RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Cost-effectiveness of surveillance for branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (BD-IPMNs) is debated. We combined different categories of risks of IPMN progression and of IPMN-unrelated mortality to improve surveillance strategies. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of 926 presumed BD-IPMNs lacking worrisome features (WFs)/high-risk stigmata (HRS) under surveillance. Charlson Comorbidity Index (CACI) defined the severity of comorbidities. IPMN relevant changes included development of WF/HRS, pancreatectomy or death for IPMN or pancreatic cancer. Pancreatic malignancy-unrelated death was recorded. Cumulative incidence of IPMN relevant changes were estimated using the competing risk approach. RESULTS: 5-year cumulative incidence of relevant changes was 17.83% and 1.6% developed pancreatic malignancy. 5-year cumulative incidences for IPMN relevant changes were 13.73%, 19.93% and 25.04% in low-risk, intermediate-risk and high-risk groups, respectively. Age ≥75 (HR: 4.15) and CACI >3 (HR: 3.61) were independent predictors of pancreatic malignancy-unrelated death. 5-year cumulative incidence for death for other causes was 15.93% for age ≥75+CACI >3 group and 1.49% for age <75+CACI ≤3. 5-year cumulative incidence of IPMN relevant changes were 13.94% in patients with age <75+CACI ≤3 compared with 29.60% in those with age ≥75+CACI >3. In this group 5-year rate of malignancy-free patients was 95.56% with a 5-year survival of 79.51%. CONCLUSION: Although it is not uncommon the occurrence of changes considered by current guidelines as relevant during surveillance of low risk BD-IPMNs, malignancy rate is low and survival is significantly affected by competing patients' age and comorbidities. IPMN surveillance strategy should be tailored based on these features and modulated over time.
Assuntos
Comorbidade , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Humanos , Idoso , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Feminino , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patologia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/mortalidade , Medição de Risco/métodos , Fatores Etários , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Intraductais Pancreáticas/patologia , Neoplasias Intraductais Pancreáticas/epidemiologia , Incidência , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/epidemiologia , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/patologia , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/mortalidade , Progressão da Doença , Fatores de Risco , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , PancreatectomiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Currently, most patients with branch duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (BD-IPMN) are offered indefinite surveillance, resulting in health care costs with questionable benefits regarding cancer prevention. This study sought to identify patients in whom the risk of cancer is equivalent to an age-matched population, thereby justifying discontinuation of surveillance. METHODS: International multicenter study involving presumed BD-IPMN without worrisome features (WFs) or high-risk stigmata (HRS) at diagnosis who underwent surveillance. Clusters of individuals at risk for cancer development were defined according to cyst size and stability for at least 5 years, and age-matched controls were used for comparison using standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) for pancreatic cancer. RESULTS: Of 3844 patients with presumed BD-IPMN, 775 (20.2%) developed WFs and 68 (1.8%) HRS after a median surveillance of 53 (interquartile range 53) months. Some 164 patients (4.3%) underwent surgery. Of the overall cohort, 1617 patients (42%) remained stable without developing WFs or HRS for at least 5 years. In patients 75 years or older, the SIR was 1.12 (95% CI, 0.23-3.39), and in patients 65 years or older with stable lesions smaller than 15 mm in diameter after 5 years, the SIR was 0.95 (95% CI, 0.11-3.42). The all-cause mortality for patients who did not develop WFs or HRS for at least 5 years was 4.9% (n = 79), and the disease-specific mortality was 0.3% (n = 5). CONCLUSIONS: The risk of developing pancreatic malignancy in presumed BD-IPMN without WFs or HRS after 5 years of surveillance is comparable to that of the general population depending on cyst size and patient age. Surveillance discontinuation could be justified after 5 years of stability in patients older than 75 years with cysts <30 mm, and in patients 65 years or older who have cysts ≤15 mm.
Assuntos
Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático , Cistos , Neoplasias Intraductais Pancreáticas , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Humanos , Neoplasias Intraductais Pancreáticas/patologia , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patologia , Pâncreas/patologia , Cistos/patologia , Ductos Pancreáticos/patologia , Neoplasias PancreáticasRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Surgical and adjuvant management of mucinous cystic neoplasms (MCNs) lacks formal guidelines and data is limited to institutional studies. Factors associated with receipt of adjuvant therapy and any associated impact on survival remain to be clarified. In the absence of other data, guidelines that recommend adjuvant chemotherapy for invasive pancreatic adenocarcinoma have been extrapolated to MCN. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The National Cancer Database (2004-2019) was utilized to identify all patients that underwent pancreatic resection for invasive MCNs. Patients that received neoadjuvant therapy or did not undergo lymphadenectomy were excluded. Patient, tumor, and treatment factors associated with survival were assessed. RESULTS: For 161 patients with invasive MCN, median overall survival (OS) was 133 months and 45% of patients received adjuvant therapy. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that poorly differentiated tumors [odds ratio (OR) 4.19, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.47-11.98; p = 0.008] and positive lymph node status (OR 2.67, 95% CI 1.02-6.98; p = 0.042) were independent predictors of receiving adjuvant therapy. Lymph node positivity [hazard ratio (HR) 2.90, 95% CI 1.47-5.73; p = 0.002], positive margins (HR 5.28, 95% CI 2.28-12.27; p < 0.001), and stage III disease (HR 12.46, 95% CI 1.40-111.05; p = 0.024) were associated with worse OS. Receipt of adjuvant systemic therapy was independently associated with decreased risk of mortality in node positive patients (HR 0.23, 95% CI 0.10-0.69; p = 0.002). Survival was not associated with adjuvant therapy in patients with negative lymph nodes or margin negative status. CONCLUSION: In contrast to pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), where adjuvant therapy improves OS for every tumor stage, surgery alone for invasive MCN is not associated with improved OS compared with surgery plus adjuvant therapy in node-negative patients. Surgery alone is likely sufficient for a subset of invasive MCN.
Assuntos
Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático , Pancreatectomia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patologia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirurgia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/terapia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamento farmacológico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/cirurgia , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/patologia , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/mortalidade , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/terapia , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso , Taxa de Sobrevida , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Seguimentos , Prognóstico , Invasividade Neoplásica , Estudos Retrospectivos , Cistadenocarcinoma Mucinoso/patologia , Cistadenocarcinoma Mucinoso/cirurgia , Cistadenocarcinoma Mucinoso/mortalidadeRESUMO
Modern series report a prevalence of pancreatic cysts in the general population of up to 50% in prospective studies. Of these, about half will be pancreatic cystic neoplasms (PCNs) that have varying degrees of malignant potential. Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) of the pancreas are the most common PCNs and are known predecessors of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Critically, they are one of the only radiographically identifiable precursors of pancreatic cancer and thus provide an opportunity for early cancer detection and surgical resection with curative intent. The combination of high prevalence and potential for malignant degeneration underscore the relevance of discussing the best management of IPMNs and improving the existing standard of care. Landmark data on IPMN prevalence, guidelines, surveillance, biomarkers, and immune landscape are highlighted.
Assuntos
Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Pâncreas , Neoplasias Intraductais Pancreáticas , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Humanos , Adenocarcinoma/patologia , Adenocarcinoma Mucinoso/diagnóstico , Adenocarcinoma Mucinoso/epidemiologia , Adenocarcinoma Mucinoso/cirurgia , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/diagnóstico , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/epidemiologia , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/cirurgia , Neoplasias Císticas, Mucinosas e Serosas/patologia , Pâncreas/patologia , Hormônios Pancreáticos , Neoplasias Intraductais Pancreáticas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Intraductais Pancreáticas/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Intraductais Pancreáticas/patologia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patologia , Prevalência , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/métodos , Neoplasias PancreáticasRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Mucinous Cystic Neoplasms (MCN) of the pancreas are premalignant cysts for which current guidelines support pancreatic resection. The primary aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to define the pooled rate of malignancy for MCN. METHODS: A systematic review of eligible studies published between 2000 and 2021 was performed on PubMed and Embase. Primary outcome was rate of malignancy. Data regarding high-risk features, including cyst size and mural nodules, were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 40 studies and 3292 patients with resected MCN were included in the final analysis. The pooled rate of malignancy was 16.1% (95%CI 13.1-19.0). The rate of malignant MCN in studies published before 2012 was significantly higher than that of studies published after recent guidelines were published (21.0% vs 14.9%, p < 0.001). Malignant MCN were larger than benign (mean difference 25.9 mm 95%CI 14.50-37.43, p < 0.001) with a direct correlation between size and presence of malignant MCN (R2 = 0.28, p = 0.020). A SROC identified a threshold of 65 mm to be associated with the diagnosis of malignant MCN. Presence of mural nodules was associated with the diagnosis of a malignant MCN (OR = 4.34, 95%CI 3.00-6.29, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Whereas guidelines recommend resection of all MCN, the rate of malignancy in resected MCN is 16%, implying that surveillance has a role in most cases, and that surgical selection criteria are warranted. Size and presence of mural nodules are significantly associated with an increased risk of malignant degeneration, small MCN and without mural nodules can be considered for surveillance.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Císticas, Mucinosas e Serosas , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Lesões Pré-Cancerosas , Humanos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patologia , Pâncreas/patologia , Neoplasias Císticas, Mucinosas e Serosas/cirurgia , Neoplasias Císticas, Mucinosas e Serosas/patologia , Lesões Pré-Cancerosas/patologia , Fatores de Risco , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Our aim is to provide a real-life picture of serous cystic neoplasms (SCNs) management once a presumptive diagnosis is made. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: SCNs of the pancreas are invariably benign entities. While consensus about their management is lacking, surgical resection still plays a role. METHODS: Presumed SCNs evaluated from 1990 to 2018 were included. Indications for surgery, predictors of resection, rate, and predictors of misdiagnosis in the surgical cohort and time trends of management strategies were the main outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 672 presumed SCNs were included. Presence of symptoms (37%) and large size (34.1%) were the most frequent indications for surgery. Symptoms (60.4% vs 19.0%, P < 0.001), size (45 vs 30 mm, P < 0.001), solid components (19.7% vs 6.2%, P < 0.001), thick walls (14.4 vs 5.6%, P = 0.001) and main pancreatic duct dilation (13.4% vs 5.6%, P = 0.004) were associated with upfront resection (n = 134, 19.9%). Upfront resection decreased over time and 15.4% of patients eventually crossed over to surgery. Increase in size (6.9 vs 1.3 mm/yr), development of symptoms (25.3% vs 3.4%, P < 0.001), solid component (6.0% vs 1.4%, P = 0.010) or jaundice (3.6% vs 0.7%, P = 0.028) were associated with crossing over to surgery. Major morbidity and mortality occurred in 17.1% and 1.7% of patients, respectively. Misdiagnosis occurred mostly in case of macrocystic/unilocular lesions of the body-tail. CONCLUSIONS: In the real-life scenario, SCNs still represent an indication for surgery particularly once large and symptomatic. During surveillance, resection occurs mostly in younger individuals for body/tail lesions. Evidence-based consensus on appropriate indications for surgery is urgently needed.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Humanos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirurgia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patologia , Pâncreas/patologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: No data exist on the actual application of pancreatic cystic neoplasm (PCN) guidelines in clinical practice. AIM: Disseminate knowledge on existing PCN guidelines and determine which guidelines are prospectively chosen by iCyst app users for different case scenarios. METHODS: iCyst is a digital tool providing access to the three main existing guidelines (European, IAP, and AGA). Through a case simulation system, for one year, the app prospectively registered users' guideline choices. RESULTS: During the study period, 276 users downloaded iCyst and entered 1020 completed simulations. Most users were European (88%) and were either surgeons (69%) or gastroenterologists (29%). Six different representative scenarios were identified. Overall, the European guidelines were the most commonly preferred (52%). In 16% of cases, the users did not choose any of the available guidelines. CONCLUSION: Digital apps can be used to disseminate guidelines in clinical practice. Guideline dissemination might serve as the basis for future research lines on specific clinical scenarios that iCyst identifies as critical.
Assuntos
Aplicativos Móveis , Pâncreas , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , HumanosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Nutritional derangements are common hallmarks of pancreatic cancer (PC). Their early detection and management are usually overlooked in routine practice. This study aimed to explore preoperative nutritional status and its prognostic value in patients undergoing surgery for PC. METHODS: Data from 73 patients who underwent surgery for PC from November 2015 to January 2018 at the General and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, The Pancreas Institute, University Hospital of Verona Hospital, Verona, Italy, were retrospectively evaluated. The Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS)-2002 was used to evaluate the preoperative nutritional risk. Body composition was assessed using bioimpedance vectorial analysis (BIVA) on the day prior to surgery. The effect of clinical, pathological, and nutritional characteristics on overall survival (OS) was investigated using a Cox and logistic regression model. Kaplan-Meier curves were compared using the log-rank test. RESULTS: Most patients (80.8%) were at preoperative risk of malnutrition (NRS-2002 ≥ 3) despite a mean BMI of 24.1 kg/m2(± 4.3). Twenty-four patients (32.9%) received neoadjuvant therapy prior to surgery. Preoperative NRS-2002 was significantly higher in this subset of patients (p = 0.026), with a significant difference by chemotherapy regimens (in favor of FOLFIRINOX, p = 0.035). In a multivariate analysis, the only independent prognostic factor for OS was the NRS-2002 score (HR 5.24, p = 0.013). Particularly, the likelihood of 2-year survival was higher in NRS < 3 (p = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis confirms that preoperative malnutrition has a detrimental impact on OS in PC patients undergoing radical surgery for PC. Careful preoperative nutritional evaluation of PC patients should be mandatory, especially in those who are candidates for neoadjuvant therapy.
Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Adenocarcinoma/cirurgia , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Humanos , Itália , Estado Nutricional , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirurgia , Prognóstico , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The objective of the present analysis is 2-fold: first, to define the evolution of time trends on the surgical approach to pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (Pan-NENs); second, to perform a complete analysis of the predictors of oncologic outcome. BACKGROUND: Reflecting their rarity and heterogeneity, Pan-NENs represent a clinical dilemma. In particular, there is a scarcity of data regarding their long-term follow-up after surgical resection. METHODS: From the Institutional Pan-NEN database, 587 resected cases from 1990 to 2015 were extracted. The time span was arbitrarily divided into 3 discrete clusters enabling a balanced comparison between patient groups. Analyses for predictors of recurrence and survival were performed, together with conditional survival analyses. RESULTS: Among the 587 resected Pan-NENs, 75% were nonfunctioning tumors, and 5% were syndrome-associated tumors. The mean age was 54 years (±14 years), and 51% of the patients were female. The median tumor size was 20âmm (range 4 to 140), 62% were G1, 32% were G2, and 4% were G3 tumors. Time trends analysis revealed that the number of resected Pan-NENs constantly increased, while the size (from 25 to 20âmm) and G1 proportion (from 65% to 49%) decreased during the study period. After a mean follow-up of 75 months, recurrence analysis revealed that nonfunctioning tumors, tumor grade, N1 status, and vascular invasion were all independent predictors of recurrence. Regardless of size, G1 nonfunctioning tumors with no nodal involvement and vascular invasion had a negligible risk of recurrence at 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: Pan-NENs have been increasingly diagnosed and resected during the last 3 decades, revealing reliable predictors of outcome. Functioning and nodal status, tumor grade, and vascular invasion accurately predict survival and recurrence with resulting implications for patient follow-up.
Assuntos
Tumores Neuroendócrinos/cirurgia , Pancreatectomia/métodos , Pancreatectomia/tendências , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirurgia , Feminino , Hospitais com Alto Volume de Atendimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The management of small and incidental branch duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (BD-IPMNs) still is of concern. The aim is assessing the safety of a surveillance protocol through the evaluation of their progression to malignancy. METHODS: All presumed BD-IPMNs observed from 2000 to 2016 were included. Only patients presenting without worrisome features (WFs) and high-risk stigmata (HRS) at diagnosis were included. Development of WF, HRS, pancreatic cancer (PC), and survival were analyzed. BD-IPMNs were defined as trivial in the continuing absence of WF/HRS after 5 years of surveillance. The age-specific standardized incidence ratio of PC in the general population was used for comparison. RESULTS: A total of 1,036 BD-IPMNs without WF/HRS at diagnosis were included, 4.2% developed WF or HRS, and 1.1% developed PC after a median of 62 months. The median cyst growth rate was 0 mm/yr. A growth rate ≥2.5 mm/yr and the development of WF resulted independent predictors of PC. The standardized incidence ratio of PC for trivial BD-IPMN (n = 378) was 22.45 (95% confidence interval 8.19-48.86), but considering only patients aged >65 years (n = 198), it decreased to 3.84 (95% confidence interval 0.77-11.20). DISCUSSION: Surveillance of the vast majority of presumed BD-IPMNs is safe, as the risk of PC is comparable to postoperative mortality of pancreatic surgery. A growth rate ≥2.5 mm/yr is the main predictor of PC, reinforcing the role of repeated observations. A trivial BD-IPMN in patients aged >65 years might not increase the risk of developing PC compared with general population, identifying potential targets for follow-up discontinuation.
Assuntos
Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Císticas, Mucinosas e Serosas/diagnóstico por imagem , Cisto Pancreático/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Intraductais Pancreáticas/diagnóstico por imagem , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/mortalidade , Conduta Expectante/métodos , Assistência ao Convalescente/normas , Idoso , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/diagnóstico por imagem , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/prevenção & controle , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/cirurgia , Progressão da Doença , Endossonografia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Císticas, Mucinosas e Serosas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Císticas, Mucinosas e Serosas/patologia , Pancreatectomia/efeitos adversos , Ductos Pancreáticos/diagnóstico por imagem , Ductos Pancreáticos/patologia , Neoplasias Intraductais Pancreáticas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Intraductais Pancreáticas/patologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco/métodosAssuntos
Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Humanos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patologia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirurgia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/terapia , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Prognóstico , Invasividade Neoplásica , Taxa de Sobrevida , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The prevalence of symptoms in pancreatic cystic neoplasms (PCNs) is mainly based on retrospective surgical series. The aim of this study is to describe the actual prevalence of symptoms in PCNs under surveillance. METHODS: Patients with PCNs under surveillance observed from 2015 to 2017 were submitted to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and a specific interview. An identical survey was carried out on a control population matched for age, sex, and comorbidities in which any pancreatic disease was excluded by MRI. RESULTS: Two groups of 184 individuals were compared. Patients with PCNs have a similar prevalence of abdominal pain when compared to controls (35.2 vs. 28.8, p = 0.2). PCNs in the distal pancreas experienced a significantly increased prevalence of abdominal pain (42.3 vs. 28.8%, p = 0.04), whereas size and presumed connection with the ductal system did not affect the prevalence of abdominal pain. PCNs associated with abdominal pain did not differ in terms of clinical and radiological features from asymptomatic ones. CONCLUSION: Patients with PCNs under surveillance have a similar prevalence of abdominal pain when compared to a matched population of controls. Abdominal pain might not correlate with radiological signs of malignancy.
Assuntos
Dor Abdominal/epidemiologia , Dor Abdominal/etiologia , Neoplasias Intraductais Pancreáticas/complicações , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/complicações , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pâncreas/patologia , Neoplasias Intraductais Pancreáticas/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico por imagem , Prevalência , Pontuação de Propensão , Estudos Prospectivos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto JovemAssuntos
Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Humanos , Inteligência Artificial , Pâncreas/patologia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patologia , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/diagnóstico por imagem , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/patologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Screening/surveillance programs for pancreatic cancer (PC) in familial high-risk individuals (FPC-HRI) have been widely reported, but their merits remain unclear. The data reported so far are heterogeneous-especially in terms of screening yield. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of currently available data coming from screening/surveillance programs to evaluate the proportion of screening goal achievement (SGA), overall surgery and unnecessary surgery. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed and the Cochrane Library database from January 2000 to December 2016to identify studies reporting results of screening/surveillance programs including cohorts of FPC-HRI. The main outcome measures were weighted proportion of SGA, overall surgery, and unnecessary surgery among the FPC-HRI cohort, using a random effects model. SGA was defined as any diagnosis of resectable PC, PanIN3, or high-grade dysplasia intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (HGD-IPMN). Unnecessary surgery was defined as any other final pathology. RESULTS: In a meta-analysis of 16 studies reporting on 1551 FPC-HRI cases, 30 subjects (1.82%), received a diagnosis of PC, PanIN3 or HGD-IPMNs. The pooled proportion of SGA was 1.4%(95% CI 0.8-2, pâ¯<â¯0.001, I2â¯=â¯0%). The pooled proportion of overall surgery was 6%(95% CI 4.1-7.9, pâ¯<â¯0.001, I2â¯=â¯60.91%). The pooled proportion of unnecessary surgery was 68.1%(95% CI 59.5-76.7, pâ¯<â¯0.001, I2â¯=â¯4.05%); 105 subjects (6.3%) received surgery, and the overall number of diagnoses from non-malignant specimens was 156 (1.5 lesion/subject). CONCLUSIONS: The weighted proportion of SGA of screening/surveillance programs published thus far is excellent. However, the probability of receiving surgery during the screening/surveillance program is non-negligible, and unnecessary surgery is a potential negative outcome.
Assuntos
Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/genética , Humanos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirurgia , Risco , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Cystic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (CPanNETs) represent an uncommon variant of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs). Due to their rarity, there is a lack of knowledge with regard to clinical features and postoperative outcome. METHODS: The prospectively maintained surgical database of a high-volume institution was queried, and 46 resected CPanNETs were detected from 1988 to 2015. Clinical, demographic, and pathological features and survival outcomes of CPanNETs were described and matched with a population of 92 solid PanNETs (SPanNETs) for comparison. RESULTS: CPanNETs accounted for 7.8% of the overall number of resected PanNETs (46/587). CPanNETs were mostly sporadic (n = 42, 91%) and nonfunctioning (39%). Two functioning CPanNETs were detected (4.3%), and they were 2 gastrinomas. The median tumor diameter was 30 mm (range 10-120). All tumors were well differentiated, with 38 (82.6%) G1 and 8 (17.4%) G2 tumors. Overall, no CPanNET showed a Ki-67 >5%. A correct preoperative diagnosis of a CPanNET was made in half of the cases. After a median follow-up of >70 months, the 5- and 10-year overall survival of resected CPanNETs was 93.8 and 62.5%, respectively, compared to 92.7 and 84.6% for SPanNETs (p > 0.05). The 5- and 10-year disease-free survival rates were 94.5 and 88.2% for CPanNETs and 81.8 and 78.9% for SPanNETs, respectively (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: In the setting of a surgical cohort, CPanNETs are rare, nonfunctional, and well-differentiated neoplasms. After surgical resection, they share the excellent outcome of their well-differentiated solid counterparts for both survival and recurrence.
Assuntos
Tumores Neuroendócrinos/diagnóstico , Tumores Neuroendócrinos/cirurgia , Cisto Pancreático/diagnóstico , Cisto Pancreático/cirurgia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Erros de Diagnóstico , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Tumores Neuroendócrinos/mortalidade , Tumores Neuroendócrinos/patologia , Cisto Pancreático/mortalidade , Cisto Pancreático/patologia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patologia , Carga Tumoral , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Biliary fistula (BF) occurs in 3-8% of patients following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). It usually pursues a benign course, but rarely may represent a life-threatening event. STUDY DESIGN: Data from 1618 PDs were collected prospectively. BF was defined as the presence of bile stained fluid from drains by post-operative day 3 and confirmed by sinogram in the majority of cases. Three classifications were validated. RESULTS: BF occurred in 58 (3.6%) patients. In 22 cases was associated with pancreatic fistula (POPF). POPF, PPH, operative time and a smaller common bile duct (CBD) were significantly associated with BF. Only CBD diameter (HR 0.55, CI 95% 0.44-0.7, p < 0.01) was an independent predictor of BF. Patients with smaller CBDs developing concomitant BF and POPF carried the highest mortality rate (34.8%, n = 8/22). All the existing classifications resulted in discrete categories of BFs when considering hospital stay and total cost as dependent variables. CONCLUSIONS: Biliary fistula is rare, but it can be life threatening when associated with POPF. As the sole independent risk factor is the CBD diameter, surgical technique is crucial. Regardless of the existing classification systems, further studies must assess the additive burden of BF when a concomitant POPF is present.
Assuntos
Fístula Biliar/epidemiologia , Pancreaticoduodenectomia/efeitos adversos , Idoso , Fístula Biliar/diagnóstico , Fístula Biliar/mortalidade , Bases de Dados Factuais , Drenagem , Feminino , Hospitais com Alto Volume de Atendimentos , Humanos , Incidência , Itália/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pancreaticoduodenectomia/mortalidade , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Pancreatic Cystic Neoplasms (PCN) represent a diverse group of tumors, some of which may progress to pancreatic cancer. Considering their high prevalence in the general population, the development of reliable biomarkers is crucial. The ideal biomarker will accurately diagnose the subtype of PCN and assess the risk of high-grade dysplasia or invasive cancer. Cyst fluid analysis has emerged as a promising approach to accomplish this goal, yet no single marker has yet gained unanimous support for routine inclusion in PCN evaluation.
Assuntos
Líquido Cístico , Cisto Pancreático , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Humanos , Cisto Pancreático/diagnóstico , Líquido Cístico/química , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico , Biomarcadores Tumorais/análise , Biomarcadores Tumorais/metabolismoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Despite significant advancements in the treatment of patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs), only a minority will experience long-term survival. This study aimed to determine the effect of chemotherapy (CT) and immunotherapy (IT) compared with that of CT alone on patient survival after surgical resection. METHODS: Patients undergoing curative-intent liver resection followed by adjuvant systemic therapy for stage IV colon cancer were identified using the National Cancer Database. Patients were stratified into type of therapy (CT alone vs CT + IT) and microsatellite status. Propensity score-weighted analysis was performed through 1:1 matching based on the nearest neighbor method. RESULTS: Of 9943 patients who underwent resection of CRLMs, 7971 (80%) received systemic adjuvant therapy. Of 7971 patients, 1432 (18%) received a combination of CT and IT. Microsatellite status was not associated with overall survival (OS). Adjuvant CT + IT was associated with increased 3-year OS compared with that of CT alone in both the unmatched cohort (55% vs 48%, respectively; P < .001) and matched cohort (52% vs 48%, respectively; P = .050). On multivariate analysis, older age, positive resection margins, and KRAS mutation were independent predictors of poor survival, whereas the administration of adjuvant CT + IT was an independent predictor of improved survival. CONCLUSION: IT combined with CT was associated with improved survival compared with that of CT alone after curative-intent resection of CRLMs, regardless of microsatellite instability status. Clinical trials to determine optimal patient selection, IT regimen, and long-term efficacy to improve outcomes of patients with CRLMs are warranted.