Persistent malperfusion after central aortic repair in acute type I aortic dissections.

OBJECTIVE: Acute dissection involving the ascending aorta and extending beyond the innominate artery (DeBakey type I) may be associated with acute ischemic complications owing to branch artery malperfusion. The purpose of this study was to document the prevalence of noncardiac ischemic complications associated with type I aortic dissections that persisted after initial ascending aortic and hemiarch repair, necessitating vascular surgery intervention. METHODS: Consecutive patients presenting with acute type I aortic dissections between 2007 and 2022 were studied. Patients who underwent initial ascending aortic and hemiarch repair were included in the analysis. Study end points included the need for additional interventions after ascending aortic repair and death. RESULTS: There were 120 patients (70% men; mean age, 58 ± 13 years) who underwent emergent repair for acute type I aortic dissections during the study period. Forty-one patients (34%) presented with acute ischemic complications. These included 22 (18%) with leg ischemia, 9 (8%) with acute strokes, 5 (4%) with mesenteric ischemia, and 5 (4%) with arm ischemia. After proximal aortic repair, 12 patients (10%) had persistent ischemia. Nine patients (8%) required additional interventions for persistent leg ischemia (n = 7), intestinal gangrene (n = 1), or cerebral edema (craniotomy, n = 1). Three other patients with acute stroke had permanent neurologic deficits. All other ischemic complications resolved after the proximal aortic repair despite mean operative times exceeding 6 hours. Comparing patients with persistent ischemia with those whose symptoms resolved after central aortic repair, there were no differences in demographics, distal extent of dissection, mean operative time for aortic repair, or need for venous-arterial extracorporeal bypass support. Overall, 6 of the 120 patients (5%) suffered perioperative deaths. Hospital deaths occurred in 3 of the 12 patients (25%) with persistent ischemia vs none of 29 patients who had resolution of the ischemia after aortic repair (P = .02). Over a mean follow-up of 51 ± 39 months, no patient required an additional intervention for persistent branch artery occlusion. CONCLUSIONS: One-third of patients with acute type I aortic dissections had associated noncardiac ischemia, prompting a vascular surgery consultation. Limb and mesenteric ischemia most often resolved after the proximal aortic repair and did not require further intervention. No vascular interventions were performed in patients with stroke. Although the presence of acute ischemia at presentation did not increase hospital or 5-year mortality rates, persistent ischemia after central aortic repair seems to be a marker for increased hospital mortality after type I dissections.

Risk factors for lower extremity vascular complications in adult patients on veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

OBJECTIVE: Utilization of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) has increased significantly over the last decade. Prior studies have reported worse mortality for patients with vascular complications on VA-ECMO; however, these were limited by small sample size. The purpose of this study is to investigate predictive risk factors for vascular complications in VA-ECMO patients and their potential impact on mortality. METHODS: Patients who underwent peripheral VA-ECMO from January 2011 to December 2021 were identified. Primary outcomes were lower extremity vascular complications and in-hospital mortality. Multivariate stepwise logistic regression models were used to identify predictors of vascular complications and in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: A total of 605 VA-ECMO patients (25% female) were identified. The mean age was 56.3 ± 13 years, and 56 (10.4%) were black. In-hospital mortality was 63.8% (n = 386), and VA-ECMO ipsilateral vascular complications occurred in 72 patients (11.9%). Vascular surgical interventions (thromboembolectomy, fasciotomies, amputation, and surgical management of cannula bleeding) were required in 30 patients (41.7%). Same-side arterial and venous cannulas, cannula size, and absence of distal perfusion cannula did not increase risk of vascular complication. Multivariate analysis identified age (odds ratio, 0.948; 95% confidence interval, 0.909-0.988; P = .0116) and pre-existing peripheral arterial disease (odds ratio, 3.489; 95% confidence inteval, 1.146-10.624; P = .0278) as independent predictors of need for vascular surgery interventions. The mortality rate of patients who developed vascular complications was not significantly different compared with the mortality rate of those who did not develop vascular complications (61% vs 64%; P = .92). CONCLUSIONS: This study represents one of the largest series to date of lower extremity vascular outcomes in patients undergoing VA-ECMO. Our results confirm the high mortality rate associated with VA-ECMO; however, vascular complications did not represent a risk factor for mortality as previously reported. Same-sided VA-ECMO cannulas, cannula size, and the presence or absence of distal perfusion cannula did not predict vascular complications. Increasing age and presence of peripheral arterial disease are independent predictors of need for vascular surgery intervention in patients on VA-ECMO.

Emergency department visits after acute aortic syndromes.

OBJECTIVE: Recent reports document a high rate of readmission after hospitalization for acute aortic syndromes (AAS) that include acute aortic dissections, intramural hematomas, or penetrating aortic ulcers. We examined the rate of return to the emergency department (ED) to better understand the utilization of emergent health care services after AAS. METHODS: Consecutive patients with AAS admitted to the vascular surgery service from 2004 to 2020 were included. Patients with type A dissections, arch involvement, or chronic aortic pathology were excluded. The primary outcome was ED visits within 90 days of the original hospitalization. RESULTS: The study included 79 subjects (62% men, 38% women; mean age: 64 ± 14 years) with AAS (82% aortic dissections, 11% intramural hematomas, and 6% penetrating aortic ulcers). A total of 54 ED visits related to the AAS occurred within 90 days of the original discharge, each of which incurred a computed tomography angiogram. Twenty-eight (35%) subjects had a mean of 2 ± 2 ED visits, whereas 51 (65%) subjects had no ED visits. Ninety percent (25 of 28) of the first ED visits occurred within 1 month of discharge and 53% (15 of 28) within 1 week. A total of 17 (61%) subjects were readmitted to the hospital from the ED. Four subjects were found to have progression of AAS on imaging studies and underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair during readmission. Comparing subjects who returned to the ED with those who did not, there were no significant differences in demographics, atherosclerotic risk factors except coronary artery disease, type of AAS, number of antihypertensive medications at admission or discharge, operative intervention, length of initial hospital stay, or discharge status. The chief complaints at the first ED visit were pain (n = 17), uncontrolled hypertension (n = 5), syncope (n = 3), and other (n = 3). CONCLUSIONS: These data show that one in three patients with AAS returned to the ED within 90 days of initial discharge. Although returning subjects had a higher number of readmissions, few had progression of AAS that required intervention. Because the vast majority were readmitted for medical therapy, early and frequent clinic follow-up may help decrease ED visits and readmissions after AAS.

Ankle-brachial index use in peripheral vascular interventions for claudication.

OBJECTIVE: The ankle-brachial index (ABI) has been recommended as the first-line noninvasive test to establish a diagnosis of peripheral arterial disease in patients with claudication (grade 1, level A evidence). The ABI can also be used to monitor disease progression and assess the benefits of treatment after peripheral vascular intervention (PVI). The Upper Midwest Region of the Vascular Quality Initiative has a unique balance of participation from vascular surgeons, interventional radiologists, and cardiologists performing PVI. We sought to identify the use of ABI and assess the functional outcomes of patients who had undergone PVI for claudication. METHODS: We conducted a review of the Upper Midwest Region of the Vascular Quality Initiative to identify PVI performed for claudication from native artery atherosclerotic occlusive disease in nondiabetic patients from 2010 to 2020. Patients who had undergone PVI with infection, tissue loss, rest pain, bypass graft stenosis, or aneurysmal disease were excluded. The primary outcomes included the ABI, ambulation status, and functional status before and after PVI. RESULTS: A total of 3787 patients (58.0% male, 42.0% female; mean age, 68.4 years) who had undergone 3830 procedures were identified. Of the 3787 patients, 2665 (69.5%) had had the ABI measured: 1803 (47.1%) before PVI only, 190 (4.9%) after PVI only, and 862 (22.5%) before and after PVI. In addition, 975 patients (25.5%) had never had the ABI performed. Statistical analysis of the entire cohort found no change in ambulation status (P = .33-.95 for all comparisons) or functional status (P = .42-.61 for all comparisons) regardless of the use of the ABI. However, a significant number of patients who had never had the ABI measured had decreased from full functional status before PVI to only being functional with light work after PVI (P = .015). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the grade 1, level A evidence, ABI had been used before and after PVI for only 22.5% of the patients who had undergone PVI for claudication. In addition, we found overall functional status had decreased significantly after PVI for those patients who had never had an ABI performed. Accurately identifying patients with claudication due to PAD using the ABI remains critically important before PVI. Given the lack of overall improvement in ambulation after PVI found in the present study, identifying the patients who will benefit from PVI to treat claudication remains elusive.

The impact of pre-existing blood pressure control in patients with acute aortic dissections.

OBJECTIVES: Arterial hypertension (HTN) is considered a seminal risk factor for aortic dissection (AD). The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether pre-existing blood pressure (BP) control lessens the extent of dissection and has a favorable impact on outcome of patients with acute AD. METHODS: Consecutive acute AD patients who had at least two BPs recorded within the 12 months preceding the AD were retrospectively analyzed. The two most recent BPs were averaged and defined per published guidelines as normal (BP≤ 130/80), Stage I HTN (BP >130/80 and <139/89), or Stage 2 or greater HTN (BP > 140/90). The number of hypertensive medications (MEDs) was also used as a surrogate marker of HTN severity. Patients with known genetic causes of AD were excluded. RESULTS: 89 subjects (55% men, 45% women; mean age, 64±14 years) with acute AD (58% Stanford type A and 42% Stanford type B) were included. Two most recent BPs were recorded a mean of 5±3 and 3±2.7 months before the AD, respectively. Twenty-nine (33%) subjects had normal BP, including nine subjects with no history of HTN and on no MEDs. Sixty (67%) subjects had elevated BP, including 21 (35%) with Stage I HTN and 39 (65%) with Stage 2 HTN. Compared to subjects with normal BP, subjects with Stage 1 and Stage 2 HTN were younger (70±13 years vs 62±1 year, p = 0.01), but there were no differences in other demographics, risk factors, comorbidities, or history of drug use. There were no group differences in the distal extent of the dissections, complications requiring thoracic endograft repair, mean length of hospital stay, final discharge status, or 30-day mortality. Compared to the number of MEDs before AD, all three groups had a higher mean number of MEDs to achieve normal BP at discharge that persisted at a mean follow-up of 18±15 months. CONCLUSIONS: These data show that approximately one-third of patients with acute AD had well controlled or no antecedent history of HTN. The degree of pre-existing HTN control had no bearing on the type or extent of AD, length of stay, or early outcome. Regardless of the state of HTN control before AD, the consistent and sustained increase in the severity of HTN after AD suggests that the dissection process has a profound and lasting effect on BP regulation. Further studies are indicated to elucidate the pathologic mechanisms involved in AD.

Representation of women in vascular surgery science and societies.

OBJECTIVE: Medical schools and surgical residencies have seen an increase in the proportion of female matriculants, with 30% of current vascular surgery trainees being women over the past decade. There is widespread focus on increasing diversity in medicine and surgery in an effort to provide optimal quality of patient care and the advancement of science. The presence of gender diversity and opportunities to identify with women in leadership positions positively correlates with women choosing to enter traditionally male-dominated fields. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the representation of women in regional and national vascular surgical societies over the last 20 years. METHODS: A retrospective review of the meeting programs of vascular surgery societies was performed. Data were collected on abstract presenters, moderators, committee members and chairs, and officers (president, president-elect, vice president, secretary, and treasurer). The data were divided into early (1999-2009) and late (2010-2019) time periods. RESULTS: Five regional and five national societies' data were analyzed, including 139 meetings. The mean percentage of female abstract presenters increased significantly from 10.9% in the early period to 20.6% in the late period (P < .001). Female senior authors increased slightly from 8.7% to 11.5%, but this change was not statistically significant (P = .22). Female meeting moderators increased significantly from 7.8% to 17.2% (P < .001), as well as female committee members increased from 10.9% to 20.3% (P = .003). Female committee chairs increased slightly from 10.9% to 16.9%, but this difference was not statistically significant (P = .13). Female society officers increased considerably from 6.4% to 14.8%. (P = .002). Significant variation was noted between societies, with five societies (three regional and two national) having less than 10% women at the officer level in 2019. There was a wide variation noted between societies in the percentage of female abstract presenters (range, 7.6%-34.9%), senior authors (3.9%-17.9%), and meeting moderators (5.4%-40.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Over the past two decades, there has been a significant increase in the representation of women in vascular surgery societies among those presenting scientific work, serving as meeting moderators, and serving as committee members. However, the representation of women among committee chairs, senior authors, and society leadership has not kept up pace with the increase noted at other levels. Efforts to recruit women into the field of vascular surgery as well as to support the professional development of female vascular surgeons are facilitated by the presence of women in leadership roles. Increasing the representation of women in vascular society leadership positions may be a key strategy in promoting gender diversity in the vascular surgery field.

Vascular surgery presence in carotid endarterectomy YouTube videos.

OBJECTIVE: YouTube videos have become a common resource for trainees to learn about surgical procedures. Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is one example procedure that may be performed by multiple specialties and with a variety of techniques. Little is known about educational content and the representation of vascular surgeons in these videos. We sought to compare the educational quality of CEA YouTube videos, techniques demonstrated, and prevalence of each specialty. METHODS: YouTube was programmatically searched for the terms "carotid endarterectomy," "carotid endarterectomy surgery," "carotid endarterectomy technique," "carotid endarterectomy CEA," and "carotid artery surgery." Videos that met inclusion criteria were analyzed for surgical technique, procedural steps, surgeon specialty, video length, and date. Videos were determined to have high-quality educational content if the video included English-language captions or narration and demonstrated key steps of the procedure: division of the common facial vein; exposure of the common, external, and internal carotid arteries; vascular control and clamping; and arteriotomy, endarterectomy, and arteriotomy closure. RESULTS: Forty-six videos met inclusion criteria. Vascular surgery was associated with 12 (26.1%) CEA videos, cardiac surgery with 13 (28.3%), and neurosurgery with 14 (30.4%). Surgeon specialty was unknown for seven (17.4%) videos. Eight videos were high quality, of which vascular surgery was associated with three (37.5%). Conventional endarterectomy was the most common technique demonstrated, whereas a total of seven videos demonstrated eversion technique. Vascular and cardiac surgeons were more likely to demonstrate patch angioplasty than neurosurgeons, who exclusively performed primary closure (P < .05). Compared with cardiac surgeons, vascular surgeon CEA videos had more views (25,956 ± 9613 vs 1200 ± 368; P < .05) and were more likely to be published by user accounts with an academic affiliation (11 vs 6; P < .05). Vascular surgery videos were older than videos by cardiac surgeons (6.0 ± 1.1 years vs 3.0 ± 0.5 years; P < .05) and neurosurgeons (6.0 ± 1.1 years vs 3.1 ± 0.8 years; P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Despite more views, the field of vascular surgery is under-represented in YouTube videos demonstrating CEA. Vascular surgery videos tend to be older and make up a minority of high-quality videos. As more learners turn to YouTube for information about surgical procedures, vascular surgeons should expand their online presence through the production and collection of high-quality videos for trainees.

Pre-emptive thoracic endovascular aortic repair is unnecessary in extended type A (DeBakey type I) aortic dissections.

OBJECTIVE: Pre-emptive thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) improves late survival and limits progression of disease after type B aortic dissection, but the potential value of pre-emptive TEVAR has not been evaluated after type A dissection extending beyond the aortic arch (DeBakey type I). The purpose of this study was to compare disease progression and need for aortic intervention in survivors of acute, extended type A (ExTA) dissections after initial repair of the ascending aorta versus acute type B aortic dissections. METHODS: Consecutive patients presenting with ExTA or type B dissections between 2011 and 2018 were studied. Forty-three patients with ExTA and 44 with type B dissections who survived to discharge and had follow-up imaging studies were included in the analysis. Study end points included progression of aortic disease (>5 mm growth or extension), need for intervention, and death. RESULTS: The groups were not different for age, sex, atherosclerotic risk factors, or extent of dissection distal to the left subclavian artery. Following emergent ascending aortic repair, five ExTA patients (12%) underwent TEVAR within 4 months after discharge. Despite optimal medical treatment, 29 type B patients (66%) underwent early or late TEVAR (P < .001). During a mean follow-up of 38 ± 30 months, 38 ExTA patients (88%) did not require intervention-23 (53%) of whom showed no disease progression. In comparison, during a mean follow-up of 18 ± 6 months, 14 type B patients (32%) did not require intervention-nine (20%) of whom showed no disease progression (P = .003). There was one aortic-related late death in the ExTA group and two in the type B group. Compared with ExTA patients, type B patients had significantly worse intervention-free survival and intervention/growth-free survival (log rank, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: In contrast with type B dissections, these midterm results demonstrate that one-half of ExTA aortic dissections show no disease progression in the thoracic or abdominal aorta, and few require additional interventions. After initial repair of the ascending aorta, pre-emptive TEVAR does not seem to be justified in patients with acute, ExTA dissections.

Development of a pulsatile cadaver-based simulation for training of open abdominal vascular surgery skills.

OBJECTIVE: Developing competence in open aortic surgery is increasingly challenging in vascular surgery training programs. Although static cadaver models provide an opportunity for dissection and exposure, the lack of pulsatility limits further education in managing blood vessels. We developed an affordable pulsatile cadaver simulation model to improve training in open abdominal aortic surgery with the primary objective of determining whether it incorporated the fidelity required to teach critical surgical techniques. METHODS: The University of Minnesota Bequest program supported a pilot project to develop a fresh pulsatile cadaver. A written pretest on exposure of the aorta in various locations was given to all trainees. The external iliac artery was exposed, cannulated, then perfused in a pulsatile fashion using normal saline and a pump. Trainees were then evaluated and timed on location of the aorta, retractor placement, dissection, and creation of an aortic anastomosis. RESULTS: Twenty-six pulsatile cadaver procedures were performed with five fellows over 13 months. All procedures were performed under the supervision of the same faculty member. Total cost over the study period was $8800. Four abdominal aortic aneurysms were found (15%). With bilateral iliac artery ligation, adequate pulsatility was created for blind supraceliac aortic dissection. Abdominal wall and organ relationships were ideal for teaching proper retractor placement and techniques for vascular dissection, endarterectomy, and anastomosis. Although 100% of fellows documented written understanding of the steps for procedures on the pretest, no fellow successfully placed a supraceliac aortic clamp, properly positioned retractors for proper open AAA exposure, or placed all proximal aortic back wall sutures transmurally on the initial assessment. After training for a variable number of cases, all were able to place a supraceliac clamp blindly within 4 minutes from skin incision. Retractor placement and suturing technique improved significantly for all trainees during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of a pulsatile cadaver-based simulation model for abdominal vascular surgery has the potential to be both affordable and provide necessary haptics and fidelity for training fellows in critical abdominal vascular techniques.

Unplanned return to operating room after lower extremity arterial bypass is an independent predictor for hospital readmission.

OBJECTIVE: Hospital readmissions after surgical operations are considered serious complications and have an impact on health care-associated costs. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services strongly encourage identification and ramification of factors associated with hospital readmissions after operations. Despite advances in endovascular surgery, lower extremity arterial bypass remains the "gold standard" treatment for severe, symptomatic peripheral arterial disease. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively review the factors associated with hospital readmission after lower extremity bypass surgery. METHODS: The 2013 lower extremity revascularization-targeted American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database and generalized 2013 general and vascular surgery NSQIP Participant Use Data File were used for this study. Patient, diagnosis, and procedure characteristics of patients undergoing lower extremity bypass surgery were assessed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to determine independent risk factors for hospital readmission within 30 days after surgery. RESULTS: A total of 2646 patients (65% male, 35% female) were identified in the NSQIP database who underwent lower extremity open revascularization during the year 2013. Indications for operations included tissue loss (39%), rest pain (32%), and severe claudication (25%). Preoperative ankle-brachial indices were 0.4 to 0.9 (32%) and <0.4 (16.5%). A total of 425 patients (16%) were readmitted within 30 days of index operation. Risk factors associated with readmission included wound complication (odds ratio [OR], 8.54; 95% confidence interval [CI], 6.68-10.92; P < .001), need for reoperation (OR, 5.95; 95% CI, 4.45-7.97; P < .001), postoperative myocardial infarction (OR, 2.19; 95% CI, 1.25-3.83; P = .006), wound dehiscence (OR, 8.45; 95% CI, 4.54-15.71; P < .001), organ or space surgical site infection (OR, 7.62; 95% CI, 2.89-20.14; P < .001), postoperative pneumonia (OR, 2.66; 95% CI, 1.28-5.52; P = .009), progressive renal insufficiency (OR, 4.12; 95% CI, 1.52-11.11; P = .005), superficial surgical site infection (OR, 7.37; 95% CI, 5.31-10.23; P < .001), urinary tract infection (OR, 2.67; 95% CI, 1.42-5.01; P = .002), and deep wound infection (OR, 14.0; 95% CI, 7.62-24.80; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Readmission after lower extremity bypass surgery is a serious complication. Various factors put a patient at high risk for readmission. Return to the operating room, wound infection, amputation, deep venous thrombosis, and major reintervention on bypass are independent risk factors for hospital readmission. Return to the operating room is associated with a 5.95-fold increase in hospital readmission.

Increased Duration of Operating Time for Carotid Endarterectomy Is Associated with Increased Mortality.

BACKGROUND: Carotid endarterectomy is the gold standard operation to prevent stroke in patients with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis and asymptomatic high-grade carotid artery stenosis. Longer operative times for different operations have been shown to affect the outcomes adversely. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of postoperative complications after carotid endarterectomy, and their relation to the operative times. METHODS: The American College of Surgeons database was queried for all patients who underwent carotid endarterectomies from 2005 to 2007. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on the operative time (<140 min and >140 min). The incidence of preoperative morbidities and postoperative complications was then compared among these groups. RESULTS: A total of 10,423 patients underwent carotid endarterectomies during this time period. Longer operative time (>140 min) is associated with higher incidence of 30-day mortality (1.3% vs. 0.7%, P = 0.013), length of stay ≥7 days (12.7% vs. 8.1%, P < 0.001), postoperative pneumonias (1.6% vs. 0.9%, P = 0.001), failure to wean from ventilator for more than 48 hr (1.8% vs. 0.6%, P < 0.001), and return to the operating room (6.5% vs. 5.2%, P = 0.010). Factors associated with longer operative times were the following: age <65 years (odds ratio [OR] 1.3, confidence interval [CI] 1.1-1.6), male gender (OR 1.6, CI 1.4-1.7), black race (OR 1.5, CI 1.2-1.8), history of myocardial infarction (OR 1.7, CI 1.2-2.4), higher American Society of Anesthesiologist score (OR 1.3, CI 1.1-1.6), presence of surgical trainees (OR 3.6, CI 1.7-7.4), and presence of surgical fellows (OR 1.7, CI 1.4-2.2). CONCLUSIONS: Longer operative times for carotid endarterectomy are associated with increased risk of postoperative complications. Factors associated with longer operative times for carotid endarterectomy can be identified preoperatively.

Endovascular Repair of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Is Associated with Lower Incidence of Post-operative Acute Renal Failure.

BACKGROUND: Acute renal failure (ARF) after surgical treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is an independent predictor of post-operative mortality. Open repair for ruptured AAA has been the gold standard treatment; however, there has been a recent trend in increased utilization of endovascular repair (EVAR) for treatment of ruptured AAA. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively review and compare the incidence of ARF among patients treated with open versus endovascular repair of ruptured AAA. METHODS: American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was searched for surgeries performed for AAA during 2005-2010. Patients' demographics and co-morbidities (diabetes mellitus, hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction, peripheral arterial disease) were collected. Incidence of ARF after surgery was reviewed. We also collected American Society for Anesthesiologists scores, operating times, functional status, post-operative complications, and mortality. RESULTS: Of total 2179 operations for ruptured AAA, incidence of mortality within first 30 days after operation was 17% after EVAR for ruptured AAA and 33.2% after open repair of ruptured AAA. Incidence of ARF was 6.9% after EVAR for ruptured AAA and 13.5% after open repair of ruptured AAA. Odds ratio for mortality after open repair was 1.94 (confidence interval [CI] 1.51-2.49) when compared with EVAR (P < 0.001), and odds ratio for developing ARF after EVAR was 1.62 (CI 1.14-2.29) as compared with open AAA repair (P < 0.05) in multivariable logistic regression models. Open repair of ruptured AAA and totally dependent functional status were associated with post-operative mortality and ARF. CONCLUSIONS: Incidence of mortality and post-operative ARF for ruptured AAA is significantly higher when treated with open repair, as compared to EVAR. Totally dependent functional status was associated with post-operative mortality and ARF.

Society for Vascular Surgery practice guidelines for atherosclerotic occlusive disease of the lower extremities: management of asymptomatic disease and claudication.

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) continues to grow in global prevalence and consumes an increasing amount of resources in the United States health care system. Overall rates of intervention for PAD have been rising steadily in recent years. Changing demographics, evolution of technologies, and an expanding database of outcomes studies are primary forces influencing clinical decision making in PAD. The management of PAD is multidisciplinary, involving primary care physicians and vascular specialists with varying expertise in diagnostic and treatment modalities. PAD represents a broad spectrum of disease from asymptomatic through severe limb ischemia. The Society for Vascular Surgery Lower Extremity Practice Guidelines committee reviewed the evidence supporting clinical care in the treatment of asymptomatic PAD and intermittent claudication (IC). The committee made specific practice recommendations using the GRADE (Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation) system. There are limited Level I data available for many of the critical questions in the field, demonstrating the urgent need for comparative effectiveness research in PAD. Emphasis is placed on risk factor modification, medical therapies, and broader use of exercise programs to improve cardiovascular health and functional performance. Screening for PAD appears of unproven benefit at present. Revascularization for IC is an appropriate therapy for selected patients with disabling symptoms, after a careful risk-benefit analysis. Treatment should be individualized based on comorbid conditions, degree of functional impairment, and anatomic factors. Invasive treatments for IC should provide predictable functional improvements with reasonable durability. A minimum threshold of a >50% likelihood of sustained efficacy for at least 2 years is suggested as a benchmark. Anatomic patency (freedom from restenosis) is considered a prerequisite for sustained efficacy of revascularization in IC. Endovascular approaches are favored for most candidates with aortoiliac disease and for selected patients with femoropopliteal disease in whom anatomic durability is expected to meet this minimum threshold. Conversely, caution is warranted in the use of interventions for IC in anatomic settings where durability is limited (extensive calcification, small-caliber arteries, diffuse infrainguinal disease, poor runoff). Surgical bypass may be a preferred strategy in good-risk patients with these disease patterns or in those with prior endovascular failures. Common femoral artery disease should be treated surgically, and saphenous vein is the preferred conduit for infrainguinal bypass grafting. Patients who undergo invasive treatments for IC should be monitored regularly in a surveillance program to record subjective improvements, assess risk factors, optimize compliance with cardioprotective medications, and monitor hemodynamic and patency status.

Incidence of Postoperative Deep Venous Thrombosis Is Higher among Cardiac and Vascular Surgery Patients as Compared with General Surgery Patients.

BACKGROUND: Unlike general surgery patients, most of vascular and cardiac surgery patients receive therapeutic anticoagulation during operations. The purpose of this study was to report the incidence of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) among cardiac and vascular surgery patients, compared with general surgery. METHODS: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for all patients who underwent surgical procedures from 2005 to 2010. Patients who developed DVT within 30 days of an operation were identified. The incidence of DVT was compared among vascular, general, and cardiac surgery patients. Risk factors for developing postoperative DVT were identified and compared among these patients. RESULTS: Of total 2,669,772 patients underwent surgical operations in the period between 2005 and 2010. Of all the patients, 18,670 patients (0.69%) developed DVT. The incidence of DVT among different surgical specialties was cardiac surgery (2%), vascular surgery (0.99%), and general surgery (0.66%). The odds ratio for developing DVT was 1.5 for vascular surgery patients and 3 for cardiac surgery patients, when compared with general surgery patients (P < 0.001). The odds ratio for developing DVT after cardiac surgery was 2, when compared with vascular surgery (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of DVT is higher among vascular and cardiac surgery patients as compared with that of general surgery patients. Intraoperative anticoagulation does not prevent the occurrence of DVT in the postoperative period. These patients should receive DVT prophylaxis in the perioperative period, similar to other surgical patients according to evidence-based guidelines.

Arterial complications in patients undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation via femoral cannulation.

BACKGROUND: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) provides continuous cardiopulmonary support on a long-term basis. It has been speculated that patients undergoing ECMO via femoral arterial cannulation are more likely to develop peripheral vascular complications. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence of peripheral vascular complications in this group of patients and outline the modalities used for treatment. METHODS: Data were collected for all patients who had femoral artery cannulation for ECMO therapy from June 2008 to October 2011. Primary outcome was any vascular complication. Secondary outcomes were 30-day mortality and amputation. Operative reports were reviewed to analyze the surgical procedures implied for treating vascular complications. RESULTS: One hundred one patients underwent ECMO therapy during the period of study; 63.4% were male with an average age of 47.7 years. Mean length of hospital stay was 19.8 days and average length of time on the ECMO device was 7.33 days. Indications for ECMO included cardiogenic shock in 61 patients (60.4%), pulmonary failure in 37 (36.6%), and combined cardiac and pulmonary failure in 3 (3%). Overall mortality comprised 42 patients (42%). Risk factors for peripheral arterial disease included hypertension (32%), diabetes mellitus (21.8%), hyperlipidemia (21.7%), and smoking (19.8%). Eighteen patients (17.8%) developed peripheral vascular complications (confidence interval 10‒25%). Among the patients who developed vascular complications, 78% were male and average length of time on the device was 7.16 days. Indications for ECMO were cardiac failure in 13 (72%) and pulmonary failure in 5 (28%). Two (11%) were managed nonoperatively and 16 (89%) needed surgical intervention, 8 (44.44%) of whom required femoral endarterectomy with patch angioplasty. One patient required below-knee amputation. None required distal bypass. Mortality among patients with vascular complications was 28% (P = 0.30). Indications for use of ECMO in these patients included cardiogenic shock in 13 (72%) and pulmonary failure in 5 (28%). The mortality rate was 58% among diabetic patients and 34% in nondiabetic patients (P = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Vascular complications occur in less then 20% of ECMO patients with the majority requiring femoral reconstruction. Development of vascular complications does not appear to increase risk of amputation or mortality. Among those patients who develop vascular complications, the most common indication for ECMO is cardiogenic shock.

Monitoring of fetal radiation exposure during pregnancy.

BACKGROUND: One unique concern of vascular surgeons and trainees is radiation exposure associated with increased endovascular practice. The safety of childbearing is a particular worry for current and future women in vascular surgery. Little is known regarding actual fetal radiation exposure. This multi-institutional study aimed to evaluate the radiation dosages recorded on fetal dosimeter badges and compare them to external badges worn by the same cohort of women. METHODS: All women who declared pregnancy with potential radiation exposure were required to wear two radiation monitors at each institution, one outside and the other inside the lead apron. Maternal (external) and fetal monitor dosimeter readings were analyzed. Maternal radiation exposures prior to, during, and postpregnancy were also assessed to determine any associated behavior modification. RESULTS: Eighty-one women declared pregnancy from 2008 to 2011 and 32 had regular radiation exposure during pregnancy. Maternal whole-body exposures ranged from 21-731 mrem. The average fetal dosimeter recordings for the cohort rounded to zero. Only two women had positive fetal dosimeter recordings; one had a single recording of 3 mrem and the other had a single recording of 7 mrem. There was no significant difference between maternal exposures prior to, during, and postpregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: Lack of knowledge of fetal radiation exposure has concerned many vascular surgeons, prompting them to wear double lead aprons during pregnancy, and perhaps prevented numerous other women from entering the field. Our study showed negligible radiation exposure on fetal monitoring suggesting that with the appropriate safety precautions, these concerns may be unwarranted.