Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
New Microbiol ; 31(4): 519-25, 2008 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19123308

RESUMO

The use of antimicrobials is an important factor contributing to the emergence of antibiotic resistance. The goal of our study was to evaluate the impact of the introduction of an antibiotic surgical prophylaxis protocol on the prevalence of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections in a tertiary care hospital. The protocol of surgical antibiotic prophylaxis was designed by a multidisciplinary team and was implemented in December 2001. Between January 2002 and December 2002, pharmacy, laboratory and active surveillance-records were prospectively reviewed to calculate prevalence rates of defined daily doses (DDD), microorganism isolation and health-care related infections. A progressive decrease from 1.58 to 0.56 of MRSA isolations per 1000 patient-days and from 76.4% to 29.4% MRSA prevalence rate was reported (p<0.001). Monthly prevalence rates of MRSA showed a significant linear correlation with the reduction of the DDD of the 3rd generation cephalosporins (r=0.90; p<0.001). MRSA surgical site and blood stream infections decreased from 78% to 38% and from 89% to 38%, respectively (p=0.017 and p=0.026). In our experience, the reduction of 3rd generation cephalosporin use was an effective strategy to reduce the MRSA infection rate and was associated with the reduction of the overall expenditure for antibiotics in the hospital.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Antibioticoprofilaxia , Cefalosporinas/uso terapêutico , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/fisiologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/epidemiologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/prevenção & controle , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Hospitais , Humanos , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Itália , Prevalência , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle
2.
Ther Clin Risk Manag ; 10: 479-84, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25028553

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Hypogonadotropic hypogonadal women are characterized by ovarian functionality deficiency, caused by low concentrations of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinizing hormone (LH). To recover reproduction functionality, recommended therapies for ovarian induction involve injections of FSH and LH medications. OBJECTIVE: Since important differences exist between recombinant and urinary gonadotropin therapies in terms of efficacy and cost, the objective of this study was to develop a cost-effectiveness model to compare recombinant FSH (rFSH) + recombinant LH (rLH) and highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin (HP-HMG). METHODS: A Markov model was developed, considering three cycles of therapy; probability of pregnancy and miscarriage were considered, and the efficacy was evaluated in terms of pregnancy occurrence. The perspective of the model was that of the Italian Health Service, so only direct cost (drugs, specialist visits, patient examinations, and hospitalizations) were included. RESULTS: rFSH + rLH is associated with a higher total cost (€3,453.50) and higher efficacy (0.87) compared with HP-HMG (€2,719.70 and 0.50). rFSH + rLH generated an incremental cost effectiveness ratio equal to €2,007.30 compared to HP-HMG; the average cost per pregnancy is estimated to be €3,990.00 for recombinant strategy and €5,439.80 for urinary strategy. Results of probabilistic sensitivity analysis were consistent with the abovementioned findings. CONCLUSION: Despite the higher acquisition cost in comparison to HP-HMG, rFSH + rLH resulted in a higher pregnancy rate, which makes it the recommended choice when considering cost-effectiveness of LH in supporting FSH-induced follicular gonadotropins in hypogonadotropic hypogonadal women.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa