Computation-guided optimization of split protein systems.

Splitting bioactive proteins into conditionally reconstituting fragments is a powerful strategy for building tools to study and control biological systems. However, split proteins often exhibit a high propensity to reconstitute, even without the conditional trigger, limiting their utility. Current approaches for tuning reconstitution propensity are laborious, context-specific or often ineffective. Here, we report a computational design strategy grounded in fundamental protein biophysics to guide experimental evaluation of a sparse set of mutants to identify an optimal functional window. We hypothesized that testing a limited set of mutants would direct subsequent mutagenesis efforts by predicting desirable mutant combinations from a vast mutational landscape. This strategy varies the degree of interfacial destabilization while preserving stability and catalytic activity. We validate our method by solving two distinct split protein design challenges, generating both design and mechanistic insights. This new technology will streamline the generation and use of split protein systems for diverse applications.

Fighting fire with fire: deploying complexity in computational modeling to effectively characterize complex biological systems.

Computational modeling empowers systems biologists to interrogate and understand increasingly complex biological phenomena, and the growing suite of computational approach presents both opportunities and challenges. Choosing the right computational approaches to address a given question requires managing a model's complexity, balancing goals and limitations including interpretability, data resolution, and computational cost. Excess model complexity can diminish the utility for building understanding, while excess simplicity can render the model insufficient for addressing the questions of interest. Using systems immunology as a case study, we review how different model design strategies uniquely manage complexity, ending with a consideration of composite models, which combine the benefits of individual paradigms but present additional challenges arising from added layers of complexity. We anticipate that considering general model design challenges and potential solutions through the lens of complexity will foster enhanced collaboration among computational and experimental researchers.

Mapping CAR T-Cell Design Space Using Agent-Based Models.

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy shows promise for treating liquid cancers and increasingly for solid tumors as well. While potential design strategies exist to address translational challenges, including the lack of unique tumor antigens and the presence of an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, testing all possible design choices in vitro and in vivo is prohibitively expensive, time consuming, and laborious. To address this gap, we extended the modeling framework ARCADE (Agent-based Representation of Cells And Dynamic Environments) to include CAR T-cell agents (CAR T-cell ARCADE, or CARCADE). We conducted in silico experiments to investigate how clinically relevant design choices and inherent tumor features-CAR T-cell dose, CD4+:CD8+ CAR T-cell ratio, CAR-antigen affinity, cancer and healthy cell antigen expression-individually and collectively impact treatment outcomes. Our analysis revealed that tuning CAR affinity modulates IL-2 production by balancing CAR T-cell proliferation and effector function. It also identified a novel multi-feature tuned treatment strategy for balancing selectivity and efficacy and provided insights into how spatial effects can impact relative treatment performance in different contexts. CARCADE facilitates deeper biological understanding of treatment design and could ultimately enable identification of promising treatment strategies to accelerate solid tumor CAR T-cell design-build-test cycles.