Preoperative use of epoietin beta in total hip replacement: a prospective study.

OBJECTIVE: Epoietin (EPO) effectively decreases perioperative blood transfusion requirements. We evaluated the feasibility of using EPO beta to increase haemoglobin levels before total hip replacement (THR) and reduce transfusion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and seventy-one patients undergoing primary THR were included in this prospective observational study. Patients with initial haemoglobin level <130 g l−1 received EPO beta subcutaneously in a four-dose regimen. Haemoglobin levels were measured at baseline, before surgery, and at postoperative days 1 and 5. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients received EPO beta preoperatively, 143 were not treated including 42 with initial haemoglobin level <130 g l−1. Haemoglobin increased by 29 ± 9 g l−1 in the low Hb + EPO group versus 2 ± 1 g l−1 for the other patients. In the low Hb + EPO group 3.6% were transfused, in the low HB group 45.2% (P = 0.001) and in the normal Hb group 11.9% (P = 0.2). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative EPO beta increases haemoglobin level and reduces transfusion frequency in anaemic patients before total joint replacement. It could play a major role in the management of perioperative blood loss in orthopaedic surgery.

The optimal motor response for infraclavicular brachial plexus block.

BACKGROUND: In this prospective study we compared the success of the infraclavicular brachial plexus block using double-stimulation in regard to the second nerve response elicited with neurostimulation. METHODS: Six-hundred-twenty-eight patients undergoing emergency upper limb surgery using infraclavicular brachial plexus block were included in this study. The musculocutaneous nerve was initially blocked and the groups were then evaluated according to the second nerve located, which was radial in 54%, median in 35%, and ulnar in 11% of patients. Blocks were performed using lidocaine 1.5% with 1/400,000 epinephrine 40 mL in all cases. The block was assessed every 5 min for 30 min after completion of the block. RESULTS: The success rate was 96% for the radial response group, 89% for the median response group, and 90% for the ulnar response group (P < 0.05). Time to perform the block and the onset time were not significantly different among groups. No serious complications were observed. CONCLUSION: We conclude that having initially located and blocked the musculocutaneous nerve, subsequent injection on a radial response resulted in a slightly more reliable success rate than injection with an ulnar or median response.

Infraclavicular brachial plexus block versus humeral block in trauma patients: a comparison of patient comfort.

In this prospective randomized study, we compared humeral block (HB) and infraclavicular brachial plexus block (ICB) with pain caused by the block as a primary outcome, assuming that ICB would cause less pain than HB. Patients undergoing emergency upper limb surgery were included in this study and received either ICB (group I, n = 52 patients) or HB (group H, n = 52 patients). Patients were asked to quantify the severity of the pain during the procedure using a visual analog scale from 0 to 100 mm and to identify which of the 4 components of the procedure was most unpleasant (skin transfixion, needle redirection in search of the nerves, local anesthetic injections, or electrical stimulation). The block was assessed every 5 min for 30 min after completion of the block. Overall visual analog scale scores for the block were 35 +/- 27 mm in group H versus 19 +/- 18 mm in group I (P < 0.0011). Electrical stimulation was the most unpleasant part of the block (group H, 29 +/- 15 mm versus group I, 15 +/- 10 mm) (P < 0.019). Time to perform the block was significantly shorter in group I (ICB, 6 +/- 4 min versus HB, 10 +/- 4 min; P < 0.0001). The onset time was 13 +/- 7 min for ICB and 9 +/- 3 min for HB (P < 0.05). No serious complications were observed. In summary, ICB is less painful, compared with HB, with a similar success rate.

A modified coracoid approach to infraclavicular brachial plexus blocks using a double-stimulation technique in 300 patients.

Infraclavicular brachial plexus block is used less than other techniques of regional anesthesia for upper-limb surgery. We describe a modified coracoid approach to the infraclavicular brachial plexus using a double-stimulation technique and assess its efficacy. Patients undergoing orthopedic surgery of the upper limb were included in this prospective study. The landmarks used were the coracoid process and the clavicle. The needle was inserted in the direction of the top of the axillary fossa (in relation to the axillary artery), with an angle of 45 degrees. Using nerve stimulation, the musculocutaneous nerve was identified first and blocked with 10 mL of 1.5% lidocaine with 1:400,000 epinephrine. The needle was then withdrawn and redirected posteriorly and medially. The radial, ulnar, or median nerve was then blocked. The block was tested every 5 min for 30 min. The overall success rate, i.e., adequate sensory block in the 4 major nerve distributions at 30 min, was 92%, and 6% of the patients required supplementation. Five patients required general anesthesia. No major complications were observed. This modified infraclavicular brachial plexus block using a double-stimulation technique was easy to perform, had frequent success, and was safe in this cohort.