Among extrinsic mechanisms are the possibility of clopidogrel underdosing in patients undergoing stenting or with acute coronary syndrome, and drug-drug interactions involving CYP3A4. Intrinsic mechanisms include genetic polymorphisms of the P2Y(12) receptor and of the CYP3As, accrued release of adenosine diphosphate, or up-regulation of other platelet activation pathways. Presently, there is no definite demonstration of an association between low responsiveness to clopidogrel and thrombotic events. The optimal level of clopidogrel-induced platelet inhibition, which will correlate quantitatively with clopidogrel's ability to prevent atherothrombotic events is still lacking. Furthermore, because there is no single and validated platelet function assay to measure clopidogrel's antiplatelet effect, it is not justified to routinely look for clopidogrel resistance in the clinical setting. This review discusses currently available evidence surrounding the variability in the antiplatelet response to clopidogrel.

Analysis of bleeding complications associated with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptors blockade in patients with high-risk acute coronary syndromes: insights from the PRISM-PLUS study.

We aim to characterize the hemorrhagic complications and predictors of increased bleeding risk in a population of patients with high-risk acute coronary syndromes (ACS), enrolled in the PRISM-PLUS study. Patients treated with heparin plus tirofiban had more bleeding events compared to patients treated with heparin alone. No significant increase in major bleeding, thrombocytopenia, blood loss and blood products transfusions was observed among the patients who received the combination therapy. Several clinical variables were independently associated with increased risk of bleeding for both treatment groups: advanced age, lower body weight, female gender, decreased creatinine clearance (<30 ml/min). Females, patients with impaired renal function, patients requiring percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially prolonged PCI (>100 min duration) or coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) were at risk for increased major bleeding complications. Increased blood loss was also found in females, patients with elevated diastolic blood pressure, PCI, duration of PCI>100 min or CABG. No incremental risk was detected with the addition of tirofiban to heparin in patients at risk for major bleeding or increased blood loss. We concluded that identification of patients with high-risk ACS, at risk for bleeding complications and blood loss can be done with specific clinical variables. Tirofiban added to heparin increased minor hemorrhagic complications. Although there was no significant increase in major bleeding, thrombocytopenia and blood transfusions with the combination of tirofiban plus heparin, the power to detect a statistically significant difference in these endpoints was limited by the small number of events.

Brain natriuretic peptide in the management of heart failure: the versatile neurohormone.

Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), also called B-type natriuretic peptide, is a member of a family of structurally related hormones, the natriuretic peptides. Current data suggest that measurement of BNP plasma concentrations is a useful tool in the diagnosis of acute heart failure in patients presenting to an emergency department with acute dyspnea. Furthermore, BNP constitutes a promising new marker of prognosis after an acute coronary syndrome episode and in patients with chronic heart failure. Nesiritide, the human recombinant form of BNP, is a new vasodilator used in the treatment of acute heart failure that has several potential advantages over current drug therapy.

Platelet activity and antibody titers after exposure to streptokinase or streptococcal infection.

INTRODUCTION: Streptokinase use, in acute myocardial infarction, is hindered by failure to reperfuse (60%) and early reocclusion (16%). This phenomenon may, among other causes, be due to systemic inactivation of streptokinase, as well as streptokinase-induced platelet aggregation and clot propagation from antibodies to streptokinase produced after streptokinase administration or streptococcal infections. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of streptokinase-induced, antibody-mediated, platelet activation and aggregation after administration of SK or development of a streptococcal infection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included 45 normal volunteers (Control group), as well as 45 patients who had received streptokinase (Streptokinase group) and 13 who had suffered a severe streptococcal infection (Streptococcal infection group) within the past 3 years. Extent of streptokinase-induced, antibody-mediated, platelet activation and aggregation, as well as anti-streptokinase antibody and streptokinase resistance titers (lowest streptokinase concentration to cause clot lysis within 10 min) were measured. RESULTS: Whereas streptokinase-induced, antibody-mediated, platelet activation was observed in 49% of streptokinase patients and in only 17% and 15% of streptococcal infection patients and normal volunteers (p<0.05 Streptokinase vs. Control and Streptokinase vs. Streptococcal infection), streptokinase-induced platelet aggregation was observed in 23% of streptokinase patients and streptococcal infection patients, and in none of the control patients (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Streptokinase-induced, antibody-mediated, platelet activation and aggregation occur in patients with high titers of anti-streptokinase antibody and may play a role in failure of streptokinase therapy. Streptococcal infection patients behave like streptokinase patients in terms of the reactivity of their platelets to subsequent streptokinase dose in vitro.

Potential anaphylactic shock with abciximab readministration.

A 46-year-old woman developed an anaphylactic reaction during percutaneous coronary intervention after she was pretreated with prednisone and diphenhydramine for a known allergy to iodine. She developed pruritus, edema, and nausea, which were followed by bradycardia and shock, minutes after administration of a bolus and standard-dose infusion of abciximab. The reaction was treated successfully with epinephrine, methoxamine, hydrocortisone, atropine, furosemide, sodium bicarbonate, diphenhydramine, and ranitidine.

Inhibition of streptokinase-induced, antibody-mediated platelet aggregation with tirofiban after exposure to streptokinase or streptococcal infection.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of tirofiban (a glycoprotein IIb-IIIa inhibitor) in preventing streptokinase-induced, antibody-mediated platelet aggregation after administration of streptokinase or development of a streptococcal infection. DESIGN: Prospective analysis. SETTING: Research center of a Canadian hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Forty-five healthy volunteers, 45 patients who had received streptokinase within the past 3 years, and 13 patients who had a severe streptococcal infection also within the past 3 years. INTERVENTION: Blood samples were drawn to measure the extent of inhibition of streptokinase-induced, antibody-mediated platelet activation and aggregation by tirofiban. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Platelet aggregation was measured by using a turbidimetric method. The extent of inhibition by tirofiban was measured by incubating tirofiban for 2 minutes before adding streptokinase 5000 U/ml. Also, tirofiban was added 2 minutes before adding adenosine 5'-diphosphate (ADP) 2 microM/L into the last tube as a comparison. Strepto-kinase-induced, antibody-mediated platelet aggregation was observed in 10 (22%) of the 45 patients treated with streptokinase, in 3 (23%) of the 13 patients with streptococcal infection, and in none of the 45 healthy volunteers. Tirofiban inhibited streptokinase-induced, antibody-mediated platelet aggregation by 89 +/- 14% (p<0.001). Similarly, ADP-induced platelet aggregation was inhibited by 92 +/- 6% (p<0.001) with tirofiban. CONCLUSION: Streptokinase-induced, antibody-mediated platelet aggregation occurred in 13 (22%) of 58 patients who received streptokinase or were exposed to a streptococcal infection in the past 3 years. Such patients may not benefit from streptokinase therapy. In these patients, tirofiban significantly decreased the extent of antistreptokinase antibody-mediated platelet aggregation. Hence, patients undergoing streptokinase therapy may benefit from tirofiban as adjunctive therapy.

Distinction between myocardial ischemia and postural changes in continuous ECG monitoring based on ST-segment amplitude and vector orientation--preliminary results.

BACKGROUND: Myocardial ischemia, commonly defined as ST-segment elevation or depression on the electrocardiogram (ECG), is plagued by a large number of false positive events. OBJECTIVES: To present a new method that attempts to distinguish between 'highly probable ischemia' and positional changes. METHODS: Continuous three-lead orthogonal ECG monitoring was performed in three groups of subjects: 16 healthy volunteers undergoing a body position change protocol, 22 patients undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) and 17 patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). For each event (ischemic or postural), the change in ST-segment amplitude was calculated, as well as the angle between the ST-segment vector of the reference beat and the beats demonstrating ST-segment elevation or depression. Angles and ST-segment amplitude changes from well-documented ischemic events obtained from the PTCA patients and from the healthy volunteers in six different body positions were compared. RESULTS: Using both ST-segment amplitude and vector angle changes, ischemic events could be detected and differentiated from a postural change with a sensitivity of 91% and a specificity of 96%. Finally, the approach was blindly applied to continuous ECG recordings of ACS patients. The method allowed the classification of 37% of all ST-segment changes detected as highly probable ischemic events as opposed to only 7% using the standard 100 microV threshold. CONCLUSION: The current approach showed that highly probable ischemic events could be better distinguished from positional changes with objective criteria using ST-segment amplitude and vector orientation.

A national survey of antimicrobial prophylaxis in adult cardiac surgery across Canada.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize national and regional patterns of antimicrobial prophylaxis in adult cardiac surgery across Canada. DESIGN: Retrospective, cross-sectional analysis. SETTING: Thirty-three adult cardiac surgical centres across Canada. INTERVENTIONS: A one-page questionnaire collecting information regarding institutional demographics and antimicrobial prophylaxis regimens for adult cardiac surgical procedures was mailed to all adult surgical centres across Canada. If a response was not received within one month, a second survey was mailed, followed by a telephone reminder within two weeks of the second mailing. MAIN RESULTS: The Overall response rate was 100%. Prophylactic antimicrobials were used in all the adult cardiac centres; single-agent prophylaxis was used in 97% (32 of 33) of centres; Single-dose antimicrobial prophylaxis was used in only 3% (one of 33) of centres. Preoperative and postoperative antimicrobial prophylaxis regimens varied both between provinces and within provinces across Canada. Cefazolin was the antimicrobial used in 88% (38 of 43) and 87% (33 of 38) of the reported pre-operative and post-operative prophylaxis regimens, respectively. Antimicrobial prophylaxis was initiated in the operating room 72% (26 of 36) of the time and intra-operative supplemental antimicrobial doses were administered for cardiac procedures longer than a median of 4 hours (range 4 to 8 hr). Overall, the median duration of antimicrobial prophylaxis was 36 hours (range 8 to 96 hr). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the availability of various published guidelines, our survey identified several areas for improvement with respect to antimicrobial prophylaxis in adult cardiac surgery across Canada.

Heterogeneity in platelet cyclooxygenase inhibition by aspirin in coronary artery disease.

BACKGROUND: Platelets, long believed to be incapable of de novo protein synthesis, may retain their ability to form the cyclooxygenase (COX) enzyme once it has been inactivated by aspirin. This may explain the inefficacy of the drug to induce sustained platelet inhibition in certain patients. We evaluated the stability of platelet inhibition following once-daily enteric-coated aspirin administration. METHODS: Platelet responsiveness to aspirin was evaluated in 11 stable coronary artery disease patients on chronic aspirin therapy before and 1, 3, 8, and 24h after observed ingestion of 80-mg enteric-coated aspirin. Inhibition of the COX pathway was measured pharmacologically through plasma thromboxane (Tx) B(2) levels, and functionally by light transmission aggregometry in response to arachidonic acid. COX-independent platelet activity was measured in response to adenosine diphosphate, epinephrine and collagen. RESULTS: Plasma TxB(2) levels showed profound inhibition of TxA(2) formation, which was stable throughout 24h, in all but 1 subject. This subject had optimal response to aspirin (inhibition of platelet TxA(2) production within 1h), but recovered the ability to synthesize TxA(2) within 24h of aspirin ingestion. Arachidonic acid-induced platelet aggregation closely mirrored TxB(2) formation in this patient, portraying a functional ability of the platelet to aggregate within 24h of aspirin ingestion. COX-independent platelet aggregation triggered TxA(2) production to a similar extent in all patients, likely through signal-dependent protein synthesis. CONCLUSIONS: COX-dependent platelet activity is recovered in certain individuals within 24h of aspirin administration. Further research should consider increasing aspirin dosing frequency to twice daily, to allow sustained inhibition in such subjects.

Genetic determinants of response to aspirin: appraisal of 4 candidate genes.

INTRODUCTION: Intersubject variability in platelet response to aspirin could be related to genetic factors that regulate platelet enzymes or receptors. This study evaluates the impact of the selected polymorphisms in the COX-1 gene, the CYP5A1 gene, the P2RY1 receptor gene, and the GPIIbIIIa receptor gene on platelet response to aspirin and risk of suffering from major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: 192 Caucasian patients with stable coronary artery disease treated with daily aspirin were recruited and followed for 3 years. Platelet aggregation was measured by light transmission aggregometry with arachidonic acid (1.6 mM) and adenosine diphosphate (5, 10 or 20 µM) used as agonists. Genotyping was performed by standard PCR methods. RESULTS: Arachidonic acid-induced platelet aggregation was unaffected by the COX-1 22C/T and by the Pl(A1/A2) polymorphisms. However, carriers of the 1622 G/G genotype of the P2RY1 gene had significantly higher levels of arachidonic acid-induced platelet aggregation compared with non-carriers (AA 2.0%, AG 2.0% vs. GG 9.0%, p=0.047). Carrying the 1622 G/G genotype increased the risk of inadequate platelet response to aspirin, defined as arachidonic acid-induced aggregation ≥ 20%, by a factor of 8.5 (1.4 - 53.3, p=0.022) and the risk of 3-year MACCE by a factor of 7 (1.4 - 34.7, p=0.017). CONCLUSION: The 1622A/G mutation of the P2RY1 gene could contribute to inadequate platelet response to aspirin and is associated with an increased risk of suffering from MACCE.

Platelet count, not oxidative stress, may contribute to inadequate platelet inhibition by aspirin.

BACKGROUND: Several patient characteristics have been shown to increase the risk of inadequate platelet inhibition by aspirin, yet underlying mechanisms remain mostly unknown. We explored whether oxidative stress, via isoprostane formation, was associated with inadequate platelet response to aspirin. Additionally, we sought to investigate whether individual pre-selected demographic, hematological or biochemical parameters further increased the risk of inadequate platelet response to aspirin. METHODS: Two hundred consecutive subjects suffering from stable coronary artery disease and under daily aspirin therapy were enrolled in our study. Inadequate platelet response to aspirin was defined as residual platelet aggregation>or=20% per arachidonic acid-induced light transmission aggregometry. Morning urinary samples were used to determine levels of isoprostanes (8-iso-PGF2alpha) using an enzyme immunoassay. RESULTS: Eight subjects were deemed to present inadequate platelet response to aspirin. Wide intersubject variability was observed in urinary 8-iso-PGF2alpha levels. However, levels were similar between aspirin responders and non-responders. Patients with inadequate platelet response to aspirin had higher platelet counts and received the lowest daily aspirin dose when compared to responders, suggesting subtherapeutic aspirin therapy due to increased platelet production. Only platelet count remained independently predictive of inadequate platelet response to aspirin in a multiple logistic regression model. CONCLUSIONS: Urinary 8-iso-PGF2alpha levels, a reflection of systemic oxidative stress, did not appear to contribute to impaired platelet responsiveness to aspirin, while increased platelet production may partly explain this phenomenon.

Comparison of electrocardiographic recordings in open-chest and closed-chest swine models.

The aim of our study was to compare the electrocardiographic recordings in an experimental open-chest swine model before and after left-sided thoracotomy to detect any surgery-induced fluctuations that might interfere with subsequent experimental interventions. We obtained electrocardiograms from 8 deeply anesthetized domestic swine and compared the respective ST-segment potentials obtained after vascular surgery and after left-sided thoracotomy and dissection of the left anterior descending coronary artery. Compared with baseline recordings, no significant ST-segment deviation on any of the electrocardiographic leads occurred after vascular surgery. However, statistically significant ST-segment depression was observed after thoracotomy. Invasive surgical procedures in open-chest swine models may lead to morphologic changes in the ST segment. The physiologic mechanism of these changes is not fully understood.

Possibility of a rebound phenomenon following antiplatelet therapy withdrawal: a look at the clinical and pharmacological evidence.

The importance of regular administration of antiplatelet drugs in patients suffering from coronary artery disease stands on firm grounds, as large meta-analyses have shown these therapies to drastically reduce the risk of death. Although the current guidelines published jointly by the American Heart Association, the American College of Cardiology, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, the American College of Surgeons and the American Dental Association stress the hazards of premature discontinuation of antiplatelet drugs, abrupt withdrawal remains widespread, with potentially catastrophic consequences. In the limited state of knowledge on antiplatelet drug withdrawal, an early sound of alarm has risen from early thromboembolic complications reported after the interruption of treatment in patients who require antiplatelet therapy for prevention of ischemic vascular disease. Acute thrombotic complications are not immediate and usually follow interruption of aspirin or clopidogrel therapy after a mean delay of 8-25 days, a time lapse consistent with normal platelet turnover required to replace the platelet pool in circulation and suggestive of a rebound phenomenon. This review article describes the thrombotic risks associated with discontinuing antiplatelet therapy and the bleeding risks associated with continuing these drugs. By integrating the current understanding of the pharmacology of antiplatelet agents and the kinetics of platelet function recovery, this article unveils the possibility of a pharmacological rebound phenomenon which could lead to adverse ischemic events, and supports the warning against premature discontinuation of antiplatelet drugs issued in current guidelines.