Cardiac autonomic function in REM-related obstructive sleep apnoea: insights from nocturnal heart rate variability profiles.

PURPOSE: In light of the reported association between REM-related obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) and heightened cardiovascular risk, this study aims to compare cardiac autonomic function in patients with REM-OSA and OSA independent of sleep stage. We hypothesized that REM-OSA patients would exhibit higher sympathetic cardiac modulation based on heart rate variability (HRV) profiles. METHODS: HRV was compared between the OSA group (AHI ≥ 5 events/h, n = 252) and the REM-OSA group (AHI ≥ 5 events/h, AHIREM:AHINREM ≥ 2, n = 137). Time- and frequency-domain measures of HRV were analysed during N2 and REM sleep. RESULTS: Clinical characteristics between the two test groups differed significantly, 45% of REM-OSA patients were female, with mild OSA (median, interquartile range (IQR)) AHI of 10 (7) events/h. Only 26% of the OSA cohort were female with moderate OSA (AHI = 17 (20) events/h, p < 0.001). Compared with the OSA group, the low frequency to high frequency ratio (LF:HF) and LF power were lower and HF power was higher in the REM-OSA group during N2 (LF:HF, p = 0.012; LF; p = 0.013; HF, p = 0.007) and in REM sleep (LF:HF, p = 0.002; LF, p = 0.004; HF, p < 0.001). Patient sex and OSA severity had a significant combined effect on average N to N interval, LF power, and LF:HF ratio during N2 and REM sleep (all p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Contrary to our hypothesis, REM-OSA patients demonstrated consistently higher cardiac vagal modulation, reflecting better cardiac autonomic adaptation. These results were attributed to differences in OSA severity and sex in these two groups, both independently affecting HRV. This study emphasises the need for future research into the underlying pathophysiology of REM-OSA and the potential implications of sex and OSA severity on cardiovascular risk.

Long-Term Noninvasive Ventilation in Chronic Stable Hypercapnic Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. An Official American Thoracic Society Clinical Practice Guideline.

Background: Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) is used for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and chronic hypercapnia. However, evidence for clinical efficacy and optimal management of therapy is limited.Target Audience: Patients with COPD, clinicians who care for them, and policy makers.Methods: We summarized evidence addressing five PICO (patients, intervention, comparator, and outcome) questions. The GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach was used to evaluate the certainty in evidence and generate actionable recommendations. Recommendations were formulated by a panel of pulmonary and sleep physicians, respiratory therapists, and methodologists using the Evidence-to-Decision framework.Recommendations:1) We suggest the use of nocturnal NIV in addition to usual care for patients with chronic stable hypercapnic COPD (conditional recommendation, moderate certainty); 2) we suggest that patients with chronic stable hypercapnic COPD undergo screening for obstructive sleep apnea before initiation of long-term NIV (conditional recommendation, very low certainty); 3) we suggest not initiating long-term NIV during an admission for acute-on-chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure, favoring instead reassessment for NIV at 2-4 weeks after resolution (conditional recommendation, low certainty); 4) we suggest not using an in-laboratory overnight polysomnogram to titrate NIV in patients with chronic stable hypercapnic COPD who are initiating NIV (conditional recommendation, very low certainty); and 5) we suggest NIV with targeted normalization of PaCO2 in patients with hypercapnic COPD on long-term NIV (conditional recommendation, low certainty).Conclusions: This expert panel provides evidence-based recommendations addressing the use of NIV in patients with COPD and chronic stable hypercapnic respiratory failure.

Advances in non-invasive positive airway pressure technology.

Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) has become the standard of care for patients with a range of respiratory and sleep breathing disorders. Technological advances have enabled the development of several newer modes of automatically adapting NIV suitable for patients with more complex breathing abnormalities that may be difficult to manage effectively with more traditional positive airway pressure therapy. These modes allow for more stable ventilation when fluctuating ventilation requirements occur such as in positional upper airway obstruction or state-related variations in respiratory mechanics and drive. Adaptive servoventilation (ASV) is designed for patients with periodic breathing and central apnoeas in whom carbon dioxide levels are normal to low, with the goal of therapy to dampen and stabilize ventilation. In contrast, volume-assured pressure support is used in diagnostic groups characterized by hypoventilation, where targeting an effective level of ventilation irrespective of sleep stage or body position is required. These newer modes have the potential to simplify and optimize ventilation, although at present there is no evidence that they are clinically superior to standard home ventilation techniques. The complexity and differences in algorithms and features of various device brands, along with a limited evidence base documenting longer term outcomes, complicate decisions around which patient phenotypes are best suited to these newer modes. In-built sensor and data storage capabilities of newer home ventilation devices provide the opportunity for earlier recognition of issues with ventilation and to guide corrective action. Further work is needed to determine how this impacts longer term clinical outcomes.

Evaluation and Management of Obesity Hypoventilation Syndrome. An Official American Thoracic Society Clinical Practice Guideline.

Background: The purpose of this guideline is to optimize evaluation and management of patients with obesity hypoventilation syndrome (OHS).Methods: A multidisciplinary panel identified and prioritized five clinical questions. The panel performed systematic reviews of available studies (up to July 2018) and followed the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation evidence-to-decision framework to develop recommendations. All panel members discussed and approved the recommendations.Recommendations: After considering the overall very low quality of the evidence, the panel made five conditional recommendations. We suggest that: 1) clinicians use a serum bicarbonate level <27 mmol/L to exclude the diagnosis of OHS in obese patients with sleep-disordered breathing when suspicion for OHS is not very high (<20%) but to measure arterial blood gases in patients strongly suspected of having OHS, 2) stable ambulatory patients with OHS receive positive airway pressure (PAP), 3) continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) rather than noninvasive ventilation be offered as the first-line treatment to stable ambulatory patients with OHS and coexistent severe obstructive sleep apnea, 4) patients hospitalized with respiratory failure and suspected of having OHS be discharged with noninvasive ventilation until they undergo outpatient diagnostic procedures and PAP titration in the sleep laboratory (ideally within 2-3 mo), and 5) patients with OHS use weight-loss interventions that produce sustained weight loss of 25% to 30% of body weight to achieve resolution of OHS (which is more likely to be obtained with bariatric surgery).Conclusions: Clinicians may use these recommendations, on the basis of the best available evidence, to guide management and improve outcomes among patients with OHS.

Non-invasive ventilation versus oxygen therapy in cystic fibrosis: A 12-month randomized trial.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: No published studies have examined the long-term effects of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) in cystic fibrosis (CF). Our primary aim was to determine if adults with CF and sleep desaturation were less likely to develop hypercapnia with NIV ± O2 compared to low-flow oxygen therapy (LFO2 ) or meet the criteria for failure of therapy over 12 months. We studied event-free survival, hospitalizations, lung function, arterial blood gases (ABG), sleep quality and health-related quality of life. METHODS: A prospective, randomized, parallel group study in adult patients with CF and sleep desaturation was conducted, comparing 12 months of NIV ± O2 to LFO2 . Event-free survival was defined as participants without events. Events included: failure of therapy with PaCO2 > 60 mm Hg, or increase in PaCO2 > 10 mm Hg from baseline, increases in TcCO2 > 10 mm Hg, lung transplantation or death. Outcomes were measured at baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months, including lung function, ABG, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Inventory (PSQI), SF36 and hospitalizations. RESULTS: A total of 29 patients were randomized to NIV ± O2 (n = 14) or LFO2 (n = 15) therapy for 12 months. Of the 29 patients, 18 met the criteria for event-free survival over 12 months. NIV ± O2 group had 33% (95% CI: 5-58%) and 46% (95% CI: 10-68%) more event-free survival at 3 and 12 months than LFO2 group. No statistically significant differences were seen in spirometry, ABG, questionnaires or hospitalizations. CONCLUSION: NIV ± O2 during sleep increases event-free survival over 12 months in adults with CF. Further studies are required to determine which subgroups benefit the most from NIV.

A randomised controlled trial of CPAP versus non-invasive ventilation for initial treatment of obesity hypoventilation syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Obesity hypoventilation syndrome (OHS) is the most common indication for home ventilation, although the optimal therapy remains unclear, particularly for severe disease. We compared Bi-level and continuous positive airways pressure (Bi-level positive airway pressure (PAP); CPAP) for treatment of severe OHS. METHODS: We conducted a multicentre, parallel, double-blind trial for initial treatment of OHS, with participants randomised to nocturnal Bi-level PAP or CPAP for 3 months. The primary outcome was frequency of treatment failure (hospital admission, persistent ventilatory failure or non-adherence); secondary outcomes included health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and sleepiness. RESULTS: Sixty participants were randomised; 57 completed follow-up and were included in analysis (mean age 53 years, body mass index 55 kg/m2, PaCO2 60 mm Hg). There was no difference in treatment failure between groups (Bi-level PAP, 14.8% vs CPAP, 13.3%, p=0.87). Treatment adherence and wake PaCO2 were similar after 3 months (5.3 hours/night Bi-level PAP, 5.0 hours/night CPAP, p=0.62; PaCO2 44.2 and 45.9 mm Hg, respectively, p=0.60). Between-group differences in improvement in sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Scale 0.3 (95% CI -2.8, 3.4), p=0.86) and HRQoL (Short Form (SF)36-SF6d 0.025 (95% CI -0.039, 0.088), p=0.45) were not significant. Baseline severity of ventilatory failure (PaCO2) was the only significant predictor of persistent ventilatory failure at 3 months (OR 2.3, p=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: In newly diagnosed severe OHS, Bi-level PAP and CPAP resulted in similar improvements in ventilatory failure, HRQoL and adherence. Baseline PaCO2 predicted persistent ventilatory failure on treatment. Long-term studies are required to determine whether these treatments have different cost-effectiveness or impact on mortality. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12611000874910, results.

How will cancer survivors use survivorship care plans?

BACKGROUND: Survivorship care plans (SCPs) are internationally endorsed as an important tool to enhance post-treatment survivorship care. To support broad implementation of SCPs, we investigated survivors' preferences regarding SCPs. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study was conducted at a comprehensive cancer center. Eligible patients from 10 clinical services, generally up to 12 months following end of treatment (EOT) were approached in clinics or via telephone. A purpose-designed survey assessed survivors' intended use of a SCP and preferences regarding format and content. Intended minimum sample size of 200. RESULTS: Two hundred and thirty surveys were returned (response rate 68%). Of the 230 participants, over 55% had completed treatment within six months, 35% between six and 12 months, and 10% were receiving ongoing treatments. Most (82%) had not received a SCP and more than one third (42%) reported receiving no information resources at EOT. Almost all (98%) desired further information. Most common information elements desired in a SCP: 'list of symptoms to watch out for and report' (76%), 'summary of treatment received' (70%) and 'things I can do to look after myself' (67%). Most common suggested uses were as: 'a record of cancer treatment' (63%), 'a reminder of things to do to look after myself ' (57%) and 'to help me understand my cancer experience' (56%). Over half (52%) would share the information with their general practitioner. Most indicated preference for paper-based SCPs (91%). There was support for both brief (36%) and detailed versions (42%). Over half requested the information be delivered in a face-to-face discussion with a health professional. Regular telephone support from the treating health care team was most commonly suggested as an additional service to support survivors after EOT. CONCLUSIONS: Although similar to international findings, results suggest alternate ways of providing the information that survivors desire. Most desired SCP elements have been defined. A flexible approach to SCP interventions is justified.

Non-invasive ventilation for cystic fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: Non-invasive ventilation may be a means to temporarily reverse or slow the progression of respiratory failure in cystic fibrosis by providing ventilatory support and avoiding tracheal intubation. Using non-invasive ventilation, in the appropriate situation or individuals, can improve lung mechanics through increasing airflow and gas exchange and decreasing the work of breathing. Non-invasive ventilation thus acts as an external respiratory muscle. This is an update of a previously published review. OBJECTIVES: To compare the effect of non-invasive ventilation versus no non-invasive ventilation in people with cystic fibrosis for airway clearance, during sleep and during exercise. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group Trials Register comprising references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches, handsearching relevant journals and abstract books of conference proceedings. We searched the reference lists of each trial for additional publications possibly containing other trials.Most recent search: 08 August 2016. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials comparing a form of pressure preset or volume preset non-invasive ventilation to no non-invasive ventilation used for airway clearance or during sleep or exercise in people with acute or chronic respiratory failure in cystic fibrosis. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Three reviewers independently assessed trials for inclusion criteria and methodological quality, and extracted data. MAIN RESULTS: Ten trials met the inclusion criteria with a total of 191 participants. Seven trials evaluated single treatment sessions, one evaluated a two-week intervention, one evaluated a six-week intervention and one a three-month intervention. It is only possible to blind trials of airway clearance and overnight ventilatory support to the outcome assessors. In most of the trials we judged there was an unclear risk of bias with regards to blinding due to inadequate descriptions. The six-week trial was the only one judged to have a low risk of bias for all other domains. One single intervention trial had a low risk of bias for the randomisation procedure with the remaining trials judged to have an unclear risk of bias. Most trials had a low risk of bias with regard to incomplete outcome data and selective reporting.Six trials (151 participants) evaluated non-invasive ventilation for airway clearance compared with an alternative chest physiotherapy method such as the active cycle of breathing techniques or positive expiratory pressure. Three trials used nasal masks, one used a nasal mask or mouthpiece and one trial used a face mask and in one trial it is unclear. Three of the trials reported on one of the review's primary outcome measures (quality of life). Results for the reviews secondary outcomes showed that airway clearance may be easier with non-invasive ventilation and people with cystic fibrosis may prefer it. We were unable to find any evidence that non-invasive ventilation increases sputum expectoration, but it did improve some lung function parameters.Three trials (27 participants) evaluated non-invasive ventilation for overnight ventilatory support compared to oxygen or room air using nasal masks (two trials) and nasal masks or full face masks (one trial). Trials reported on two of the review's primary outcomes (quality of life and symptoms of sleep-disordered breathing). Results for the reviews secondary outcome measures showed that they measured lung function, gas exchange, adherence to treatment and preference, and nocturnal transcutaneous carbon dioxide. Due to the small numbers of participants and statistical issues, there were discrepancies in the results between the RevMan and the original trial analyses. No clear differences were found between non-invasive ventilation compared with oxygen or room air except for exercise performance, which significantly improved with non-invasive ventilation compared to room air over six weeks.One trial (13 participants) evaluated non-invasive ventilation on exercise capacity (interface used was unclear) and did not reported on any of the review's primary outcomes. The trial found no clear differences between non-invasive ventilation compared to no non-invasive ventilation for any of our outcomes.Three trials reported on adverse effects. One trial, evaluating non-invasive ventilation for airway clearance, reported that a participant withdrew at the start of the trial due to pain on respiratory muscle testing. One trial evaluating non-invasive ventilation for overnight support reported that one participant could not tolerate an increase in inspiratory positive airway pressure. A second trial evaluating non-invasive ventilation in this setting reported that one participant did not tolerate the non-invasive ventilation mask, one participant developed a pneumothorax when breathing room air and two participants experienced aerophagia which resolved when inspiratory positive airway pressure was decreased. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Non-invasive ventilation may be a useful adjunct to other airway clearance techniques, particularly in people with cystic fibrosis who have difficulty expectorating sputum. Non-invasive ventilation, used in addition to oxygen, may improve gas exchange during sleep to a greater extent than oxygen therapy alone in moderate to severe disease. The effect of NIV on exercise is unclear. These benefits of non-invasive ventilation have largely been demonstrated in single treatment sessions with small numbers of participants. The impact of this therapy on pulmonary exacerbations and disease progression remain unclear. There is a need for long-term randomised controlled trials which are adequately powered to determine the clinical effects of non-invasive ventilation in cystic fibrosis airway clearance and exercise.

Non-invasive ventilation during exercise training for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

BACKGROUND: Exercise training as a component of pulmonary rehabilitation improves health-related quality of life (HRQL) and exercise capacity in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, some individuals may have difficulty performing exercise at an adequate intensity. Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) during exercise improves exercise capacity and dyspnoea during a single exercise session. Consequently, NIV during exercise training may allow individuals to exercise at a higher intensity, which could lead to greater improvement in exercise capacity, HRQL and physical activity. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether NIV during exercise training (as part of pulmonary rehabilitation) affects exercise capacity, HRQL and physical activity in people with COPD compared with exercise training alone or exercise training with sham NIV. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the following databases between January 1987 and November 2013 inclusive: The Cochrane Airways Group specialised register of trials, AMED, CENTRAL, CINAHL, EMBASE, LILACS, MEDLINE, PEDro, PsycINFO and PubMed.  SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials that compared NIV during exercise training versus exercise training alone or exercise training with sham NIV in people with COPD were considered for inclusion in this review. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently selected trials for inclusion in the review, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Primary outcomes were exercise capacity, HRQL and physical activity; secondary outcomes were training intensity, physiological changes related to exercise training, dyspnoea, dropouts, adverse events and cost. MAIN RESULTS: Six studies involving 126 participants who completed the study protocols were included. Most studies recruited participants with severe to very severe COPD (mean forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) ranged from 26% to 48% predicted). There was an increase in percentage change peak and endurance exercise capacity with NIV during training (mean difference in peak exercise capacity 17%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 7% to 27%, 60 participants, low-quality evidence; mean difference in endurance exercise capacity 59%, 95% CI 4% to 114%, 48 participants, low-quality evidence). However, there was no clear evidence of a difference between interventions for all other measures of exercise capacity. The results for HRQL assessed using the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire do not rule out an effect of NIV (total score mean 2.5 points, 95% CI -2.3 to 7.2, 48 participants, moderate-quality evidence). Physical activity was not assessed in any study. There was an increase in training intensity with NIV during training of 13% (95% CI 1% to 27%, 67 participants, moderate-quality evidence), and isoload lactate was lower with NIV (mean difference -0.97 mmol/L, 95% CI -1.58mmol/L to -0.36 mmol/L, 37 participants, moderate-quality evidence). The effect of NIV on dyspnoea or the number of dropouts between interventions was uncertain, although again results were imprecise. No adverse events and no information regarding cost were reported. Only one study blinded participants, whereas three studies used blinded assessors. Adequate allocation concealment was reported in four studies. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The small number of included studies with small numbers of participants, as well as the high risk of bias within some of the included studies, limited our ability to draw strong evidence-based conclusions. Although NIV during lower limb exercise training may allow people with COPD to exercise at a higher training intensity and to achieve a greater physiological training effect compared with exercise training alone or exercise training with sham NIV, the effect on exercise capacity is unclear. Some evidence suggests that NIV during exercise training improves the percentage change in peak and endurance exercise capacity; however, these findings are not consistent across other measures of exercise capacity. There is no clear evidence that HRQL is better or worse with NIV during training. It is currently unknown whether the demonstrated benefits of NIV during exercise training are clinically worthwhile or cost-effective.

A comparison of two obesity-related hypoventilation disorders: Impact on sleep, quality of life and neurocognitive outcomes and the effects of positive airway pressure therapy.

Study Objectives: Symptom impact and neurocognitive function have not been previously compared between patients with obesity-associated hypoventilation disorders (obesity hypoventilation syndrome [OHS]) and hypoventilation in the setting of obesity and obstructive airways disease (OHAD). The aim of this study is to compare baseline sleep-related symptoms, health-related quality of life, and neurocognitive function between OHS and OHAD and the impact of PAP therapy on these outcomes. Methods: Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), Pittsburgh Sleepiness Quality Index (PSQI), SF36, and various neurocognitive tests, in addition to anthropometric, polysomnography, lung function, and blood gas data from participants with OHS and participants with OHAD, were included in the analysis. These data were originally collected in their respective randomized clinical trials, comparing the efficacy of different PAP modes (bilevel PAP vs. CPAP) in resolving hypercapnia. Between groups (OHS vs OHAD), pre- and post-treatment (with 3 months of positive airway pressure) comparisons were made using linear mixed modeling. Results: 45 OHS participants (mean age 51 years old, 33% female, BMI 52 kg/m2, FER 0.81, PaCO2 54 mmHg, AHI 87/h) and 32 OHAD participants (mean age 61years old, 31% female, BMI 43kg/m2, FER 0.60, PaCO2 54 mmHg, AHI 59/h) were included in the analysis. Both OHS and OHAD had similar baseline ESS (14(5.6) vs. 12(5.4)), Global PSQI (10(3.2) vs. 11(4.8)), SF36 and neurocognitive test performances (other than OHAD had lower digit symbol substitution test performance). Treatment with PAP therapy resulted in similar ESS, Global PSQI, and SF36 improvements in both groups. Neurocognitive performance did not significantly improve after PAP therapy in either group. Conclusions: The symptom impact between two separate hypoventilation disorders (OHS and OHAD), in terms of sleepiness, sleep quality, quality of life, and cognitive function, were similar. OHS and OHAD had similar treatment responses in these parameters after 3 months of PAP therapy.Nocturnal ventilatory support in OHS.

Heart rate variability analysis in obstructive sleep apnea patients with daytime sleepiness.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Recent studies suggest that sleepy patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) are at higher risk for incident cardiovascular disease. This study assessed cardiac autonomic function in sleepy versus non-sleepy patients with OSA using heart rate variability (HRV) analysis. We hypothesized that HRV profiles of sleepy patients would indicate higher cardiovascular risk. METHODS: Electrocardiograms (ECG) derived from polysomnograms (PSG) collected by the Sydney Sleep Biobank were used to study HRV in groups of sleepy (ESS ≥ 10) and non-sleepy OSA patients (ESS < 10). HRV parameters were averaged across available ECG signals during N2 sleep. RESULTS: A total of 421 patients were evaluated, with a mean age of 54 (14) years, body mass index of 33 (9) kg/m2, apnea-hypopnea index of 21 (28) events/h, and 66% male. The sleepy group consisted of 119 patients and the non-sleepy group 302 patients. Sleepy patients exhibited lower HRV values for: root mean square successive difference (RMSSD, p = 0.028), total power (TP, p = 0.031), absolute low frequency (LF, p = 0.045), and high-frequency (HF, p = 0.010) power compared to non-sleepy patients. Sleepy patients with moderate-to-severe OSA exhibited lower HRV values for: (RMSSD, p = 0.045; TP, p = 0.052), absolute LF (p = 0.051), and HF power (p = 0.025). There were no differences in other time and frequency domain HRV markers. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows a trend toward parasympathetic withdrawal in sleepy OSA patients, particularly in moderate-to-severe cases, lending mechanistic support to the link between the sleepy phenotype and CVD risk in OSA.

Characterisation of Symptom and Polysomnographic Profiles Associated with Cardiovascular Risk in a Sleep Clinic Population with Obstructive Sleep Apnoea.

Aim: Recent data have identified specific symptom and polysomnographic profiles associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD) in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). Our aim was to determine whether these profiles were present at diagnosis of OSA in patients with established CVD and in those with high cardiovascular risk. Participants in the Sydney Sleep Biobank (SSB) database, aged 30-74 years, self-reported presence of CVD (coronary artery disease, cerebrovascular disease, or heart failure). In those without established CVD, the Framingham Risk Score (FRS) estimated 10-year absolute CVD risk, categorised as "low" (<6%), "intermediate" (6-20%), or "high" (>20%). Groups were compared on symptom and polysomnographic variables. Results: 629 patients (68% male; mean age 54.3 years, SD 11.6; mean BMI 32.3 kg/m2, SD 8.2) were included. CVD was reported in 12.2%. A further 14.3% had a low risk FRS, 38.8% had an intermediate risk FRS, and 34.7% had a high risk FRS. Groups differed with respect to age, sex and BMI. OSA severity increased with established CVD and increasing FRS. The symptom of waking too early was more prevalent in the higher FRS groups (p=0.004). CVD and FRS groups differed on multiple polysomnographic variables; however, none of these differences remained significant after adjusting for age, sex, and BMI. Conclusion: Higher CVD risk was associated with waking too early in patients with OSA. Polysomnographic variations between groups were explained by demographic differences. Further work is required to explore the influence of OSA phenotypic characteristics on susceptibility to CVD.

Non-invasive ventilation for cystic fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: Non-invasive ventilation may be a means to temporarily reverse or slow the progression of respiratory failure in cystic fibrosis. OBJECTIVES: To compare the effect of non-invasive ventilation versus no non-invasive ventilation in people with cystic fibrosis. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group Trials Register comprising references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches, handsearching relevant journals and abstract books of conference proceedings. We searched the reference lists of each trial for additional publications possibly containing other trials.Most recent search: 22 February 2013. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials comparing a form of pressure preset or volume preset non-invasive ventilation to no non-invasive ventilation in people with acute or chronic respiratory failure in cystic fibrosis. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Three reviewers independently assessed trials for inclusion criteria and methodological quality, and extracted data. MAIN RESULTS: Fifteen trials were identified; seven trials met the inclusion criteria with a total of 106 participants. Six trials evaluated single treatment sessions and one evaluated a six-week intervention.Four trials (79 participants) evaluated non-invasive ventilation for airway clearance compared with an alternative chest physiotherapy method and showed that airway clearance may be easier with non-invasive ventilation and people with cystic fibrosis may prefer it. We were unable to find any evidence that NIV increases sputum expectoration, but it did improve some lung function parameters.Three trials (27 participants) evaluated non-invasive ventilation for overnight ventilatory support, measuring lung function, validated quality of life scores and nocturnal transcutaneous carbon dioxide. Due to the small numbers of participants and statistical issues, there were discrepancies in the results between the RevMan and the original trial analyses. No clear differences were found between non-invasive ventilation compared with oxygen or room air except for exercise performance, which significantly improved with non-invasive ventilation compared to room air over six weeks. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Non-invasive ventilation may be a useful adjunct to other airway clearance techniques, particularly in people with cystic fibrosis who have difficulty expectorating sputum. Non-invasive ventilation, used in addition to oxygen, may improve gas exchange during sleep to a greater extent than oxygen therapy alone in moderate to severe disease. These benefits of non-invasive ventilation have largely been demonstrated in single treatment sessions with small numbers of participants. The impact of this therapy on pulmonary exacerbations and disease progression remain unclear. There is a need for long-term randomised controlled trials which are adequately powered to determine the clinical effects of non-invasive ventilation in cystic fibrosis airway clearance and exercise.