RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Women with aesthetic prostheses must be included in the target population of mammography screening programmes. Breast implants are radiopaque and partially obscure the breast tissue. This can be avoided with the use of the Eklund technique, which causes an increased radiation exposure. In this study, augmented women undergoing a dedicated protocol within a population-based screening programme were compared according to selected indicators with the standard screening population. Essential dosimetric parameters and their time trend were also assessed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was conducted in a screening centre in Milan in the years 2009-2016. The screening protocol for women with breast implants included a double-read mammography with the Eklund views, ultrasound and clinical breast examination. RESULTS: A total of 28,794 women were enrolled, including 588 (2%) women with breast implants and 28,206 (98%) undergoing the standard screening protocol. The invasive assessment rate was 9.0 for women with breast implants vs. 15 in the standard cohort. The surgical referral rate was 2.2% vs. 0.9%. The detection rate was similar in the two groups (4.0 and 4.5, respectively). There were significant differences in the average glandular dose according to the mammography equipment. The use of the Eklund views increased over time. CONCLUSIONS: Screening of augmented women according to a specific protocol in the contexts of population-based programmes is feasible. Observed differences in screening indicators relative to the standard screening population require further research. The increasing use of Eklund views probably results from quality assurance measures associated with screening programmes.
Assuntos
Implantes de Mama , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Vigilância da População/métodos , Idoso , Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias da Mama/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Itália/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: communicating breast cancer screening (BCS) limits and overdiagnosis implies providing complete and balanced information to allow informed decision-making. OBJECTIVES: to describe women's perceptions, preconceptions, and information preferences regarding the breast cancer screening (BCS) programme paper and web information materials of the Agency for Health Protection of the Metropolitan Area of Milan (Lombardy Region, Northern Italy). DESIGN: qualitative, descriptive study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: participants' voluntary recruitment took place in the registration departments of three hospitals. Participants were purposively recruited based on sociodemographic characteristics of the target population of the programme (44 women aged 40-74 years, living in the Metropolitan Area of Milan). In each material type subgroup, different health literacy levels and age classes were included, until thematic saturation was reached. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: thematic analysis of qualitative data collected during think-aloud interviews. RESULTS: the thematic analysis identified 5 main themes: 1. validation of the information reported in the materials, according to the interviewees' personal experiences;2. information preferences of particular subgroups of women, which led to a tailored approach for the web materials;3. negative emotions elicited while receiving information regarding BCS limits, which guided the rewriting of certain definitions; 4. disproportioned risk perception, with greater weight attributed to the risk of false negative results than the risk of overdiagnosis; 5. organizational preferences regarding the type and frequency of the provided tests and the age limits of the programme. CONCLUSIONS: in the present sample of women living in the Metropolitan Area of Milan, knowledge and comprehension of overdiagnosis are scarce. The main reasons for distrust in the BCS programme rely on the preexisting beliefs regarding the most appropriate tests and age limits. These beliefs were established from previously received information, inconsistent with that officially provided by the programme.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias da Mama/epidemiologia , Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Feminino , Humanos , Itália/epidemiologia , Mamografia , PercepçãoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Nowadays adolescents and children are more and more exposed to sexually explicit internet material (SEIM), but most parents and healthcare professionals neglect this issue. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the impact of online pornography on minors' health with a specific focus on the effects produced on their behavioural, psychophysical and social development. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A literature search was performed on PubMed and ScienceDirect in March 2018 with the query "(pornography OR sexually explicit internet material) AND (adolescent OR child OR young) AND (impact OR behaviour OR health)." Results published between 2013 and 2018 were analysed and compared with previous evidence. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: According to selected studies (N.=19), an association between consumption of online pornography and several behavioral, psychophysical and social outcomes - earlier sexual debut, engaging with multiple and/or occasional partners, emulating risky sexual behaviors, assimilating distorted gender roles, dysfunctional body perception, aggressiveness, anxious or depressive symptoms, compulsive pornography use - is confirmed. CONCLUSIONS: The impact of online pornography on minors' health appears to be relevant. The issue can no longer be neglected and must be targeted by global and multidisciplinary interventions. Empowering parents, teachers and healthcare professionals by means of educational programs targeting this issue will allow them to assist minors in developing critical thinking skills about pornography, decreasing its use and obtaining an affective and sex education that is more suitable for their developmental needs.
Assuntos
Menores de Idade , Comportamento Sexual , Adolescente , Criança , Literatura Erótica/psicologia , Humanos , Internet , Educação Sexual , Comportamento Sexual/psicologiaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: In recent years, the quick spread of Internet has brought many children and teenagers to be increasingly connected online without adult control. The use of Internet offers many opportunities, but at the same time it exposes young users to multiple risks. Among these, the consumption of sexually explicit internet material (SEIM) is one of the most relevant. The aim of the present study is to describe the epidemiology of this phenomenon regarding its prevalence and distribution among sexes and different age groups. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A literature search was performed on PubMed and ScienceDirect using the query "(pornography OR sexually explicit internet material) AND (adolescent OR child OR young)." Only papers published between 2013 and 2018 were included in the analysis. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: According to selected studies (N.=21), the prevalence of boys approaching SEIM ranges from 56% to 100%, whereas the percentage widely varies between 7.6% and 82% for girls. The first exposure to SEIM happens in a purely accidental way in over half of cases and at a mean age of 12 years for males and 14.5 years for females. The risk of exposure is doubled for smartphone and tablet owners. CONCLUSIONS: The spread of pornography and SEIM among minors seems to be epidemic and even pandemic. We need to consider its possible effects on the psychophysical welfare of the very young, influencing their growth and development. Therefore, the impact that pornography may have on the physical, psychological, and sexual health of younger people warrants further investigation.
Assuntos
Literatura Erótica , Comportamento Sexual , Adolescente , Masculino , Adulto , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Literatura Erótica/psicologia , Comportamento Sexual/psicologia , Coleta de DadosRESUMO
Background and aim Falls and fall-related injuries are a major public health issue which needs global attention due to its clinical and socioeconomic impact. Important risk factors for falls are polypharmacy and the assumption of so-called Fall Risk Increasing Drugs (FRIDs). Aims of our study were to investigate the associations between falls and the use of medications among inpatients by conducting a retrospective case-control study in a rehabilitation hospital in Northern Italy in 2018. Methods A Conditional Logistic Regression was performed to analyze the impact that 13 types of FRIDs individually and the number of administrated FRIDs had on the risk of falling. A second regression model was obtained adjusting the case-control matching for CIRS, Morse and Barthel scores. Results We identified 148 cases and 444 controls. 3 types of FRIDs were significantly correlated (p < 0,05) with an increased risk of falling: Antipsychotics, Antidepressants, Diuretics. Antidepressants were the only type of FRID significantly correlated (p=0,008) even in the model adjusted for CIRS, Morse and Barthel scores. The unadjusted model showed that the addition of one type of FRID to therapy was significantly associated with the fall event (p<0.05). Conclusion Assumption of drugs, in particular antidepressant and polypharmacy, can play a role in hospital falling. The fall risk assessment tools available, suffer from low specificity and sensitivity and do not assess these risk factors. A holistic approach with a multidimensional evaluation of the patient through screening tools, functional assessment tools and a full medical evaluation should be pursued to improve prediction.
Assuntos
Acidentes por Quedas , Preparações Farmacêuticas , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Hospitais , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Controlling inappropriateness of care is an essential issue, especially in rehabilitation medicine. In fact, admitting a patient to a rehabilitation hospital or unit is a complex decision also due to the absence of shared and objective admission criteria. AIM: The aim was to define clinical admission criteria and rules in rehabilitation medicine. DESIGN: Survey based on the application of the Delphi method on a sample of rehabilitation medicine experts. SETTING: Administration of electronic online questionnaires concerning appropriateness of admission to intensive rehabilitation. POPULATION: Volunteer sample of 53 experts with the following inclusion criteria: being members of the Italian Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, having practical experience in the research field, agreeing to the confidentiality of the information and being skilled in both rehabilitation and healthcare organization. METHODS: A three-round Delphi survey was conducted according to international guidelines. The two initial rounds consisted of an electronic online questionnaire while in the third one a report of the results was provided to the participants. The experts had to score their agreement with each item in the questionnaires, based on either a Likert scale or a dichotomous statement. Consensus between the experts was assessed. RESULTS: A total of 53 health professionals completed the Delphi survey. 19 out of 20 Italian regions were represented. The first round consisted of 8 multiple-choice questions. The second round was designed according to the suggestions provided by the panelists in the previous one and consisted of a twelve items questionnaire. At the end of the survey, seven criteria of appropriateness of admission to rehabilitation were identified and five rules defining an appropriate admission to a rehabilitation facility were elaborated. CONCLUSIONS: This study represents an attempt to create a worthwhile and reliable tool for a more conscious clinical practice in admission to rehabilitation, based on a set of shared criteria and rules. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: To increase appropriateness of admission to rehabilitation. Improving appropriateness in healthcare delivery must be a primary goal in order to improve healthcare quality, save money and ensure system sustainability.