Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: does IPOM plus allow to increase the indications in larger defects?

PURPOSE: The laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR) may have a limit of effectiveness, especially in defects greater than 80 cm2, with a higher recurrence rate which contraindicates this technique. The purpose of this study is to analyze the indication of LVHR determining and comparing the recurrence rate according to defect size in two series. METHODS: We analyzed all patients who underwent LVHR between 2007 and 2017. Patients were divided according to the ring size: < o ≥ 80 cm2 into group one (G1) and group two (G2) respectively. In both groups, all three techniques were used: intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM), IPOM with closure of the defect (IPOM plus), and IPOM plus + anterior videoscopic component separation (AVCS). RESULTS: A total of 258 patients underwent LVHR. Mean recurrence rate was 13% in G1 and 24% in G2. A statistically significant difference was found when comparing the IPOM technique among both groups, with a higher recurrence rate when ring size was ≥ 80 cm2 (p < 0.5). However, when comparing recurrence rate in IPOM plus and IPOM plus + AVCS between both groups, no significant differences were observed, yielding a p of 0.51 and 0.63, respectively. CONCLUSION: The IPOM technique has shown a limit of effectiveness in large ventral hernia defects. The combination of techniques (ring closure and AVCS) may be useful to expand the indication for this surgery to larger defects and to reduce the recurrence rate. Prospective randomized studies are required to confirm this trend.

Preferred location for the development of esophageal adenocarcinoma within a segment of intestinal metaplasia.

BACKGROUND: Barrett's metaplasia is the predominant precursor for the development of esophageal adenocarcinoma. This precancerous lesion has become the focus of various surveillance programs aimed at detecting earlier and therefore potentially curable lesions. However, sampling error by missing invasive cancer lesions is a common problem. This study aimed to identify preferred locations within a segment of Barrett's mucosa for the development of esophageal adenocarcinoma. METHODS: The study group consisted of 213 patients with histologically proven esophageal adenocarcinoma. Of those, there were 134 cases of early cancer and 79 cases of locally advanced lesions. These patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The frequency of intestinal metaplasia and the location of the tumor occurrence within the segment of intestinal metaplasia were assessed. RESULTS: Intestinal metaplasia was found in 83% of the early lesions and in 98% of the advanced tumors after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In 82.2% of the cases, the tumor was located at the distal margin of the intestinal metaplasia in patients with early tumor manifestations. The remaining tumor mass after neoadjuvant therapy also was located predominantly at the distal margin of the segment of intestinal metaplasia (85% of the cases). CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrate that almost all adenocarcinomas of the esophagus are based on the development of a segment of intestinal metaplasia. The distal margin of Barrett's mucosa seems to be the most vulnerable location for the development of invasive cancer.

Laparoscopy After Liver Transplant: Result of an Initial Series.

UNLABELLED: There are few reports about laparoscopic approach after liver transplantation (LT). The aim of this paper is to analyze in terms of feasibility and therapeutic effectiveness an initial experience with laparoscopy in patients who have had a liver transplantation. METHODS: Laparoscopic procedures were divided into "early" and "late" laparoscopy. RESULTS: A total of 10 laparoscopic procedures after LT were performed in 9 patients: 3 early and 7 late. The early laparoscopic procedures were performed in 3 patients who had a torpid evolution in their liver transplant: 2 were diagnostic only and 1 was also therapeutic. There were no intraoperative events or conversions. We recorded 2 complications. In 7 patients a late laparoscopy was performed: 4 in the upper abdomen and 3 in the lower abdomen. Of the 4 in the upper abdomen, 3 were liver procedures and 1 was in the transverse colon, on the other side; in addition, 2 laparoscopic inguinal hernia repairs and 1 laparoscopic appendectomy also were performed. None of these 7 cases was converted, and there were no intraoperative events. CONCLUSIONS: The early postoperative period, in critically ill patients diagnostic and eventually therapeutic laparoscopy was feasible and effective in our cases. Late laparoscopy in the upper abdomen is difficult due to adhesions and adds to the risk of poor graft function, but was feasible for both diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. Late laparoscopy in the lower abdomen with good graft function has the same safety and efficacy as those performed on nontransplanted patients.