Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
BMC Pediatr ; 19(1): 182, 2019 06 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31170939

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Stunting in developing countries continues to be a major public health problem. Measuring head circumference (HC) during clinical anthropometric assessment can help predict stunting. The aim of this study was to assess burden and determine the predictors of low HC (<- 2 SD) at birth and during first 2 years of life in a semi- urban settlement of Vellore. METHODS: The study uses baseline data and serial HC measurements from the birth cohort of MAL-ED study, where 228 children from Vellore completed follow-up between March 2010 to February 2014. Analysis of baseline, maternal and paternal characteristics, micro-nutrient status and cognition with HC measurements was performed using STATA version 13.0 software. RESULTS: The mean HC (±SD) at 1st, 12th and 24th month were 33.37 (1.29) cm, 42.76 (1.23) cm and 44.9 (1.22) cm respectively. A third of the infants (75/228) had HC less than - 2 SD at first month of life, and on follow-up, 50% of the cohort had HC ≤ -2 SD both at 12th and 24th month. Low HC measurements at all three time-points were observed for 21.6% (46/222) infants. Low HC was significantly associated with stunting in 37.3% (OR = 10.8), 57.3% (OR = 3.1) and 44.4% (OR = 2.6) children at 1st, 12th and 24th month respectively. Bivariate analysis of low HC (<- 2 SD) at 12th month showed a statistically significant association with lower socioeconomic status, low paternal and maternal HC and low maternal IQ. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed maternal (AOR = 0.759, 95% CI = 0.604 to 0.954) and paternal (AOR = 0.734, 95% CI = 0.581 to 0.930) HC to be significantly associated with HC attained by the infant at the end of 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: One-third of the children in our cohort had low head circumference (HC) at birth, with one-fifth recording low HC at all time-points until 2 years of age. Low HC was significantly associated with stunting. Paternal and maternal HC predicted HC in children. HC measurement, often less used, can be a simple tool that can be additionally used by clinicians as well as parents/caregivers to monitor child growth.


Assuntos
Cefalometria , Transtornos do Crescimento/diagnóstico , Cabeça/patologia , Fatores Etários , Índice de Massa Corporal , Cefalometria/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Transtornos do Crescimento/sangue , Humanos , Índia/epidemiologia , Lactente , Inteligência , Masculino , Desnutrição/epidemiologia , Idade Materna , Micronutrientes/sangue , Razão de Chances , Tamanho do Órgão , Pais/educação , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores Socioeconômicos , População Suburbana/estatística & dados numéricos
2.
Oman J Ophthalmol ; 16(2): 237-243, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37602185

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Robust integration of diabetic retinopathy (DR) screening within health systems is essential to prevent DR-related blindness. This, however, remains a challenge in the developing world. The aim of this study was to evaluate two models of DR screening programs within rural general health-care services. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study from two rural health centers. Demographic and clinical data of patients completing DR screening were analyzed. Patients were screened in regular ophthalmology clinics (ROC) or integrated diabetic clinics (IDC). Referral and treatment completion data were retrieved from the clinical charts at the base hospital. RESULTS: A total of 2535 DR screenings were conducted for 2296 patients. The total population prevalence for any DR was 14.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 12.8%-15.6%) and vision-threatening DR (VTDR) was 4.7% (95% CI: 3.8%-5.6%). In the ROC and IDC groups, respectively, the prevalence of any DR was 20.4% and 8.2%, VTDR, 7.8% and 1.7%, and blindness, 1.4% and 0.4% (all P < 0.001). Referral completion rates were higher in the ROC group (44.8% vs. 25.2%, P < 0.001), while treatment completion in both was similar (69.6% vs. 70.6%). Referral and treatment completion rates for referable DR were 61.2% and 48.2%, and for VTDR, 62% and 38.8%, respectively. Only 11.45% of patients completed the repeat screening follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Patients attending IDCs had a significantly lower prevalence of any DR, VTDR, and blindness demonstrating the advantages of integrated diabetic care in a rural setting. However, referral uptake and DR treatment completion need strengthening.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa