Comparison of GFR calculation methods: MDRD and CKD-EPI vs. (99m)Tc-DTPA tracer clearance rates.

INTRODUCTION: Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is considered the best index of kidney function. The Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD)-Study equation has gained worldwide acceptance for estimating GFR from serum creatinine. Recently the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) group developed a new equation that claims to be more accurate and could replace MDRD for routine clinical use. Nuclear medicine methods are accepted as more accurate, and have become regular practice provided they are easily available. The aim of this study was to evaluate how indirect GFR calculations correlated with the nuclear medicine method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors compared (99m)Tc-DTPA clearance using the Gates method and a two-blood sample method with MDRD and CKD-EPI, in a population of renal donor candidates and oncological patients treated with nephrotoxic chemotherapy. RESULTS: Our results showed that even though both equations provided a good correlation (p < 0.001) with GFR evaluated by the nuclear medicine method, they underestimated the GFR value in comparison to nuclear medicine methods. Our study also found that CKD-EPI was superior to MDRD. CONCLUSION: Using purely creatinine-based GFR estimates can lead to complications in clinical practice, especially when correct GFR values are mandatory, like when calculating adequate chemotherapy dosage, and should be used with caution. When the more accurate nuclear medicine methods are unavailable due to cost or accessibility issues, our study showed that the new CKD-EPI appears to reflect GFR results more accurately than MDRD, and thus should be the method of choice for estimating GFR.

Comparison of GFR measurement with a two-blood sample technique using [99mTc]Tc-DTPA vs. creatinine-based equations in potential kidney donors.

INTRODUCTION: Accurate determination of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is crucial for selection of kidney donors. Nuclear medicine methods are considered accurate in measuring GFR but are not always easily available. The four-variable Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD4), Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI), and Full Age Spectrum (FAS) formulas are common equations for estimating GFR and are recommended for initial assessment of kidney donors. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of these GFR estimation equations compared with technetium-99m diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid ([99mTc]Tc-DTPA) clearance. METHODS: We compared GFR estimation by [99mTc]Tc-DTPA clearance using a two-blood sample method with estimation by MDRD4, CKD-EPI, and FAS creatinine-based equations in a population of healthy potential kidney donors. RESULTS: A total of 195 potential kidney donors (68.2% female; mean age 49 years, range 21-75 years) were included in this study. Mean [99mTc]Tc-DTPA measured GFR (mGFR) was 101.5 ± 19.1 mL/min/1.73 m2. All three equations underestimated the GFR value measured by [99mTc]Tc-DTPA (MDRD4: -11.5 ± 18.8 mL/min/1.73 m2; CKD-EPI: -5.0 ± 17.4 mL/min/1.73 m2; FAS: -8.3 ± 17.4 mL/min/1.73 m2). Accuracy within 30% and 10% of the measured GFR value was highest for CKD-EPI. CONCLUSION: The CKD-EPI equation showed better performance in estimating GFR in healthy potential kidney donors, proving to be a more accurate tool in the initial assessment of kidney donors. However, creatinine-based equations tended to underestimate kidney function. Therefore, GFR should be confirmed by another method in potential kidney donors.

Comparison of GFR measurement with a two-blood sample technique using [99mTc]Tc-DTPA vs. creatinine-based equations in potential kidney donors / Comparação da medição da TFG com uma técnica com duas amostras de sangue usando [99mTc]Tc-DTPA vs. equações baseadas em creatinina em potenciais doadores de rim

ABSTRACT Introduction: Accurate determination of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is crucial for selection of kidney donors. Nuclear medicine methods are considered accurate in measuring GFR but are not always easily available. The four-variable Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD4), Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI), and Full Age Spectrum (FAS) formulas are common equations for estimating GFR and are recommended for initial assessment of kidney donors. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of these GFR estimation equations compared with technetium-99m diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid ([99mTc]Tc-DTPA) clearance. Methods: We compared GFR estimation by [99mTc]Tc-DTPA clearance using a two-blood sample method with estimation by MDRD4, CKD-EPI, and FAS creatinine-based equations in a population of healthy potential kidney donors. Results: A total of 195 potential kidney donors (68.2% female; mean age 49 years, range 21-75 years) were included in this study. Mean [99mTc]Tc-DTPA measured GFR (mGFR) was 101.5 ± 19.1 mL/min/1.73 m2. All three equations underestimated the GFR value measured by [99mTc]Tc-DTPA (MDRD4: -11.5 ± 18.8 mL/min/1.73 m2; CKD-EPI: -5.0 ± 17.4 mL/min/1.73 m2; FAS: -8.3 ± 17.4 mL/min/1.73 m2). Accuracy within 30% and 10% of the measured GFR value was highest for CKD-EPI. Conclusion: The CKD-EPI equation showed better performance in estimating GFR in healthy potential kidney donors, proving to be a more accurate tool in the initial assessment of kidney donors. However, creatinine-based equations tended to underestimate kidney function. Therefore, GFR should be confirmed by another method in potential kidney donors.

RESUMO Introdução: Determinar precisamente a taxa de filtração glomerular (TFG) é crucial para seleção de doadores de rim. Métodos de medicina nuclear são considerados precisos na medição da TFG, mas nem sempre estão facilmente disponíveis. As fórmulas Modification of Diet in Renal Disease de 4 variáveis (MDRD4), Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI), e Full Age Spectrum (FAS) são equações comuns para estimar a TFG, sendo recomendadas para avaliação inicial dos doadores. Este estudo visou avaliar o desempenho destas equações de estimativa da TFG em comparação com o clearance do tecnécio-99m-ácido dietilenotriaminopentacético ([99mTc]Tc-DTPA). Métodos: Comparamos a TFG por clearance de [99mTc]Tc-DTPA usando um método com duas amostras de sangue com estimativa da TFG pelas equações MDRD4, CKD-EPI e FAS baseadas em creatinina em uma população de potenciais doadores saudáveis. Resultados: Incluiu-se 195 potenciais doadores de rim (68,2% mulheres; idade média de 49 anos, intervalo 21-75 anos). A TFG média medida por [99mTc]Tc-DTPA foi 101,5 ± 19,1 mL/min/1,73m2. As três equações subestimaram o valor da TFG medida por [99mTc]Tc-DTPA (MDRD4: -11,5 ± 18,8 mL/min/1,73 m2; CKD-EPI: -5,0 ± 17,4 mL/min/1,73 m2; FAS: -8,3 ± 17,4 mL/min/1,73 m2). A precisão dentro de 30% e 10% do valor da TFG medida foi maior para CKD-EPI. Conclusão: A equação CKD-EPI mostrou melhor desempenho na estimativa da TFG em potenciais doadores de rim saudáveis, revelando-se uma ferramenta mais precisa na avaliação inicial dos doadores. Entretanto, equações baseadas em creatinina tendem a subestimar a função renal. Portanto, a TFG deve ser confirmada por outro método em potenciais doadores.