Thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomy: thoracic stage in prone position.

OBJECTIVE: to analyze the National Cancer Institute Abdominopelvic Division (INCA / MS/HC I) initial experience with thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomy with thoracic stage in prone position. METHODS: we studied 19 consecutive thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomies from may 2012 to august 2014, including ten patients with squamous cells carcinoma (five of the middle third and five of the lower third) and nine cases of gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (six Siewert I and three Siewert II). All procedures were initiated by the prone thoracic stage. RESULTS: There were minimal blood loss, optimal mediastinal visualization, oncological radicality and no conversions. Surgical morbidity was 42 %, most being minor complications (58% Clavien I or II), with few related to the technique. The most common complication was cervical anastomotic leak (37%), with a low anastomotic stricture rate (two stenosis: 10.53%). We had one (5.3%) surgical related death, due to a gastric tube`s mediastinal leak, treated by open reoperation and neck diversion. The median Intensive Care Unit stay and hospital stay were two and 12 days, respectively. The mean thoracoscopic stage duration was 77 min. Thirteen patients received neoadjuvant treatment (five squamous cells carcinoma and eight gastroesophageal adenocarcinomas). The average lymph node sample had 16.4 lymph nodes per patient and 22.67 when separately analyzing patients without neoadjuvant treatment. CONCLUSION: the thoraco-laparoscopic approach was a safe technique in the surgical treatment of esophageal cancer, with a good lymph node sampling.

ACERTO guidelines of perioperative nutritional interventions in elective general surgery.

OBJECTIVE: to present recommendations based on the ACERTO Project (Acceleration of Total Post-Operative Recovery) and supported by evidence related to perioperative nutritional care in General Surgery elective procedures. METHODS: review of relevant literature from 2006 to 2016, based on a search conducted in the main databases, with the purpose of answering guiding questions previously formulated by specialists, within each theme of this guideline. We preferably used randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews and meta-analyzes but also selected some cohort studies. We contextualized each recommendation-guiding question to determine the quality of the evidence and the strength of this recommendation (GRADE). This material was sent to authors using an open online questionnaire. After receiving the answers, we formalized the consensus for each recommendation of this guideline. RESULTS: the level of evidence and the degree of recommendation for each item is presented in text form, followed by a summary of the evidence found. CONCLUSION: this guideline reflects the recommendations of the group of specialists of the Brazilian College of Surgeons, the Brazilian Society of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition and the ACERTO Project for nutritional interventions in the perioperative period of Elective General Surgery. The prescription of these recommendations can accelerate the postoperative recovery of patients submitted to elective general surgery, with decrease in morbidity, length of stay and rehospitalization, and consequently, of costs.

GIST: avaliações morfológica e imuno-histoquímica do prognóstico / GIST: morphological and immunohistochemical prognostic evaluation

INTRODUÇÃO: os tumores estromais gastrointestinais possuem amplo espectro biológico, variando desde lesões de comportamento benigno até aquelas de caráter maligno, capazes de ampla disseminação e frequentes metástases viscerais. Atualmente, o prognóstico está baseado num escore, denominado grau de risco. Entretanto, este sistema apresenta falhas, com tumores classificados como de riscos intermediário e baixo associados ao desenvolvimento de metástases. Desta forma, são necessários estudos que visem ao aprimoramento desse sistema de classificação, destacando-se nesse campo, nos últimos anos, o índice de proliferação celular que tem mostrado valor prognóstico na predição da agressividade tumoral. OBJETIVOS: analisar critérios morfológicos (tamanho macroscópico, topografia do tumor, índice mitótico, necrose, subtipo histológico), verificar o grau de risco e pesquisar a aplicabilidade dos marcadores imuno-histoquímicos (actina músculo-específico, proteína S-100, Ki67 e p16ink4a) como fatores prognósticos do tumor estromal gastrointestinal (GIST). RESULTADOS: a análise univariada mostrou significância com tumores maiores que 5 cm, número de mitoses maior que 5/50 CGA, presença de necrose, de grau de risco alto e índice de proliferação celular (Ki67) maior que 5 por cento com relação à redução da sobrevida global dos pacientes (p = 0,017; 0,01; 0,001; 0,016; < 0,001 respectivamente). Os outros fatores analisados (subtipo histológico, imunofenótipo e p16ink4a) não mostraram significância. CONCLUSÃO: o grau de risco, o tamanho tumoral, o índice mitótico e a presença de necrose corroboram evidências prévias da sua utilização, como fatores morfológicos prognósticos e o emprego do índice de proliferação celular (Ki67) associado ao grau de risco para melhor esclarecimento do comportamento biológico dos GIST.

INTRODUCTION: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) have a wide biological spectrum, ranging from benign to malignant lesions, which are prone to wide spread and frequent visceral metastasis. Currently, the prognosis is based on a score system known as risk level. However, this system has some drawbacks. For instance, tumors classified as low or intermediate risk may be associated with the development of metastasis. Therefore, studies are required to improve this classification system and incorporate recent developments such as cellular proliferation index, which has shown prognostic value in the prediction of tumor aggressiveness. OBJECTIVES: To analyze morphological criteria (macroscopic size, tumor topography, mitotic index, necrosis, histological subtype), observe risk and investigate the usefulness of immunohistochemical markers (muscle-specific actin, S-100 protein, Ki67 and p16ink4a) as prognostic markers of GIST. RESULTS: Univariate analysis showed that a reduced global survival was significantly associated with tumor size greater than 5cm, mitotic index greater than 5/50 CGA, presence of necrosis, a high risk level, and a cellular proliferation index (Ki67) higher than 5 percent on the reduction of overall survivel of patients (p = 0.017, 0.010, 0.001, 0.016 and 0.0005, respectively). Other factors such as histological subtype, immunophenotype and p16ink4a were not significant. CONCLUSION: According to our data, risk level, tumor size, mitotic index and the presence of necrosis stood as morphological predictors of reduced survival, which underpins previous evidence of their application. The cellular proliferation marker Ki67 associated with risk level also proved to be a useful predictor of tumor aggressiveness.