Safety and feasibility of transradial infrainguinal peripheral arterial disease interventions.

OBJECTIVE: Transradial access (TRA) has traditionally been favored for coronary interventions. Tools with up to 200 cm length now allow operators to treat infrainguinal peripheral arterial disease (PAD) using TRA. This study aims to assess the safety and feasibility of TRA infrainguinal interventions. METHODS: Patients with infrainguinal PAD who underwent intervention via TRA from July 2013 through June 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Exclusion criteria included Barbeau D waveform, a radial artery diameter of greater than 2 mm, radial artery occlusion, Raynaud syndrome, or peripheral vasculitis. Procedural success (adequate inline flow to the foot), TRA alone failure (crossover or use of an additional access site), clinical success (defined as improvement in ankle brachial index, clinical symptoms, or wound healing) and adverse events were recorded from procedure notes and follow-up visits. RESULTS: Thirty-six procedures were attempted using TRA in 32 patients (mean age, 65.8 years; range, 29-86; 22 male, 14 female) with mean height of 65.8 inches (range, 59.0-72.0 inches) and a body mass index of 28.7 (range, 19.1-43.9). Preprocedure Rutherford classification (II/III/IV/V/VI) was 8/15/2/7/4, respectively. The left radial artery was used for 35 of 36 procedures (97.2%). Treated vessels included the common femoral (n = 4), superficial femoral (n = 25), deep femoral (n = 1), popliteal (n = 10), tibioperoneal trunk (n = 2), tibial (n = 4), and plantar (n = 1) arteries. Interventions included angioplasty (n = 32, 100%), atherectomy (n = 8, 25%), and stenting (n = 13, 41%). Procedural success was 100%, the TRA alone failure rate was 11.1%, and clinical success was 89.3%. The median follow-up was 286.5 days (range, 0-919 days). Adverse events included radial artery pseudoaneurysm (n = 1), access site hematoma/bleeding (n = 3), radial artery occlusion (n = 1), groin hematoma (n = 1), popliteal artery dissection treated with stenting (n = 2), and a small superficial femoral artery perforation (n = 1) treated with prolonged balloon tamponade. No patients experienced signs of cerebrovascular events or distal embolism. CONCLUSIONS: TRA is a useful option for treating patients with PAD; however, several limitations still exist.

Transfemoral Filter Eversion Technique following Unsuccessful Retrieval of Option Inferior Vena Cava Filters: A Single Center Experience.

This report describes the technical feasibility of using the filter eversion technique after unsuccessful retrieval attempts of Option and Option ELITE (Argon Medical Devices, Inc, Athens, Texas) inferior vena cava (IVC) filters. This technique entails the use of endoscopic forceps to evert this specific brand of IVC filter into a sheath inserted into the common femoral vein, in the opposite direction in which the filter is designed to be removed. Filter eversion was attempted in 25 cases with a median dwell time of 134 days (range, 44-2,124 d). Retrieval success was 100% (25/25 cases), with an overall complication rate of 8%. This technique warrants further study.

Transradial Approach for Noncoronary Interventions: A Single-Center Review of Safety and Feasibility in the First 1,500 Cases.

PURPOSE: To review safety and feasibility in a single center using transradial access (TRA) for noncoronary interventions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis was performed of 946 patients evaluated for 1,531 consecutive TRA procedures from April 2012 to July 2015. Exclusion criteria included sheath > 6 F, Barbeau D waveform, radial artery (RA) diameter < 2 mm on ultrasound, history of severe aortic tortuosity or RA occlusion, and dialysis. TRA was attempted in 936 patients (62% men; median age, 62.4 y) who underwent 1,512 consecutive procedures (chemoembolization [n = 485], yttrium-90 mapping [n = 391] and infusion [n = 293], renal/visceral intervention [n = 172], uterine artery embolization [n = 116], peripheral intervention [n = 43], endoleak repair [n = 10], and other [n = 2]). Patients were evaluated for complications during follow-up at ~30 days. RESULTS: Technical success was 98.2% (1,485/1,512). Major complications (0.13%) included pseudoaneurysm (n = 1) and seizure (n = 1). Minor complications (2.38%) included hematoma/bleeding (n = 13), RA occlusion (n = 11), arm pain (n = 6), and RA spasm (n = 6). Univariate analysis demonstrated a lower rate of adverse events in African American patients (hazard ratio [HR], 0.25; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.07-0.86; P = .027). Twenty-seven cases (1.8%) required crossover to transfemoral access (TFA). Crossover rates were higher in female patients (P = .0055), height < 1.7 m (P = .024), renal/visceral interventions (P = .0003), and endoleak interventions (P = .0357). Multivariate analysis demonstrated intervention type to be the only significant predictor of TFA crossover (renal/visceral [HR, 4.48; 95% CI, 1.84-10.9; P = .001]; endoleak repair [HR, 9.54; 95% CI, 1.09-83.8; P = .042]). CONCLUSIONS: TRA was safe and well tolerated in a heterogeneous patient population across a range of peripheral vascular interventions.

Radial Access for Lower Extremity Peripheral Arterial Interventions: Do We Have the Tools?

The benefits of transradial arterial access (TRA) versus transfemoral arterial access (TFA) have been extensively described in the literature; however, TFA remains the predominant access site choice in the management of peripheral arterial disease (PAD). There are still significant unmet needs for operators wishing to provide the same effective interventions for lower extremity PAD via TRA as with TFA. This article provides an up-to-date review of the literature and devices currently available for operators wishing to treat lower extremity PAD via TRA and the limitations they may face.

Outcomes of radioembolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with marginal functional hepatic reserve.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the outcomes of radioembolization (RE) as a therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with marginal functional hepatic reserve. METHODS: A retrospective review of 471 patients (1/2010-7/2015) treated with RE (Therasphere, BTG, UK) was performed. A total of 36 patients (mean age: 66.1±9.3, male: 86.1%) underwent therapy for HCC with a MELD≥15 (median: 16, range: 15-22). Baseline demographics of the study cohort were as follows: etiology (HCV: 26, 72.2%), cirrhosis (n=32, 88.9%), ECOG 0 (n=16, 44.4%), Child-Pugh class (A=15, B=19, C=2), unilobar distribution (n=27, 75%), AFP>200 (n=11, 30.6%), portal vein thrombosis (PVT, n=7, 19.4%), metastasis (n=3, 8.3%). Outcomes analyzed included CTCAEv4.03 laboratory toxicities (120-day), imaging response (mRECIST), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: A total of 42 treatments were performed with mean dose of 2.02±1.23GBq. The cumulative grade 3/4 toxicity was 28% overall and 21% for bilirubin at 120-days. The objective response and disease control rates were 48.3% (14/29) and 69% (20/29) respectively. The median (95% CI) PFS was 5.9 (4.4-7.7) months. Ten (27.8%) patients received additional locoregional therapy at a median (IQR) of 138 (102-243) days post RE. The mean (95% CI) OS was 21.9 (14.8-29.0) months. The absence of PVT was associated with improved OS (p=0.005) Disease control at 90-days was also associated with an OS benefit (p=0.037). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with unresectable HCC and marginal functional hepatic reserve treated with RE had favorable objective response and disease control rates, both predictive of overall survival.