Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ; 64(4): 1162-7, 2006 Mar 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16427211

RESUMO

PURPOSE: We examined overall and disease-specific survival outcomes both from the time of initial treatment and from the start of salvage hormone therapy (HT), by the extent of disease progression at the time salvage HT was started in patients treated on RTOG Protocol 86-10. METHODS: [corrected] With a median follow-up of 9.0 years, 247 patients (54%) had received subsequent salvage HT. The overall survival (OVS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were compared by the extent of disease progression at the time salvage HT was started. RESULTS: For those patients with distant metastases (DM) present at the start of salvage HT, the OVS and DSS were significantly reduced when compared to [corrected] those with DM absent at the time salvage HT was started (OVS at 8 years, 31% vs. 58%; DSS at 8 years, 38% vs. 65%). A statistically significant increase in DSS was observed among the 143 patients with DM absent when patients with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) less than 20 were compared with those with PSA greater than 20 at the time salvage HT was started. CONCLUSION: [corrected] The DSS and the OVS of the relapsed patient are decreased in those with more extensive disease at the time of salvage HT. However, because this protocol could not evaluate the effect of posttreatment PSA velocity on outcomes, which is likely a better predictor of long-term success with salvage HT, these results cannot be taken to demonstrate that early salvage HT in patients with long posttreatment PSA doubling times is necessary for longer survival.


Assuntos
Antagonistas de Androgênios/uso terapêutico , Antineoplásicos Hormonais/uso terapêutico , Flutamida/uso terapêutico , Gosserrelina/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias da Próstata/tratamento farmacológico , Terapia de Salvação/métodos , Análise de Variância , Antagonistas de Androgênios/efeitos adversos , Antineoplásicos Hormonais/efeitos adversos , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Flutamida/efeitos adversos , Gosserrelina/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Antígeno Prostático Específico , Neoplasias da Próstata/mortalidade , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/radioterapia , Falha de Tratamento
2.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ; 54(5): 1302-10, 2002 Dec 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12459350

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To compare, by a secondary analysis, the therapeutic benefits of androgen suppression in protocol prostate cancer patients with relapse after radiotherapy (RT) for locally advanced disease who, in the Phase III trial beginning in 1987, were assigned to receive or not receive a short course of neoadjuvant maximal androgen suppression before definitive RT. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 1987 and 1991, 456 patients were entered in the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group trail 86-10 and randomized to receive (Arm I) or not to receive (Arm II) neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (HT), which was 4 months of goserelin (3.6 mg every 4 weeks) and flutamide (250 mg t.i.d.) before and during RT for bulky T2-T4 tumors. The overall and disease-specific survival after both randomization and salvage HT for patients with relapse was evaluated, as well as the duration of response in those patients undergoing salvage HT. The outcomes in patients who had received neoadjuvant HT vs. those who had not were compared. The median follow-up after randomization for all alive patients was 9.0 years and was 5.5 years for alive patients after beginning salvage HT. RESULTS: Fewer patients received salvage HT on Arm I than on Arm II (45% vs. 63%, p <0.001). The outcomes by randomized treatment arm (I vs. II) from the time of beginning salvage HT were similar. At 5 years after salvage HT, the overall survival rates were 41% and 41% and the disease-specific survival rates were 50% and 50%. At 8 years after randomization, the overall survival rates were 47% and 44% and the disease-specific survival rates were 55% and 56%. CONCLUSION: Although a 4-month course of neoadjuvant and concurrent maximum androgen suppression and RT (compared with RT alone) significantly increases the freedom from relapse rate and freedom from receiving salvage HT, it does not compromise the long-term beneficial effect of subsequent salvage HT, if needed for relapse. These findings with long follow-up in patients treated for locally advanced disease diagnosed 9-14 years previously should help allay concerns of the possible development of "resistance" to androgen suppression when 4-month courses of neoadjuvant HT are used before primary treatment.


Assuntos
Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Neoplasias da Próstata/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Próstata/radioterapia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antineoplásicos Hormonais/uso terapêutico , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Flutamida/uso terapêutico , Gosserrelina/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias da Próstata/mortalidade , Recidiva , Terapia de Salvação , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa