Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
BMJ Open ; 13(2): e067910, 2023 02 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36828654

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of colchicine and high-intensity rosuvastatin in addition to standard of care on the progression of COVID-19 disease in hospitalised patients. DESIGN: A pragmatic, open-label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial conducted from October 2020 to September 2021. Follow-up was conducted at 30 and 60 days. The electronic medical record was used at all stages of the trial including screening, enrolment, randomisation, event ascertainment and follow-up. SETTING: Four centres in the Yale New Haven Health System. PARTICIPANTS: Non-critically ill hospitalised patients with COVID-19. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomised 1:1 to either colchicine plus high-intensity rosuvastatin in addition to standard of care versus standard of care alone. Assigned treatment was continued for the duration of index hospitalisation or 30 days, whichever was shorter. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The prespecified primary endpoint was progression to severe COVID-19 disease (new high-flow or non-invasive ventilation, mechanical ventilation, need for vasopressors, renal replacement therapy or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, or death) or arterial/venous thromboembolic events (ischaemic stroke, myocardial infarction, deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism) evaluated at 30 days. RESULTS: Among the 250 patients randomised in this trial (125 to each arm), the median age was 61 years, 44% were women, 15% were Black and 26% were Hispanic/Latino. As part of the standard of care, patients received remdesivir (87%), dexamethasone (92%), tocilizumab (18%), baricitinib (2%), prophylactic/therapeutic anticoagulation (98%) and aspirin (91%). The trial was terminated early by the data and safety monitoring board for futility. No patients were lost to follow-up due to electronic medical record follow-up. There was no significant difference in the primary endpoint at 30 days between the active arm and standard of care arm (15.2% vs 8.8%, respectively, p=0.17). CONCLUSIONS: In this small, open-label, randomised trial of non-critically ill hospitalised patients with COVID-19, the combination of colchicine and rosuvastatin in addition to standard of care did not appear to reduce the risk of progression of COVID-19 disease or thromboembolic events, although the trial was underpowered due to a lower-than-expected event rate. The trial leveraged the power of electronic medical records for efficiency and improved follow-up and demonstrates the utility of incorporating electronic medical records into future trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04472611.


Assuntos
Isquemia Encefálica , COVID-19 , Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Masculino , Rosuvastatina Cálcica , SARS-CoV-2 , Colchicina , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Contemp Clin Trials ; 110: 106547, 2021 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34461322

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Despite improvement in the standard of care (SOC) for hospitalized COVID-19 patients, rates of morbidity and mortality remain high. There continues to be a need for easily available and cost-effective treatments. Colchicine and rosuvastatin are both safe and well-studied medications with anti-inflammatory and other pleiotropic effects that may provide additional benefits to hospitalized COVID-19 patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: The Colchicine/Statin for the Prevention of COVID-19 Complications (COLSTAT) trial is a pragmatic, open-label, multicenter, randomized trial comparing the combination of colchicine and rosuvastatin in addition to SOC to SOC alone in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Four centers in the Yale New Haven Health network will enroll a total of 466 patients with 1:1 randomization. The trial will utilize the electronic health record (Epic® Systems, Verona, Wisconsin, USA) at all stages including screening, randomization, intervention, event ascertainment, and follow-up. The primary endpoint is the 30-day composite of progression to severe COVID-19 disease as defined by the World Health Organization ordinal scale of clinical improvement and arterial/venous thromboembolic events. The secondary powered endpoint is the 30-day composite of death, respiratory failure requiring intubation, and myocardial injury. CONCLUSIONS: The COLSTAT trial will provide evidence on the efficacy of repurposing colchicine and rosuvastatin for the treatment of hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Moreover, it is designed to be a pragmatic trial that will demonstrate the power of using electronic health records to improve efficiency and enrollment in clinical trials in an adapting landscape. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04472611 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04472611).


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases , Colchicina/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases/uso terapêutico , SARS-CoV-2 , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
PLoS One ; 16(2): e0246764, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33606757

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are highly effective in treating cancer; however, cardiotoxicity can occur, including myocarditis. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging is useful for evaluation of myocarditis, although it has not been well studied in ICI cardiotoxicity. METHODS: We identified patients referred for CMR evaluation of ICI cardiotoxicity from September 2015 through September 2019. We assessed structural and functional parameters, feature tracking (FT) left ventricular and atrial strain, T2- weighted ratios and quantitative late gadolinium enhancement (LGE). We also applied the Updated Lake Louise Criteria for diagnosis of myocarditis. RESULTS: Of the 20 patients referred, the median left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 52.5% ± 19.1 and 50% had a normal LVEF (≥53%). FT strain analysis revealed an average abnormal global longitudinal strain (GLS) of -9.8%± 4.2%. In patients with a normal LVEF, the average GLS remained depressed at -12.3%± 2.4%. In all patients, GLS demonstrated a significant negative correlation with LVEF (rs = -0.64, p 0.002). Sixteen patients (80%) had presence of LGE (14 non-ischemic pattern and 2 ischemic). Percent LGE did not correlate with any CMR parameters and notably did not correlate with LVEF (rs = -0.29, p = 0.22) or GLS (rs = 0.10, p = 0.67), highlighting the value of tissue characterization beyond functional assessment. Nine patients (45%) met full Updated Lake Louise Criteria and 85% met at least one criterion, suggestive of myocarditis in the correct clinical context. Thirteen patients (65%) were treated for ICI-associated myocarditis and, of these, 54% (n = 7) had recovery of LVEF to normal. There was no correlation between LVEF (p = 0.47), GLS (0.89), or % LGE (0.15) and recovery of LVEF with treatment. CONCLUSION: In patients with suspected ICI cardiotoxicity, CMR is an important diagnostic tool, even in the absence of overt left ventricular dysfunction, as abnormalities in left ventricular strain, T2 signal and LGE can identifying disease.


Assuntos
Cardiotoxicidade/diagnóstico por imagem , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/efeitos adversos , Miocardite/diagnóstico por imagem , Disfunção Ventricular Esquerda/diagnóstico por imagem , Idoso , Cardiotoxicidade/complicações , Cardiotoxicidade/diagnóstico , Meios de Contraste , Edema/diagnóstico por imagem , Feminino , Fibrose/diagnóstico por imagem , Gadolínio , Humanos , Inflamação/diagnóstico por imagem , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Imagem Cinética por Ressonância Magnética , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Miocardite/complicações , Miocardite/patologia , Disfunção Ventricular Esquerda/complicações , Disfunção Ventricular Esquerda/fisiopatologia , Função Ventricular Esquerda
4.
J Infect Public Health ; 10(5): 572-578, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28215914

RESUMO

Muti-Drug Resistant Organisms (MDROs) are problematic all over the world, especially in Lebanon. High fecal carriage rates of MDR Enterobacteriaceae were reported from Lebanese nursing homes. Some studies show that MDROs have a fitness cost as compared to sensitive isolates. In this study, the competitive growth of MDR Escherichia coli obtained from fecal samples from elderly is assessed. Fecal swabs from ten elderly patients from a Lebanese nursing home were obtained between June and December, 2015. Isolates were identified by API 20E and antimicrobial susceptibilities were determined. Production of ESBL (extended spectrum ß lactamase), MBL (metallo ß lactamse), AmpC and KPC (Klebsiella pneumonia carbapenemase) was detected phenotypically by the use of EDTA, PBA, cloxacillin, and DDSTs. In-vitro competition assays were performed using E. coli isolates with different combinations of bacterial resistance. A total of 117 isolates was obtained with 71.8% E. coli, 7.7% of which were ESBL and 5.1% AmpC producers. Sensitive E. coli isolates out-competed all other isolates when in competition, followed sequentially by ESBL, AmpC, and OXA-48 (oxacillin) producers. This study shows an advantage of sensitive E. coli strains obtained from fecal samples to out-compete resistant strains in specific in-vitro conditions. This ability could be exploited in the elimination of MDR organisms from the gut flora, after further investigation.


Assuntos
Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla , Enterobacteriaceae/efeitos dos fármacos , Enterobacteriaceae/isolamento & purificação , Fezes/microbiologia , Idoso , Estudos Transversais , Enterobacteriaceae/enzimologia , Enterobacteriaceae/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Escherichia coli/efeitos dos fármacos , Escherichia coli/enzimologia , Escherichia coli/isolamento & purificação , Humanos , Líbano , Casas de Saúde , Fenótipo , beta-Lactamases/metabolismo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa