Surgeon Factors Influencing Breast Surgery Outcomes: A Scoping Review to Define the Modern Breast Surgical Oncologist.

BACKGROUND: Modern breast surgical oncology incorporates many aspects of care including preoperative workup, surgical management, and multidisciplinary collaboration to achieve favorable oncologic outcomes and high patient satisfaction. However, there is variability in surgical practice and outcomes. This review aims to identify modifiable surgeon factors influencing breast surgery outcomes and provide a definition of the modern breast surgical oncologist. METHODS: A systematic literature search with additional backward citation searching was conducted. Studies describing modifiable surgeon factors with associated breast surgery outcomes such as rates of breast conservation, sentinel node biopsy, re-excision, complications, acceptable esthetic outcome, and disease-free and overall survival were included. Surgeon factors were categorized for qualitative analysis. RESULTS: A total of 91 studies met inclusion criteria describing both modifiable surgeon factor and outcome data. Four key surgeon factors associated with improved breast surgery outcomes were identified: surgical volume (45 studies), use of oncoplastic techniques (41 studies), sub-specialization in breast surgery or surgical oncology (9 studies), and participation in professional development activities (5 studies). CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of the literature review, the modern breast surgical oncologist has a moderate- to high-volume breast surgery practice, understands the use and application of oncoplastic breast surgery, engages in additional training opportunities, maintains memberships in relevant societies, and remains up to date on key literature. Surgeons practicing in breast surgical oncology can target these modifiable factors for professional development and quality improvement.

The oncologic impact of hormone replacement therapy in premenopausal breast cancer survivors: A systematic review.

SYNOPSIS: This is the first systematic review to investigate the risk of recurrence in breast cancer survivors <50 years old who have used hormone replacement therapy (HRT). BACKGROUND: The risk of HRT in premenopausal breast cancer survivors is unclear. Due to the higher incidence of estrogen receptor negative tumours in women <50, the potential for HRT to promote breast cancer recurrence may differ from older age groups. METHODS: We performed a search of Medline, EMBASE and CINAHL through June 2016. For the observational studies relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated for the recurrence rate among HRT users and nonusers. A random effects model was used to estimate the combined RR using the Mantel-Haenszel method. RESULTS: Four papers satisfied our inclusion criteria. 3477 subjects were analyzed. On pooled meta-analysis of breast cancer recurrence in the observational studies, no significant association was found between HRT and risk of recurrence (RR 1.04 [95% CI 0.45, 2.41]). The randomized controlled trial (RCT) included found an increased risk of recurrence with HRT among women <50 (HR 1.56 [95% CI 1.1-2.2]). However, among women of all ages with an estrogen receptor negative tumour there was no significant difference in recurrence when compared to hormone receptor positive tumours (HR 1.15 [95% CI 0.7-1.8, p = 0.55]). DISCUSSION: This review on HRT in breast cancer survivors <50 revealed conflicting results between randomized and observational study data. Further studies are warranted to investigate the association between HRT and recurrence rates in younger breast cancer survivors.