Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Emerg Med ; 42: 38-42, 2021 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33440329

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Some contend that patients with acute alcohol or illicit substance intoxication should be treated in outpatient detoxification centers rather than in the ED. However, these patients often have underlying acute medical needs. We sought to determine the frequency of medical interventions required by ED patients with alcohol or illicit substance intoxication. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study of consecutive ED patients presenting to an urban tertiary care ED with altered mental status due to alcohol or illicit substance use. We performed data collection for patients deemed to be low-risk for complications, as defined by receiving care in an intoxication observation unit. Trained staff observed and recorded all medical interventions, including medications administered, diagnostic testing, procedures performed, and airway interventions. The incidence of agitation was recorded using the Altered Mental Status Scale (AMSS, ordinal scale from -4 to +4, where +4 is most agitated). The data analysis is descriptive. RESULTS: This analysis included 2685 encounters (1645 unique patients; median age 39; 73% male) from January to May 2019. Average breath alcohol concentration was 0.20 g/dL (range 0.00-0.47). There were 89% encounters with alcohol intoxication, and in 17% encounters the patient was suspected or known to have drug intoxication (either alone or in conjunction with alcohol use). On arrival to the ED, 372 (14%) had agitation (AMSS +1 or higher) and 32 (1%) were profoundly agitated (AMSS +4). In total, 1526 (56%) received at least one intervention that could not be provided by a local detoxification or sobering facility. Of the study population, 955 (36%) received a sedating medication, 903 (34%) required physical restraints for patients or staff safety, 575 (21%) underwent imaging studies, 318 (12%) underwent laboratory testing, 367 (13%) received another intervention (IV access, EKG, splinting, wound care, etc). Additionally, 111 (4%) patients received an airway intervention (19 intubation, 23 nasal airway, 85 supplemental oxygen) and 275 (10%) required repositioning to protect the airway. There were 168 (6%) patients admitted to the hospital. CONCLUSION: In this population of relatively low-risk ED patients with drug and alcohol intoxication, a substantial proportion of patients received medical interventions.


Assuntos
Intoxicação Alcoólica/terapia , Overdose de Drogas/terapia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Drogas Ilícitas/intoxicação , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Intoxicação Alcoólica/diagnóstico , Intoxicação Alcoólica/psicologia , Overdose de Drogas/diagnóstico , Overdose de Drogas/psicologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Agitação Psicomotora/etiologia , Adulto Jovem
2.
Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl ; 3(1): 100105, 2021 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33778478

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To investigate types and intensity of pain experienced by individuals with cerebral palsy (CP) and common pain-relieving approaches used by caregivers. DESIGN: The approach was cross-sectional, using standardized interviews. SETTING: Individuals with CP were recruited from a specialty health care hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Eighty-six individuals (N=86; mean age, 17.2 years; male, 58%) with CP and complex communication needs participated. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pain type, mean pain intensity (MPI) (graded on a scale of 0=no pain to 10=worst possible pain), and mean pain relief (MPR) (graded on a scale of 0=intervention did not help at all to 10=intervention completely relieved pain) were assessed by caregiver report as part of the Dalhousie Pain Interview for each type of pain experienced in the previous 7 days. RESULTS: Caregivers reported that 58 participants (67%) had experienced pain in the previous 7 days. MPI was 7.7±1.8 when the pain was worst in the previous 7 days. The 2 most common types of pain included musculoskeletal pain (n=70) and gastrointestinal pain (n=11). The most frequent treatment to relieve musculoskeletal pain was changing positions (n=27, MPI=5.1±2.3, MPR=6.6±2.1), medication (n=25, MPI=7.4±1.6, MPR=5.3±1.9), and massage (n=19, MPI=6.7±1.9, MPR=5.2±1.7). To treat gastrointestinal pain, medication was typically used (n=4, MPI=4.8±1.4, MPR=5.5±1.0), although no treatment was just as common (n=4, MPI=4.5±2.3). CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that musculoskeletal pain is prevalent in individuals with CP, and changing physical positions and providing medication are strategies most used by caregivers.

3.
J Am Board Fam Med ; 33(6): 913-922, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33219070

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Having depression and living in a rural environment have separately been associated with poor diabetes outcomes, but there little is known about the interaction between the 2 risk factors. This study investigates the association of depression and rurality with glycemic control in adults, as well as their interaction. METHODS: This is a repeated cross-sectional study with data collected from 2010 to 2017 (n = 1,697,173 patient-year observations), comprising a near-complete census of patients with diabetes in Minnesota. The outcome of interest was glycemic control defined as hemoglobin A1c under 8%. We used a logit model with clinic-level random effects to predict glycemic control as a function of depression, patient rurality, and their interaction, adjusted for differences in observed characteristics of the patient, clinic, and patient's neighborhood. RESULTS: Having depression was associated with lower probability of achieving glycemic control (P < .001). Although rurality alone had no association with glycemic control, significant interactions existed between depression and rurality. Living in a small rural town mitigated the negative association between depression and glycemic control (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Although patients with depression had poorer glycemic control, living in a small rural town reduced the negative association between depression and glycemic control.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Diabetes Mellitus , Adulto , Glicemia , Estudos Transversais , Depressão/epidemiologia , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiologia , Hemoglobinas Glicadas/análise , Humanos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa