RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a respiratory infection known as severe respiratory acute syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The purpose of this manuscript is to review information leading to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine. DATA SOURCES: A literature search was conducted of PubMed and clinicaltrials.gov (August 2018-October 2021) to identify trials related to the FDA approval of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Trials included are those the FDA deemed significant and accurate enough to be included in the FDA approval process. Information not recognized by the Centers of Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) nor FDA is omitted to not add to further confusion and misinformation. DATA SYNTHESIS: In persons 16 years or older without evidence of prior SARS-CoV-2 infection, a total of 77 COVID-19 cases (0.39%) in the vaccine group from 7 days onward after the second dose vs 833 (4.1%) in the placebo group (Vaccine efficacy 91.1%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 88.8-93.1). According the CDC definition of severe infection, there were no severe infections in the vaccine group 7 days and onward after the second dose, compared to 31 (0.15%) in the placebo group (Vaccine efficacy 100%; 95% CI: 87.6-100.0). Relevance to Patient Care and Clinical Practice: Reduction of infection by SARS-COV-2 is a top priority in protecting the health of all people and the official approval of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccination may improve this goal. CONCLUSIONS: Data available show a high efficacy rate of preventing SARS -CoV-2 with relatively low rates of ADE after full vaccination with Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Vacinas , Vacina BNT162 , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra COVID-19/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Imunização , SARS-CoV-2 , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , United States Food and Drug Administration , VacinaçãoRESUMO
The world is suffering a respiratory pandemic disease caused by a novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV), commonly known as COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019). The Food and Drug Administration issued an emergency authorization for chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine as experimental treatments for COVID-19 leading to a shortage of both medications. A literature review conducted in April 2020 shows a lack of high-quality data available, resulting in ambiguous guideline recommendations. Decisions to use either drug should be made with careful consideration of risks versus benefits along with proper monitoring. Because of its higher potency and better safety profile, hydroxychloroquine may be the more reasonable treatment option if treatment is initiated.
Assuntos
Cloroquina/uso terapêutico , Infecções por Coronavirus/tratamento farmacológico , Hidroxicloroquina/uso terapêutico , Pneumonia Viral/tratamento farmacológico , Betacoronavirus/isolamento & purificação , COVID-19 , Cloroquina/efeitos adversos , Emergências , Humanos , Hidroxicloroquina/efeitos adversos , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2 , Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19RESUMO
PURPOSE: Acne vulgaris is a ubiquitous condition in men and women starting in adolescence. It is often persistent and refractory to multiple treatment methods. Although multiple medications may be used on- or off-label for treatment, many adverse effects and risks exist with these treatments, and there has not been an agent with a novel mechanism of action introduced in 40 years. Clascoterone is a recently approved topical acne medication with the first novel mechanism of action since isotretinoin. The purpose of this article was to review the clinical data regarding the safety and efficacy of topical clascoterone for the treatment of acne vulgaris in male and female subjects aged >12 years. METHODS: A literature search of PubMed, EMBASE, and MEDLINE was conducted for clinical trials published between January 2014 and March 2021 in the English language using the key words Winlevi, clascoterone, and acne vulgaris. Articles were selected if they were related to the approval by the US Food and Drug Administration of clascoterone or provided novel data regarding this drug entity. FINDINGS: Two Phase III randomized controlled trials (NCT02608450 and NCT02608476) were ultimately selected, as these trials provided pivotal information to the US Food and Drug Administration for the approval of topical clascoterone. IMPLICATIONS: The findings of this review show that topical clascoterone is likely an effective and safe option for the treatment of acne vulgaris. It offers efficacy rates similar to those of current medications through a novel mechanism of action. Its place in therapy remains unclear, but it might be placed ahead of other androgen receptor antagonists such as spironolactone due to its avoidance of systemic side effects.
Assuntos
Acne Vulgar , Propionatos , Acne Vulgar/tratamento farmacológico , Adolescente , Antagonistas de Receptores de Andrógenos , Cortodoxona/análogos & derivados , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Introduction: A fixed-dose combination of amlodipine and celecoxib, branded in the USA as Consensi®, was recently granted a US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved indication for treatment of comorbid hypertension and osteoarthritis.Areas covered: A PubMed and Medline search was conducted for clinical trials published through December 2020 in the English language using keywords amlodipine, celecoxib, combination product, consensi, hypertension, osteoarthritis, and pill burden. Although no clinical trials have been published in the peer-reviewed literature, results from two phase 3 clinical trials reported to ClinicalTrials.gov suggest that amlodipine-celecoxib has similar short-term efficacy compared with amlodipine alone in reducing blood pressure and a comparable adverse event profile to the individual components administered alone.Expert opinion: Despite the pill burden reduction and a body of evidence supporting the efficacy and safety of the individual drugs, the role of amlodipine-celecoxib in the management of patients with hypertension-osteoarthritis remains in question. This is in no small part because the combination product is very costly relative to the generic components, provides limited flexibility for dose-adjustment, and lacks long-term data on safety and efficacy.