Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy can differentiate Alzheimer's disease from normal aging.

In order to evaluate the pattern of proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-MRS) in the gray and white matter of patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and healthy controls, a cross-sectional study was carried out on 13 consecutive AD patients and 7 healthy older subjects who were referred to the Day-Hospital for diagnostic assessment. All examinations were performed on a 1.5 Tesla whole-body scanner. Volumes of interest were selected in both the gray (temporal region) and the white (frontal region) matter. N-acetyl group, total creatine, total choline and myo-inositol were quantified referring the metabolite peak area to the unsuppressed water peak area acquired under the same conditions, and the ratio was expressed in arbitrary units. A significant decrease in N-acetyl-aspartate (NAA) in both gray and white matter and an increase in myo-inositol (mI) in gray matter of AD patients were observed. The gray matter NAA/mI ratio clearly separated the two groups. White matter mI was significantly associated with severity and duration of dementia. No association with age was documented. It can be concluded that in vivo 1H-MRS can contribute to the knowledge of pathophysiology of AD, giving neurochemical details of both gray and white matter. In particular, the gray matter NAA/ml ratio seems to be able to differentiate normal cerebral aging from Alzheimer's disease.

Diagnosing Alzheimer's disease in very elderly patients. Relevance of some functional and psychobehavioral aspects assessed by the Gottfries-Bråne-Steen Rating Scale for Dementia. Study Group on Brain Aging, Italian Society of Gerontology and Geriatrics.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the Gottfries-Bråne-Steen (GBS) Rating Scale more fully with instruments commonly used for the diagnostic assessment of older patients with cognitive disturbances--the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE), Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS), and Global Deterioration Scale (GDS)--and to characterize the specific diagnostic value of the GBS. DESIGN: A multicenter study including patients diagnosed with senile dementia of the Alzheimer type (SDAT; age at onset: > 75 years) and age-matched non-demented subjects. SUBJECTS: One hundred thirty-eight consecutively referred SDAT patients and 116 non-demented age-matched healthy subjects selected from among relatives of the patients. METHODS: The MMSE, GBS and HDRS were used for assessing patients and controls. The GDS was utilized for dementia staging. FINDINGS: Principal component analysis carried out on GBS scores yielded three factors explaining 74% of variance: factor 1, general functioning; factor 2, depression, and factor 3, restlessness. The actual composition of these factors was analyzed after computing factor scores for each subject by means of forward selection regressions, each using the MMSE, GDS and HDRS as predictors of scores on a given factor. The best predictors were MMSE and GDS scores for factor 1; HDRS for factor 2, and MMSE for factor 3. A GBS cutoff of 8 (obtained after a quality receiver operating characteristic analysis) best discriminated between demented and non-demented subjects (positive-predictive value: 0.88; negative-predictive value: 0.90). CONCLUSIONS: The GBS Rating Scale for dementia can be a useful tool in routine clinical assessment of older subjects with cognitive impairment and distinguishes between demented and non-demented subjects; it gives comprehensive information on functional and psychobehavioral characteristics of demented patients, being composed of factors related to the MMSE and HDRS.

Neuropsychological assessment of the severely impaired elderly patient: validation of the Italian short version of the Severe Impairment Battery (SIB). Gruppo di Studio sull'Invecchiamento Cerebrale della Società Italiana di Gerontologia e Geriatria.

One hundred and sixty-nine severely demented patients were tested in a multicenter study with the short version of the Severe Impairment Battery which was translated into Italian with the purpose of adapting and validating it for an Italian population. Patients were enrolled in Italian geriatric centers participating in the Study Group on Aging Brain of the Italian Society of Gerontology and Geriatrics. Following thorough clinical and instrumental examinations, they were evaluated with the Mini Mental State Examination, the Clinical Dementia Rating, the Severe Impairment Battery (SIB), the Gottfries-Bråne-Steen Rating Scale for Dementia, the Activity of Daily Living index, and the Bedford Alzheimer Nursing Severity scale (BANS.s). The inter-rater reliability of the SIB was highly significant for the total score and its subtests; test-retest reliability showed the same significance in all items. Also concurrent validity, performed comparing the total SIB score with the total BANS.s score, was significant. The short Italian version of the SIB proved to be a very reliable tool for the evaluation of severely demented patients; it has the advantage of being easy to administer, it evaluates more cognitive domains that, are typically assessed in dementia, and has a wide enough range of scores to detect even small differences in the examined abilities.