A Comparison of Mental Workload in Individuals with Transtibial and Transfemoral Lower Limb Loss during Dual-Task Walking under Varying Demand.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the influence of lower limb loss (LL) on mental workload by assessing neurocognitive measures in individuals with unilateral transtibial (TT) versus those with transfemoral (TF) LL while dual-task walking under varying cognitive demand. METHODS: Electroencephalography (EEG) was recorded as participants performed a task of varying cognitive demand while being seated or walking (i.e., varying physical demand). RESULTS: The findings revealed both groups of participants (TT LL vs. TF LL) exhibited a similar EEG theta synchrony response as either the cognitive or the physical demand increased. Also, while individuals with TT LL maintained similar performance on the cognitive task during seated and walking conditions, those with TF LL exhibited performance decrements (slower response times) on the cognitive task during the walking in comparison to the seated conditions. Furthermore, those with TF LL neither exhibited regional differences in EEG low-alpha power while walking, nor EEG high-alpha desynchrony as a function of cognitive task difficulty while walking. This lack of alpha modulation coincided with no elevation of theta/alpha ratio power as a function of cognitive task difficulty in the TF LL group. CONCLUSIONS: This work suggests that both groups share some common but also different neurocognitive features during dual-task walking. Although all participants were able to recruit neural mechanisms critical for the maintenance of cognitive-motor performance under elevated cognitive or physical demands, the observed differences indicate that walking with a prosthesis, while concurrently performing a cognitive task, imposes additional cognitive demand in individuals with more proximal levels of amputation.

Biomechanical and neurocognitive performance outcomes of walking with transtibial limb loss while challenged by a concurrent task.

Individuals who have sustained loss of a lower limb may require adaptations in sensorimotor and control systems to effectively utilize a prosthesis, and the interaction of these systems during walking is not clearly understood for this patient population. The aim of this study was to concurrently evaluate temporospatial gait mechanics and cortical dynamics in a population with and without unilateral transtibial limb loss (TT). Utilizing motion capture and electroencephalography, these outcomes were simultaneously collected while participants with and without TT completed a concurrent task of varying difficulty (low- and high-demand) while seated and walking. All participants demonstrated a wider base of support and more stable gait pattern when walking and completing the high-demand concurrent task. The cortical dynamics were similarly modulated by the task demand for both groups, to include a decrease in the novelty-P3 component and increase in the frontal theta/parietal alpha ratio power when completing the high-demand task, although specific differences were also observed. These findings confirm and extend prior efforts indicating that dual-task walking can negatively affect walking mechanics and/or neurocognitive performance. However, there may be limited additional cognitive and/or biomechanical impact of utilizing a prosthesis in a stable, protected environment in TT who have acclimated to ambulating with a prosthesis. These results highlight the need for future work to evaluate interactions between these cognitive-motor control systems for individuals with more proximal levels of lower limb loss, and in more challenging (ecologically valid) environments.

Effects of Traumatic Amputation on ß-Trace Protein and ß2-Microglobulin Concentrations in Male Soldiers.

BACKGROUND: Serum creatinine (SCr) levels are decreased following traumatic amputation, leading to the overestimation of glomerular filtration rate (GFR). ß-Trace protein (BTP) and ß2-microglobulin (B2M) strongly correlate with measured GFR and have not been studied following amputation. We hypothesized that BTP and B2M would be unaffected by traumatic amputation. METHODS: We used the Department of Defense Serum Repository to compare pre- and post-traumatic amputation serum BTP and B2M levels in 33 male soldiers, via the N Latex BTP and B2M nephelometric assays (Siemens Diagnostics, Tarrytown, N.Y., USA). Osterkamp estimation using DEXA scan measurements was used to establish percent estimated body weight loss (%EBWL). Results were analyzed for small (3-5.9% EBWL), medium (6-13.5%), and large (>13.5%) amputation subgroups; and for a control group matched 1:1 to the 12 large amputation subjects. Paired Student's t test was used for comparisons. RESULTS: Mean serum BTP levels were unchanged in controls, all amputees, and the small and medium amputation subgroups. BTP appeared to decrease following large %EBWL amputation (p = 0.05). Mean serum B2M levels were unchanged in controls, all amputees, and the small and medium amputation subgroups. B2M appeared to increase following large %EBWL amputation (p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: BTP and B2M levels are less affected than SCr by amputation, and should be considered for future study of GFR estimation. BTP and B2M changes following large %EBWL amputation require validation and may offer insight into non-GFR BTP and B2M determinants as well as increased cardiovascular disease and mortality following amputation.

Does intact limb loading differ in servicemembers with traumatic lower limb loss?

BACKGROUND: The initiation and progression of knee and hip arthritis have been related to limb loading during ambulation. Although altered gait mechanics with unilateral lower limb loss often result in larger and more prolonged forces through the intact limb, how these forces differ with traumatic limb loss and duration of ambulation have not been well described. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The purpose of this study was to determine whether biomechanical variables of joint and limb loading (external adduction moments, vertical ground reaction force loading rates, and impulses) are larger in the intact limb of servicemembers with versus without unilateral lower limb loss and whether intact limb loading differs between shorter (≤ 6 months) versus longer (≥ 2 years) durations of ambulation with a prosthesis. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of all clinical and research gait evaluations performed in the biomechanics laboratory at Walter Reed Army Medical Center and Walter Reed National Military Medical Center between January 2008 and December 2012. Biomechanical data meeting all inclusion and exclusion criteria were obtained for 32 individuals with unilateral transtibial limb loss, 49 with unilateral transfemoral limb loss, and 28 without limb loss. Individuals with unilateral lower limb loss were separated by their experience ambulating with a prosthesis at the time of the gait collection, ≤ 6 months or ≥ 2 years, to determine the effect of duration of ambulation with a prosthesis. RESULTS: Intact limb mean and peak vertical ground reaction force loading rates (median [range; 95% confidence interval]) were larger for transtibial subjects with ≤ 6 months of experience ambulating with a prosthesis versus control subjects (mean: 12.13 body weight [BW]/s [4.45-16.79; 10.18-12.81] versus 9.03 BW/s [4.64-14.47; 8.26-9.74]; effect size [ES] = 0.40; p = 0.003; and peak: 17.23 BW/s [6.58-25.25; 15.46-19.01] versus 13.60 BW/s [9.82-19.51; 12.98-15.05]; ES = 0.43; p = 0.001), respectively. Intact limb mean and peak vertical ground reaction force loading rates were also larger in subjects with transfemoral limb loss with ≤ 6 months and ≥ 2 years of experience ambulating with a prosthesis versus control subjects (mean: 12.67 BW/s [5.88-18.15; 11.06-14.47] and 12.59 BW/s [8.08-17.39; 11.83-13.68] versus 9.03 BW/s [4.64-14.47; 8.26-9.74]; ES ≥ 0.53; p < 0.001; peak: 19.82 BW/s [11.93-29.43; 18.35-23.05] and 21.33 BW/s [16.68-36.69; 20.66-24.26] versus 13.60 BW/s [9.82-19.51; 12.98-15.05]; ES ≥ 0.68; p < 0.001, respectively). Similarly, intact limb vertical ground reaction force impulses (0.63 BW·s [0.53-0.81; 0.67-0.69] and 0.62 BW·s [0.55-0.74; 0.60-0.63] versus 0.57 BW·s [0.50-0.66; 0.55-0.58]; ES ≥ 0.53, p < 0.001) were also larger among both groups of transfemoral subjects versus control subjects, respectively. Limb loading variables were not statistically different between times ambulating with a prosthesis within groups with transtibial or transfemoral limb loss. CONCLUSIONS: Larger intact limb loading in individuals with traumatic transtibial loss were only noted early in the rehabilitation process, but these variables were present early and late in the rehabilitation process for those with transfemoral limb loss. Such evidence suggests an increased risk for early onset and progression of arthritis in the intact limb, especially in those with transfemoral limb loss. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Interventions should focus on correcting modifiable gait mechanics associated with arthritis, particularly among individuals with transfemoral limb loss, to potentially mitigate the development and progression in this population.

Effects of a Powered Ankle-Foot Prosthesis and Physical Therapy on Function for Individuals With Transfemoral Limb Loss: Rationale, Design, and Protocol for a Multisite Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Powered ankle-foot prosthetic devices can generate net positive mechanical work during gait, which mimics the physiological ankle. However, gait deviations can persist in individuals with transfemoral limb loss because of habit or lack of rehabilitation. Prosthetic research efforts favor the design or evaluation of prosthetic componentry and rarely incorporate any type of rehabilitation, despite evidence suggesting that it is critical for minimizing gait imbalances. Given the accelerated rate of innovation in prosthetics, there is a fundamental knowledge gap concerning how individuals with transfemoral limb loss should learn to correctly use powered ankle-foot devices for maximum functional benefit. Because of the recent advances in prosthetic technology, there is also a critical unmet need to develop guidelines for the prescription of advanced prosthetic devices that incorporate both physical and psychological components to identify appropriate candidates for advanced technology. OBJECTIVE: The primary goal of this investigation is to examine the roles of advanced prosthetic technology and a device-specific rehabilitative intervention on gait biomechanics, functional efficacy, and pain in individuals with transfemoral limb loss. The secondary goal is to develop preliminary rehabilitation guidelines for advanced lower limb prosthetic devices to minimize gait imbalances and maximize function and to establish preliminary guidelines for powered ankle-foot prosthetic prescription. METHODS: This prospective, multisite study will enroll 30 individuals with unilateral transfemoral limb loss. At baseline, participants will undergo a full gait analysis and assessment of function, neurocognition, cognitive load, subjective preferences, and pain using their current passive prosthesis. The participants will then be fitted with a powered ankle-foot device and randomized into 2 equal groups: a powered device with a device-specific rehabilitation intervention (group A) or a powered device with the current standard of practice (group B). Group A will undergo 4 weeks of device-specific rehabilitation. Group B will receive the current standard of practice, which includes basic device education but no further device-specific rehabilitation. Data collection procedures will then be repeated after 4 weeks and 8 weeks of powered ankle use. RESULTS: This study was funded in September 2017. Enrollment began in September 2018. Data collection will conclude by March 2024. The initial dissemination of results is expected in August 2024. CONCLUSIONS: The projected trends indicate that the number of individuals with limb loss will dramatically increase in the United States. The absence of effective, evidence-based interventions may make individuals with transfemoral limb loss more susceptible to increased secondary physical conditions and degenerative changes. With this expected growth, considerable resources will be required for prosthetic and rehabilitation services. Identifying potential mechanisms for correcting gait asymmetries, either through advanced prosthetic technology or rehabilitative interventions, can provide a benchmark for understanding the optimal treatment strategies for individuals with transfemoral limb loss. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03625921; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03625921. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/53412.

Evaluation of Weight Shift and X-Factor During Golf Swing of Veterans With Lower Limb Loss.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the weight shift and X-Factor values of golfers with lower limb loss. DESIGN: Veterans with above or below knee limb loss participated in a 3-day adaptive golf event hosted by the Department of Veterans Affairs. Professional golf instructors educated participants on proper golf swing mechanics, after which kinematic analysis of trunk rotation and kinetic analysis of weight transfer between the legs during the golf swing were evaluated using three-dimensional motion capture and force platforms. RESULTS: Golfers with a trail leg amputation, regardless of level of limb loss, demonstrated superior weight shift, whereas golfers with lead limb amputation showed greater X-Factor values (all P < 0.05). Golfers with below knee limb loss demonstrated better weight shift strategies compared to those with above knee limb loss, regardless of which leg was amputated (i.e., lead or trail limb, all P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Sports rehabilitation programs should focus on increased weight bearing on the prosthetic limb to achieve appropriate weight shift and increased flexibility to increase X-Factor values. Participation in such programs can offer both physical and psychosocial benefits and may be a valid tool to increase the overall quality of life of veterans with lower limb loss.

Women with limb loss: rationale, design and protocol for a national, exploratory needs assessment to evaluate the unique physical and psychosocial needs of women with limb loss.

INTRODUCTION: There is a growing population of women with limb loss, yet limited research is available to provide evidentiary support for clinical decision-making in this demographic. As such, there is a critical gap in knowledge of evidence-based healthcare practices aimed to maximise the physical and psychosocial needs of women with limb loss. The objective of this study is to develop a comprehensive, survey-based needs assessment to determine the unique impact of limb loss on women, including physical and psychosocial needs. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A bank of existing limb loss-specific and non-limb loss-specific surveys were arranged around domains of general health, quality of life, prosthetic use and needs, psychosocial health and behaviours and body image. These surveys were supplemented with written items to ensure coverage of relevant domains. Written items were iteratively refined with a multidisciplinary expert panel. The interpretability of items and relevance to limb loss were then internally tested on a small group of rehabilitation, engineering and research professionals. A diverse sample of 12 individuals with various levels of limb loss piloted the instrument and participated in cognitive interviews. Items from existing surveys were evaluated for relevance and inclusion in the survey, but not solicited for content feedback. Pilot testing resulted in the removal of 13 items from an existing survey due to redundancy. Additionally, 13 written items were deleted, 42 written items were revised and 17 written items were added. The survey-based needs assessment has been crafted to comprehensively assess the wide spectrum of issues facing women with limb loss. The final version of the survey-based needs assessment included 15 subsections. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study was approved by the Veterans Affairs Central Institutional Review Board. The results will be disseminated through national and international conferences, as well as through manuscripts in leading peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: No healthcare intervention on human participants was conducted.

Criteria for Advanced Prosthetic Foot Prescription: Rationale, Design, and Protocol for a Multisite, Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: The prescription of prosthetic ankle-foot devices is often based on the professional judgment of the limb loss care team or limited evidentiary research. Current prosthetic research efforts have focused on the design and development of prosthetic devices rather than on understanding which devices are the most appropriate to prescribe. This investigation will evaluate biomechanical, functional, and subjective outcome measures to help determine the optimal prescription parameters of prosthetic ankle-foot devices. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to develop evidence-based guidelines for limb loss care teams for the appropriate prescription of commercially available prosthetic ankle-foot devices to improve function and satisfaction. METHODS: This investigation will be a multisite, randomized, crossover clinical trial targeting the enrollment of 100 participants. Participants will use 3 different types of prosthetic devices (energy storing and returning, articulating, and powered) in random order. Participants will be fitted and trained with each device and then separately use each device for a 1-week acclimation period. Following each 1-week acclimation period, participants will be evaluated using several functional measures and subjective surveys. A random subset of participants (30/100, 30%) will also undergo full-body gait analysis, following each 1-week acclimation period, to collect biomechanical data during level ground and incline and decline walking. After all individual device evaluations, participants will be given all 3 prostheses concurrently for 4 weeks of home and community use to capture user preference. Activity monitoring and a guided interview will be used to determine overall user preference. RESULTS: The study was funded in August 2017, and data collection began in 2018. Data collection is expected to be completed before July 2023. Initial dissemination of results is expected to occur in the winter of 2023. CONCLUSIONS: By identifying biomechanical, functional, and subjective outcomes that are sensitive to differences in prosthetic ankle-foot devices, a benchmark of evidence can be developed to guide effective prosthetic prescription. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03505983; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03505983. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/45612.

Exploring relationships among multi-disciplinary assessments for knee joint health in service members with traumatic unilateral lower limb loss: a two-year longitudinal investigation.

Motivated by the complex and multifactorial etiologies of osteoarthritis, here we use a comprehensive approach evaluating knee joint health after unilateral lower limb loss. Thirty-eight male Service members with traumatic, unilateral lower limb loss (mean age = 38 yr) participated in a prospective, two-year longitudinal study comprehensively evaluating contralateral knee joint health (i.e., clinical imaging, gait biomechanics, physiological biomarkers, and patient-reported outcomes); seventeen subsequently returned for a two-year follow-up visit. For this subset with baseline and follow-up data, outcomes were compared between timepoints, and associations evaluated between values at baseline with two-year changes in tri-compartmental joint space. Upon follow-up, knee joint health worsened, particularly among seven Service members who presented at baseline with no joint degeneration (KL = 0) but returned with evidence of degeneration (KL ≥ 1). Joint space narrowing was associated with greater patellar tilt (r[12] = 0.71, p = 0.01), external knee adduction moment (r[13] = 0.64, p = 0.02), knee adduction moment impulse (r[13] = 0.61, p = 0.03), and CTX-1 concentration (r[11] = 0.83, p = 0.001), as well as lesser KOOSSport and VR-36General Health (r[16] = - 0.69, p = 0.01 and r[16] = - 0.69, p = 0.01, respectively). This longitudinal, multi-disciplinary investigation highlights the importance of a comprehensive approach to evaluate the fast-progressing onset of knee osteoarthritis, particularly among relatively young Service members with lower limb loss.

A Comprehensive, Multidisciplinary Assessment for Knee Osteoarthritis Following Traumatic Unilateral Lower Limb Loss in Service Members.

INTRODUCTION: Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a primary source of long-term disability and decreased quality of life (QoL) in service members (SM) with lower limb loss (LL); however, it remains difficult to preemptively identify and mitigate the progression of KOA and KOA-related symptoms. The objective of this study was to explore a comprehensive cross-sectional evaluation, at the baseline of a prospective study, for characterizing KOA in SM with traumatic LL. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-eight male SM with traumatic unilateral LL (23 transtibial and 15 transfemoral), 9.5 ± 5.9 years post-injury, were cross-sectionally evaluated at initial enrollment into a prospective, longitudinal study utilizing a comprehensive evaluation to characterize knee joint health, functionality, and QoL in SM with LL. Presences of medial, lateral, and/or patellofemoral articular degeneration within the contralateral knee were identified via magnetic resonance imaging(for medically eligible SM; Kellgren-Lawrence Grade [n = 32]; and Outerbridge classification [OC; n = 22]). Tri-planar trunk and pelvic motions, knee kinetics, along with temporospatial parameters, were quantified via full-body gait evaluation and inverse dynamics. Concentrations of 26 protein biomarkers of osteochondral tissue degradation and inflammatory activity were identified via serum immunoassays. Physical function, knee symptoms, and QoL were collected via several patient reported outcome measures. RESULTS: KOA was identified in 12 of 32 (37.5%; KL ≥ 1) SM with LL; however, 16 of 22 SM presented with patellofemoral degeneration (72.7%; OC ≥ 1). Service members with versus without KOA had a 26% reduction in the narrowest medial tibiofemoral joint space. Biomechanically, SM with versus without KOA walked with a 24% wider stride width and with a negative correlation between peak knee adduction moments and minimal medial tibiofemoral joint space. Physiologically, SM with versus without KOA exhibited elevated concentrations of pro-inflammatory biomarker interleukin-7 (+180%), collagen breakdown markers collagen II cleavage (+44%), and lower concentrations of hyaluronic acid (-73%) and bone resorption biomarker N-telopeptide of Type 1 Collagen (-49%). Lastly, there was a negative correlation between patient-reported contralateral knee pain severity and patient-reported functionality and QoL. CONCLUSIONS: While 37.5% of SM with LL had KOA at the tibiofemoral joint (KL ≥ 1), 72.7% of SM had the presence of patellofemoral degeneration (OC ≥ 1). These findings demonstrate that the patellofemoral joint may be more susceptible to degeneration than the medial tibiofemoral compartment following traumatic LL.

Circumference Method Estimates Percent Body Fat in Male US Service Members with Lower Limb Loss.

BACKGROUND: The Department of Defense circumference method (CM) is used to estimate percent body fat (%BF) in evaluation of health, physical fitness, appearance, and military readiness; however, the CM has not been validated in individuals with lower limb loss. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the agreement between CM and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) for measuring %BF in individuals with lower limb loss. DESIGN: This study is part of a larger cross-sectional comparison study, and this analysis was included as a secondary objective. Two methods of measuring %BF included CM and DXA, with DXA as the reference standard for this study. PARTICIPANTS/SETTING: This study was conducted at Walter Reed Army Medical Center. Data were collected from summer 2010 to summer 2011. One hundred individuals, 50 with and 50 without lower limb loss, were screened for this study; three individuals with limb loss and two without limb loss had incomplete data, and one individual (female, without limb loss) lacked a comparison participant. All participants were recruited from a military medical center, and data were collected in a clinic research laboratory. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Measurements of %BF were compared between methods for each group. STATISTICAL ANALYSES PERFORMED: Measurements of %BF were compared using paired t-tests and intraclass correlation coefficient. Agreement and bias were assessed with Bland-Altman analysis. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to determine the diagnostic accuracy of the CM to identify participants with %BF levels in the obese category (≥25%). RESULTS: A statistically significant difference was found between %BF methods in the group with limb loss (1.7%; P = 0.001) and the group without limb loss (1.4%; P = 0.005), with DXA consistently higher than CM. However, the intraclass correlation coefficient estimates for the agreement between %BF by CM and DXA were 0.848 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.683-0.922; P < 0.001) and 0.828 (CI: 0.679-0.906; P < 0.001), for the groups with and without limb loss, respectively, suggesting that CM has good to near excellent agreement with DXA for estimating %BF in these groups. Receiver operating characteristic analysis indicated that the area under the curve supported predictive ability to detect obesity-based %BF in males with and without limb loss. CONCLUSIONS: Although a statistically significant difference was found between methods for individuals with limb loss, there was also good agreement between the methods, suggesting that CM may be a useful tool for estimating %BF in individuals with lower limb loss. The CM may be a useful and field expedient method for assessing %BF in a clinical setting when DXA is not available.

Demographic and Functional Characteristics of National Veterans Wheelchair Games Participants: A Cross-sectional Study.

INTRODUCTION: Although many studies report the impact of adaptive sports and recreation on quality of life for people with disabilities across several age groups, few have focused on the Veteran population. The purpose of this study was to establish a baseline of common characteristics of the Veteran population that participated in the National Veterans Wheelchair Games (NVWG) in 2017 and 2018, including their perception on how their participation is associated with function and social factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study was implemented as part of a quality assurance collaboration between the University of Pittsburgh and the Veterans Administration National Veterans Sports Programs and Special Events. Demographic and quality-of-life data were collected through the Functional Mobility Assessment (FMA) and associated Uniform Dataset as well as the Sports Participation Outcome Research Tool and Comprehensive Uniform Survey (SPORTACUS). This report provides and discusses the descriptive analyses that were performed on the data and establishes a framework to assess the impact of sports and exercise for Veterans with disabilities. RESULTS: A sample of 426 Veterans, 87% who were male and an average population age of 56 years old, reported high FMA scores on each of 10 items (daily routine, comfort, health, operate, reach, transfer, personal care, indoor mobility, outdoor mobility, and transportation) along with SPORTACUS scores scoring above 5, based on a 1-6 scoring scale (1 being "completely disagree" and 6 being "completely agree"), on each domain indicating sports participation is associated with their ability to function and participate in the community. CONCLUSION: Based on these results, it can be concluded for this military Veteran population that participation in a large, organized adaptive sports programs such as the NVWG has a positive association with daily function, quality of life, community participation, and use of higher quality assistive technology.

Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Rehabilitation of Lower Limb Amputation: An Update from the Department of Veterans Affairs and Department of Defense.

Between 2015 and 2017, the US Department of Veterans Affairs and the US Department of Defense developed a clinical practice guideline for rehabilitation of lower limb amputation to address key clinical questions. A multidisciplinary workgroup of US Department of Veterans Affairs and US Department of Defense amputation care subject matter experts was formed, and an extensive literature search was performed which identified 3685 citations published from January 2007 to July 2016. Articles were excluded based on established review criteria resulting in 74 studies being considered as evidence addressing one or more of the identified key issues. The identified literature was evaluated and graded using the National Academies of Science GRADE criteria. Recommendations were formulated after extensive review. Eighteen recommendations were confirmed with four having strong evidence and workgroup confidence in the recommendation. Key recommendations address patient and caregiver education, consideration for the use of rigid and semirigid dressings, consideration for the use of microprocessor knees, and managed lifetime care that includes annual transdisciplinary assessments. In conclusion, this clinical practice guideline used the best available evidence from the past 10 yrs to provide key management recommendations to enhance the quality and consistency of rehabilitation care for persons with lower limb amputation.

Transfemoral amputee intact limb loading and compensatory gait mechanics during down slope ambulation and the effect of prosthetic knee mechanisms.

BACKGROUND: Intact limb knee osteoarthritis is a prevalent secondary disability in transfemoral amputees. Walking down a ramp may increase this risk due to excessive limb loading. We sought to determine whether intact limb loading differed between transfemoral amputees and controls during down slope ambulation, and the compensatory strategies transfemoral amputees used to modify intact limb loading. Secondarily, we sought to determine the effect of prosthetic knee type. METHODS: Five unilateral transfemoral amputees and five non-amputee controls walked down a ramp and the following outcome measures were compared between amputees and controls and across prosthetic knee type (C-leg versus Power Knee): step length, walking speed, leading limb ground reaction forces, and trailing and leading limb ankle and knee energy absorption. Linear mixed effects regression was used to test for association between gait variables and limb. FINDINGS: There were no significant differences in intact limb loading between amputees and controls or between prosthetic knee types. Transfemoral amputees walked slower (C-leg - control = -0.29 m/s; P = 0.008, Power Knee - control = -0.38 m/s; P < 0.001) with a shorter intact limb step length (C-leg - control = -0.12 m/s; P < 0.001, Power Knee - control = -0.16 m/s; P < 0.001). The prosthetic trailing limb ankle absorbed less energy throughout stance than the trailing limb in controls (C-leg-control = -0.22 J/kg; P < 0.001, Power Knee - control = -0.22 J/kg; P < 0.001). INTERPRETATION: Intact limb loading in transfemoral amputees is equivalent to controls during down ramp ambulation, in spite of reduced prosthetic trailing limb energy absorption. The primary compensatory strategies include a reduced ambulation speed and intact limb step length, which reduces center of mass velocity at heel contact.

Knee adduction moment peak and impulse do not change during the first six months of walking with a prosthesis.

BACKGROUND: Individuals with unilateral lower limb loss are at increased risk for developing knee osteoarthritis in their contralateral limb. The mechanisms underlying this phenomenon are unknown, but large or unusual loads on the limb are thought to contribute to osteoarthritis development. Yet, to our knowledge, there have been no longitudinal assessments of knee joint kinetics to assist with identifying the origin or progression of such loads. RESEARCH QUESTION: This study aimed to examine knee joint kinetics of individuals with lower limb loss as a function of time from independent ambulation. METHODS: Eight male Service Members with unilateral lower limb loss (3 transfemoral/5 transtibial) completed gait analyses, walking at self-selected speed and cadence, at 0, 2, and 6 months following initial independent ambulation. RESULTS: Although there was a significant time effect on stride length (p = 0.047), there were no pairwise differences (all p ≥ 0.152). Additionally, there was not a significant effect of time on the peak (p = 0.666), loading rate (p = 0.336), or impulse (p = 0.992) of knee adduction moment (KAM), peak knee flexion moment (KFM) (p = 0.128), or the peak (p = 0.485) or loading rate (p = 0.130) of vertical ground reaction force (VGRF). SIGNIFICANCE: The results of the current study demonstrate that major features of knee joint loading do not change over the first 6 months of independently walking with a prosthesis. The magnitude of these loads are similar to loads observed in individuals with lower limb loss further from injury/initial ambulation, but the present results do not imply that no changes occur after 6 months.

Measurement of attentional reserve and mental effort for cognitive workload assessment under various task demands during dual-task walking.

Previous work focused on cognitive workload assessment suggests EEG spectral content and component amplitudes of the event-related potential (ERP) waveform may index mental effort and attentional reserve, respectively. Although few studies have assessed attentional reserve and mental effort during upper-extremity performance, none have employed a combined approach to measure cognitive workload during locomotion. Therefore, by systematically considering ERPs, spectral content and importantly their combination, this study aimed to examine whether concurrent changes in spectral content and ERPs could collectively serve as an index of cognitive workload during locomotion. Specifically, ERP and EEG biomarkers were assessed as participants performed a cognitive task under two levels of difficulty (easy or hard) and two conditions (seated or walking). Changes in attentional reserve and mental effort appeared to collectively index cognitive workload under varying demands due to changes in task difficulty or performance conditions. This work can inform cognitive workload assessment in patient populations with gait deficiencies for future applications.

Knee Joint Loading during Single-Leg Forward Hopping.

Increased or abnormal loading on the intact limb is thought to contribute to the relatively high risk of knee osteoarthritis in this limb for individuals with unilateral lower limb loss. This theory has been assessed previously by studying walking, but knee joint loading during walking is often similar between individuals with and without limb loss, prompting assessment of other movements that may place unusual loads on the knee. One such movement, hopping, is a form of locomotion that individuals with unilateral lower limb loss may situationally use instead of walking, but the mechanical effects of hopping on the intact limb are unknown. PURPOSE: Compare knee joint kinetics of healthy adults during single-leg forward hopping compared to walking, a more traditional form of locomotion. METHODS: Twenty-four healthy adults walked and hopped at self-selected speeds of 1.5 and 2.3 m·s, respectively. Joint moments were calculated using inverse dynamics. A paired Student's t-test was utilized to compare peak, impulse, and loading rate (LR) of knee adduction moment (KAM), and peak knee flexion moment (KFM) between walking and hopping. RESULTS: Peak KFM and KAM LR were greater during hopping compared to walking (peak KFM: 20.73% vs 5.51% body weight (BW) × height (Ht), P < 0.001; KAM LR: 0.47 vs. 0.33 BW·Ht·s, P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Kinetic measures affecting knee joint loading are greater in hopping compared to walking. It may be advisable to limit single-leg forward hopping in the limb loss population until it is known if these loads increase knee osteoarthritis risk.

Medial knee joint contact force in the intact limb during walking in recently ambulatory service members with unilateral limb loss: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Individuals with unilateral lower limb amputation have a high risk of developing knee osteoarthritis (OA) in their intact limb as they age. This risk may be related to joint loading experienced earlier in life. We hypothesized that loading during walking would be greater in the intact limb of young US military service members with limb loss than in controls with no limb loss. METHODS: Cross-sectional instrumented gait analysis at self-selected walking speeds with a limb loss group (N = 10, age 27 ± 5 years, 170 ± 36 days since last surgery) including five service members with transtibial limb loss and five with transfemoral limb loss, all walking independently with their first prosthesis for approximately two months. Controls (N = 10, age 30 ± 4 years) were service members with no overt demographical risk factors for knee OA. 3D inverse dynamics modeling was performed to calculate joint moments and medial knee joint contact forces (JCF) were calculated using a reduction-based musculoskeletal modeling method and expressed relative to body weight (BW). RESULTS: Peak JCF and maximum JCF loading rate were significantly greater in limb loss (184% BW, 2,469% BW/s) vs. controls (157% BW, 1,985% BW/s), with large effect sizes. Results were robust to probabilistic perturbations to the knee model parameters. DISCUSSION: Assuming these data are reflective of joint loading experienced in daily life, they support a "mechanical overloading" hypothesis for the risk of developing knee OA in the intact limb of limb loss subjects. Examination of the evolution of gait mechanics, joint loading, and joint health over time, as well as interventions to reduce load or strengthen the ability of the joint to withstand loads, is warranted.

Gait and Functional Outcomes for Young, Active Males With Traumatic Unilateral Transfemoral Limb Loss.

OBJECTIVE: Altered body structures that occur with the loss of a lower limb can impact mobility and quality of life. Specifically, biomechanical changes that result from wearing a prosthesis have been associated with an increased risk of falls or joint degeneration, as well as increased energy demands. While previous studies describing these outcomes are typically limited by number of outcome measures and/or small, diverse patient groups, recent military conflicts present a unique opportunity to collect outcomes from a relatively homogenous, active patient population with limb loss. Thus, the objective of this study is to provide reference outcome measures on the basis of a large, relatively homogenous cohort of military personnel with transfemoral limb loss. METHODS: A retrospective review of biomechanical, physiological, functional, and subjective measures was completed for 67 male servicemembers who sustained an injury resulting in traumatic, transfemoral limb loss during recent conflicts. These individuals represent a defined cohort, capable of exhibiting improved clinical outcomes resulting from demographic characteristics and extensive rehabilitation. Biomechanical and physiological outcome measures for 76 uninjured male servicemembers are also provided to serve as normative reference for full return to function. Select biomechanical and physiological outcomes related to stability, overuse, and efficiency are discussed in the text, on the basis of relevance to clinical gait assessment, in addition to functional and subjective measures. RESULTS: In general, individuals with transfemoral limb loss exhibit decreased stability relative to uninjured individuals, noted by larger peak trunk velocity and step width variability; increased risk of low back and knee joint pain and/or degeneration, noted by larger trunk lateral flexion and bending moments, as well as larger vertical ground reaction force (vGRF) loading rates and impulses, respectively; and decreased efficiency during gait, noted by larger oxygen costs and leading limb mechanical work. CONCLUSION: Although the comprehensive set of measures presented here indicates overall reductions in biomechanical and functional performance with transfemoral limb loss compared to uninjured individuals, these reductions were relatively smaller than existing evidence among populations that are more diverse in age and activity level. Therefore, this data set may be used as benchmarks for young, active individuals with transfemoral limb loss, to assist with setting clinical goals, and to aid in the evaluation of new treatment techniques or interventions. These measures will also be particularly important for subsequent evaluations and longitudinal follow-ups to determine the longer-term impact of transfemoral limb loss on this cohort.

A comparison of kinematic-based gait event detection methods in a self-paced treadmill application.

Kinematic-based algorithms for detecting gait events are efficient and useful in the absence of (reliable) kinetic data. However, the validity of these kinematic-based algorithms for self-paced treadmill walking is unknown, particularly given the influence of walking speed on such data. We quantified offsets in event detection of four foot kinematics-based algorithms (horizontal position, horizontal velocity, vertical velocity, and sagittal resultant velocity) relative to events determined by a threshold in vertical ground reaction force among seven uninjured individuals - and nine with unilateral transtibial amputation - walking on a self-paced treadmill. Across walking speeds from 0.48-1.64m/s (0.5-31.7% CV), offsets ranged from -7 to +3 frames (≈83.3ms) in heel strike, and -3 to +5 frames (≈66.6 ms) in toe off. Regardless of method, offsets in heel strike were not influenced (-0.010.61) by variability in walking speed. However, offsets in toe-off were positively correlated with variability in walking speed for the horizontal position (r=0.539; P<0.001) and velocity (r=0.463; P<0.001) algorithms, and negatively correlated (r=-0.317; P<0.001) for the vertical velocity algorithm; offsets from the sagittal resultant velocity algorithm, with thresholds adjusted for walking speed, were not strongly associated (r=0.126; P=0.27). Although relatively minimal offsets support the applicability of these algorithms to self-paced walking, for individuals with asymptomatic and pathological gait patterns, sagittal resultant velocity of the foot produces the most consistent event detection over the widest range of (and variability in) walking speeds.