Incidental axillary dose delivery to axillary lymph node levels I-III by different techniques of whole-breast irradiation: a systematic literature review.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: In breast cancer treatment, radiotherapy is an essential component for locoregional management. Axillary recurrence in patients with invasive breast carcinoma remains an issue. The question of whether breast irradiation may unintentionally include levels I, II, and III, and may decrease the risk of axillary recurrence, remains a topic of discussion. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A literature search was performed in PubMed and the Cochrane Library to identify articles that have published data regarding dose-volume analysis of axillary levels in breast irradiation. The following MESH terms were used: "breast cancer/lymph nodes" AND "radiotherapy dosage." RESULTS: Thirteen articles were identified. The irradiation technique, initial dose prescribed to the breast, delineated volumes, and dose received at axillary levels were heterogeneous. The average dose delivered to axilla levels I, II, and III with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy using standard fields (ST) ranged between 22 and 43.5 Gy, 3 and 35.6 Gy, and 1.0 and 20.5 Gy, respectively. The average doses delivered to axilla levels I, II, and III with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy using "high tangential" fields (HT) ranged between 38 and 49.7 Gy, 11 and 47.1 Gy, and 5 and 44.7 Gy, respectively. Finally, the average doses delivered to axilla levels I, II, and III using intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) were between 14.5 and 42.6 Gy, 3.4 and 35 Gy, and 1.2 and 25.5 Gy, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our literature review suggests that the incidental dose delivered to the axilla during whole-breast irradiation is heterogenous and dependent on the irradiation technique used. However, whether this observation can be translated into a therapeutic effect is still a matter of debate.

Single-fraction radiosurgery versus fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy in patients with brain metastases: a comparative study.

To compare the local control and brain radionecrosis in patients with brain metastasis primarily treated by single-fraction radiosurgery (SRS) or hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HFSRT). Between January 2012 and December 2017, 179 patients with only 1-3 brain metastases (total: 287) primarily treated by SRS (14 Gy) or HFSRT (23.1 Gy in 3 fractions of 7.7 Gy, every other day) were retrospectively analyzed in a single center. Follow-up imaging data were available in 152 patients with 246 lesions. The corresponding Biological Effective Dose (BED) were 33.6 Gy and 40.9 Gy respectively for SRS and HFSRT group, assuming an α/ß of 10 Gy. Local control (LC) and risk of radionecrosis (RN) were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. The actuarial local control rates at 6 and 12 months were 94% and 88.1% in SRS group, and 87.6% and 78.4%, in HFSRT group (p = 0.06), respectively. Only the total volume of edema was associated with worse LC (p = 0.01, HR 1.02, 95% CI [1.004-1.03]) in multivariate analysis. Brain radionecrosis occurred in 1 lesion in SRS group and 9 in HFSRT group. Median time to necrosis was 5.5 months (range 1-9). Only the volume of GTV was associated with RN (p = 0.02, HR 1.09, 95% CI [1.01-1.18]) in multivariate analysis. Multi-fraction SRT dose of 23.31 Gy in 3 fractions has similar efficacy to single-fraction SRT dose of 14 Gy in patients with brain metastases. A slightly higher occurrence of radionecrosis appeared in HFSRT group.

Brain metastasis formation and irradiation by stereotactic radiation therapy combined with immunotherapy: A systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Brain metastasis (BM) is a complex process that implies immune cells and microglia. Stereotactic radiation therapy (SRT) and immunotherapy (IT) are established to increase the immune response; but their association has never been prospectively studied. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two reviewers performed a systematic review in original papers published up to September 2019. We analysed OS, local (mLRF) and regional (mBRF) median disease-free survival in patients with BMs after SRT with and without IT. RESULTS: Upon 14 studies, eleven concerned melanoma, three concerned lung cancers. SRT-IT showed better OS, mLRF and mBRF than SRT. mBRF was better if SRT was performed with short delay from IT. No higher rates of radionecrosis and haemorrhage were found among groups. CONCLUSION: This review suggests SRT combined to IT in melanoma is safe and could provide better BRF, suggesting a lymphocytic immune reaction in brain. No improvement trend was found in lung cancer BM.

A systematic review of palliative bone radiotherapy based on pain relief and retreatment rates.

Palliative radiotherapy has been shown to have effects on Quality of Life during painful bone metastasis. This review aimed to determine equivalence in pain relief (PR) and retreatment rate (RR) using both single and multi-fraction irradiations, based on evaluation of the trial's quality. We performed a systematic review since ICRU 50 Report (1993) to June 2017, then evaluated trials for reproducibility and good methodology criteria. We found five studies that were reproducible in both dose and volume prescription. One study used three-dimensional (3D) treatment planning. Equivalence between single and multi-fraction schedules was demonstrated for PR after 3 months, but a 2-3 time RR appeared after single-fraction schedules, notably in the first year after treatment (primarily during the first four months). Reserving long course therapy for well-preserved patients would allow for better long-term efficacy with lower RR, while altered patients would suffer less from single-fraction treatments. It appears that life expectancy might not be used as a criterion for this choice.