[Quality of life in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator from a salutogenic perspective : A qualitative study in cardiologic health service research]. / Die Lebensqualität von Patienten mit implantierbarem Kardioverter-Defibrillator aus salutogenetischer Sicht : Eine qualitative Studie der kardiologischen Versorgungsforschung.

BACKGROUND: Evidence on disease-related quality of life (DRQoL) of patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) has been described heterogeneously. Disease-specific measures of DRQoL in ICD patients are lacking. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to gain a broader understanding of long-term DRQoL in ICD patients. Special focus was placed on stressors and cognitive management strategies in everyday life. METHODS: Data assessment was performed via semistructured, guideline-based interviews. The monocentric qualitative study included 10 ICD patients with primary and secondary prophylactic indication and 3 cardiologists. The qualitative analysis used the salutogenesis model (Antonovsky) as a framework. RESULTS: The interviews show that most patients do not experience a prominent limitation in their quality of life through the ICD. We found that patients focus on their individual coping strategies to handle the ICD indication with a sense of coherence, aiming at understanding their situation and giving it meaning. Whether the DRQoL is modified positively or negatively after ICD implantation depends on individual factors of resilience and factors of coherence. CONCLUSIONS: We established a salutogenic model for the assessment of DRQoL in patients with ICDs. A stable DRQoL on ICD implantation and follow-up could be achieved if patients at high risk (small sense of coherence and reduced resilience) are identified and their individual lifestyles are taken into account.

Apoptosis primarily accounts for the growth-inhibitory properties of sulindac metabolites and involves a mechanism that is independent of cyclooxygenase inhibition, cell cycle arrest, and p53 induction.

Sulindac causes regression of and prevents recurrence of colonic adenomas in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. Although cell cycle arrest and apoptosis have been proposed, the mechanism of action is poorly understood. In this study, we characterized the growth-inhibitory effects of active metabolites of sulindac in cultured colon adenocarcinoma cells by determining the contribution of apoptosis and cell cycle arrest and the requirement for cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibition and p53 involvement and compared the effects of sulindac metabolites with the chemotherapeutic drug, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). Time course and dose-response experiments demonstrated that increased apoptosis paralleled the growth-inhibitory effects of the sulfide and sulfone. A relationship among a series of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs was observed between potency for growth inhibition and ability to induce apoptosis but not potency to inhibit COX. For example, the sulfone was at least 5000-fold less potent than the sulfide for inhibiting COX but only 6.5-fold less potent for inducing apoptosis. Moreover, the prostaglandin analogue, dimethyl-prostaglandin E2, failed to reverse the apoptosis-inducing effects of the sulfide. Sulindac metabolites caused G1 cell cycle arrest in proliferating cells but were comparably effective in nonproliferating cells. In contrast, 5-FU treatment was less effective in nonproliferating cells. Combined treatment with sulindac metabolites and 5-FU did not result in an additive apoptotic response. Treatment of cells with 5-FU increased p53 protein levels, whereas sulindac metabolites did not induce expression. Saos-2 cells, which lack p53, responded to sulindac metabolites but not 5-FU. These results show that apoptosis primarily contributes to growth inhibition by sulindac metabolites. The biochemical pathway does not require COX inhibition or p53 induction and appears to be fundamentally different from the apoptotic response to 5-FU.

Impact of BRCA1 testing on women with cancer: a pilot study.

We sought to understand better the impact of genetic testing and counseling in a group of women who had early breast cancer (age <50) or ovarian cancer and a family history of cancer. Thirty-five women underwent genetic counseling and genetic testing for BRCA1/2 at the University of Colorado Cancer Center, Hereditary Cancer Clinic. Psychological assessment (IES and Hopkins Symptom Checklist) was made before counseling, and 1 month after genetic test results were reported to women. A statistically significant decrease in anxiety was evidenced 1 month after results were given (p = 0.024). Decreased intrusive thoughts related to genetic testing were seen only for those testing negative (p = 0.0003). Women diagnosed with cancer less than 1 year prior to genetic testing experienced the greatest cancer-specific distress (p = 0.01) and distress related to genetic testing (p = not significant). Satisfaction with the counseling and testing process was high. In conclusion, genetic testing and counseling can occur with little anxiety and stress. However, women less than 1 year from a cancer diagnosis will experience the greatest distress associated with genetic testing and counseling. Women who are considering genetic testing and counseling close to a diagnosis of cancer may require greater psychological support.

Carvedilol targets human K2P 3.1 (TASK1) K+ leak channels.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Human K(2P) 3.1 (TASK1) channels represent potential targets for pharmacological management of atrial fibrillation. K(2P) channels control excitability by stabilizing membrane potential and by expediting repolarization. In the heart, inhibition of K(2P) currents by class III antiarrhythmic drugs results in action potential prolongation and suppression of electrical automaticity. Carvedilol exerts antiarrhythmic activity and suppresses atrial fibrillation following cardiac surgery or cardioversion. The objective of this study was to investigate acute effects of carvedilol on human K(2P) 3.1 (hK(2P) 3.1) channels. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Two-electrode voltage clamp and whole-cell patch clamp electrophysiology was used to record hK(2P) 3.1 currents from Xenopus oocytes, Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells and human pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells (hPASMC). KEY RESULTS: Carvedilol concentration-dependently inhibited hK(2P) 3.1 currents in Xenopus oocytes (IC(50) = 3.8 µM) and in mammalian CHO cells (IC(50) = 0.83 µM). In addition, carvedilol sensitivity of native I(K2P3.1) was demonstrated in hPASMC. Channels were blocked in open and closed states in frequency-dependent fashion, resulting in resting membrane potential depolarization by 7.7 mV. Carvedilol shifted the current-voltage (I-V) relationship by -6.9 mV towards hyperpolarized potentials. Open rectification, characteristic of K(2P) currents, was not affected. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The antiarrhythmic drug carvedilol targets hK(2P) 3.1 background channels. We propose that cardiac hK(2P) 3.1 current blockade may suppress electrical automaticity, prolong atrial refractoriness and contribute to the class III antiarrhythmic action in patients treated with the drug.