Axial and peripheral spondyloarthritis: does psoriasis influence the clinical expression and disease burden? Data from REGISPONSER registry.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether the presence of psoriasis influences the clinical expression, disease activity and disease burden in both axial and peripheral phenotypes of spondyloarthritis (SpA). METHODS: Patients from the Spanish REGISPONSER registry classified as having SpA according to the ESSG criteria were included. Patients were classified as psoriatic or non-psoriatic depending on the presence of cutaneous or nail psoriasis; thereafter, they were classified as having either axial [presence of radiographic sacroiliitis OR inflammatory back pain (IBP)] or peripheral phenotype (absence of radiographic sacroiliitis AND absence of IBP AND presence of peripheral involvement). Pair-wise univariate and multivariate analyses among the four groups (psoriatic/non-psoriatic axial phenotypes and psoriatic/non-psoriatic peripheral phenotypes) were performed with adjustment for treatment intake. RESULTS: A total of 2296 patients were included in the analysis. Among patients with axial phenotype, psoriasis was independently associated (P < 0.05) with HLA-B27+ [odds ratio (OR) 0.27], uveitis (OR 0.46), synovitis (ever) (OR 2.59), dactylitis (OR 2.78) and the use of conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs) (OR 1.47) in comparison with non-psoriatic patients. Among patients with peripheral phenotype and adjusting for csDMARD intake, psoriasis was independently associated with higher age at disease onset (OR 1.05), HLA-B27+ (OR 0.14) and heel enthesitis (OR 0.22). Higher scores for patient-reported outcomes and greater use of treatment at the time of the study visit were observed in psoriatic patients with either axial or peripheral phenotype. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that, among all patients with SpA, psoriasis is associated with differences in clinical expression of SpA, a greater disease burden and increased use of drugs.

Enthesitis indices identify different patients with this characteristic in axial and peripheral spondyloarthritis and also in psoriatic arthritis: ASAS-PerSpA data.

BACKGROUND: In axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), peripheral SpA (pSpA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA), enthesitis is a hallmark clinical feature that can be assessed by the SPARCC index, LEI, MASES and MEI. These indices evaluate different locations, which may identify different numbers of patients with enthesitis among SpA subtypes. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate whether the proportion of patients with at least one enthesitis across these three most prevalent SpA subtypes differs according to the index used and to evaluate the level of agreement among indices in detecting patients with enthesitis. METHODS: A total of 4185 patients (2719 axSpA, 433 pSpA and 1033 PsA) from the international and cross-sectional ASAS-PerSpA study were included. The proportion of patients with enthesitis identified by the indices was evaluated across the three diseases. Pairwise agreement between indices was computed using Cohen's kappa. RESULTS: The prevalence rates of patients with at least one enthesitis according to the MEI, MASES, SPARCC index and LEI were 17.2%, 13.5%, 10.7%, and 8.3%, respectively. In axSpA, the indices that identified the most patients with enthesitis were the MEI and MASES (98.7% and 82.4%, respectively); in pSpA and PsA, the indices that identified the most patients with enthesitis were the MEI and SPARCC index (MEI: 100% and SPARCC: 84.6%; MEI: 97.3% and SPARCC: 77%, respectively). In the total population, the MASES vs. MEI showed the strongest agreement (absolute agreement 96.3%; kappa: 0.86); similar results were obtained in axSpA patients (97.3%; 0.90). In pSpA and PsA patients, the SPARCC vs. MEI (97.2%; 0.90 and 95.4%; 0.83, respectively) showed the strongest agreement. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the prevalence of patients with enthesitis across SpA subtypes differs depending on the disease and the index used. The MEI and MASES appeared best for assessing enthesis in SpA and axSpA, while the MEI and SPARCC index appeared best for assessing enthesitis in pSpA and PsA.

Achilles enthesitis on physical examination leads to worse outcomes after 2 years of follow up in patients with ankylosing spondylitis from REGISPONSER-AS registry.

BACKGROUND: Enthesitis represents one of the most important peripheral musculoskeletal manifestations in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). However, studies specifically evaluating Achilles tendon enthesitis and its impact over time are scarce. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the impact of Achilles' tendon enthesitis found at baseline during physical examination on the outcome measures after 2 years of follow-up in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). METHODS: This was an observational and prospective study conducted during 2 years of follow-up in the REGISPONSER-AS registry. Linear regression models adjusted for age, body mass index (BMI), and anti-TNF intake were conducted to evaluate the association between the presence of Achilles enthesitis at baseline and the patient-reported outcome (PRO) scores at baseline. The impact of this feature on PROs over 2 years of follow-up was evaluated using mixed models for repeated measures adjusted for age, BMI, and anti-TNF intake. RESULTS: Among the 749 patients included, 46 patients (6.1%) showed Achilles' tendon enthesitis during physical examination at the baseline study visit. Patients with Achilles enthesitis had an increase in the global VAS score, BASDAI, mBASDAI, ASDAS-CRP, and BASFI scores in comparison with patients without this feature. In addition, the mean global VAS, BASDAI, and ASDAS-CRP scores were significantly higher among patients with Achilles enthesitis over the 2 years of follow-up after adjusting for age, BMI, and current anti-TNF intake. The percentage of patients achieving ASDAS low disease activity (ASDAS < 2.1) after 2 years of follow-up was 15.9% and 31.5% for patients with and without Achilles enthesitis, respectively (p = 0.030). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with AS, the presence of Achilles' tendon enthesitis was associated with worse scores on the outcome measures after 2 years of follow-up, leading to a lower probability of achieving low disease activity.

Impact of the number of comorbidities on the outcome measures and on the retention rate of the first anti-TNF in patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis. Two-year follow-up in REGISPONSER-AS.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of the number of comorbidities on the outcome measures after two years of follow-up in patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) and to determine whether the number of comorbidities influences the retention rate of the first anti-TNF. METHODS: This was an observational and prospective study conducted during 2 years of follow-up in the REGISPONSER-AS registry. The patients were divided into three groups according to the number of comorbidities at baseline (0, 1 or ≥2). Linear regression models adjusted for disease duration, age, sex and smoking were constructed to evaluate the association between the number of comorbidities and the Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO) scores. The impact of the number of comorbidities on PROs over two years of follow-up was evaluated using mixed models for repeated measures adjusted for disease duration, age, sex and smoking. Finally, the retention rate of the first anti-TNF antibody across the three groups was evaluated using a log-rank test. RESULTS: Patients with two or more comorbidities showed higher scores at baseline and during the two years of follow-up for the Global VAS, BASDAI, ASDAS, and BASFI and worse scores for the physical component of the SF12. A higher probability of discontinuation of the first anti-TNF was found in patients with 2 or more comorbidities compared with the patients in the other groups (38.2% vs. 26.6% vs. 25.4% for ≥2 comorbidities, 0 and 1 comorbidity, respectively), although these differences were not significant (log-rank test: p-value = 0.180). CONCLUSION: In patients with AS, the presence of 2 or more comorbidities was associated with worse scores on the outcome measures test after two years of follow-up and a greater tendency of discontinuation for the first anti-TNF.

Distribution of comorbidities in spondyloarthritis with regard to the phenotype and psoriasis: data from the ASAS-COMOSPA study.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of the study was to compare the prevalence of comorbidities between patients with axial and peripheral phenotypes and to evaluate the role of psoriasis in such comorbidities. METHODS: Patients from the cross-sectional Assessment in SpondyloArthritis Inter-national Society (ASAS)-COMOSPA study were classified as having either the axial (presence of sacroiliitis on X-ray or MRI) or peripheral phenotype (absence of sacroiliitis AND presence of peripheral involvement). Patients with each phenotype were divided into two groups depending on the presence or history of psoriasis. Pair-wise comparisons among the four groups (axial/peripheral phenotype with/without psoriasis) were conducted through univariate logistic regressions and generalized linear mixed models using disease duration and sex as fixed effects and country as random effect. RESULTS: A total of 3291 patients were included in this analysis. The peripheral involvement with psoriasis phenotype showed the highest prevalence of hypertension (44.9%), dyslipidaemia (34%) and diabetes (8.8%), while the axial involvement without psoriasis phenotype exhibited the lowest prevalence of dyslipidaemia (14.2%), diabetes (4.1%) and stroke (0.9%). Among patients with psoriasis, the axial phenotype showed a significantly lower prevalence of hypertension (OR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.35-0.75) and lower prevalence of Framingham score ⩾15 (OR: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.38-0.85) than patients with peripheral involvement after adjusting for disease duration, sex and country. Among patients with the axial phenotype, patients with psoriasis showed a higher prevalence of hypertension (OR 1.76, 1.40-2.20), dyslipidaemia (OR: 1.99, 95% CI: 1.56-2.53), diabetes (OR: 2.05, 95% CI: 1.39-3.02) and Framingham score ⩾15 (OR: 2.00, 95% CI: 1.57-2.55) than non-psoriatic patients. No differences were found across groups concerning bone metabolism disorders. CONCLUSION: Both the peripheral phenotype and psoriasis are independently associated with an increased prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors. No differences were found for bone metabolism disorders.

Which factors explain the patient global assessment in patients with ankylosing spondylitis? A hierarchical cluster analysis on REGISPONSER-AS.

OBJECTIVES: To determine groups of factors (clusters) potentially associated with the patient global assessment (measured with the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Patient Global Score (BAS-G)), and to quantify the contribution of each cluster to the patient's well-being. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study in patients with a diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) from the national, multicentre Spanish REGISPONSER-AS registry. A hierarchical cluster analysis was conducted to group the potential factors (sociodemographic, socioeconomic, patient-reported outcomes, physical exploration variables and depression) associated with the BAS-G. The contribution of each cluster to the variability of the BAS-G was evaluated using a multivariate linear regression model and the determination coefficient (R2) for each cluster. RESULTS: A total of 681 patients with complete data were included. Three clusters of variables potentially associated with the BAS-G were found: cluster 1 contained the Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score (MASES), depression, sex (female) and university studies; cluster 2 included the Graffar scale, age and body mass index; and cluster 3 contained the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI), the individual items of the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), pain during the last week, nocturnal pain and the number of swollen joints. A total of 6.8% of the variability of the BAS-G was explained by cluster 1, 0.5% was explained by cluster 2, and 60.8% was explained by cluster 3. CONCLUSION: The BAS-G is mostly explained by pain and function, while demographic and socioeconomic factors are weakly associated with the BAS-G. Depression also has a weak effect on this score.