Clinicopathologic characteristics and outcomes of endometrial Cancer patients with mismatch repair deficiency in the era of universal Lynch syndrome screening.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate clinicopathologic characteristics and survival impact associated with mismatch repair (MMR) deficient subgroups of endometrial cancer (EC) in patients undergoing universal screening for Lynch Syndrome. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study using a prospectively maintained gynecologic oncology registry of patients who underwent surgery for EC was conducted. All pathology specimens underwent tumor testing using immunohistochemistry for MMR deficiency with reflex MLH1 promotor methylation testing. Tumors were classified as MMR-I (intact MMR expression), MMR-DM (MMR deficient due to MLH1 methylation), and MMR-DU (MMR deficient without MLH1 methylation). Univariate and multivariate analysis performed to determine factors associated with MMR-DM. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) analyzed by stage and endometrioid subgroup. RESULTS: From 2012 to 2016, 1018 EC patients were identified and screened. Overall, 71.6% were classified as MMR-I, 23.8% MMR-DM, and 4.6% MMR-DU. In comparison to MMR-DU, MMR-DM tumors were associated with older age, postmenopausal status, lymphovascular space invasion, and pure endometrioid histology. Compared to MMR-I, MMR-DM tumors were associated with older age, endometrioid histology, lymphovascular space invasion, and higher grade on multivariable analysis. There was no difference in PFS and OS between the three groups overall. In patients with endometrioid EC, MMR-DM tumors were associated with lower PFS vs. MMR-I (HR:2.51, CI:1.54, 4.10, P < 0.001). This effect persisted for stage I/II endometrioid EC (HR 2.66, CI:1.34, 5.26 p = 0.005). No difference in PFS or OS was noted among stage III/IV endometrioid tumors. CONCLUSION: MMR deficiency is associated with adverse prognostic factors and worse PFS among endometrioid tumors, particularly in early stage EC. MMR testing outside of LS screening has prognostic value, warranting consideration for inclusion as a biomarker in prospective clinical trials.

Endometrial cancer in young women: prognostic factors and treatment outcomes in women aged ≤40 years.

OBJECTIVE: Endometrial cancer in pre-menopausal patients aged ≤40 years is rare and poses both diagnostic and management challenges. The goal of this study was to investigate the clinical and pathologic factors associated with endometrial cancer in this group and their impact on survival. METHODS: Patients with endometrial cancer treated between January 2004 and August 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who underwent either primary surgical treatment or fertility-sparing therapy were included. Exclusion criteria were age >60 years and patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy or primary radiation. Age at diagnosis was used to classify patients into two groups: ≤40 and 41-60 years. Clinical and pathologic variables were compared between the groups. Progression-free survival and overall survival were estimated using Cox proportional hazards. RESULTS: A total of 551 patients were evaluated, of which 103 (18.7%) patients were ≤40 years and 448 (81.3%) were 41-60 years. Age ≤40 years was associated with higher body mass index (38.8 vs 35.8 kg/m2, p=0.008), non-invasive cancers (54.2% vs 32.6%, p<0.001), lower uterine segment involvement (27.2% vs 22.5%, p<0.001), and less lymphovascular space invasion (16.8% vs 29.1%, p=0.015). The rate of synchronous ovarian cancer was 9.2% vs 0.7% in age 41-60 years (p<0.001), and 19% of women with endometrial cancer aged ≤40 years underwent fertility-sparing therapy. Grade, stage, myometrial invasion, lymphovascular space invasion, and lymph node status were associated with survival, and fertility-sparing therapy adversely affected the recurrence rate of the age ≤40 years cohort. Among all patients aged ≤60 years, mismatch repair deficiency due to MLH1 methylation was associated with worse progression-free survival, 48.6% vs 83.3% (HR 1.98, 95% CI 1.06 to 3.17, p=0.032), and overall survival, 56.5% vs 90.0% (HR 2.58, 95% CI 1.13 to 5.90, p=0.025). CONCLUSIONS: Patients aged ≤40 years with endometrial cancer have more favorable prognostic factors and higher rates of synchronous tumors. Fertility-sparing therapy was associated with higher recurrence rates. The prognostic value of MLH1 methylation in this population warrants further investigation.

Characterizing the endometrial fluid cytokine profile in women with endometriosis.

PURPOSE: To compare growth factor and cytokine profiles in the endometrial secretions of patients with and without endometriosis to determine whether a particular protein profile is predictive of the disease. METHODS: Patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecologic surgery for benign indications were recruited for this prospective cohort study. Prior to surgery, endometrial fluid was aspirated and multiplex immunoassay was used to quantify 7 cytokines and growth factors. During surgery, each patient was staged according to the ASRM staging system for endometriosis. Cytokines and growth factors were evaluated using the Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests. Combinations of cytokines were evaluated using logistic regression analysis, and ROC curves were generated to evaluate the predictive capacity of the assay. RESULTS: Endometrial secretions were analyzed from 60 patients. Nineteen had stage 3-4 endometriosis, 19 had stage 1-2 disease, and 22 had no endometriosis. There were no significant differences between controls and stage 1-2 endometriosis; however, levels of IL-1α and IL-6 were significantly increased in women with moderate-to-severe disease. A combination of IL-1α, IL-1ß, and IL-6 in endometrial secretions predicts stage 3-4 endometriosis with an AUC of 0.78. A threshold value of 118 pg/mL yields a sensitivity of 75% and specificity of 70%. CONCLUSION: Aspiration of endometrial fluid is a safe and effective approach for evaluating the endometrial profile of women with endometriosis. Women with moderate-to-severe endometriosis demonstrate a distinct cytokine profile compared to controls. A combination of IL-1α, IL-1ß, and IL-6 in the endometrial secretions is predictive of stage 3-4 endometriosis, but is not predictive of minimal-to-mild disease.