The impact of telehome care on health status and quality of life among patients with diabetes in a primary care setting in Poland.

BACKGROUND: Telehome care has been proposed as a solution to the challenges of providing effective and affordable care for patients with diabetes. METHODS: A total of 100 adult patients with type 2 diabetes-divided between insulin and noninsulin requiring-was enrolled in a randomized, controlled trial aimed at investigating the effects of telehome monitoring. The experimental group (n = 50) received an in-home wireless glucose monitor and transmitter, whereas the control group (n = 50) was instructed to follow the conventional arrangement. RESULTS: There was an overall reduction in HbA1c values in both experimental and control groups after 6 months. A significant difference in HbA1c values between the groups was observed only among the noninsulin-requiring patients (decline from 6.95% ± 0.82% to 6.66% ± 0.86% in IB vs. 7.21% ± 2.02% to 7.2% ± 1.86% in IIB; p = 0.02). The experimental group reported considerably less hyperglycemic and hypoglycemic events. The profile of the patient who benefited the most from telemonitoring consisted of older, more educated patient who had acquired the disease relatively recently, and who spends most of the time at home. The experimental group had higher overall scores on quality of life measures and sense of control over diabetes. There was a positive association between educational attainment and ability to use the telemonitoring system without help (p = 0.045). CONCLUSIONS: Although not conclusive because of the small sample and short observation period, the study suggests that telehome monitoring is an effective tool in controlling type 2 diabetes in a primary care setting.

Telemedicine for diabetes support in family doctors' practices: a pilot project.

A telemedicine support system for diabetes management was compared with standard monitoring of patients with diabetes. The telemedicine system was composed of two modules: a Patient Unit and a Medical Unit connected by the telecommunication network. The study involved 60 patients of family doctors' practices in the Lower Silesia Region who were diagnosed with diabetes. There was no significant difference in haemoglobin A(1c) between telemonitoring and the traditional group of diabetic patients during the survey. The patients' quality of life slightly improved in the telemonitoring (mean score 3.4) and the traditionally monitored group (mean score 3.2), but there was no significant difference between them. Most of the telemonitoring patients (75%) expressed the desire to continue with telemedicine support and nearly 60% of patients monitored with traditional methods wanted to be included in the telemedicine group. The system seems to be reliable, simple to use and friendly for the patients.