Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Neurosciences (Riyadh) ; 26(2): 141-151, 2021 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33814366

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To quantify the extent and variation of depression, anxiety and stress among medical and non-medical Saudi Arabian students. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, students from Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia, were recruited. The Faculty of Education was randomly selected to represent the non-medical colleges. The depression, anxiety and stress scale-21 items (DASS-21) was used to estimate the study outcomes. RESULTS: Of the 465 undergraduates recruited in this study, 49.68% (n=231) were medical students and 50.32% (n=234) were non-medical students. Approximately 54%, 53%, and 38% of the participants were found to be suffering from depression, anxiety, and stress, respectively. The analyses showed that the two groups did not differ significantly with respect to stress and depression (p=0.934 and 0.423, respectively). However, the non-medical students exhibited a significantly higher anxiety score compared to the medical students (p=0.002). Family conflicts was a common risk factor for the studied psychological disturbances. Female gender and travel time from home to university were significant predictors of depression and anxiety, whereas a positive history of a psychological condition increased the likelihood of depression and stress. CONCLUSION: There was a high prevalence of anxiety, stress, and depression among the students, with a significantly higher anxiety levels among the non-medical students.


Assuntos
Ansiedade/epidemiologia , Depressão/epidemiologia , Estresse Psicológico/epidemiologia , Estudantes de Medicina/psicologia , Estudantes/psicologia , Adolescente , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Prevalência , Arábia Saudita/epidemiologia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto Jovem
2.
Saudi J Med Med Sci ; 11(1): 44-53, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36909001

RESUMO

Background: High levels of burnout, stress, and stimulant abuse have been reported among medical and dental students worldwide, with country-specific factors being contributors. The association, risk factors, and predictors of these three variables have not sufficiently been reported from Saudi Arabia, especially from the Western region. Objective: To determine the prevalence, association, and predictors of burnout, stress, and stimulant abuse among medical and dental students in the Western region of Saudi Arabia. Methods: This cross-sectional study included all second to sixth year medical and dental students enrolled at Taibah University, Madinah, Saudi Arabia, during the 2019-2020 academic year. A self-administered, closed online questionnaire was administered. Data regarding stress were elicited using Cohen's 10-item Self-Perceived Stress Scale and regarding burnout using the Oldenburg Burnout Inventory Student Version questionnaire. Multiple logistic regression model to identify the risk of burnout was conducted, and univariate and multiple linear regression models were carried out to identify the predictors of stress. Results: Of 1016 eligible students, 732 responded (medical: 511; dental: 221). About half of the students experienced burnout (51.5%), with both high disengagement (49%) and exhaustion (45%). Most participants (90.3%) experienced moderate levels of stress. Eight (1.1%) respondents had experienced stimulant abuse; there was a no significant association between stimulant abuse and burnout in the multivariate analysis. Stress, age, gender, body mass index, GPA, study field, smoking, family income, and birth order were significant predictors of burnout, while burnout, age, gender, GPA, and physical exercise were significant predictors of stress. Conclusion: The findings in this study highlight the need for policymakers to devise strategies that target early identification as well as reduction of the high levels of burnout and stress.

3.
Saudi Med J ; 44(4): 345-354, 2023 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37062556

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To describe variations in characteristics of randomized controlled trials conducted in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries, and critically appraising the quality of design, conduct and analysis of the trials. METHODS: We carried out a systematically comprehensive electronic search of articles published between 1990 and 2018 and indexed in several databases: i) MEDLINE/PubMed, ii) EMBASE, iii) Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), iv) ClinicalTrials.gov, and v) World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. We summarized the overall risk of bias present in all analyzed studies using the Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias tool (CCRBT). RESULTS: A remarkable shift in numbers of publications from 2006 onwards was found. The largest number of publications were from Saudi Arabia and consisted of hospitals/clinics based studies. Lack of randomization was found in the majority of reports, and nearly three-fourth of the studies involved the use of intention-to-treat (ITT) principle. However, the proportion of adequately generated random sequence methods has increased yearly, and this increase accounted for a relatively large proportion over the latter half of the studied period (p<0.001), in contrast to the proportion of allocation concealment and blinding. Journal impact factor was significantly correlated with the quality of random sequence generation (r=0.145; p=0.014). CONCLUSION: The randomization methods have gained more attention over the last 3 decades. Secondly, Journal impact factor can serve as an indicator of randomization quality. To mitigate the large rate of overall high risk of bias in GCC studies, high-quality trials must be considered by ensuring adequate allocation concealment and blinding methods. PROSPERO No. ID: CRD42022310331.


Assuntos
Fator de Impacto de Revistas , Humanos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Arábia Saudita
4.
Saudi Med J ; 43(8): 915-926, 2022 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35964951

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To assess the survival of COVID-19 patients in Saudi Arabia and to investigate possible mortality predictors. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study involving 248 patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 who were admitted to the primary COVID-19 referral hospital in Jeddah between March and June of 2020. Socio-demographic characteristics, comorbidities, laboratory investigations, management protocols, complications, treatment options, and mortality data were extracted from electronic medical records. The time analysis began at the first signs of illness thorough discharge or death. RESULTS: Our study showed that in-hospital complications including heart failure followed by acute renal failure had the largest effect size on mortality (p<0.001). Elderly patients and those with comorbid asthma had a higher risk of death. Non-survivors presented more commonly with shortness of breath and fever than survivors. High D-Dimer level was a marginally significant indicator of mortality in the studied population (p=0.05). We did not find a significant benefit in relation to any treatment option. CONCLUSION: Age, asthma, some in-hospital complications are important survival indicators in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. The controllable co-factors should be monitored and managed by healthcare workers to reduce mortality rates in those hospitalized with COVID-19.


Assuntos
Asma , COVID-19 , Idoso , Asma/complicações , Asma/epidemiologia , COVID-19/complicações , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Hospitais , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Arábia Saudita/epidemiologia
5.
Saudi Med J ; 37(1): 96-9, 2016 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26739983

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the prevalence of intimate partner violence (IPV) among female patients, age 18-60 years, attending primary health care centers (PHCCs) and to measure its determinants, and reporting behavior. METHODS: A cross-sectional study design using validated, translated, and self-administered questionnaire among 497 Saudi female patients attending PHCCs in Taif, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) from January to February 2015 was employed. A 2-stage probability sampling was adopted for selection of PHCCs in the first stage, and then participants in the second stage. RESULTS: The estimated prevalence of IPV during the last year was 11.9%. Predictors of IPV related to abused women included divorced status and divorced parents; while those related to abusers (husbands) included widowed parents, exposure to violence in childhood, and alcohol or drugs addiction. Most of the abused wives (56%) talked regarding their IPV to their families, their husbands' families (15.2%), or their friends (11.8%); while only a minority (3.3%) complained to the police or to a judge, and no one reported this to a family physician, or to women protection agency. CONCLUSION: One out of 10 women is a victim of IPV in Taif, KSA. Intimate partner violence is significantly associated with a number of victims and abuser-related psychosocial factors, the detection of which might help screening for individuals at risk.


Assuntos
Sobreviventes Adultos de Maus-Tratos Infantis/estatística & dados numéricos , Comportamento de Busca de Ajuda , Violência por Parceiro Íntimo/estatística & dados numéricos , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Maus-Tratos Conjugais/estatística & dados numéricos , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudos Transversais , Divórcio/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Aplicação da Lei , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Fatores de Risco , Arábia Saudita/epidemiologia , Apoio Social , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa