RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The current study aimed to develop and preliminarily validate an initial version of an instrument to assess the leisure activity preferences of people receiving adult day services (ADS). METHODS: Based on previously conducted concept mapping steps, we identified 12 clusters of preferences for leisure activities. We adopted the structure of the Preferences for Everyday Living Inventory and phrased our cluster labels as questions to develop a first draft of the Preferences for Leisure Activities Inventory (P-LAI). We conducted cognitive interviews (n = 8) to revise, preliminarily validate, and preliminarily finalize the P-LAI. RESULTS: The draft of the P-LAI included 25 questions. Based on the results of the cognitive interviews, the number of questions was reduced to 21, three questions were rephrased, and evidence to support the preliminary validity of the P-LAI based on the response processes was provided. CONCLUSIONS: The P-LAI is the first instrument to assess preferences for leisure activities in the ADS environment. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The preliminary results of the P-LAI allow ADS providers and healthcare professionals to assess the preferences for leisure activities of people who receive ADS in a structured way. Based on these results, preference-based services can be designed and planned, and the person-centered philosophy of care can be further operationalized in the ADS environment.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: This review identifies and examines theoretical approaches (components and objectives) to person-centred dementia care in order to obtain a better understanding of what is meant by the concept of person-centred dementia care. DESIGN: Following the approach of Whittemore and Knafl, an integrative literature review was conducted to answer the following questions: (1) Which theoretical approaches to person-centred dementia care have been published? (2) What are the components of the theoretical approaches to person-centred dementia care thus identified, and which objectives can be identified? DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE (via PubMed), CINAHL (via EBSCO) and PsycINFO (via EBSCO) were searched through to 26 April 2021. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We included any kind of published literature that describes theoretical approaches to person-centred dementia care and that was written in German or English. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two independent reviewers extracted data. Data were pooled using a data extraction form developed by the Joanna Briggs Institute. A qualitative content analysis was conducted. RESULTS: The analysis revealed heterogeneous perspectives within the identified approaches to person-centred dementia care. Statements pertaining to the components and objectives could be assigned to three different subcategories (microlevel, macrolevel and application level). This analysis enabled an enhanced understanding of how person-centred dementia care is currently described and whether and how the theoretical approaches differ in terms of their orientations and their focus on the individual and/or on sociality, which allows conclusions regarding the underlying conceptual idea of personhood. CONCLUSIONS: There is a clear challenge for future research to overcome the dominance of the focus on the individual and to consider aspects of sociality to be at least equally important. This is needed in order to understand dementia as a multifaceted phenomenon that demands a differentiated consideration of theoretical notions of how to understand personhood in this context.