Concentrations of stiripentol in children and adults with epilepsy: the influence of dose, age, and comedication.

BACKGROUND: Stiripentol (STP) was approved as an orphan drug in 2007 in Europe as adjunctive therapy with valproic acid (VPA) and clobazam (CLB) for Dravet syndrome. Dravet syndrome is a highly pharmacoresistant form of epilepsy, which starts in early childhood. Data about STP pharmacokinetics and interactions are still limited and in part inconsistent. The aim of our study was to analyze the effect of age, gender, daily STP dose per body weight (milligrams per kilogram), VPA, CLB, and enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs on STP concentration-to-dose ratio (CDR), STP clearance, and STP trough concentrations. METHODS: Retrospectively, 220 STP serum concentrations in 75 patients from 3 German Epilepsy Centers were analyzed. Analysis of variance, regression analysis, and generalized estimating equations were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Our findings confirm the nonlinear STP pharmacokinetics. At steady state, STP CDR increased with daily STP doses. Compared with patients older than 12 years, STP concentrations were decreased by 39.6% in children aged 6-12 years (P < 0.001) and by 57.5% in children younger than 6 years (P < 0.001). Phenobarbital and phenytoin decreased STP concentrations by 63.2%. This effect was highly significant (P < 0.001), despite the small number of patients (n = 7) treated with phenobarbital or phenytoin. VPA had no significant effect on STP serum concentrations, whereas STP serum concentrations were moderately but significantly increased by CLB (24.6%, P = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS: Therapeutic drug monitoring of STP seems to be useful because of the wide variation of STP CDR, the nonlinear concentration-to-dose relationship, age-dependent pharmacokinetics, and drug-drug interactions.

Symptoms and course of intoxication with mesuximide--a case report.

We report on a 31-year-old, female patient who presented with somnolence due to an intoxication by the antiepileptic drug, mesuximide (MSM). The serum concentration of its metabolite n-desmethyl-mesuximide (85.7 mg/L) was above the so-called therapeutic range (10-40 mg/L) but below the concentration range that led to an impairment of consciousness in previous cases according to the German SPC (>150 mg/L). The symptoms remitted quickly under hemodialysis. In somnolent patients treated with MSM, the treating physicians should be aware of drug intoxication as a possible etiology. Therefore, the serum concentration should be measured early. Due to the, often, long latency until the results are available, treatment initiation may be necessary based on suspicion.

Serum concentrations of rufinamide in children and adults with epilepsy: the influence of dose, age, and comedication.

Rufinamide (RUF) is an orphan drug for adjunctive treatment of seizures associated with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome in persons aged 4 years and older. Several studies have investigated the pharmaconkinetics of RUF, but information about interactions is still limited and the results are in part inconsistent. The aim of our study was to analyze the effect of age, gender, daily RUF dose per body weight (mg/kg), valproic acid (VPA), and enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs (EIAEDs) on RUF concentration-to-dose ratio (RUF serum concentration/RUF dose per body weight), RUF clearance (RUF dose/RUF serum concentration), and RUF trough concentrations. Different statistical methods were used to evaluate 292 blood samples from 119 patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria. In summary, the results using generalized estimating equation regression models confirm a moderate but statistically significant nonlinear RUF concentration-dose relationship. At steady state, the trough concentrations of RUF increase in a less than dose proportional manner. Children (younger than 12 years) had significantly lower RUF concentrations (19.0%, P < 0.001) than adults (18 years or older) on comparable RUF doses per body weight. VPA was the most frequent comedication (51%) in our patient group. Mean RUF concentrations were 86.6% higher when VPA concentrations were greater than 90 µg/mL (P < 0.001) and 45.4% higher when VPA concentrations were between 50 and 90 µg/mL (P < 0.001) but not significantly different at VPA concentrations less than 50 µg/mL (4.4%, P > 0.1) compared with combinations without VPA. In combination with EIAEDs, mean RUF concentrations were 21.8% lower (P = 0.002) compared with combinations without EIAEDs. However, the group of AEDs classified as EIAEDs was heterogeneous and the number of patients, especially of children with EIAEDs, was relatively small. Our data indicate that oxcarbazepine and, especially, methsuximide decrease RUF concentrations as well. Therapeutic drug monitoring might be helpful because RUF concentrations differ markedly in patients on comparable RUF doses.

Topiramate overdose: a case report of a patient with extremely high topiramate serum concentrations and nonconvulsive status epilepticus.

We report the case of a 21-year-old man with idiopathic generalized epilepsy who ingested about 8,000 mg of topiramate (TPM) in a suicide attempt. On admission to the hospital he had a nonconvulsive status epilepticus and received 4 mg lorazepam i.v. He recovered rapidly despite an initial TPM concentration of 144.6 microg/ml. To our knowledge, this is the first report of a patient who survived such a high TPM concentration. The case indicates that nonconvulsive status epilepticus could be a manifestation of TPM intoxication.

The antiepileptic drug topiramate is a substrate for human P-glycoprotein but not multidrug resistance proteins.

PURPOSE: Resistance to antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) is the major problem in the treatment of epilepsy. One of the candidate mechanisms of pharmacoresistance is the limitation of AED access to the seizure focus by overexpression of efflux transporters, including P-glycoprotein (Pgp) and multidrug resistance proteins (MRPs).In this respect, it is important to know which AEDs are substrates for such drug transporters in humans. METHODS: In the present study, we used polarized kidney cell lines (LLC, MDCK) transfected with human drug transporters (Pgp, MRP1, MRP2 or MRP5) to evaluate whether the AED topiramate is a substrate for any of these transporters. Known Pgp and MRP substrates were used for comparison. RESULTS: Basolateral-to-apical transport of topiramate, which could be counteracted with the Pgp inhibitor, tariquidar, was determined in Pgp overexpressing LLC cells, whereas topiramate was not transported by any of the MRPs. A comparison with previous experiments in the same transport assay showed that topiramate exhibited the most pronounced Pgp-mediated efflux transport among the AEDS that have been studied as yet. CONCLUSIONS: Thus, these data indicate that brain levels of topiramate may be affected by overexpression of Pgp as determined in patients with intractable epilepsy.

Topiramate: a prospective study on the relationship between concentration, dosage and adverse events in epileptic patients on combination therapy.

RATIONALE: The relationship between topiramate (TPM) concentration, dosage and adverse events in patients with epilepsy is still controversial. We therefore performed a prospective study in patients with poorly controlled epilepsy treated with TPM, predominantly in combination with other antiepileptic drugs. The goal of the study was to investigate the relationship between the occurrence of adverse events due to TPM and its serum concentration or dosage, respectively. METHODS: The relationship between the occurrence of adverse events and TPM serum concentration or dosage, respectively, was examined in a group of 42 young adult and adult patients with poorly controlled epilepsy. Within 22 months, all patients treated with TPM had been included in the study. The 8 adverse events occurring most frequently (difference > or = 10%) in TPM-treated patients in 5, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group studies, were checked regularly. This side effect profile has been presented by Reife et al. (1995a). Other possible or probable adverse events were also documented. RESULTS: The difference in TPM serum concentrations and TPM dosages (mg/kg) for patients without an adverse event, and patients with a given adverse event was statistically significant for "abnormal thinking, impaired concentration, weight loss, dizziness, speech problems, somnolence, ataxia, increased seizure frequency and paresthesia". To avoid adverse events, we recommend an initial "maintenance serum concentration" of below 4 microg/mL. As regards the TPM dosage, our results suggest initial maintenance dosages of 100 TPM or lower, 1.5 mg/kg or lower, respectively. These conclusions are limited by the relatively small number of patients.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of oxcarbazepine.

Oxcarbazepine is an antiepileptic drug with a chemical structure similar to carbamazepine, but with different metabolism. Oxcarbazepine is rapidly reduced to 10,11-dihydro-10-hydroxy-carbazepine (monohydroxy derivative, MHD), the clinically relevant metabolite of oxcarbazepine. MHD has (S)-(+)- and the (R)-(-)-enantiomer, but the pharmacokinetics of the racemate are usually reported. The bioavailability of the oral formulation of oxcarbazepine is high (>95%). It is rapidly absorbed after oral administration, reaching peak concentrations within about 1-3 hours after a single dose, whereas the peak of MHD occurs within 4-12 hours. At steady state, the peak of MHD occurs about 2-4 hours after drug intake. The plasma protein binding of MHD is about 40%. Cerebrospinal fluid concentrations of MHD are in the same range as unbound plasma concentrations of MHD. Oxcarbazepine can be transferred significantly through the placenta in humans. Oxcarbazepine and MHD exhibit linear pharmaco-kinetics and no autoinduction occurs. Elimination half-lives in healthy volunteers are 1-5 hours for oxcarbazepine and 7-20 hours for MHD. Longer and shorter elimination half-lives have been reported in elderly volunteers and children, respectively. Mild to moderate hepatic impairment does not appear to affect MHD pharmacokinetics. Renal impairment affects the pharmacokinetics of oxcarbazepine and MHD. The interaction potential of oxcarbazepine is relatively low. However, enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs such as phenytoin, phenobarbital or carbamazepine can reduce slightly the concentrations of MHD. Verapamil may moderately decrease MHD concentrations, but this effect is probably without clinical relevance. The influence of oxcarbazepine on other antiepileptic drugs is not clinically relevant in most cases. However, oxcarbazepine appears to increase concentrations of phenytoin and to decrease trough concentrations of lamotrigine and topiramate. Oxcarbazepine lowers concentrations of ethinylestra-diol and levonorgestrel, and women treated with oxcarbazepine should consider additional contraceptive measures. Due to the absent or lower enzyme-inducing effect of oxcarbazepine, switching from carbamazepine to oxcarbazepine can result in increased serum concentrations of comedication, sometimes associated with adverse effects. The effect of oxcarbazepine appears to be related to dose and to serum concentrations of MHD. In general, daily fluctuations of MHD concentration are relatively slight, smaller than would be expected from the elimination half-life of MHD. However, relatively high fluctuations can be observed in individual patients. Therapeutic monitoring may help to decide whether adverse effects are dependent on MHD concentrations. A mean therapeutic range of 15-35 mg/L for MHD seems to be appropriate. However, more systematic studies exploring the concentration-effect relationship are required.

Fluctuation of lacosamide serum concentrations during the day and occurrence of adverse drug reactions--first clinical experience.

PURPOSE: To obtain better understanding of the effect of lacosamide (LCM) in clinical practice, laboratory and clinical data of 17 patients under treatment with LCM as an add-on antiepileptic drug (AED) were retrospectively evaluated. METHODS: Total LCM serum concentrations were obtained at hourly intervals for up to 5h and 8h after morning dose. Adverse drug reactions (ADR) were assessed. RESULTS: LCM serum concentrations showed high fluctuations during the day with a steep increase within the first 3h after intake (mean 87.8%; range: 44.4-149.0%) under b.i.d. Mean trough and peak concentrations of LCM were 5.0 µg/ml (range: 1.8-9.5 µg/ml) and 9.7 µg/ml (range: 4.0-18.3 µg/ml), respectively; mean dose 353 mg/d (range: 200-600mg/d). Twelve patients showed ADRs. After conversion to t.i.d. or dose reduction LCM serum concentration showed lower fluctuations during the day and a lower increase after intake (mean: 50.0%, range: 27.1-66.7%); peak LCM was 9.4 µg/ml (range: 4.7-11.6 µg/ml), mean dose 388 mg/d (range: 300-500 mg/d). These interventions led to amelioration of the ADR. CONCLUSION: Changing the dose regimen from two to three times daily could reduce fluctuations of LCM during the day and improve tolerability of LCM in patients with ADR.

Serum concentrations of pregabalin in patients with epilepsy: the influence of dose, age, and comedication.

Pregabalin (PGB) is a new antiepileptic drug (AED) approved for adjunctive therapy for partial seizures with and without generalized tonic-clonic seizures and for the treatment of peripheral neuropathic pain in adults. PGB does not bind to plasma proteins and is excreted predominantly unchanged by the kidneys. Previous studies indicated that PGB shows no relevant interactions with other AEDs. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of PGB dose, patient age, and comedication on the serum concentration of PGB. In total, 198 samples of 167 (adult) inpatients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria (eg, trough concentration, body weight available) were investigated. A patient was considered twice only if the comedication had been changed. The PGB serum concentration (mg/L) in relation to PGB dose/body weight (mg/kg) per day (level-to-dose ratio, LDR, [(mg/L)/(mg/kg)=kg/L]) was calculated and compared for the most frequent drug combinations (n=97). Analysis of covariance (using age as covariate) carried out on the log-transformed data showed that comedication had a slight but significant (P = 0.02) effect on PGB serum concentrations. The median LDR of PGB was 0.29 for PGB + oxcarbazepine (n=16), 0.31 for PGB + carbamazepine (n=20), 0.35 for PGB + levetiracetam (n=11), 0.35 for PGB + lamotrigine (n=15), and 0.39 for PGB + valproic acid + lamotrigine (n=35). Regression analysis including all 198 samples indicated (in accordance with analysis of covariance) that PGB concentrations were lower in combination with enzyme-inducing AEDs (phenytoin, carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine) and were age-dependent (higher in older patients). The PGB dose-concentration relationship was nearly linear (r=0.68, P<0.0001). However, patients on the same PGB dosage per body weight had rather different PGB trough concentrations, which could be explained only in part by age and comedication. The increase of PGB serum concentrations in older patients is in accordance with expectations for drugs that are predominantly renally excreted. Unexpectedly and in contrast to other studies, our data indicate that comedication with enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs (eg, carbamazepine) can moderately decrease PGB serum concentrations (about 20% to 30%). Further studies should clarify the effect of age and interactions on PGB concentrations.

Comparison of brain extracellular fluid, brain tissue, cerebrospinal fluid, and serum concentrations of antiepileptic drugs measured intraoperatively in patients with intractable epilepsy.

PURPOSE: The mechanisms of drug resistance in epilepsy are only incompletely understood. According to a current concept, overexpression of drug efflux transporters at the blood-brain barrier may reduce levels of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in epileptogenic brain tissue. Increased expression of drug efflux transporters such as P-glycoprotein has been found in brain tissue surgically resected from patients with medically intractable epilepsy, but it is not known whether this leads to decreased extracellular (interstitial) AED concentrations in affected brain regions. This prompted us to measure concentrations of AEDs in the extracellular space of human neocortical tissue by using intraoperative microdialysis (IOMD) in those parts of the brain that had to be removed for therapeutic reasons. For comparison, AED levels were determined in brain tissue, subarachnoid CSF, and serum. METHODS: Concentrations of carbamazepine (CBZ), 10-hydroxy-carbazepine (10-OH-CZ, metabolite of oxcarbazepine), lamotrigine (LTG), levetiracetam (LEV), topiramate, or phenytoin were determined by using one to four catheters during IOMD in the medial temporal gyrus. Furthermore, to calculate the individual recovery of every catheter, an in vitro microdialysis was performed with ultrafiltrate of serum concurrently obtained from the respective patient. In addition, AED levels were determined in the resected brain tissue, CSF, and serum of the same patients. Altogether 22 pharmacoresistant epilepsy patients (nine male, 13 female patients; age 15-54 years) with complex partial seizures or secondarily generalized seizures were involved. In a first series, IOMD samples 40 min after beginning of the microdialysis (flow rate, 1 microl/min), and in a second series, continuous measurements 25, 30, 35, and 40 min from the beginning were evaluated (flow rate, 2 microl/min). With in vitro recovery data of the individual catheters, the concentration in the extracellular space (ECS) was estimated. RESULTS: AED concentrations in the ECS of the cortex measured by catheters located at a distance of 0.6 cm differed markedly in some patients, whereas concentrations in the ultrafiltrate of the serum of the respective patients measured with the same catheters varied only slightly. Furthermore, ECS concentrations related to the ultrafiltrate of serum showed considerable interindividual variations. The high intra- and interindividual variation of ECS concentrations is demonstrated by the low correlation between concentrations in ECS and the ultrafiltrate of serum (CBZ, r= 0.41; 10-OH-CZ, r= 0.42; LTG, r= 0.27) in contrast to the high correlation between brain tissue concentration and the ultrafiltrate of serum (CBZ, r= 0.97; 10-OH-CZ, r= 0.88; LTG, r= 0.98) in the same group of patients. When comparing AED concentrations in the ECS with those in the CSF, ECS concentrations were significantly lower for CBZ, 10-OH-CZ, LTG, and LEV. CONCLUSIONS: The data demonstrate that AED concentrations show a considerable intraindividual and interindividual variation in the ECS of cortical regions. Furthermore, the ECS concentration of several AEDs is significantly lower than their CSF concentration in patients with intractable epilepsy. However, in the absence of data from nonepileptic tissues, it is not possible to judge whether the present findings relate to overexpression of multidrug transporters in the brain. Instead, the present study illustrates the methodologic difficulties involved in performing IOMD studies in patients and may thus be helpful for future approaches aimed at elucidating the role of multidrug transporters in epilepsy.

Neocortical microenvironment in patients with intractable epilepsy: potassium and chloride concentrations.

PURPOSE: The regulation of extracellular ion concentrations plays an important role in neuronal function and epileptogenesis. Despite the many studies into the mechanisms of epileptogenesis in human experimental models, no data are available regarding the fluctuations of extracellular potassium ([K(+)](o)) and chloride ([Cl(-)](o)) concentrations, which could underlie seizure susceptibility in human chronically epileptic tissues in vivo. METHODS: By using cerebral microdialysis during surgical resection of epileptic foci, the basic [K(+)](o) and [Cl(-)](o) as well as their changes after epicortical electric stimulation were studied in samples of dialysates obtained from 11 patients by ion-selective microelectrodes. RESULTS: The mean basal values of [K(+)](o) and [Cl(-)](o) in all patients were 3.83 +/- 0.08 mM and 122.9 +/- 2.6 mM, respectively. However, significant differences were observed in the basal levels of both [K(+)](o) and [Cl(-)](o) between different patients. Statistically, no correlation was found between basal [K(+)](o) or [Cl(-)](o) and electrocorticogram (ECoG) spike activity, but in one patient, dramatically lowered baseline [Cl(-)](o) was accompanied by enhanced ECoG spike activity. Application of epicortical electrical stimulation increased [K(+)](o) but not [Cl(-)](o) in all cases. According to the velocity as well as spatial distribution of [K(+)](o) reduction to the prestimulation levels, three different types of responses were observed: slow decline, fast decline, and slow and fast declines at adjacent sites. CONCLUSIONS: These data may represent abnormalities in ion homeostasis of the epileptic brain.

Serum concentrations of topiramate in patients with epilepsy: influence of dose, age, and comedication.

Topiramate is a new antiepileptic drug (AED) approved as add-on therapy. Previous studies have shown that topiramate has only a limited effect on other AEDs, but its own metabolism can be induced by enzyme-inducing drugs. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of topiramate dose, age, and comedication, especially of carbamazepine, phenytoin, phenobarbital, oxcarbazepine, lamotrigine, and valproic acid (VPA) on topiramate serum concentrations in patients with epilepsy. In total, 480 samples of 344 inpatients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria (e.g., trough concentration, body weight available) were investigated. The topiramate serum concentration in relation to topiramate dose per body weight (level-to-dose ratio) was calculated and compared for patients receiving topiramate monotherapy and for patients receiving topiramate plus one other AED. Analysis of covariance (using age as covariate) showed that comedication had a highly significant influence on the topiramate serum concentrations. Regression analysis including all 480 samples confirmed that in combinations with phenytoin, carbamazepine, phenobarbital, and oxcarbazepine, the topiramate concentrations were significantly lower compared with topiramate monotherapy, whereas VPA and lamotrigine had no significant influence. Moreover, regression analysis indicated that primidone and methsuximide lowered topiramate concentrations, whereas gabapentin, bromide, and sulthiame did not. In addition to comedication, the patient's age was significantly correlated with topiramate clearance. In accordance with the results of previous studies, these results indicated that infants and children had lower topiramate concentrations than adults receiving the same topiramate dose per body weight. Comedication and age should be considered in adjusting topiramate dosage. Determination of topiramate serum concentrations may be useful, especially when enzyme-inducing drugs are withdrawn or added.

Serum concentrations of Levetiracetam in epileptic patients: the influence of dose and co-medication.

Levetiracetam (LEV) is a new antiepileptic drug approved as add-on therapy. Previous studies indicated that LEV has no relevant interactions with other antiepileptic drugs. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of LEV dose, age, and co-medication on the serum concentration of LEV. In total, 363 samples of 297 inpatients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria (e.g., trough concentration, body weight available) were investigated. A patient was considered twice only if his co-medication had been changed. The LEV serum concentration in relation to LEV dose/body weight [level-to-dose ratio, LDR, (microgram/mL)/(mg/kg)] was calculated and compared for the most frequent drug combinations. Analysis of covariance (using age as covariate) carried out on the log-transformed data showed that co-medication had a highly significant (P < 0.001) effect on LEV serum concentrations. The median LDR of LEV was 0.32 for LEV + phenytoin, 0.32 for LEV + carbamazepine, 0.34 LEV + oxcarbazepine, 0.45 for LEV + lamotrigine, 0.46 for LEV + phenobarital, 0.52 for LEV monotherapy, 0.53 for LEV + valproic acid, and 0.54 LEV + valproic acid + lamotrigine. In co-medication with phenytoin (P < 0.001), carbamazepine (P < 0.001), and oxcarbazepine (P < 0.004), the LDR of LEV was significantly lower than it was with LEV monotherapy, whereas the LDR of LEV of patients on co-medication with valproic acid or lamotrigine did not differ significantly from the LDR of LEV of patients on LEV monotherapy (P > 0.05). Regression analysis including all 363 samples confirmed that other drugs (e.g., phenytoin, carbamazepine) lower LEV concentrations. In addition to co-medication, age had a significant effect on clearance of LEV. Children had lower LEV concentrations than adults on the same LEV dose per body weight. In contrast to other studies, our data point out that other enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs (e.g., phenytoin, carbamazepine) can moderately decrease LEV serum concentrations (by 20-30%). However, our observations should be confirmed by prospective pharmacokinetic studies.

Does lamotrigine influence valproate concentrations?

The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of lamotrigine (LTG) on valproate (VPA) concentrations dependent on LTG dose, LTG concentration, and additional enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs (AED) as well. For this purpose the following patient groups were compared: VPA monotherapy, VPA + one enzyme-inducing AED, VPA + LTG, and VPA + LTG + one enzyme-inducing AED. A total of 400 serum concentrations from 372 patients were evaluated. Two or more serum samples from the same patient were considered only if the comedication had been changed. For statistical evaluation, regression analytical methods and an analysis of variance were performed. For the analysis of variance, the VPA serum concentration in relation to VPA dose:body weight (level:dose ratio, LDR) was calculated and compared for different drug combinations. The analysis of variance revealed a significant effect of enzyme-inducing comedication (as expected) and age on the VPA LDR. Patients on LTG had a slightly lower VPA LDR, but this effect was not statistically significant. In addition, nonlinear regression analysis confirmed that patients on enzyme-inducing AED (carbamazepine, phenytoin, phenobarbital, methsuximide) had significantly lower VPA concentrations. Patients on ethosuximide had slightly but not significantly lower VPA concentrations. Patients on LTG also had significantly lower VPA levels, but this effect was only minor (-7%) and most probably not of any clinical relevance. Furthermore, the regression analysis showed that the relationship between the VPA dose per body weight and the serum concentration deviates significantly from linearity. Children less than 6 years old had lower VPA levels than older children and adults on a comparable VPA dose per body weight. Gender had no significant influence on VPA serum concentration. In addition, a subgroup of 40 patients was analyzed to see whether changing the LTG dose influences VPA serum concentrations. It did not. Thus, the authors conclude that the effect of LTG on VPA concentrations is not of clinical relevance.