Aortic valve leaflet and root dimensions in normal tricuspid aortic valves: A computed tomography study.

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: The aim of this study was to use coronary computed tomography in patients with normal tricuspid aortic valves to perform detailed aortic root and aortic valve geometric analysis with a focus on the asymmetry of the three leaflets. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of anonymized coronary computed tomography angiograms was performed using dedicated software, where manual aortic root segmentation and marking of several points of interest were followed by automated measurements of aortic root and leaflets. Asymmetry of the three leaflets in individual patients was assessed by calculating absolute and relative differences between the largest and the smallest of the three leaflets. RESULTS: We analyzed 70 aortic valves, the mean patient age was 53 ± 11 years, and 50% (n = 35) of patients were female. All aortic valves were tricuspid, without calcifications and aortic roots were of normal dimensions. Some degree of asymmetry was present in all analyzed valves. Absolute and relative differences for free margin length were 3.2 ± 1.4 mm and 9.3 ± 3.8%, respectively. The largest relative difference was noted in the coaptation area (36.5 ± 16.5%) and the smallest in leaflet effective height (6.1 ± 4.8%). Using predefined cutoff criteria for absolute differences in leaflet dimensions, 86% of the valves were classified as asymmetric. CONCLUSIONS: Most normal tricuspid aortic valves show some degree of asymmetry. Equal free margin length of the three leaflets is not needed for normal tricuspid aortic valve function. Leaflet effective height showed the least amount of asymmetry confirming its importance in keeping the aortic valve competent.

Factors associated with degraded trabecular bone score in heart transplant recipients.

Trabecular bone score (TBS) is a textural index that provides indirect evaluation of trabecular microarchitecture. It improves fracture risk assessment in several high-risk populations. We aimed to evaluate the role of TBS assessment in heart transplant recipients (HTR). In a cross-sectional study with 87 HTR (69 males and 18 females), we assessed TBS and evaluated potential associations between TBS and factors related to increased fracture risk. We also evaluated the correlations between the presence of vertebral fractures (VF) and degraded TBS. We confirmed degraded TBS in the majority of HTR. 27.6% of HTR had partially degraded, 27.6% had degraded TBS. HTR with degraded TBS were older, had higher body mass index, lower bone mineral density (BMD), and T-score. As opposed to stable BMD over different time points, TBS significantly differed among different post-transplant time periods. TBS did not correlate with current methylprednisolone or past zoledronic acid treatment, presence of hypogonadism or diabetes. TBS did not have additional value over BMD in predicting the presence of VF. Most fractures occurred in patients with osteopenia and in patients with partly degraded TBS. Studies with longitudinal designs and larger sample sizes are warranted to further assess the potential role of TBS in HRT.

Effects of Repetitive Transendocardial CD34+ Cell Transplantation in Patients With Nonischemic Dilated Cardiomyopathy.

RATIONALE: Preclinical data in heart failure models suggest that repetitive stem cell therapy may be superior to single-dose cell administration. OBJECTIVE: We investigated whether repetitive administration of CD34+ cells is superior to single-dose administration in patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy. METHODS AND RESULTS: Of 66 patients with dilated cardiomyopathy, New York Heart Association functional class III, and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <40% enrolled in the study, 60 were randomly allocated to repetitive cell therapy (group A, n=30) or single-cell therapy (group B, n=30). Patients received G-CSF (granulocyte colony-stimulating factor) for 5 days, and 80 million CD34+ cells were collected by apheresis and injected transendocardially. In group A, cell therapy was repeated at 6 months. All patients were followed for 1 year, and the primary end point was the difference in change in LVEF between the groups. At baseline, the groups did not differ in age, sex, LVEF, NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide), or 6-minute walk test distance. When directly comparing groups A and B at 1 year, there was no significant difference in change in LVEF (from 32.2±9.3% to 41.2±6.5% in group A and from 30.0±7.0% to 37.9±5.3% in group B, P=0.40). From baseline to 6 months, both groups improved in LVEF (+6.9±3.3% in group A, P=0.001 and +7.1±3.5% in group B, P=0.001), NT-proBNP (-578±211 pg/mL, P=0.02 and -633±305 pg/mL, P=0.01), and 6-minute walk test (+87±21 m, P=0.03 and +92±25 m, P=0.02). In contrast, we observed no significant changes between 6 months and 1 year (LVEF: +2.1±2.3% in group A, P=0.19 and +0.8±3.1% in group B, P=0.56; NT-proBNP: -215±125 pg/mL, P=0.26 and -33±205 pg/mL, P=0.77; 6-minute walk test: +27±11 m, P=0.2 and +12±18 m, P=0.42). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with dilated cardiomyopathy, repetitive CD34+ cell administration does not seem to be associated with superior improvements in LVEF, NT-proBNP, or 6-minute walk test when compared with single-dose cell therapy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02248532.

Endocrine disorders after heart transplantation: national cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Endocrine disorders in patients after heart transplantation (HT) remain understudied. We aimed to assess endocrine profiles and management of HT recipients in the early post- transplant period. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study on 123 consecutive HT recipients in the Advanced Heart Failure and Transplantation Programme between 2009 and 2018. All recipients had per-protocol endocrine follow-up within the first postoperative year. The median time to first post-transplant endocrine follow-up was 3 months (IQR 2-4). We assessed the incidence of vitamin D deficiency, bone mineral density, history of low energy fractures, hypogonadism in male recipients, posttransplant diabetes mellitus, and thyroid and parathyroid function. RESULTS: We enrolled 22 women and 101 men of median age 57 years (IQR 50-63). Post-transplant diabetes mellitus developed in 14 patients (11.4%). 18 of 25 patients (14.6%) with preexisting type 2 diabetes mellitus required intensification of antidiabetic therapy. 38 male patients (40.4%) had hypogonadism. 5 patients (4.6%) were hypothyroid and 10 (9.3%) latent hyperthyroid. Secondary hyperparathyroidism was present in 19 (17.3%), 25-hydroxyvitamin D deficiency in 64 (54.7%) of patients. Osteoporosis was present in 26 (21.1%), osteopenia in 59 (48.0%) patients. 47 vertebral fractures, 3 hip and 1 humerus fractures occurred in 21 patients. Most of the patients had coincidence of two or three disorders, while less than 5% did not have any endocrine irregularities. All patients received calcium and vitamin D supplements. Forty-six patients (37.4%) were treated with zoledronic acid, 12 (9.8%) with oral bisphosphonates. Two patients were treated with teriparatide. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of multiple endocrine disorders early after heart transplantation is high. Assessment and management of increased fracture risk and all other potentially affected endocrine axes should be considered as a standard of care in this early period.

Stem Cell Therapy for Chronic and Advanced Heart Failure.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this review is to discuss recent advances in the field of cell therapy in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) of ischemic (iCMP) and nonischemic (dCMP) etiology, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), and in advanced heart failure patients undergoing mechanical circulatory support (LVAD). RECENT FINDINGS: In HFrEF patients (iCMP and dCMP cohorts), autologous and/or allogeneic cell therapy was shown to improve myocardial performance, patients' functional capacity, and neurohumoral activation. In HFpEF patient population, the concept of cell therapy in novel and remains largely unexplored. However, initial data are very encouraging and suggest at least a similar benefit in improvements of myocardial performance (also diastolic function of the left ventricle), exercise capacity, and neurohumoral activation. Recently, cell therapy was explored in the sickest population of advanced heart failure patients undergoing LVAD support also showing a potential benefit in promoting myocardial reverse remodeling and recovery. In the past decade, several cell therapy-based clinical trials showed promising results in various chronic and advanced heart failure patient cohorts. Future cell treatment strategies should aim for more personalized therapeutic approaches by defining optimal stem cell type or their combination, dose, and delivery method for an individual patient adjusted for patient's age and stage/duration of heart failure.

Electroanatomic Properties of the Myocardium Predict Response to CD34+ Cell Therapy in Patients With Ischemic and Nonischemic Heart Failure.

BACKGROUND: We investigated a correlation between electromechanical properties of the myocardium and response to CD34+ cell therapy in patients with chronic heart failure. METHODS AND RESULTS: We enrolled 40 patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) and 40 with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). All patients were in New York Heart Association functional class III and had a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <40%. CD34+ cells were mobilized by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and collected via apheresis. Electroanatomic mapping was performed to define areas of myocardial scar and hibernation, and CD34+ cells were injected transendocardially in the hibernating areas. Patient were followed for 6 months; responders were defined as patients with LVEF increase of >5%. At baseline, the groups did not differ in sex, LVEF, creatinine, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide or electroanatomic parameters (scar area: 53 ± 18% in ICM vs 55 ± 23% in DCM [P = .83]; hibernating area: 23 ± 13% vs 22 ± 12% [P = .56]). At 6 months we found similar rates of responders in both groups (60% in ICM vs 65% in DCM [P = .95]). When compared with nonresponders, responders had less myocardial scar (47 ± 17% vs 58 ± 15% [P = .003]). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with chronic heart failure due to ICM and DCM we observed similar electroanatomic properties of the myocardium. In both groups, lower myocardial scar burden was associated with better clinical response to CD34+ cell therapy.

Low serum testosterone is associated with impaired graft function early after heart transplantation.

BACKGROUND: We sought to investigate a correlation between serum testosterone levels and graft function early after heart transplantation. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study, we measured serum testosterone levels 4 weeks after heart transplantation in 49 consecutive male recipients. Echocardiography was carried out to evaluate graft function. Low serum testosterone was defined as <11 nmol/L. RESULTS: Low serum testosterone was present in 21 (43%) recipients (Group A), and 28 (57%) had normal testosterone levels (Group B). The two groups did not differ in age and presence of renal dysfunction, arterial hypertension, diabetes, or hyperlipidemia. Donor age and allograft ischemic time were not different between the two groups. Both groups had comparable tacrolimus through levels, dose of mycophenolate mophetil, and methylprednisolone. Patients in Group A had significantly lower LVEF (58±5% vs 65±6% vs Group B, P=.001) and TAPSE (1.3±0.3 cm vs 1.6±0.3 cm in Group B, P=.01). In comparison with Group B, more patients in Group A were found to have low grade (1R) rejection (25% vs 3%; P=.02). CONCLUSION: Low serum testosterone levels appear to be associated with impaired graft function and an increased incidence of low-grade rejection episodes early after heart transplantation.

LVAD as a Bridge to Heart Transplantation in a Patient with Left Ventricular Noncompaction Cardiomyopathy and Advanced Heart Failure.

Left ventricular noncompaction cardiomyopathy (LVNC) is a rare hereditary cardiomyopathy characterized by the formation of an outer compacted and inner noncompacted layer of the myocardium. The latter is characterized by prominent trabeculations and deep intertrabecular recesses and is functionally inferior to the compacted myocardium. As there is no specific treatment for patients with LVNC who develop heart failure, the management of these patients is limited and many patients progress to advanced stages of the disease. For LVNC patients with advanced heart failure, the data regarding the use of mechanical circulatory support are scarce. We report a case of a 29-year-old patient with LVNC and advanced refractory heart failure, who was successfully bridged to heart transplantation using a long-term continuous-flow left ventricular assist device.

Intracoronary transplantation of CD34(+) cells is associated with improved myocardial perfusion in patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: We investigated the effects of intracoronary transplantation of CD34(+) cells on myocardial perfusion in patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). METHODS AND RESULTS: We enrolled 21 patients with DCM (left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] <40%, New York Heart Association functional class III) who underwent peripheral stem cell mobilization with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF). CD34(+) cells were collected by means of apheresis. Patients underwent myocardial perfusion imaging, and CD34(+) cells were injected in the coronary artery supplying viable segments with reduced myocardial perfusion and regional dysfunction. Myocardial perfusion imaging was repeated 6 months later. Clinical response to stem cell therapy was predefined as a change in LVEF >5%. The majority of patients were men (81%) with an overall mean age 53 ± 9 years, LVEF 25 ± 5%, and 6-minute walking distance 354 ± 71 m. Myocardial perfusion defects at rest were observed in 86% of patients and were more common in the left anterior descending territory (50%). At 6 months' follow-up, there was a significant improvement in rest myocardial perfusion scores (6.3 ± 5.8 vs 3.1 ± 4.3; P < .001), LVEF (25 ± 7% vs 29 ± 8%; P = .005), and 6-minute walking distance (354 ± 71 m vs 404 ± 91 m; P < .001). Responders to stem cell therapy had lower summed rest perfusion score at both baseline (3.2 ± 3.0 vs 9.1 ± 6.3; P = .015) and follow-up (1.0 ± 1.5 vs 5.0 ± 5.1; P = .028). CONCLUSIONS: CD34(+) cell transplantation may lead to improved myocardial perfusion in patients with nonischemic DCM. Patients with less severe myocardial perfusion defects at baseline may have an increased likelihood to respond to intracoronary CD34(+) cell transplantation.

Immunologic Network and Response to Intramyocardial CD34+ Stem Cell Therapy in Patients With Dilated Cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: Although stem cell therapy (SCT) is emerging as a potential treatment for patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), clinical response remains variable. Our objective was to determine whether baseline differences in circulating immunologic and nonimmunologic biomarkers may help to identify patients more likely to respond to intramyocardial injection of CD34(+)-based SCT. METHODS AND RESULTS: We enrolled from January 3, 2011 to March 5, 2012 37 patients with longstanding DCM (left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] <40%, New York Heart Association functional class III) who underwent peripheral CD34(+) stem cell mobilization with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and collection by means of apheresis. CD34(+) cells were labeled with (99m)Tc-hexamethylpropyleneamine oxime to allow assessment of stem cell retention at 18 hours. Response to SCT was predefined as an increase in LVEF of ≥5% at 3 months. The majority (84%) of patients were male with an overall mean LVEF of 27 ± 7% and a median N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) level of 2,774 pg/mL. Nineteen patients (51%) were responders to SCT. There was no significant difference between responders and nonresponders regarding to age, sex, baseline LVEF, NT-proBNP levels, or 6-minute walking distance. With the use of a partial least squares (PLS) predictive model, we identified 9 baseline factors that were associated with both stem cell response and stem cell retention (mechanistic validation). Among the baseline factors positively associated with both clinical response and stem cell retention were G-CSF, SDF-1, LIF, MCP-1, and MCP-3. Among baseline factors negatively associated with both clinical response and retention were IL-12p70, FASL, ICAM-1, and GGT. A decrease in G-CSF at 3-month follow-up was also observed in responders compared with nonresponders (P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: If further validated, baseline immunologic and nonimmunologic biomarkers may help to identify patients with DCM who are more likely to respond to CD34(+)-based SCT.

Stem cell therapy for chronic heart failure.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The aim of this review was to discuss recent advances in clinical aspects of stem cell therapy in heart failure with emphasis on patient selection, stem cell types and delivery methods. RECENT FINDINGS: Several stem cell types have been considered for the treatment of patients with heart failure. In nonischemic heart failure, transplantation of CD34 cells improved myocardial performance, functional capacity and neurohumoral activation. In ischemic heart failure, cardiosphere-derived cells were shown to reduce myocardial scar burden with concomitant increase in viable tissue and regional systolic wall thickening. Both autologous and allogeneic mesenchymal stem cells were shown to be effective in improving heart function in patients with ischemic heart failure; this may represent an important step toward the development of a standardized stem cell product for widespread clinical use. SUMMARY: Although trials of stem cell therapy in heart failure have shown promising results, the findings are not consistent. Given the wide spectrum of heart failure, it may be difficult to define a uniform stem cell therapy for all subsets of patients; instead, future stem cell therapeutic strategies should aim for a more personalized approach by establishing optimal stem cell type, dose and delivery method for an individual patient and disease state.

Effects of intracoronary CD34+ stem cell transplantation in nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy patients: 5-year follow-up.

RATIONALE: CD34+ transplantation in dilated cardiomyopathy was associated with short-term improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction and exercise tolerance. OBJECTIVE: We investigated long-term effects of intracoronary CD34+ cell transplantation in dilated cardiomyopathy and the relationship between intramyocardial cell homing and clinical response. METHODS AND RESULTS: Of 110 dilated cardiomyopathy patients, 55 were randomized to receive CD34+ stem cell transplantation (SC group) and 55 received no cell therapy (controls). In the SC group, CD34+ cells were mobilized by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and collected via apheresis. Patients underwent myocardial scintigraphy and cells were injected in the artery supplying segments with the greatest perfusion defect. At baseline, 2 groups did not differ in age, sex, left ventricular ejection fraction, or N-terminal B-type natriuretic peptide levels. At 5 years, stem cell therapy was associated with increased left ventricular ejection fraction (from 24.3 ± 6.5% to 30.0 ± 5.1%; P=0.02), increased 6-minute walk distance (from 344 ± 90 m to 477 ± 130 m; P<0.001), and decreased N-terminal B-type natriuretic peptide (from 2322 ± 1234 pg/mL to 1011 ± 893 pg/mL; P<0.01). Left ventricular ejection fraction improvement was more significant in patients with higher myocardial homing of injected cells. During follow-up, 27 (25%) patients died and 9 (8%) underwent heart transplantation. Of the 27 deaths, 13 were attributed to pump failure and 14 were attributed to sudden cardiac death. Total mortality was lower in the SC group (14%) than in controls (35%; P=0.01). The same was true of pump failure (5% vs. 18%; P=0.03), but not of sudden cardiac death (9% vs. 16%; P=0.39). CONCLUSIONS: Intracoronary stem cell transplantation may be associated with improved ventricular function, exercise tolerance, and long-term survival in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. Higher intramyocardial homing is associated with better stem cell therapy response.

Increased red cell distribution width is associated with poor stem cell mobilization in patients with advanced chronic heart failure.

Parameters associated with poor CD34(+) stem cell mobilization in advanced chronic heart failure (CHF) patients were investigated. Forty-four CHF patients underwent bone marrow stimulation with granulocyte colony stimulating factor. Poor cell mobilization presents in 32% of patients. Poor and good mobilizers did not differ significantly regarding age, gender, left ventricular ejection fraction, kidney or liver function and exercise capacity. Significant differences were found regarding NT-proBNP levels and red cell distribution width (RDW). Increased RDW was the only independent predictor of poor CD34(+) stem cell mobilization on multivariable analysis and may serve as a biomarker of poor stem cell mobilization in CHF patients.

Comparison of transendocardial and intracoronary CD34+ cell transplantation in patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: In an open-label blinded study, we compared intracoronary and transendocardial CD34(+) cell transplantation in patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy. METHODS AND RESULTS: Of the 40 patients with dilated cardiomyopathy, 20 were randomized to receive intracoronary injection and 20 received transendocardial CD34(+) cell delivery. In both groups, CD34(+) cells were mobilized by filgrastim, collected via apheresis, and labeled with technetium-99m radioisotope for single-photon emission computed tomographic imaging. In the intracoronary group, cells were injected intracoronarily in the artery supplying segments of greater perfusion defect on myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. In the transendocardial group, electroanatomic mapping was used to identify viable but dysfunctional myocardium, and transendocardial cell injections were performed. Nuclear single-photon emission computed tomographic imaging for quantification of myocardial retention was performed 18 hours thereafter. At baseline, groups did not differ in age, sex, left ventricular ejection fraction, or N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide levels. The number of CD34(+) cells was also comparable (105 ± 31 × 10(6) in the transendocardial group versus 103 ± 27 × 10(6) in the intracoronary group, P=0.62). At 18 hours after procedure, myocardial retention was higher in the transendocardial group (19.2 ± 4.8%) than in the intracoronary group (4.4 ± 1.2%, P<0.01). At 6 months, left ventricular ejection fraction improved more in the transendocardial group (+8.1 ± 4.3%) than in the intracoronary group (+4.2 ± 2.3%, P=0.03). The same pattern was observed for the 6-minute walk test distance (+125 ± 33 m in the transendocardial group versus +86 ± 13 m in the intracoronary group, P=0.03) and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (-628 ± 211 versus -315 ± 133 pg/mL, P=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with dilated cardiomyopathy, transendocardial CD34(+) cell transplantation is associated with higher myocardial retention rates and greater improvement in ventricular function, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide, and exercise capacity compared with intracoronary route. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01350310.

The presence of electromechanical mismatch in nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy is associated with ventricular repolarization instability.

BACKGROUND: We analyzed electromechanical mismatch (EMM) and its relationship to ventricular repolarization in patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). METHODS AND RESULTS: In 39 DCM patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <40% and New York Heart Association functional class ≥III, electroanatomic mapping was used to quantify areas of EMM. High-resolution electrocardiograph was used to measure heart rate variability (HRV) and QT variability index (QTVI). EMM was present in 22 patients (56%, group 1), whereas 17 patients presented no mismatched segments (44%, group 2). The groups did not differ in age (56 ± 10 years in group 1 vs 57 ± 7 years in group 2; P = .82), sex (male: 82% vs 94%; P = .40), LVEF (27 ± 8% vs 25 ± 6%; P = .18), or N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (2,350 pg/mL vs 2,831 pg/mL; P = .32). Although heart rate and HRV were similar in both groups (rate: 80 ± 20 beats/min in group 1 vs 74 ± 19 beats/min in group 2 [P = .47]; standard deviation of normal-to normal RR intervals: 106 ± 79 vs 88 ± 115 [P = .61]), we found significantly higher QTVI values in patients from group 1 (-1.15 ± 0.46 vs -1.62 ± 0.51 in group 2; P = .005). In patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, ventricular arrhythmias recorded ≤1 year before enrollment were more frequent in group 1 than in group 2 (58% vs 13%; P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: EMM is present in a majority of patients with DCM and is associated with ventricular repolarization instability.

The effects of levosimendan on renal function early after heart transplantation: results from a pilot randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the effects of a levosimendan (LS)-based strategy compared with standard inotropic therapy on renal function in heart transplantation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using a randomized study design, 94 patients were assigned to LS-based therapy or standard inotropic support. At the time of transplantation, the groups did not differ in age, gender, heart failure etiology, hemodynamic profile, LVEF, or comorbidities. While there were no differences in serum creatinine (sCr) or eGFR between groups at baseline, patients in the LS group had a greater increase in their relative eGFR (62% vs. 12%, p = 0.002) and a lower incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) (28% vs. 6%, p = 0.01) during the first post-transplant week. On logistic regression analysis, correlates of AKI were randomization to LS therapy (OR = 0.21 [0.09-0.62], p = 0.01), baseline renal dysfunction (OR = 3.9 [1.1-13.6], p = 0.032), and diabetes mellitus (OR = 4.2 [1.1-16.5], p = 0.038). However, LS was associated with a greater need for additional norepinephrine therapy (40 [85%] vs. 15 [31%], p < 0.001) and a trend toward longer intensive care unit stay (9.5 ± 9.0 d vs. 7.0 ± 6.0 d, p = 0.13). CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing heart transplantation, levosimendan-based strategy may be associated with better renal function when compared to standard therapy.

Mesenchymal stromal cells to treat patients with non-ischaemic heart failure: Results from SCIENCE II pilot study.

AIMS: Allogeneic stem cell therapy is more logistically suitable compared with autologous cell therapy for large-scale patient treatment. We aim to investigate the clinical safety and efficacy profile of the allogeneic adipose tissue derived mesenchymal stromal cell product (CSCC_ASC) as an add-on therapy in patients with chronic non-ischaemic heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF) < 40%. METHODS AND RESULTS: This is a single-centre investigator-initiated randomized phase I/II study with direct intra-myocardial injections of 100 million allogeneic CSCC_ASC. A total of 30 HFrEF patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class ≥II despite optimal anticongestive heart failure medication and plasma NT-proBNP > 300 pg/mL (>35 pmol/L) were included and randomized 2:1 to CSCC_ASC or standard care. The primary endpoint left ventricular end systolic volume (LVESV) and other echo related parameters were analysed by an investigator blinded for treatment allocation. No difference in serious adverse events was observed between groups. LVESV decreased significantly from baseline to 6 months follow-up in the ASC group (153.7 ± 53.2 mL and 128.7 ± 45.6 mL, P < 0.001) and remained unchanged in the standard care group (180.4 ± 39.4 mL and 186.7 ± 48.9 mL, P = 0.652). There was a significant difference between the groups in LVESV change (31.3 ± 11.0 mL, P = 0.009). The difference from baseline to follow-up between the two groups in left ventricular end diastolic volume (LVEDV) was 18.7 ± 12.4 mL, P = 0.146 and in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) -7.8 ± 2.1%, P = 0.001. Considering the baseline values of LVESV, LVEDV and LVEF as covariates, the difference between groups for change from baseline to follow-up resulted in a P-value of 0.056, 0.076, and 0.738, respectively. NYHA class and self-reported health did also improve significantly in the ASC group compared with the standard care group (0.7 ± 0.2, P = 0.001 and -12.8 ± 5.3, P = 0.025; respectively). There was no difference in NT-proBNP (-371 ± 455 pmol/L, P = 0.422) or in 6 min walk test (12 ± 31 m, P = 0.695) between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Intramyocardial injections of allogeneic CSCC_ASC in patients with chronic non-ischaemic HFrEF was safe and improved LVESV, LVEF, NYHA class, and self-reported health compared with standard care group.

Use of a totally artificial heart for a complex postinfarction ventricular septal defect.

The incidence of cardiac rupture complicating myocardial infarction has declined since the introduction of thrombolytic therapy. Despite the advances in the management of myocardial infarction, cardiac rupture remains an important cause of death among infarction-related fatalities. We discuss a patient who presented to our hospital with myocardial infarction and who subsequently developed a complex ventricular septal rupture, for which surgical repair was not feasible. Implantation of a CardioWest Total Artificial Heart (SynCardia Systems) allowed for immediate hemodynamic stabilization and served as a bridge to transplantation.

Effect of allogeneic adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stromal cell treatment in chronic ischaemic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction - the SCIENCE trial.

AIMS: The aim of the SCIENCE trial was to investigate whether a single treatment with direct intramyocardial injections of adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (CSCC_ASCs) was safe and improved cardiac function in patients with chronic ischaemic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). METHODS AND RESULTS: The study was a European multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II trial using allogeneic CSCC_ASCs from healthy donors or placebo (2:1 randomization). Main inclusion criteria were New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II-III, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <45%, and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels >300 pg/ml. CSCC_ASCs or placebo (isotonic saline) were injected directly into viable myocardium. The primary endpoint was change in left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) at 6-month follow-up measured by echocardiography. A total of 133 symptomatic HFrEF patients were included. The treatment was safe without any drug-related severe adverse events or difference in cardiac-related adverse events during a 3-year follow-up period. There were no significant differences between groups during follow-up in LVESV (0.3 ± 5.0 ml, p = 0.945), nor in secondary endpoints of left ventricular end-diastolic volume (-2.0 ± 6.0 ml, p = 0.736) and LVEF (-1.6 ± 1.0%, p = 0.119). The NYHA class improved slightly within the first year in both groups without any difference between groups. There were no changes in 6-min walk test, NT-proBNP, C-reactive protein or quality of life the first year in any groups. CONCLUSION: The SCIENCE trial demonstrated safety of intramyocardial allogeneic CSCC_ASC therapy in patients with chronic HFrEF. However, it was not possible to improve the pre-defined endpoints and induce restoration of cardiac function or clinical symptoms.

Cell Therapy in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction.

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is the most common cause of hospitalisation for heart failure. However, only limited effective treatments are available. Recent evidence suggests that HFpEF may result from a systemic proinflammatory state, microvascular endothelial inflammation and microvascular rarefaction. Formation of new microvasculature in ischaemic tissues is dependent on CD34+ cells, which incorporate into the newly developing vasculature and produce pro-angiogenic cytokines. In HFpEF patients, worsening of diastolic function appears to correlate with decreased numbers of CD34+ cells. Therefore, it is plausible that increasing the myocardial numbers of CD34+ cells could theoretically lead to improved microvascular function and improved diastolic parameters in HFpEF. In accordance with this hypothesis, recent pilot clinical data suggest that CD34+ cell therapy may indeed be associated with improved diastolic function and better functional capacity in HFpEF patients and could thus represent a promising novel therapeutic modality for this patient population.