The visibility of cancer on earlier mammograms in a population-based screening programme.

The aim of this study was to examine how frequently the later-round screen-detected and interval breast cancers were visible in earlier screening mammograms by retrospective review and to compare their radiological and clinicopathological features with those diagnosed by primary screening. In a population-based mammography screening programme 63,731 women aged 50-59 years were invited and 56,158 examinations were carried out in the period 1987-1992 in the Tampere area in Finland. A total of 276 breast cancers were detected, of which 131 were diagnosed on later screening rounds or were interval cancers. A retrospective review of previous screening mammograms was carried out in 130 cases by the radiologist who diagnosed the breast cancer and thus knew the exact location of the tumour, no blinded review was carried out. 43 (33%) cancers were visible, 84 (65%) were not visible and 3 (2%) not included on the mammogram in a retrospective review. Later round screen-detected cancers were statistically significantly more often visible in earlier screening mammograms (43%) than interval cancers (19%) (P = 0.002). Tumours missed by screening mammography but which were visible on retrospective review were often histologically well-differentiated and were more often diagnosed in the subsequent screening round than by clinical diagnosis as interval cancers. If all retrospectively visible interval cancers had been diagnosed by screening 19% (10/54) of the interval cancers could have been avoided. If all retrospectively visible cancers had been diagnosed at the time of false-negative screening or assessment 65% (84/130) of all patients would have benefitted from an earlier diagnosis compared with the actual figure of 31% (41/130).

Validity of radiological examinations of patients with breast cancer in different age groups in a population based study.

By studying which radiological examinations had been performed before breast cancer operations the aim was to assess, how much benefit ultrasonography (US) and fine or core needle biopsy (FNAB, CNB) gave in addition to mammography, and whether the sensitivity of these examinations varied with the age of the patient. There were 659 consecutive histologically and six cytologically verified breast cancer cases included in the study. Information on mammography, US and FNAB findings were retrieved from the original patient files and classified as malignant or benign. The sensitivity (Se) of these was compared in three age groups (26-49, 50-59 and 60-92). Seventeen (3%) tumours had operations without any radiological examination and 73 (11%) without cytological or histological verification. The sensitivity of mammography (Se=0.92) was statistically significantly higher than the sensitivity of FNAB (Se=0.85, P=0.002) or US (Se=0.86, P=0.003). The sensitivity of mammography increased with age; US sensitivity was slightly higher amongst younger than older patients; the sensitivity of FNAB did not depend on the age of the patient. The sensitivity using a cutoff level of class 5 for mammography was higher (50% typical malignant findings) than for US (45%) or FNAB (30%). Among cases with benign mammographic finding (classes 1-2), the US finding was malignant (classes 3-5) in 4% and FNAB was malignant in 7%. Mammography is a reliable method of breast examination especially for women over 50 years of age. Ultrasonography is beneficial, particularly in younger women, but it is mainly performed as a complementary examination to a mammography and therefore could not be evaluated as an independent examination. FNAB and CNB results were not related to the age of the patient.

Pancreatic carcinoma and fast MR imaging: technical considerations for signal intensity difference measurements.

The aim of the study was to find the fast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequence with the best conspicuity of pancreatic lesions at 1.0 T and 1.5 T. A total of 51 patients were studied. At 1.0 T, 22 patients with verified malignant pancreatic lesions were studied using the T1-weighted breath-hold spoiled Gradient Echo 2D FLASH(75) or FLASH(80) sequences, both non-enhanced and enhanced with gadolinium. The relative signal intensity difference (SIDR) between lesion and pancreas was measured. At 1.5 T, 20 patients with primary malignant lesions of the pancreas, and nine patients with 13 benign cystic lesions were examined with the breath-hold T2-weighted TrueFISP, HASTE, T1-weighted 2D FLASH(80) and FLASH(50) fat saturation sequences, the latter also enhanced. The signal intensity (SI) values of the pancreas and lesions as well as the pancreatic standard deviation (S.D.) were assessed, and the contrast-to-noise ratio (C/N) was determined. Statistical significances were calculated using an analysis of variance. No statistically significant difference between the sequences used in the conspicuity of cancer was found, either at 1.0 T or at 1.5 T. At 1.5 T, the T2-weighted TrueFISP and HASTE sequences could differentiate benign, cystic lesions from malignant lesions.

Chest computed tomography in the staging of pancreatic and periampullary carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Staging of the tumours in the pancreas and periampullary region usually consists of abdominal computed tomography (CT). Laparoscopy is also advocated. Little attention has been paid to extra-abdominal staging. In addition to peritoneal, lymphatic and hepatic metastases, lung metastases are frequently found. The chest CT scan has been demonstrated as better than the plain chest roentgenogram or conventional tomography in demonstrating lung tumours. This study was done to evaluate whether the chest CT scan gives information additional to the plain chest roentgenogram in the staging of pancreatic and periampullary tumours. METHODS: Fifty-three patients with a pancreatic or periampullary tumour underwent helical CT scan of the chest in addition to the abdominal CT scan. The CT scans and the chest roentgenograms were read separately without the result of the other being known; the results were compared with each other and with the clinical and operative findings. RESULTS: In the chest CT scan, 7 out of 53 (13%) patients had nodules in the lungs. The chest pathologies were not seen in the chest roentgenogram except for pneumonia in one patient and lung tumours in another (sensitivity of the chest roentgenogram 2/7 = 29%). Liver metastasis, local invasion of the tumour or poor general condition of the patient made lung biopsy or bronchoscopy unnecessary or impossible. CONCLUSION: Lung metastases seldom appear in patients with pancreatic or periampullary carcinoma without other contraindications for resection, which is why the chest CT scan cannot be recommended in the staging of these tumours for operation.

Teenage pregnancy and delivery.

The outcome of pregnancy and delivery was studied in 122 teenagers (under 18 years) and matched controls. There were no differences in complications during pregnancy, delivery method or outcome of pregnancy as measured by perinatal mortality and morbidity. Anemia post partum existed more often in the teenage group, and teenager's newborns were also lighter than those of the controls. This may be due to premature deliveries, which were more common in the teenage group. Premature deliveries were more common in patients who did not visit health centres or maternity outpatient clinics. The main problem is how to attach such teenagers to organized maternity care.

Detection of severe acute pancreatitis by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

The aim of the study was to assess the ability of MRI to differentiate between the two forms of severity of acute pancreatitis (AP), which is important for the detection of patients who require intensive monitoring and therapy. The second objective was to evaluate whether the distinction would be possible regardless of the MRI equipment. Magnetic resonance imaging was performed before and after intravenous administration of a gadolinium (Gd) chelate at 1.0 T using the breath-hold multislice rapid gradient-echo turbo fast low-angle shot (FLASH) sequence in 14 patients, and at 1.5 T with the 2D FLASH(50) sequence with fat saturation in 18 patients with acute pancreatitis early in the course of the disease. The patients were classified according to the Atlanta classification system as having the mild (MAP) or severe (SAP) form of the disease. At 1.0 T with use of a body coil, contrast-enhanced MRI failed to distinguish mild from severe pancreatitis. At 1.5 T with a phased-array body coil, the signal intensities of the patients with SAP were statistically significantly lower than those of the MAP group. Our initial clinical experience suggests that MRI with a sufficient magnetic field gradient strength may be useful for separating the two forms of acute pancreatitis in their early phases.

Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of acute haemorrhagic necrotizing pancreatitis.

Eleven piglets with haemorrhagic necrotizing pancreatitis and nine piglets with oedematous pancreatitis were imaged using a multi-breath-hold TurboFLASH (TR 6.5 ms, TE 3 ms, TI 300 ms, flip angle 8 degrees , three slices) pre-excited T1-weighted sequence with an IV bolus injection of gadopentetate dimeglumine (Gd-DTPA, 0. 3 mmol/kg) as a contrast agent to show dynamic contrast enhancement of the pancreas by MRI. All piglets were imaged according to the same protocol before inducing the disease. Following the IV Gd-DTPA bolus, time-enhancement curve of the pancreas during haemorrhagic necrotizing pancreatitis was significantly lower than during oedematous pancreatitis. The enhancement curves for the healthy piglets and piglets with oedematous pancreatitis did not differ significantly. Each piglet served as its own control. Because the results of this initial study are similar to those obtained with contrast-enhanced CT, we conclude that our results may encourage further clinical trials, and contrast-enhanced dynamic MRI may be an alternative to the established method of CT for diagnosing acute haemorrhagic necrotizing pancreatitis.

Dynamic high-field MR imaging in experimental porcine acute pancreatitis.

The effects of acute pancreatitis on MR imaging signal intensities (SIs) were determined in an experimental study at 1.0 T. Oedematous pancreatitis was induced in 9 piglets and haemorrhagic pancreatitis in 11 piglets. Each animal served as its own control for MR imaging before and after induction of pancreatitis. T1-weighted spin echo (450/15 ms) and dynamic turbo FLASH (flip angle 8 degrees) sequences were used without contrast medium in testing the stability of the SI measurements. There was no significant difference in the SI-versus-time curves of the pancreas in piglets with oedematous and haemorrhagic pancreatitis. However, the difference in mean SIs between healthy and diseased piglets was significant. Thus, although non-contrast MR may be useful in the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis, it does not distinguish between oedematous and haemorrhagic pancreatitis.

The visibility of cancer on previous mammograms in retrospective review.

AIM: To study how many tumours were visible in restrospect on mammograms originally reported as normal or benign in patients coming to surgery with proven breast cancer. The effect of making the pre--operative mammogram available was also assessed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three hundred and twenty initial mammograms of consecutive new breast cancer cases were analysed by a group of radiologists in the knowledge that all patients were later diagnosed with breast cancer. The films were read twice, first without and then with the later (pre-operative) mammograms available. The parenchymal density in the location of the tumour was classified as fatty, mixed or dense, and the tumours were classified as visible or not visible. The reasons for the invisibility of the tumour in the earlier examination were analysed. RESULTS: Fourteen per cent (45) of cancers were retrospectively visible in earlier mammograms without the pre-operative mammograms having been shown, and 29% (95) when pre-operative mammograms were shown. Breast parenchymal density decreased with age and the visibility of tumours increased with age. When considered simultaneously, the effect of age (over 55 vs under 55) was greater (OR = 2.9) than the effect of density (fatty vs others) (OR = 1.5). The most common reasons for non-detection were that the lesion was overlooked (55%), diagnosed as benign (33%) or was visible only in one projection (26%). Growing density was the most common (37%) feature of those lesions originally overlooked or regarded as benign. CONCLUSIONS: Tumours are commonly visible in retrospect, but few of them exhibit specific signs of cancer, and are recognized only if they grow or otherwise change. It is not possible to differentiate most of them from normal parenchymal densities. Saarenmaa, I. (2001). Clinical Radiology56, 40-43.

The effect of age and density of the breast on the sensitivity of breast cancer diagnostic by mammography and ultasonography.

PURPOSE: We studied which, age of the patient or density of the breast accounts for the sensitivity of mammography and ultrasonography (US). Furthermore we studied whether the overall impression on the density of the breast or the density in tumour area accounts for the sensitivity of mammography and ultrasonography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The material consisted of 572 consecutive histologically and 5 cytologically verified breast cancer cases. Mammography and US examinations were performed immediately before breast cancer operations and information on the findings were received from the original patient files and classified as malignant or benign. The density of breast parenchyma to fatty, mixed or dense in total breast and separately in tumour area was defined by a radiologist group from the original mammograms by comparing to model mammograms. The sensitivity (Se) of mammography and US was compared in 3 age groups (26-49, 50-59 and 60-92) and in the different density classes. RESULTS: Sensitivity of mammography increased by age (density-adjusted OR = 0.2, 95%, CI 0.1-0.5) in age group 26-49 compared to age group 60-92) and with fattiness of the breast (age-adjusted OR= 0.4, 95%, CI 0.1-1.0 for dense breast parenchyma in tumour area compared to fatty breast). Sensitivity of US was inversely related to age (density-adjusted OR = 2.3, 95%, CI 1.0-5.2 in age group 26-49 compared to age group 60-92) and directly related with fattiness of breast (age-adjusted OR = 0.5, 95%, CI 0.2-0.9 by dense breast parenchyma in tumour area compared to fatty breast). Density in the tumour area compared to total breast density was related only mariginally better sensitivity both of mammography (0.4 vs. 0.6) and of US (0.5 vs. 0.6). CONCLUSION: Sensitivity of both mammography and sensitivity of US are independently related both to the age of the patient and to the density of the breast. The effect of age is inverse and that of density parallel between mammography and US on sensitivity. The effect of overall breast density was close to the effect of density at the site of the tumour on the sensitivity of both mammography and US.