Activity and outcomes of autologous stem cell transplantation in the private sector in Australia.

BACKGROUND: Few Australasian autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) programmes perform ASCT in the private sector. Relatively little is known about ASCT outcomes in the private sector, which varies in care delivery models to the public system. AIMS: To investigate transplantation activity and survival outcomes at Icon Cancer Centre's Brisbane-based private clinical and laboratory ASCT programme over a 23-year period. METHODS: Retrospective, observational study of all adults who underwent ASCT at Icon between 1996 and 2018. Main outcome measures were transplant activity, overall survival (OS) and 100-day and 1-year transplant-related mortality (TRM). Outcomes were benchmarked against the Australasian Bone Marrow Transplant Recipient Registry (ABMTRR). RESULTS: Between 1996 and 2018, 1676 ASCT were performed in 1454 patients. From 2010 to 2018, ASCT performed at Icon contributed 40% of all South East Queensland ASCT. In the past 5 years, 21% of Icon's patients were aged ≥70 years, compared with 5% across Australasia. For the entire cohort, 100-day and 1-year TRM was 1.1% and 1.7%, respectively, while for those aged ≥70 years, it was 2.0% and 3.1%. For ASCT performed between 2014 and 2018, 100-day and 1-year TRM was 0.8% and 1.4%, which was half the TRM rates reported by the ABMTRR. The 10-year post-transplant OS at Icon was higher than the ABMTRR data, across all disease subtypes. CONCLUSION: We report excellent OS and low TRM, demonstrating the critical role of the private sector in the administration of this highly complex therapy. The Icon ASCT programme is the largest ASCT contributor in Queensland. It is inclusive of patients aged ≥70 years, demonstrating low and acceptable TRM.

Correction: Vegan versus meat-based dog food: Guardian-reported indicators of health.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265662.].

Vegan versus meat-based dog food: Guardian-reported indicators of health.

Alternative pet foods may offer benefits concerning environmental sustainability and the welfare of animals processed into pet foods. However, some worry these may compromise the welfare of pets. We asked 2,639 dog guardians about one dog living with them, for at least one year. Among 2,596 involved in pet diet decision-making, pet health was a key factor when choosing diets. 2,536 provided information relating to a single dog, fed a conventional meat (1,370 = 54%), raw meat (830 = 33%) or vegan (336 = 13%) diet for at least one year. We examined seven general indicators of ill health: unusual numbers of veterinary visits, medication use, progression onto a therapeutic diet after initial maintenance on a vegan or meat-based diet, guardian opinion and predicted veterinary opinion of health status, percentage of unwell dogs and number of health disorders per unwell dog. Dogs fed conventional diets appeared to fare worse than those fed either of the other two diets. Dogs fed raw meat appeared to fare marginally better than those fed vegan diets. However, there were statistically significant differences in average ages. Dogs fed raw meat were younger, which has been demonstrated to be associated with improved health outcomes. Additionally, non-health related factors may have improved apparent outcomes for dogs fed raw meat, for three of seven general health indicators. We also considered the prevalence of 22 specific health disorders, based on predicted veterinary assessments. Percentages of dogs in each dietary group considered to have suffered from health disorders were 49% (conventional meat), 43% (raw meat) and 36% (vegan). Significant evidence indicates that raw meat diets are often associated with dietary hazards, including nutritional deficiencies and imbalances, and pathogens. Accordingly, the pooled evidence to date indicates that the healthiest and least hazardous dietary choices for dogs, are nutritionally sound vegan diets.