Topoisomerase IIalpha mRNA and protein expression in ovarian carcinoma: correlation with clinicopathological factors and prognosis.

Topoisomerase IIalpha (Top IIalpha) is a nuclear enzyme that plays a central role in DNA metabolism, and is a molecular target for a variety of chemotherapeutic agents. Top IIalpha has recently gained attention as a biomarker for therapy response and patient survival. In this study, we attempted to assess the feasibility of measuring Top IIalpha gene expression in RNA, isolated from archival formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue specimens, which are used routinely in pathology laboratories. We have employed a new technique on the basis of magnetic particles' separation and purification of nucleic acids, and evaluated both protein and mRNA expressions from the same routinely processed tissue blocks. We investigated the expression of Top IIalpha mRNA and protein by real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction and immunohistochemistry, in a cohort of 133 primary ovarian carcinomas, and evaluated the association between Top IIalpha expression and clincopathological variables as well as patient outcome. Elevated Top IIalpha mRNA expression was observed in high-grade tumors (P=0.003) and advanced stage disease (P=0.011). In univariate Kaplan-Meier analysis, patients with higher expression of Top IIalpha nuclear protein had a significantly decreased overall survival (P=0.045). Interestingly, we detected cytoplasmic protein expression of Top IIalpha in a subset of samples. Cytoplasmic expression of Top IIalpha was associated with the expression of chromosomal region maintenance/exportin 1 (CRM1)-a nuclear export protein (P=0.008). Our study suggests that Top IIalpha overexpression is involved in the progression of ovarian cancer in a subset of the patients. Our results encourage the further evaluation of the prognostic and predictive values of Top IIalpha expression in ovarian carcinoma, which might help to assess the patients' risk profile, and the planning of an individualized therapy.

IMP3 expression in human ovarian cancer is associated with improved survival.

The insulin-like growth factor-II mRNA-binding protein IMP3 plays an important role in embryogenesis and recent reports suggest an involvement in tumorigenesis. Although IMP3 expression has been well studied in mouse and human fetal and adult gonads, its role in ovarian cancer is unknown. We investigated the expression of IMP3 at protein and mRNA levels in a cohort of primary ovarian carcinomas and in 11 ovarian cancer cell lines. Western blot analysis revealed an expression of IMP3 in all ovarian cancer cell lines and immunohistochemistry demonstrated a positive cytoplasmic staining in 32 of 68 carcinomas (47%). In contrast, epithelium of borderline tumors, as well as, benign ovarian lesions and normal ovaries exhibited only weak or no IMP3 expression. In univariate Kaplan-Meier analysis, IMP3 protein expression was significantly associated with better overall survival (P=0.048). To confirm these findings, we further determined IMP3 mRNA expression in 43 ovarian cancer specimens by real time quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. A significant correlation between protein and mRNA levels (r=0.414, P=0.006), as well as a correlation of IMP3 mRNA expression with patient overall survival (P=0.044), was observed. Our results demonstrate that IMP3 is expressed in a subpopulation of ovarian cancer and a marker of good prognosis.

Class I histone deacetylase expression has independent prognostic impact in human colorectal cancer: specific role of class I histone deacetylases in vitro and in vivo.

PURPOSE: Recently, several studies reported a strong functional link between histone deacetylases (HDAC) and the development of tumors of the large intestine. However, despite the importance of these molecules, comparably little is known on expression patterns and functions of specific HDAC isoforms in colorectal cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We characterized class I HDAC isoform expression patterns in a cohort of 140 colorectal carcinomas by immunohistochemistry. In addition, effects of HDAC inhibition by valproic acid and suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid, and specific HDAC isoform knockdown by short interfering RNA, were investigated in a cell culture model. RESULTS: We found class I HDACs highly expressed in a subset of colorectal carcinomas with positivity for HDAC1 in 36.4%, HDAC2 in 57.9%, and HDAC3 in 72.9% of cases. Expression was significantly enhanced in strongly proliferating (P = 0.002), dedifferentiated (P = 0.022) tumors. High HDAC expression levels implicated significantly reduced patient survival (P = 0.001), with HDAC2 expression being an independent survival prognosticator (hazard ratio, 2.6; P = 0.03). Short interfering RNA-based inhibition of HDAC1 and HDAC2 but not HDAC3 suppressed growth of colon cancer cells in vitro, although to a lesser extent than chemical HDAC inhibitors did. CONCLUSIONS: The strong prognostic impact of HDAC isoforms in colorectal cancer, the interactions of HDACs with tumor cell proliferation and differentiation in vivo, and our finding that HDACs are differentially expressed in colorectal tumors suggest that the evaluation of HDAC expression in clinical trials for HDAC inhibitors might help to identify a patient subgroup who will exceptionally profit from such a treatment.

Association of patterns of class I histone deacetylase expression with patient prognosis in gastric cancer: a retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: Although histone deacetylases (HDACs) are known to have an important regulatory role in cancer cells, and HDAC inhibitors (HDIs) have entered late-phase clinical trials for the treatment of several cancers, little is known about the expression patterns of HDAC isoforms in tumours. We aimed to clarify these expression patterns and identify potential diagnostic and prognostic uses of selected class I HDAC isoforms in gastric cancer. METHODS: Tissue samples from a training cohort and a validation cohort of patients with gastric cancer from two German institutions were used for analyses. Tissue microarrays were generated from tumour tissue collected from patients in the training group, whereas tissue slides were used in the validation group. The tissues were scored for expression of class I HDAC isoforms 1, 2, and 3. Overall expression patterns (gHDAC) were grouped as being negative (all three isoforms negative), partially positive (one or two isoforms positive), or completely positive (all isoforms positive), and correlated with clinicopathological parameters and patient survival. The main endpoints were amount of expression of each of the three HDAC isoforms, patterns of expression of gHDAC, effect of metastasis on expression of HDAC and gHDAC, and overall survival according to HDAC expression patterns. FINDINGS: 2617 tissue microarray spots from 143 patients in the training cohort and 606 tissue slides from 150 patients in the validation cohort were studied. 52 of the 143 (36%) gastric tumours in the training cohort and 32 of the 150 (21%) gastric tumours in the validation cohort showed nuclear expression of all three HDAC isoforms. 60 (42%) of tumours in the training cohort and 65 (43%) in the validation cohort expressed one or two isoforms in the nuclei, whereas 31 (22%) of tumours in the training cohort and 53 (35%) in the validation cohort were scored negative for all three proteins. gHDAC expression in both cohorts was higher when lymph-node metastases were present (p=0.0175 for the training group and p=0.0242 for the validation group). Survival data were available for 49 patients in the training group and 123 patients in the validation group. In the validation cohort, 3-year survival was 44% (95% CI 34-57) in the HDAC1-negative group, 50% (39-64) in the HDAC2-negative group, and 48% (34-67) in the gHDAC-negative group. 3-year survival decreased to 21% (11-37) when HDAC1 was positive, 16% (9-31) when HDAC2 was positive, and 5% (1-31) when gHDAC (all isoforms) were positive. Those patients highly expressing one or two isoforms (the gHDAC-intermediate group) had an estimated 3-year survival of 40% (29-56). In multivariate analyses, high gHDAC and HDAC2 expression were associated with shorter survival in the training cohort (gHDAC: hazard ratio [HR] 4.15 [1.23-13.99], p=0.0250; HDAC2: HR 3.58 [1.36-9.44], p=0.0100) and in the validation cohort (gHDAC: HR 2.18 [1.19-4.01], p=0.0433; HDAC2: HR 1.72 [1.08-2.73], p=0.0225), independent of standard clinical predictors. INTERPRETATION: High HDAC expression is significantly associated with nodal spread and is an independent prognostic marker for gastric cancer. Additionally, we postulate that immunohistochemical detection of HDAC as a companion diagnostic method might predict treatment response to HDIs, thereby enabling selection of patients for this specific targeted treatment in gastric cancer.

Class I histone deacetylases 1, 2 and 3 are highly expressed in renal cell cancer.

BACKGROUND: Enhanced activity of histone deacetylases (HDAC) is associated with more aggressive tumour behaviour and tumour progression in various solid tumours. The over-expression of these proteins and their known functions in malignant neoplasms has led to the development of HDAC inhibitors (HDI) as new anti-neoplastic drugs. However, little is known about HDAC expression in renal cell cancer. METHODS: We investigated the expression of HDAC 1, 2 and 3 in 106 renal cell carcinomas and corresponding normal renal tissue by immunohistochemistry on tissue micro arrays and correlated expression data with clinico-pathological parameters including patient survival. RESULTS: Almost 60% of renal cell carcinomas expressed the HDAC isoforms 1 and 2. In contrast, HDAC 3 was only detected in 13% of all renal tumours, with particular low expression rates in the clear cell subtype. HDAC 3 was significantly higher expressed in pT1/2 tumours in comparison to pT3/4 tumours. Expression of class I HDAC isoforms correlated with each other and with the proliferative activity of the tumours. We found no prognostic value of the expression of any of the HDAC isoforms in this tumour entity. CONCLUSION: Class I HDAC isoforms 1 and 2 are highly expressed in renal cell cancer, while HDAC 3 shows low, histology dependent expression rates. These unexpected differences in the expression patterns suggests alternative regulatory mechanisms of class I HDACs in renal cell cancer and should be taken into account when trials with isoform selective HDI are being planned. Whether HDAC expression in renal cancers is predictive of responsiveness for HDI will have to be tested in further studies.

Activation of mTOR in a subgroup of ovarian carcinomas: correlation with p-eIF-4E and prognosis.

Ovarian carcinoma patients have an extremely poor prognosis; therefore, new molecular therapeutic approaches are urgently needed. The mTOR pathway, which may be targeted by substances such as Rapamycin or RAD001, is emerging as a promising target for anticancer therapy. So far, the expression and prognostic impact of mTOR signalling elements have not been completely studied in ovarian tumors. We analyzed p-mTOR, p-4E-BP1 and p-eIF-4E in 107 human ovarian lesions and observed an overexpression of p-mTOR (47%) and p-eIF-4E (56%) protein in primary ovarian carcinomas as compared to borderline tumors. Phospho-mTOR expression was significantly related to p-eIF-4E (p< or =0.001) and serous histological type (p=0.03). Increased p-4E-BP1 (31%) was associated with poor differentiation (p=0.04) and higher mitotic rate (p=0.004). In univariate analysis, increased expression of p-mTOR and p-eIF-4E was significantly associated with better overall survival (p=0.003, p=0.029). To connect the expression data with mechanistic studies, a set of 10 ovarian cancer cell lines was used. Expression of p-mTOR was increased in all cancer cell lines as compared to ovarian surface epithelial (HOSE) cells. Rapamycin treatment revealed a reduction of p-mTOR and p-4E-BP1 but increased p-AKT levels. We show for the first time an association of p-mTOR and p-eIF-4E with better overall survival for ovarian cancer patients. The combined results of our in vivo and cell culture studies suggest that a subpopulation of these patients may benefit from mTOR inhibition. The design of future clinical trials should incorporate biomarker testing to determine predictive markers for response to mTOR inhibitors.

Phospho-mTOR and phospho-4EBP1 in endometrial adenocarcinoma: association with stage and grade in vivo and link with response to rapamycin treatment in vitro.

PURPOSE: Endometrial adenocarcinoma, due to a frequent activation of PI3 K/AKT has been proposed as a candidate neoplasm for the treatment with mTOR inhibitors. Yet, data on the expression of mTOR cascade components in endometrial cancer are lacking. METHODS: To provide a basis for futher studies with mTOR inhibitors, we used immunohistochemistry to evaluate the expression of activated mTOR pathway components in 57 endometrial cancer surgical specimens in vivo, and investigated in vitro the relation between the activation of AKT/mTOR and the response to rapamycin. RESULTS: p-mTOR expression was associated with nuclear p-4EBP1 expression (P = 0.02), and was more frequent in tumors extending ouside the uterine corpus (P = 0.011). Nuclear p-4EBP1 expression was increased in carcinomas of poor differentiation (P = 0.012). In cultivated PTEN-deficient Ishikawa cells, in addition to an activation of AKT, a phosphorylation of mTOR and 4EBP1 was evident, while PTEN-wild type HEC-1A cells lacked AKT activation but revealed a reduced expression of p-mTOR and p-4EBP1. Rapamycin induced a growth reduction, which was clearly more pronounced in Ishikawa cells than in HEC-1A cells (P < 0.03) and could be observed for up to 6 days. CONCLUSISONS: Expression of mTOR and 4EBP1 characterize high-grade, high-stage endometrial adenocarcinomas and might be predictive markers of a response to rapamycin. Based on our results, we suggest that the expression of elements of the mTOR pathway in human tumor tissue should be further evaluated as a possible predictive marker in large-scale clinical studies as well as translational research protocols in clinical studies with mTOR inhibitors.

Expression of the nuclear export protein chromosomal region maintenance/exportin 1/Xpo1 is a prognostic factor in human ovarian cancer.

BACKGROUND: The human nuclear export protein chromosomal region maintenance/exportin 1/Xpo1 (CRM1) mediates the nuclear export of proteins and messenger RNAs and, thus, is an important regulator of subcellular distribution of key molecules. Whereas cell-biologic studies have suggested a fundamental role for CRM1 in the regulation of mitosis, the expression of this protein in human tumor tissue has not been investigated to date. METHODS: In this study, the expression of CRM1 was analyzed in a cohort of 88 ovarian tumors and 12 ovarian cell lines for the first time to the authors' knowledge. RESULTS: Immunohistochemistry revealed increased nuclear (52.7%) and cytoplasmic (56.8%) expression of CRM1 in 74 carcinomas compared with the expression revealed in borderline tumors and benign lesions. Similarly, CRM1 expression was increased in ovarian cancer cell lines compared with human ovarian surface epithelial cells. Cytoplasmic CRM1 expression was related significantly to advanced tumor stage (P= .043), poorly differentiated carcinomas (P= .011), and higher mitotic rate (P= .008). Nuclear CRM1 was associated significantly with cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) expression (P= .002) and poor overall survival (P= .01). Because it was demonstrated previously that blocking of CRM1 by leptomycin B (LMB) contributes to the inhibition of nuclear export, the authors used a set of mechanistic assays to study the effects of CRM1 inhibition in cancer cells. Treatment of OVCAR-3 cells with LMB revealed a significant reduction of cell proliferation and increased apoptosis as well as suppressed interleukin-1beta-induced COX-2 expression. CONCLUSIONS: The current results indicated that CRM1 is expressed in a subpopulation of ovarian carcinomas with aggressive behavior and is related to poor patient outcome. A correlation also was demonstrated between CRM1 and COX-2 expression in ovarian cancer tissue. Furthermore, the treatment of ovarian cancer cells with LMB revealed a reduction in COX-2 expression. Therefore, the authors suggest that CRM1 may be an interesting biomarker for the assessment of patient prognosis and a molecular target for anticancer treatment.