Association of stage 1 hypertension defined by the 2017 ACC/AHA guideline with cardiovascular events and mortality in Chinese adults / 中华医学杂志(英文版)

BACKGROUND@#The 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) blood pressure (BP) guideline lowered the threshold defining hypertension to 130/80 mmHg. However, how stage 1 hypertension defined using this guideline is associated with cardiovascular events in Chinese adults remains unclear. This study assessed the association between stage 1 hypertension defined by the 2017 ACC/AHA guideline and clinical outcomes in the Chinese population.@*METHODS@#Participants with stage 1 hypertension ( n = 69,509) or normal BP ( n = 34,142) were followed in this study from 2006/2007 to 2020. Stage 1 hypertension was defined as a systolic blood pressure of 130-139 mmHg or a diastolic blood pressure of 80-89 mmHg. None were taking antihypertensive medication or had a history of myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, or cancer at baseline. The primary outcome was a composite of MI, stroke, and all-cause mortality. The secondary outcomes were individual components of the primary outcome. Cox proportional hazards models were used for the analysis.@*RESULTS@#During a median follow-up of 11.09 years, we observed 10,479 events (MI, n = 995; stroke, n = 3408; all-cause mortality, n = 7094). After multivariable adjustment, the hazard ratios for stage 1 hypertension vs. normal BP were 1.20 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.13-1.25) for primary outcome, 1.24 (95% CI, 1.05-1.46) for MI, 1.45 (95% CI, 1.33-1.59) for stroke, and 1.11 (95% CI, 1.04-1.17) for all-cause mortality. The hazard ratios for participants with stage 1 hypertension who were prescribed antihypertensive medications compared with those without antihypertensive treatment during the follow-up was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.85-0.96).@*CONCLUSIONS@#Using the new definition, Chinese adults with untreated stage 1 hypertension are at higher risk for MI, stroke, and all-cause mortality. This finding may help to validate the new BP classification system in China.

Severity of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease is a risk factor for developing hypertension from prehypertension / 中华医学杂志(英文版)

BACKGROUND@#There is little published evidence about the role of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in the progression from prehypertension to hypertension. This study was conducted to investigate the association of NAFLD and its severity with the risk of hypertension developing from prehypertension.@*METHODS@#The study cohort comprised 25,433 participants from the Kailuan study with prehypertension at baseline; those with excessive alcohol consumption and other liver diseases were excluded. NAFLD was diagnosed by ultrasonography and stratified as mild, moderate, or severe. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression was used to calculate the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of incident hypertension according to the presence and 3 categories of severity of NAFLD.@*RESULTS@#During a median of 12.6 years of follow-up, 10,638 participants progressed to hypertension from prehypertension. After adjusting for multiple risk factors, patients with prehypertension and NAFLD had a 15% higher risk of incident hypertension than those without NAFLD (HR = 1.15, 95% CI 1.10-1.21). Moreover, the severity of NAFLD was associated with the incidence of hypertension, which was higher in patients with more severe NAFLD (HR = 1.15 [95% CI 1.10-1.21] in the mild NAFLD group; HR = 1.15 [95% CI 1.07-1.24] in the moderate NAFLD group; and HR = 1.20 [95% CI 1.03-1.41] in the severe NAFLD group). Subgroup analysis indicated that age and baseline systolic blood pressure may modify this association.@*CONCLUSIONS@#NAFLD is an independent risk factor for hypertension in patients with prehypertension. The risk of incident hypertension increases with the severity of NAFLD.

Therapeutic effect of hydrocortisone combined with vitamin C and vitamin B1 on patients with sepsis: a Meta-analysis / 中华危重病急救医学

Objective:To systematically evaluate the effect of hydrocortisone combined with vitamin C and vitamin B1 on the efficacy of patients with sepsis or septic shock.Methods:Databases including CNKI, Sino Med, VIP, Wanfang, PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase were searched from inception to January 2021 for the randomized controlled trial (RCT) about hydrocortisone combined with vitamin C and vitamin B1 to treat sepsis or septic shock. The experimental group was given intravenous injection of hydrocortisone, vitamin B1 and vitamin C based on conventional treatment; the control group was given conventional treatment or placebo/hydrocortisone/hydrocortisone+vitamin B1 based on conventional treatment. Outcome indicators included sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA), mortality, the duration of vasoactive drugs, new acute kidney injury (AKI) patients, length of stay in intensive care unit (ICU) and in hospital. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and evaluated the risk of bias in the included studies. RevMan 5.3 software was then used to perform Meta-analysis. Funnel plot was used to test publication bias.Results:A total of 6 articles involving 816 patients were included, with 411 patients in the experimental group and 405 patients in the control group. The Meta-analysis results showed that the duration of vasoactive drugs in the experimental group was significantly shorter than that in the control group [mean difference ( MD) = -24.02, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) was -32.36 to -15.68, P < 0.000 01]. However, there were no significant differences in SOFA, mortality, new AKI patients, the length of ICU stay and hospital stay between the two groups [SOFA: MD = -0.14, 95% CI was -1.15 to 0.87, P = 0.79; mortality: relative risk ( RR) = 0.99, 95% CI was 0.81 to 1.21, P = 0.92; new AKI patients: RR = 1.10, 95% CI was 0.42 to 2.87, P = 0.84; length of ICU stay: MD = 1.33, 95% CI was -2.22 to 4.89, P = 0.46; length of hospital stay: MD = 1.02, 95% CI was -0.66 to 2.69, P = 0.23]. The funnel plot showed that most of the points were symmetrical and showed an inverted funnel shape, suggesting that the publication bias among the studies was small. There was no significant publication bias on this Meta-analysis. Conclusions:Hydrocortisone combined with vitamin C and vitamin B1 can shorten the duration of vasoactive drugs in patients with sepsis or septic shock, but it cannot effectively reduce the SOFA score, mortality, new AKI patients, length of stay in ICU and in hospital. Limited by the number and quality of the included studies, further large-scale, multi-center, blinded, RCT are still needed for verification.