RESUMO
A secondary analysis of a prospective multicenter cohort was performed in six intensive care units (ICU) in four European countries (France, Greece, Spain and Turkey). The main objective was to identify factors associated with ventilator-associated events (VAEs) in adults who underwent mechanical ventilation (MV) ≥ 48 h. Secondary objectives were to identify: variables influencing VAE in the subpopulation with endotracheal intubation and in those subjects who were ventilated > 7 days. Subjects who had undergone MV ≥ 48 h were included. In subjects with multiple episodes of MV, only the first one was eligible. The adult definitions for VAEs were adjusted to the 2015 update of the CDC's 2013 National Healthcare Safety Network Association. Factors associated with VAE were estimated through multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis. Among 163 adults (42 tracheostomies), 76 VAEs (34.9 VAEs/1,000 ventilator-days) were documented: 9 were Ventilator-Associated Conditions (VAC) and 67 Infection-related Ventilator-Associated Complications (IVAC)-plus (9 only IVAC and 58 Possible Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia). VAEs developed after a median of 6 days (interquartile range: 4-9). VAEs were independently associated with long-acting sedative/analgesic drugs (Hazard Ratio [HR]: 4.30), selective digestive decontamination (SDD) (HR: 0.38), and surgical/trauma admission (HR: 2.30). Among 116 subjects with endotracheal tube, SDD (HR: 0.21) and surgical/trauma admission (HR: 3.11) remained associated with VAE. Among 102 subjects ventilated >7 days, only long-acting sedative/analgesic agents (HR: 8.69) remained independently associated with VAE. In summary, SDD implementation and long-acting analgesic/sedative agents restriction prescription may prevent early and late VAEs, respectively. Bundles developed to prevent VAEs should include these two interventions.
Assuntos
Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica/epidemiologia , Respiração Artificial/efeitos adversos , Idoso , Cuidados Críticos , Feminino , França , Grécia , Serviços de Assistência Domiciliar , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Prospectivos , Espanha , TurquiaAssuntos
COVID-19/virologia , Proteínas do Sistema Complemento/análise , Endotélio Vascular/virologia , SARS-CoV-2/patogenicidade , Dermatopatias Virais/virologia , Pele/irrigação sanguínea , Pele/virologia , Vasculite Sistêmica/virologia , Adolescente , COVID-19/complicações , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Teste de Ácido Nucleico para COVID-19 , Endotélio Vascular/imunologia , Endotélio Vascular/patologia , Interações Hospedeiro-Patógeno , Humanos , Masculino , SARS-CoV-2/imunologia , SARS-CoV-2/isolamento & purificação , Pele/imunologia , Pele/patologia , Dermatopatias Virais/diagnóstico , Dermatopatias Virais/imunologia , Vasculite Sistêmica/diagnóstico , Vasculite Sistêmica/imunologiaAssuntos
COVID-19/complicações , Pele/patologia , Evolução Fatal , Calcanhar , Humanos , Hipóxia/virologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Necrose/virologia , SARS-CoV-2RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Ventilator-associated events (VAE) is a tier implemented for surveillance by the CDC in the USA. Implementation usefulness for clinical decisions is unknown. METHODS: We conducted a secondary analysis from a prospective, multicentre, international study, to assess the impact on outcomes of using tiers with shorter follow-up (VAE24), lower oxygenation requirements (light-VAE) or both (light VAE24). RESULTS: A cohort of 261 adults with 2706 ventilator-days were included. The median (IQR) duration of mechanical ventilation (MV) was 9 days (5-21), and the median (IQR) length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) was 14 days (8-26). A VAE tier was associated with a trend to increase from 32% to 44% in the ICU mortality rates. VAE Incidence was 24 per 1,000 ventilator-days, being increased when reduced the oxygenation settings requirement (35 per 1,000 ventilator-days), follow-up (41 per 1,000 ventilator-days) or both (55 per 1,000 ventilator-days). A VAE tier was associated with 13 extra (21 vs. 8) days of ventilation, 11 (23 vs. 12) ICU days and 7 (31 vs. 14) hospitalization days, outperforming the modified tiers' performance. CONCLUSIONS: The modification of ventilator settings (consistent with ventilator-associated events) was associated with worse outcomes among adults with prolonged mechanical ventilation. Monitoring ventilator-associated events at the bedside represents a new tool for quality improvement.
Assuntos
Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Tempo de Internação , Respiração Artificial , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Idoso , Adulto , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Monitorização Fisiológica/métodos , Ventiladores Mecânicos/efeitos adversos , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica/epidemiologia , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica/prevenção & controle , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica/etiologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Estudos de Coortes , IncidênciaRESUMO
Mechanical ventilation (MV) is a life-support therapy that may predispose to morbid and lethal complications, with ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) being the most prevalent. In 2013, the Center for Disease Control (CDC) defined criteria for ventilator-associated events (VAE). Ten years later, a growing number of studies assessing or validating its clinical applicability and the potential benefits of its inclusion have been published. Surveillance with VAE criteria is retrospective and the focus is often on a subset of patients with higher than lower severity. To date, it is estimated that around 30% of ventilated patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) develop VAE. While surveillance enhances the detection of infectious and non-infectious MV-related complications that are severe enough to impact the patient's outcomes, there are still many gaps in its classification and management. In this review, we provide an update by discussing VAE etiologies, epidemiology, and classification. Preventive strategies on optimizing ventilation, sedative and neuromuscular blockade therapy, and restrictive fluid management are warranted. An ideal VAE bundle is likely to minimize the period of intubation. We believe that it is time to progress from just surveillance to clinical care. Therefore, with this review, we have aimed to provide a roadmap for future research on the subject.
RESUMO
Background: Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) represents a common hospital-acquired infection among mechanically ventilated patients. We summarized evidence concerning ventilator care bundles to prevent VAP. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed. Randomized controlled trials and controlled observational studies of adults undergoing mechanical ventilation (MV) for at least 48 h were considered for inclusion. Outcomes of interest were the number of VAP episodes, duration of MV, hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, and mortality. A systematic search was conducted in the MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, and the Web of Science between 1985 and 2022. Results are reported as odds ratio (OR) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The PROSPERO registration number is CRD42022341780. Results: Thirty-six studies including 116,873 MV participants met the inclusion criteria. A total of 84,031 participants underwent care bundles for VAP prevention. The most reported component of the ventilator bundle was head-of-bed elevation (n=83,146), followed by oral care (n=80,787). A reduction in the number of VAP episodes was observed among those receiving ventilator care bundles, compared with the non-care bundle group (OR=0.42, 95% CI: 0.33, 0.54). Additionally, the implementation of care bundles decreased the duration of MV (MD=-0.59, 95% CI: -1.03, -0.15) and hospital length of stay (MD=-1.24, 95% CI: -2.30, -0.18) in studies where educational activities were part of the bundle. Data regarding mortality were inconclusive. Conclusions: The implementation of ventilator care bundles reduced the number of VAP episodes and the duration of MV in adult ICUs. Their application in combination with educational activities seemed to improve clinical outcomes.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Guidelines aim to standardize and optimize diagnosis and management. We evaluated the quality of evidence supporting recommendations from different international adult guidelines on bronchiectasis, and classified with the GRADE system. METHODS: Quality of eligible clinical practice guidelines was assessed for six domains using the AGREE II tool, with ≥ 80% rating as excellent. RESULTS: Seven guidelines (283 recommendations) were analyzed, and four of them were considered "recommended for use" (three reported after 2017 as excellent). Overall, 144 (50.9%) recommendations were based on low-quality evidence, representing 81.5% in diagnosis and 36.2% in therapy. In contrast, 5/92 (5.4%) and 40/191 (20.9%) recommendations regarding diagnostic and treatment (respectively) were based on high-quality evidence. Quality agreement ratings were significantly (p< 0.05) higher for guidelines delivered after 2015, progressing from 27.7% to 58.3%, qualifying as excellent. Highest scores were documented in the domains of "scope and purpose" followed by "clarifying of presentation" and "editorial independence". CONCLUSION: Updated guidelines reported after 2017 improved quality, although well-designed randomized clinical trials remain an unmet need. AGREE II quality assessment identified four guidelines qualified as recommended for use. Improvements are required in stakeholder involvement and applicability.
Assuntos
Bronquiectasia , Adulto , Bronquiectasia/diagnóstico , Bronquiectasia/terapia , HumanosRESUMO
It remains unknown whether the type of aerosol generating device is affecting efficacy and safety among non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis (NCFB) adults. The proposal of this network meta-analysis (NMA) is to evaluate effectiveness and safety of inhaled antibiotics administered via dry powder inhaler (DPI) and via nebulizers (SVN) among adult patients with NCFB. Inclusion criteria were randomized-controlled trials, adults (≥18 years) with NCFB, and inhaled antibiotics administered via DPI as intervention. Search strategy was performed in PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library from 2000 to 2019. Sixteen trials (2870 patients) were included. Three trials (all ciprofloxacin) used DPIs and thirteen used SVN (three ciprofloxacin). Both DPI and SVN devices achieved similar safety outcomes (adverse events, antibiotic discontinuation, severe adverse events, and bronchospasm). Administration of ciprofloxacin via DPI significantly improved time to first exacerbation (87 days, 95% CI 34.3-139.7) and quality of life (MD -7.52; 95% CI -13.06 to -1.98) when compared with via SVN. No other significant differences were documented in clinical efficacy (at least one exacerbation, FEV1% predicted) and microbiologic response (bacterial eradication, emergence of new potential pathogens, and emergence of antimicrobial resistance) when comparing devices. Our NMA documented that time to first exacerbation and quality of life, were more favorable for DPIs. Decisions on the choice of devices should incorporate these findings plus other criteria, such as simplicity, costs or maintenance requirements.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention proposed a shift in its surveillance paradigm from ventilator-associated pneumonia to ventilator-associated events (VAE) to broaden the focus of prevention and achieve a greater impact on outcomes. The main objective of the present study was to identify factors associated with pediatric VAEs in children undergoing mechanical ventilation ≥ 48 h. METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of a pediatric cohort of a multicenter prospective study. Children who underwent mechanical ventilation ≥ 48 h were included. Exclusion criteria were previous ventilation, extracorporeal life support, and right-to-left shunt or pulmonary hypertension. In the subjects with multiple episodes of mechanical ventilation, only the first episode was considered. Remifentanil and propofol are classified as short-acting sedative and analgesic agents. Pediatric VAE is defined as an "increase in PEEP ≥ 2 cm of H2O, an increase in [Formula: see text] of 0.20, or an increase in [Formula: see text] of 0.15 plus an increase in PEEP ≥ 1 cm of H2O sustained for ≥1 d. Associations with pediatric VAE were estimated through multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis. Hazard ratios and 95% CI were computed. RESULTS: In a cohort of 90 children, 24 pediatric VAEs were documented in 906 ventilator-days. Pediatric VAEs developed after a median of 4.5 (interquartile range, 4-7.25) d. Surgical admissions, spontaneous breathing trials, early mobility, vasopressors, red blood cell units transfusion, type of sedation (continuous vs intermittent), benzodiazepine use for >3 d, and pharmacologic paralysis were not associated with pediatric VAE, whereas the use of continuous short-acting sedative-analgesic agents was identified as a strong protective factor against pediatric VAE (hazard ratio 0.06 [95% CI 0.007-0.5]). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with short-acting sedative-analgesic agents should be preferred for sedation of mechanically ventilated children in intensive care.
Assuntos
Hipnóticos e Sedativos , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica , Analgésicos , Criança , Humanos , Hipnóticos e Sedativos/efeitos adversos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Estudos Prospectivos , Respiração Artificial/efeitos adversos , Ventiladores MecânicosRESUMO
We aimed to explore factors for optimizing antimicrobial treatment in emergency departments. A single-day point prevalence survey was conducted on January 18, 2020, in 53 referral/tertiary hospitals in 22 countries. 1957 (17%) of 11557 patients presenting to EDs had infections. The mean qSOFA score was 0.37 ± 0.74. Sepsis (qSOFA ≥ 2) was recorded in 218 (11.1%) patients. The mean qSOFA score was significantly higher in low-middle (1.48 ± 0.963) compared to upper-middle (0.17 ± 0.482) and high-income (0.36 ± 0.714) countries (P < 0.001). Eight (3.7%) patients with sepsis were treated as outpatients. The most common diagnoses were upper-respiratory (n = 877, 43.3%), lower-respiratory (n = 316, 16.1%), and lower-urinary (n = 201, 10.3%) infections. 1085 (55.4%) patients received antibiotics. The most-commonly used antibiotics were beta-lactam (BL) and BL inhibitors (n = 307, 15.7%), third-generation cephalosporins (n = 251, 12.8%), and quinolones (n = 204, 10.5%). Irrational antibiotic use and inappropriate hospitalization decisions seemed possible. Patients were more septic in countries with limited resources. Hence, a better organizational scheme is required.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Doenças Transmissíveis/diagnóstico , Doenças Transmissíveis/tratamento farmacológico , Uso de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Doenças Transmissíveis/patologia , Países em Desenvolvimento/estatística & dados numéricos , Saúde Global , Humanos , Escores de Disfunção Orgânica , Gravidade do Paciente , Padrões de Prática Médica , Infecções Respiratórias/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Respiratórias/epidemiologia , Sepse/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Urológicas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Urológicas/epidemiologiaRESUMO
Despite ventilator-associated respiratory infections (VARI) are reported as the most common and fatal complications related to mechanical ventilation (MV), they are not the unique occurrences. The new classification of ventilator-associated events (VAE) proposed by the centers for disease control and prevention (CDC) enhance the spectra of complications due to MV including both infection-related and non-infectious events. Both VAEs and VARIs are associated with prolonged duration of MV, longer stay in hospital and in the intensive care unit (ICU) and more antibiotic consumption, nonetheless patients with VAEs have worst outcomes. The VARI and VAE algorithms are focused on different targets and the correlation between both classifications is shown to be poor. The diagnostic criteria of the traditional classification have limited accuracy and the non-infectious complications may be misinterpreted as VARI. While the VAE surveillance enhances the spectra of MV complications but excludes less severe VARIs. Noninfective events explain up to 30% of VAEs, the main causes being atelectasis, acute respiratory distress syndrome, pulmonary edema and pulmonary embolism. The bundles assessing VAE are associated with less incidence of VAP and improved outcomes but they fail to reduce the rates of VAE. Automated VAE surveillance is efficient and useful as a quality indicator in the ICU while the differences in the interpretation of VARI criteria limit its role in the design of global protocols and preventive strategies. We suggest that a more comprehensive strategy should combine both algorithms with emphasis on clinical outcomes.
RESUMO
Introduction: Intubation is required to maintain the airways in comatose patients and enhance oxygenation in hypoxemic or ventilation in hypercapnic subjects. Recently, the Centers of Disease Control (CDC) created new surveillance definitions designed to identify complications associated with poor outcomes. Areas covered: The new framework proposed by CDC, Ventilator-Associated Events (VAE), has a range of definitions encompassing Ventilator-Associated Conditions (VAC), Infection-related Ventilator-Associated Complications (IVAC), or Possible Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia - suggesting replacing the traditional definitions of Ventilator-Associated Tracheobronchitis (VAT) and Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia (VAP). They focused more on oxygenation variations than on Chest-X rays or inflammatory biomarkers. This article will review the spectrum of infectious (VAP & VAT) complications, as well as the main non-infectious complications, namely pulmonary edema, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and atelectasis. Strategies to limit these complications and improve outcomes will be presented. Expert commentary: Improving outcomes should be the objective of implementing bundles of prevention, based on risk factors amenable of intervention. Promotion of measures that reduce the exposition or duration of intubation should be a priority.
Assuntos
Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica/prevenção & controle , Atelectasia Pulmonar/prevenção & controle , Edema Pulmonar/prevenção & controle , Respiração Artificial/efeitos adversos , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório/prevenção & controle , Ventiladores Mecânicos/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica/etiologia , Atelectasia Pulmonar/etiologia , Edema Pulmonar/etiologia , Respiração Artificial/instrumentação , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório/etiologiaRESUMO
PURPOSE: To analyze the impact on patient outcome of ventilator-associated events (VAEs) as defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in 2008, 2013, and the correlation with ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) or tracheobronchitis (VAT). METHODS: This was a prospective, observational, multicenter, international study conducted at 13 intensive care units (ICUs); thirty consecutive adults mechanically ventilated for ≥ 48 h per site were eligible, with daily follow-up being recorded in a collaborative web database; VAEs were assessed using the 2013 CDC classification and its 2015 update. RESULTS: A total of 2856 ventilator days in 244 patients were analyzed, identifying 33 VAP and 51 VAT episodes; 30-day ICU mortality was significantly higher (42.8 vs. 19.6%, p < 0.007) in patients with VAP than in those with VAT. According to the 2013 CDC definitions, 117 VAEs were identified: 113 (96%) were infection-related ventilator-associated complication-plus (IVAC-plus), while possible ventilator-associated pneumonia (PVAP) was found in 64 (56.6%) of them. VAE increased the number of ventilator days and prolonged ICU and hospital LOS (by 5, 11, and 12 days, respectively), with a trend towards increased 30-day mortality (43 vs 28%, p = 0.06). Most episodes (26, 55%) classified as IVAC-plus without PVAP criteria were due to atelectasis. PVAP significantly increased (p < 0.05) ventilator days as well as ICU and hospital LOS (by 10.5, 14, and 13 days, respectively). Only 24 (72.7%) of VAP and 15 (29.4%) of VAT episodes met IVAC-plus criteria. CONCLUSIONS: Respiratory infections (mainly VAT) were the most common complication. VAE algorithms only identified events with surrogates of severe oxygenation deterioration. As a consequence, IVAC definitions missed one fourth of the episodes of VAP and three fourths of the episodes of VAT. Identifying VAT (often missed by IVAC-plus criteria) is important, as VAP and VAT have different impacts on mortality.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Bronquite/diagnóstico , Bronquite/tratamento farmacológico , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica/diagnóstico , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica/tratamento farmacológico , Respiração Artificial/efeitos adversos , Idoso , Bronquite/etiologia , Estudos de Coortes , Técnicas e Procedimentos Diagnósticos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica/etiologia , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estudos ProspectivosAssuntos
COVID-19 , Pérnio , Dermatite , Púrpura , COVID-19/complicações , Pérnio/diagnóstico , Pérnio/patologia , Humanos , Púrpura/diagnóstico , Púrpura/etiologia , SARS-CoV-2RESUMO
Ventilator-associated pneumonia is the most common infection in intensive care unit patients associated with high morbidity rates and elevated economic costs; Pseudomonas aeruginosa is one of the most frequent bacteria linked with this entity, with a high attributable mortality despite adequate treatment that is increased in the presence of multiresistant strains, a situation that is becoming more common in intensive care units. In this manuscript, we review the current management of ventilator-associated pneumonia due to P. aeruginosa, the most recent antipseudomonal agents, and new adjunctive therapies that are shifting the way we treat these infections. We support early initiation of broad-spectrum antipseudomonal antibiotics in present, followed by culture-guided monotherapy de-escalation when susceptibilities are available. Future management should be directed at blocking virulence; the role of alternative strategies such as new antibiotics, nebulized treatments, and vaccines is promising.
RESUMO
Sepsis and septic shock is one of the leading causes of death worldwide. Antibiotics, fluid resuscitation support of vital organ function and source control are the cornerstones for the treatment of these patients. Source control measures include all those actions taken in the process of care to control the foci of infection and to restore optimal function of the site of infection. Source control represents the multidisciplinary team required in order to optimize critical care for septic shock patients. In the last decade an increase interest on fluids, vasopressors, antibiotics, and organ support techniques in all aspects whether time, dose and type of any of those have been described. However information of source control measures involving minimal invasion and new techniques, time of action and outcome without it, is scarce. In this review the authors resumes new information, recommendations and future directions on this matter when facing the more common types of infections.