RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Timely and accurate identification of subgroup at risk for major adverse cardiovascular events among patients presenting with acute chest pain remains a challenge. Currently available risk stratification scores are suboptimal. Recently, a new scoring system called the Symptoms, history of Vascular disease, Electrocardiography, Age, and Troponin (SVEAT) score has been shown to outperform the History, Electrocardiography, Age, Risk factors and Troponin (HEART) score, one of the most used risk scores in the United States. AIM: To assess the potential usefulness of the SVEAT score as a risk stratification tool by comparing its performance to HEART score in chest pain patients with low suspicion for acute coronary syndrome and admitted for overnight observation. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed medical records of 330 consecutive patients admitted to our clinical decision unit for acute chest pain between January 1st to April 17th, 2019. To avoid potential biases, investigators assigned to calculate the SVEAT, and HEART scores were blinded to the results of 30-d combined endpoint of death, acute myocardial infarction or confirmed coronary artery disease requiring revascularization or medical therapy [30-d major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE)]. An area under receiving-operator characteristic curve (AUC) for each score was then calculated. C-statistic and logistic model were used to compare predictive performance of the two scores. RESULTS: A 30-d MACE was observed in 11 patients (3.33% of the subjects). The AUC of SVEAT score (0.8876, 95%CI: 0.82-0.96) was significantly higher than the AUC of HEART score (0.7962, 95%CI: 0.71-0.88), P = 0.03. Using logistic model, SVEAT score with cut-off of 4 or less significantly predicts 30-d MACE (odd ratio 1.52, 95%CI: 1.19-1.95, P = 0.001) but not the HEART score (odd ratio 1.29, 95%CI: 0.78-2.14, P = 0.32). CONCLUSION: The SVEAT score is superior to the HEART score as a risk stratification tool for acute chest pain in low to intermediate risk patients.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: MRI or CT imaging can be used to identify the esophageal location prior to left atrial ablation, but the esophagus may move making the location unreliable when ablating to minimize esophageal injury. The aim of this study was to evaluate esophageal position and movement based on serial MRI imaging with the goal of identifying imaging and clinical characteristics that can predict the esophageal movement. METHODS: Fifty patients undergoing 190 MRI scans were analyzed. The relative position of the esophagus in each MRI along with clinical and imaging characteristics was quantified, including the gap between the left atrium (LA) and the vertebral body (GAP), an anatomic space in which the esophagus can move. RESULTS: A mean of 3.8 MRIs was analyzed per patient. Sixteen patients (32.0%) experienced significant lateral esophageal movement of more than 10 mm. In the significant movement group, body mass index (BMI) was higher (33.0 ± 6.5 vs 28.8 ± 5.3, p = 0.02) and the GAP was significantly larger (7.1 ± 2.5 vs 4.8 ± 5.1 mm, p = 0.04). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the GAP ≤ 4.5 mm was the only independent predictor of the esophagus not moving (odds ratio = 9.25, 95% confidence interval = 1.72 to 49.67, p = 0.0095). CONCLUSIONS: A GAP of less than 4.5 mm between the LA and the vertebral body is associated with lack of esophageal movement (< 10 mm). This suggests that the measurement of GAP < 4.5 mm may be used to predict the esophageal location in patients undergoing atrial ablation.