Prehospital Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the available published evidence of the effects of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) in the prehospital setting on clinical outcomes in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. DESIGN: A systematic review and meta-analysis designed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews an Meta-Analyses guidelines. SETTING: In the prehospital setting. PARTICIPANTS: All randomized control trials (RCTs) and observational trials using pre-hospital ECPR in adult patients (>17 years). INTERVENTIONS: Prehospital ECPR. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The study authors searched Medline, Embase, and PUBMED for all RCTs and observational trials. The studies were assessed for clinical, methodologic, and statistical heterogeneity. The primary outcome was survival at hospital discharge. The study outcomes were aggregated using random-effects meta-analysis of means or proportions as appropriate. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology was used to assess the quality of evidence. Four studies were included, with a total of 222 patients receiving prehospital ECPR (mean age = 51 years [95% CI 44-57], 81% of patients were male (CI 74-87), and 60% patients had a cardiac cause for their arrest (95% CI 43-76). Overall survival at discharge was 23.4% (95% CI 15.5-33.7; I2 = 62%). The pooled low-flow time was 61.1 minutes (95% CI 45.2-77.0; I2 = 97%). The quality of evidence was assessed to be low, and the overall risk of bias was assessed to be serious, with confounding being the primary source of bias. CONCLUSION: No definitive conclusions can be made as to the efficacy of prehospital ECPR in refractory cardiac arrest. Higher quality evidence is required.

To scope or not - the challenges of managing patients with positive fecal occult blood test after recent colonoscopy.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a major health problem. There is minimal consensus of the appropriate approach to manage patients with positive immunochemical fecal occult blood test (iFOBT), following a recent colonoscopy. AIM: To determine the prevalence of advanced neoplasia in patients with a positive iFOBT after a recent colonoscopy, and clinical and endoscopic predictors for advanced neoplasia. METHODS: The study recruited iFOBT positive patients who underwent colonoscopy between July 2015 to March 2020. Data collected included demographics, clinical characteristics, previous and current colonoscopy findings. Primary outcome was the prevalence of CRC and advanced neoplasia in a patient with positive iFOBT and previous colonoscopy. Secondary outcomes included identifying any clinical and endoscopic predictors for advanced neoplasia. RESULTS: The study included 1051 patients (male 53.6%; median age 63). Forty-two (4.0%) patients were diagnosed with CRC, 513 (48.8%) with adenoma/sessile serrated lesion (A-SSL) and 257 (24.5%) with advanced A-SSL (AA-SSL). A previous colonoscopy had been performed in 319 (30.3%). In this cohort, four (1.3%) were diagnosed with CRC, 146 (45.8%) with A-SSL and 56 (17.6%) with AA-SSL. Among those who had a colonoscopy within 4 years, none had CRC and 7 had AA-SSL. Of the 732 patients with no prior colonoscopy, there were 38 CRCs (5.2%). Independent predictors for advanced neoplasia were male [odds ratio (OR) = 1.80; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.35-2.40; P < 0.001), age (OR = 1.04; 95%CI: 1.02-1.06; P < 0.001) and no previous colonoscopy (OR = 2.07; 95%CI: 1.49-2.87; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: A previous colonoscopy, irrespective of its result, was associated with low prevalence of advanced neoplasia, and if performed within four years of a positive iFOBT result, was protective against CRC.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of long-term outcomes in adults undergoing the Ross procedure.

BACKGROUND: The management of aortic valve disease is becoming increasingly complicated with the evolution of treatment options available to cardiac surgeons and cardiologist. Pulmonary autograft replacement of the aortic valve, commonly known as the Ross procedure, involves excision of the pulmonary valve from the right ventricular outflow tract and implantation in the aortic position. This systematic review aims to evaluate the long-term outcomes, following the Ross procedure. METHODS: An electronic search strategy queried five online medical referencing databases from inception to 21 August 2020. All studies detailing the long-term outcomes of adults undergoing the Ross procedure were included. A random effects model was used to determine pooled continuous data. Enhanced secondary survival analysis was performed on reconstructed individual patient data. RESULTS: Twenty-three studies were included in the qualitative synthesis, including a total of 6,278 patients with a mean follow-up duration of 6.0±2.8 years. Long-term survival was 95.6%, 91.8%, 86.3% and 80.5% at five, ten, fifteen and twenty years, respectively. Freedom from autograft reoperation was 95.7%, 91.2%, 84.9% and 76.1% at five, ten, fifteen and twenty years, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: When performed in experienced centres and for appropriately selected patients, the Ross procedure represents a durable replacement of the aortic valve with excellent long-term survival.