The potential impact of multidimesional geriatric assessment in the social security system.

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of multidimensional geriatric assessment (MGA/CGA) in patients over 65 years old in predicting the release of the accompaniment allowance (AA) indemnity by a Local Medico-Legal Committee (MLC-NHS) and by the National Institute of Social Security Committee (MLC-INPS). METHODS: In a longitudinal observational study, 200 Italian elder citizens requesting AA were first evaluated by MLC-NHS and later by MLC-INPS. Only MLC-INPS performed a MGA/CGA (including SPMSQ, Barthel Index, GDS-SF, and CIRS). This report was written according to the STROBE guidelines. RESULTS: The data analysis was performed on January 2016. The evaluation by the MLC-NHS and by the MLC-INPS was in agreement in 66% of cases. In the 28%, the AA benefit was recognized by the MLC-NHS, but not by the MLC-INPS. By the multivariate analysis, the best predictors of the AA release, by the MLC-NHS, were represented by gender and the Barthel Index score. The presence of carcinoma, the Barthel Index score, and the SPMQ score were the best predictors for the AA release by MLC-INPS. CONCLUSIONS: MGA/CGA could be useful in saving financial resources reducing the risk of incorrect indemnity release. It can improve the accuracy of the impairment assessment in social security system.

[Blindness and social security in Italy: critical issues and proposals.] / La cecità civile in Italia: criticità e proposte.

In Italy, blindness and low vision are ruled by Law 138/2001: two categories of blindness (corresponding to the one in the current WHO classification), receiving economical remuneration, and three categories of low vision, not directly remunerated. The problem ensues that low vision patients, who better gain from rehabilitation, have no economical contribution to undergo such care pathways; moreover, in Italy the evaluation has not yet shifted from "visual function" to "functional vision", thus lacking a holistic evaluation of visual dysfunction impact on the patient's daily life skills. To quantify the visual function of the examinee, only subjective performance (visual acuity and/or visual field) is evaluated in accordance with Law 138/2001, thus paving the way to malingerers: the "false blinds" phenomenon has recently reached the media. The Authors suggest that a correlation between the individual anatomical picture of the pathology/ies and the visual performance, obtained in patients with similar lesions undergoing controlled clinical studies reported in the ophthalmological literature, could offer more objective values to quantify the visual function.