Pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma with adenocarcinoma-like features: napsin A expression and genomic alterations.

Pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is a highly aggressive malignancy, which was recently found to comprise three major genomic subsets: small cell carcinoma-like, non-small cell carcinoma (predominantly adenocarcinoma)-like, and carcinoid-like. To further characterize adenocarcinoma-like subset, here we analyzed the expression of exocrine marker napsin A, along with TTF-1, in a large series of LCNECs (n=112), and performed detailed clinicopathologic and genomic analysis of napsin A-positive cases. For comparison, we analyzed napsin A expression in other lung neuroendocrine neoplasms (177 carcinoids, 37 small cell carcinomas) and 60 lung adenocarcinomas. We found that napsin A was expressed in 15% of LCNEC (17/112), whereas all carcinoids and small cell carcinomas were consistently negative. Napsin A reactivity in LCNEC was focal in 12/17 cases, and weak or moderate in intensity in all cases, which was significantly lower in the extent and intensity than seen in adenocarcinomas (P<0.0001). The combination of TTF-1-diffuse/napsin A-negative or focal was typical of LCNEC but was rare in adenocarcinoma, and could thus serve as a helpful diagnostic clue. The diagnosis of napsin A-positive LCNECs was confirmed by classic morphology, diffuse labeling for at least one neuroendocrine marker, most consistently synaptophysin, and the lack of distinct adenocarcinoma component. Genomic analysis of 14 napsin A-positive LCNECs revealed the presence of mutations typical of lung adenocarcinoma (KRAS and/or STK11) in 11 cases. In conclusion, LCNECs are unique among lung neuroendocrine neoplasms in that some of these tumors exhibit low-level expression of exocrine marker napsin A, and harbor genomic alterations typical of adenocarcinoma. Despite the apparent close biological relationship, designation of adeno-like LCNEC as a separate entity from adenocarcinoma is supported by their distinctive morphology, typically diffuse expression of neuroendocrine marker(s) and aggressive behavior. Further studies are warranted to assess the clinical utility and optimal method of identifying adenocarcinoma-like and other subsets of LCNEC in routine practice.

Prognostic Value of Preradiotherapy (18)F-FDG PET/CT Volumetrics in Limited-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Whether (18)F-fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) metrics predict outcome in limited-stage (LS) small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) has not been well established; most previous reports have only analyzed maximal standardized uptake values (SUVmax). We investigated multiple pretreatment PET metrics, including SUVmax, mean SUV (SUVmean), total lesion glycolysis, and metabolic tumor volume (MTV) in LS-SCLC patients undergoing chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and correlated them with survival and disease control outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients received platinum-based chemotherapy and a median radiation dose of 45 Gy. Kaplan-Meier and competing-risks analyses were performed to assess the prognostic value of PET metrics with respect to overall survival (OS), distant failure (DF), disease-free survival (DFS), and locoregional failure (LRF). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to account for the effect of other clinical factors on outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 120 patients with LS-SCLC had analyzable pre-CRT PET/CTs. The median follow up was 34 months. Median OS was 26.9 months. OS was 53.2% at 2 years and 33.1% at 5 years. SUVmax, SUVmean, MTV, and total lesion glycolysis of the primary tumor were not significantly associated with OS, LRF, and DFS on univariate analysis. MTV was significantly associated with DF (P = .024) on univariate but not multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: This is the largest reported series to date evaluating the prognostic value of baseline PET metrics in LS-SCLC. Neither SUVmax nor other analyzed PET metrics demonstrated significant correlation with OS or LRF. MTV was correlated with DF and DFS, but this association was no longer significant after adjustment for other clinical factors. This analysis suggests that pretreatment PET scans, even with the use of advanced metrics, do not have independent prognostic value for outcomes in LS-SCLC patients after CRT.