Impact and production of Non-HLA-specific antibodies in solid organ transplantation.

Organ transplantation is an effective way to treat end-stage organ disease. Extending the graft survival is one of the major goals in the modern era of organ transplantation. However, long-term graft survival has not significantly improved in recent years despite the improvement of patient management and advancement of immunosuppression regimen. Antibody-mediated rejection is a major obstacle for long-term graft survival. Donor human leucocyte antigen (HLA)-specific antibodies were initially identified as a major cause for antibody-mediated rejection. Recently, with the development of solid-phase-based assay reagents, the contribution of non-HLA antibodies in organ transplantation starts to be appreciated. Here, we review the role of most studied non-HLA antibodies, including angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1 R), K-α-tubulin and vimentin antibodies, in the solid organ transplant, and discuss the possible mechanism by which these antibodies are stimulated.

Differences in pathologic features and graft outcomes in antibody-mediated rejection of renal allografts due to persistent/recurrent versus de novo donor-specific antibodies.

Antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) of renal allografts occurs in two forms. Type 1 ABMR results from persistence and/or a rebound of preexisting donor-specific antibodies in sensitized patients and usually occurs early post-transplantation. Type 2 ABMR is associated with de novo donor-specific antibodies and usually occurs over one year post-transplantation. It is generally accepted that types 1 and 2 also differ with regard to certain pathologic features including the frequencies of C4d positivity and concurrent cell-mediated rejection. However, direct comparison of pathologic, serologic, and clinical features of types 1 and 2 ABMR is lacking. Here we compared these features in 80 cases of ABMR (37 type 1, 43 type 2) diagnosed at our center. Compared with type 1, type 2 ABMR occurred later post-transplantation, was more often associated with donor-specific antibodies against Class II HLA, and was associated with more interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy and more frequent cell-mediated rejection, although these did not differ with respect to C4d positivity. By univariate analysis, graft survival was lower with type 2 than type 1 ABMR with borderline significance. Still, among these 80 patients, all but one treated for ABMR following diagnosis, the only two independent predictors of graft failure were at least moderate interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy and failure of the donor-specific antibody relative intensity scale score, a measure of the combined strength of all donor-specific antibodies present, to decrease in response to therapy.

Non-human leukocyte antigen-specific antibodies in thoracic transplantation.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Development of donor human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-specific antibodies is associated with graft loss, yet the role of non-HLA antibodies in solid organ transplant needs to be further defined. It is suggested that HLA antibodies and non-HLA antibodies collaborate together to impact graft outcome. This review focuses on the latest findings on antibodies against these non-HLA antigens in thoracic organ transplant. RECENT FINDINGS: These non-HLA antigens include signaling proteins expressed on the cell surface, such as angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R), endothelin type A receptor, and structure proteins, such as myosin, vimentin, and Kα1 tubulin, and extracellular matrix protein collagen. Antibodies against these antigens may impact the allograft in different ways. Although these non-HLA antibodies can damage the allograft through complement-mediated or cell-mediated cytotoxicity, antibodies against AT1R and endothelin type A receptor can also alter the endothelial cell function by activating intracellular signals. The presence of these non-HLA antibodies may predispose the patient to develop HLA-specific antibodies. Recently, it has been shown patients with AT1R antibodies pretransplant have a higher chance to develop de-novo donor-specific HLA antibodies. SUMMARY: The findings suggest it is important to stratify the patient's immunologic risk by assessing both the HLA and non-HLA-specific antibodies.

Intrinsic cardiac origin of human cardiosphere-derived cells.

AIMS: Cardiosphere-derived cells (CDCs) are in clinical development as a regenerative cell product which can be expanded ex vivo from patient cardiac biopsies. Cardiosphere-derived cells are clonogenic, exhibit multilineage differentiation, and exert functional benefits in preclinical models of heart failure. The origin of CDCs remains unclear: are these cells endogenous to the heart, or do they arise from cells that populate the heart via blood-borne seeding? METHODS AND RESULTS: Right ventricular endomyocardial biopsies were obtained from cardiac transplant recipients (n = 10, age 57 ± 15 years), and CDCs expanded from each biopsy. Donor-recipient mismatches were used to probe the origin of CDCs in three complementary ways. First, DNA analysis of short-tandem nucleotide repeats (STRs) was performed on genomic DNA from donor and recipient, then compared with the STR pattern of CDCs. Second, in two cases where the donor was male and the recipient female, CDCs were examined for the presence of X and Y chromosomes by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Finally, in two cases, quantitative PCR (qPCR) was performed for individual-specific polymorphisms of a major histocompatability locus to quantify the contribution of recipient cells to CDCs. In no case was recipient DNA detectable in the CDCs by STR analysis. In the two cases in which a female patient had received a male heart, all CDCs examined had an X and Y chromosome, similarly indicating exclusively donor origin. Likewise, qPCR on CDCs did not detect any recipient DNA. CONCLUSION: Cardiosphere-derived cells are of endogenous cardiac origin, with no detectable contribution from extra-cardiac seeding.

Rituximab and intravenous immune globulin for desensitization during renal transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Few options for transplantation currently exist for patients highly sensitized to HLA. This exploratory, open-label, phase 1-2, single-center study examined whether intravenous immune globulin plus rituximab could reduce anti-HLA antibody levels and improve transplantation rates. METHODS: Between September 2005 and May 2007, a total of 20 highly sensitized patients (with a mean [+/-SD] T-cell panel-reactive antibody level, determined by use of the complement-dependent cytotoxicity assay, of 77+/-19% or with donor-specific antibodies) were enrolled and received treatment with intravenous immune globulin and rituximab. We recorded rates of transplantation, panel-reactive antibody levels, cross-matching results at the time of transplantation, survival of patients and grafts, acute rejection episodes, serum creatinine values, adverse events and serious adverse events, and immunologic factors. RESULTS: The mean panel-reactive antibody level was 44+/-30% after the second infusion of intravenous immune globulin (P<0.001 for the comparison with the pretreatment level). At study entry, the mean time on dialysis among recipients of a transplant from a deceased donor was 144+/-89 months (range, 60 to 324). However, the time to transplantation after desensitization was 5+/-6 months (range, 2 to 18). Sixteen of the 20 patients (80%) received a transplant. At 12 months, the mean serum creatinine level was 1.5+/-1.1 mg per deciliter (133+/-97 micromol per liter), and the mean survival rates of patients and grafts were 100% and 94%, respectively. There were no infusion-related adverse events or serious adverse events during the study. Long-term monitoring for infectious complications and neurologic problems revealed no unanticipated events. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that the combination of intravenous immune globulin and rituximab may prove effective as a desensitization regimen for patients awaiting a transplant from either a living donor or a deceased donor. Larger and longer trials are needed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of this approach. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00642655.)

Quantifying HLA-specific antibodies in patients undergoing desensitization.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Two major desensitization protocols have been used to eliminate or reduce HLA antibodies to a level that allows transplantation with a low risk of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). This review will focus on the antibody testing methods used to assess changes in the breadth and strength of antibody levels and the relative strength of donor HLA-specific antibodies (DHSAs). RECENT FINDINGS: Correlations of solid-phase immunoassay (SPI) class I and II levels with the donor-specific T and B cross-match results have shown the acceptable levels of DHSA that correlate with a low risk for AMR. The DSHA levels determined by SPI correlate with cross-match results and with clinical outcome. Therefore, the results of either assay can be used to determine the risk of AMR and when treatment has reduced DSHA to a level safe for transplantation. Monitoring DSHA is important for guiding the number of treatments as well as the timing of additional treatments needed to achieve these acceptable levels. SUMMARY: DSHA monitoring, in both protocols, uses the correlation of solid-phase antibody testing and the donor-specific cross-match to determine the efficacy of the protocol and when the acceptable level of DSHA is achieved permitting transplantation with minimal likelihood of AMR.

Angiotensin II type I receptor antibodies in thoracic transplantation.

Angiotensin II type I receptor (AT1R) is a critical player in regulating vasoconstriction, blood pressure, sodium retention. Even though AT1R has limited polymorphism, AT1R antibodies have been detected in several diseases. The role of AT1R antibodies in transplantation is first reported in kidney transplant, and then identified in heart and lung transplants. Mechanical circulatory support devices (MCS) can also stimulate production of AT1R antibodies. AT1R antibodies may negatively impact graft or patient survival through mechanisms independent of the classical complement activation.

Pretransplant donor-specific and non-specific immune parameters associated with early acute rejection.

BACKGROUND: New immunosuppression protocols have resulted in decreased rates of biopsy-proven acute rejection; however, it is unclear whether recipients without biopsy-proven acute rejection are still at risk for immune complication and chronic allograft dysfunction. The aim of our studies was to determine whether pretransplant immune parameters were associated with posttransplant early acute rejection, unstable creatinine courses, and poor graft outcome. METHODS: Immune parameters, including human leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatch, HLA-specific antibodies, global CD4+ cellular response as measured by intracellular adenosine triphosphate (iATP) synthesis, and IFN-gamma precursor frequencies to donor or third-party cells as measured by ELISPOT were determined for a total of 126 kidney recipients treated with a protocol, including rapid discontinuation of prednisone. RESULTS: The donor specific pretransplant parameters of HLA class I mismatches (P=0.04) and total HLA mismatches (P=0.04) with the donor as well as the pretransplant HLA-donor specific antibodies (P=0.002) were associated with biopsy-proven acute rejection. Higher pretransplant iATP levels, a donor nonspecific parameter, were found associated with biopsy proven acute rejection (P=0.04). Pretransplant iATP levels were significantly greater for recipients with early unstable creatinine levels (P=0.01). Recipients with a pretransplant iATP value greater than 375 ng/ml were 3.67 times more likely to experience acute rejection (P=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Pretransplant assessment of donor specific and nonspecific immune parameters may identify recipients who can benefit from closer clinical and immunological surveillance to allow for tailored immunsuppression and selective intervention aimed at optimizing both short and long-term graft outcome.

Comprehensive assessment for serum treatment for single antigen test for detection of HLA antibodies.

The single antigen test is widely used in the field of transplantation to determine the specificity of HLA antibodies. It will be beneficial to standardize the procedure of the single antigen test among HLA laboratories. It is not uncommon that single antigen testing on native sera fails to detect antibodies with very high concentrations. It has been shown that cleavage products of activated complement components may mask strongly binding antibodies in single antigen testing. To overcome inhibition by the activated complement products, sera are pretreated with ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), dithiothreitol (DTT), or heat inactivation before single antigen testing. However, no studies have been published to systemically compare the impact of these treatments on single antigen testing. The aim of this study is to understand the different effects these treatments may have on single antigen test results. We found that mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) obtained from sera treated with EDTA and heat inactivation were nearly identical, while DTT treatment was less potent to remove the inhibition. In addition, sera dilution did not further increase MFI of antibodies after EDTA treatment. Our results provide guidance to choose a pretreatment reagent for single antigen testing, and to compare studies obtained from laboratories using different treatments.

Impact of Non-Human Leukocyte Antigen-Specific Antibodies in Kidney and Heart Transplantation.

The presence of donor human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-specific antibodies has been shown to be associated with graft loss and decreased patient survival, but it is not uncommon that donor-specific HLA antibodies are absent in patients with biopsy-proven antibody-mediated rejection. In this review, we focus on the latest findings on antibodies against non-HLA antigens in kidney and heart transplantation. These non-HLA antigens include myosin, vimentin, Kα1 tubulin, collagen, and angiotensin II type 1 receptor. It is suggested that the detrimental effects of HLA antibodies and non-HLA antibodies synergize together to impact graft outcome. Injury of graft by HLA antibodies can cause the exposure of neo-antigens which in turn stimulate the production of antibodies against non-HLA antigens. On the other hand, the presence of non-HLA antibodies may increase the risk for a patient to develop HLA-specific antibodies. These findings indicate it is imperative to stratify the patient's immunologic risk by assessing both HLA and non-HLA antibodies.

A 3-Center Study Reveals New Insights Into the Impact of Non-HLA Antibodies on Lung Transplantation Outcome.

BACKGROUND: The presence of antibodies to angiotensin type 1 receptor (AT1R) and endothelin type A receptor (ETAR) is associated with allograft rejection in kidney and heart transplantation. The aim of our study was to determine the impact of AT1R and ETAR antibodies on graft outcome in lung transplantation. METHODS: Pretransplant and posttransplant sera from 162 lung recipients transplanted at 3 centers between 2011 and 2013 were tested for antibodies to AT1R and ETAR by the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) assay. Clinical parameters analyzed were: HLA antibodies at transplant, de novo donor-specific antibodies (DSA), antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), acute cellular rejection, and graft status. RESULTS: Late AMR (median posttransplant day 323) was diagnosed in 5 of 36 recipients with de novo DSA. Freedom from AMR significantly decreased for those recipients with strong/intermediate binding antibodies to AT1R (P = 0.014) and ETAR (P = 0.005). Trends for lower freedom from acute cellular rejection were observed for recipients with pretransplant antibodies to AT1R (P = 0.19) and ETAR (P = 0.32), but did not reach statistical significance. Lower freedom from the development of de novo DSA was observed for recipients with antibodies detected pretransplant to AT1R (P = 0.054), ETAR (P = 0.012), and HLA-specific antibodies (P = 0.063). When the pretransplant antibody status of HLA-specific antibody (hazard ratio [HR], 1.69) was considered together with either strong binding to AT1R or ETAR, an increased negative impact on the freedom from the development of de novo DSA was observed (HR, 2.26 for HLA antibodies and ETAR; HR, 2.38 for HLA antibodies and ETAR). CONCLUSIONS: These results illustrate the increased negative impact when antibodies to both HLA and non-HLA antigens are present pretransplant.

Role of flow cytometry to define unacceptable HLA antigens in lung transplant recipients with HLA-specific antibodies.

BACKGROUND: Antidonor HLA-specific antibodies have been associated with hyperacute rejection and primary graft failure in lung transplant recipients. Thus, transplant candidates with HLA-specific antibodies generally undergo prospective crossmatching to exclude donors with unacceptable HLA antigens. However, the need to perform a prospective crossmatch limits the donor pool and is associated with increased waiting list times and mortality. A virtual crossmatch strategy using flow cytometry, which enables precise determination of HLA-specific antibody specificity, was compared to prospective crossmatching in sensitized lung transplant candidates. METHODS: In all, 341 lung transplant recipients were analyzed retrospectively (April 1992 to July 2003). Sixteen patients with HLA-specific antibodies underwent transplantation based on flow cytometric determination of antibody specificity and 10 underwent prospective crossmatching. RESULTS: Freedom from bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) at three years was similar in those undergoing a virtual crossmatch, those undergoing prospective crossmatching, and those without HLA-specific antibodies (80.4% +/- 13.4, 85.7% +/- 13.2, and 73.8% +/- 2.8, respectively, P = 0.88). Three-year survival was also comparable (87.5% +/- 8.3, 70.0% +/- 14.5, and 78.5% +/- 2.4, respectively, P = 0.31). Elimination of prospective crossmatching for sensitized patients was associated with a significant decrease in time on the waiting list (P < 0.01) and in waiting list mortality (P < 0.05). All 16 patients undergoing a virtual crossmatch had negative retrospective crossmatches. CONCLUSIONS: By carefully determining the specificity of HLA-specific antibodies, flow cytometry methodologies enable the prediction of negative crossmatch results with up to 100% accuracy, enabling the determination of appropriateness of donors. Using this virtual crossmatch strategy, crossmatching can be safely omitted prior to lung transplantation, thereby decreasing waiting list time and mortality rates for candidates with HLA-specific antibodies.

Optimizing transplantation of sensitized heart candidates using 4 antibody detection assays to prioritize the assignment of unacceptable antigens.

BACKGROUND: The virtual crossmatch relies on the assignment of unacceptable antigens (UAs) to identify compatible donors. The purpose of our study was to identify an algorithm for assignment of UAs such that a negative complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) crossmatch and concomitant negative or weakly positive flow cytometric crossmatch (FXM) are obtained. METHODS: We used 4 antibody methods: (1) Luminex single antigen (LSA), (2) LSA with a 1:8 serum dilution, (3) C1q LSA, and (4) CDC panel. The UAs were prioritized in the following order: (1) all C1q+/CDC+, (2) LSA 1:8 >7,500 median fluorescence intensity, and (3) LSA >10,000 median fluorescence intensity. RESULTS: Of 295 heart transplants that were performed at our center, 69 (23%) recipients had detectable human leukocyte antigen specific antibody at the time of transplant. All donor specific antibodies (DSAs) were avoided for 44 of 69 (64%) (DSA-). There were 25 recipients who had DSA at the time of transplant: 12 (48%) had negative FXM (DSA+/FXM-), and 13 (52%) had positive T-cell and/or B-cell FXM (DSA+/FXM+). Lower freedom from antibody-mediated rejection was observed for the DSA+/FXM+ group compared with the DSA- group (p < 0.0001). DSA remained detectable after transplant in the sera of 14 recipients, and de novo DSA was detected in 32 recipients. Freedom from antibody-mediated rejection was comparable for both groups (p = 0.53) but was lower than the DSA- group (p < 0.0001). Survival was comparable for all groups at 1,200 days post-transplant. CONCLUSIONS: Strategic prioritization of UA assignment has allowed transplantation of highly sensitized patients across the DSA barrier with survival rates comparable to DSA- heart transplant recipients.

Antibody-mediated rejection of the lung: A consensus report of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation.

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is a recognized cause of allograft dysfunction in lung transplant recipients. Unlike AMR in other solid-organ transplant recipients, there are no standardized diagnostic criteria or an agreed-upon definition. Hence, a working group was created by the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation with the aim of determining criteria for pulmonary AMR and establishing a definition. Diagnostic criteria and a working consensus definition were established. Key diagnostic criteria include the presence of antibodies directed toward donor human leukocyte antigens and characteristic lung histology with or without evidence of complement 4d within the graft. Exclusion of other causes of allograft dysfunction increases confidence in the diagnosis but is not essential. Pulmonary AMR may be clinical (allograft dysfunction which can be asymptomatic) or sub-clinical (normal allograft function). This consensus definition will have clinical, therapeutic and research implications.

Utility of peritransplant and rescue intravenous immunoglobulin and extracorporeal immunoadsorption in lung transplant recipients sensitized to HLA antigens.

The role of anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies in lung transplantation is not fully clear. The presence of pretransplant third-party anti-HLA antibodies or the development of de novo anti-HLA antibodies has been associated with acute posttransplant complications, bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS), and early mortality in some studies. However, little has been reported regarding the utility of desensitization therapy in sensitized lung transplant recipients. For approximately 3 years, desensitization therapy consisting of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) and, in most instances, extracorporeal immunoadsorption (ECI) has been administered peritransplant to lung transplant recipients at our institution with third-party anti-HLA antibodies or as rescue therapy to those who develop de novo anti-HLA antibodies. Notably, the administration of peritransplant desensitization therapy to these patients has been associated with improvement in several clinical parameters, including acute rejection and BOS. Furthermore, administration of rescue IVIG with or without ECI has been associated with an overall improvement in the rate of pulmonary function decline. Our experience suggests that desensitization therapy may be beneficial for lung transplant recipients with pretransplant or de novo anti-HLA antibodies. We discuss the appropriateness and clinical impact of IVIG and ECI in sensitized lung transplant recipients as well as cellular mechanisms that may contribute.

Pre-transplant panel reactive antibody in lung transplant recipients is associated with significantly worse post-transplant survival in a multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: The presence of antibodies to human leukocyte antigens (HLA) prior to transplantation has been linked to worse post-transplant outcomes in many solid organ transplants. The effect of these antibodies is less clear in lung transplant recipients, although previous studies have suggested an increased incidence of allograft dysfunction. METHODS: A retrospective study of all first lung transplant recipients from the University of Toronto (November 1983-July 2001, n = 380) and Duke University (April 1992-June 2000, n = 276) was performed. Demographic data, survival information, and level of last pre-transplant panel reactive antibody (PRA) were collected. PRA level was measured by the complement-dependent cell cytotoxicity assay at both centers. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and groups were compared with the Wilcoxon rank sum test. RESULTS: Of 656 lung transplant recipients, 101 (15.4%) had a PRA greater than 0, 37 (5.6%) had a PRA greater than 10%, and 20 (3.0%) had a PRA greater than 25%. Patients with a PRA greater than 25% had decreased median survival than did the rest of the patients (1.5 vs 5.2 years) and at 1 month (70% vs 90%), 1 year (65% vs 76%), and 5 years (31% vs 50%), respectively (p = 0.006, Wilcoxon's rank sum test) test). CONCLUSION: Significant elevation of PRA prior to lung transplantation is associated with worse survival, especially in the early post-transplant period. This may be due to a direct effect of anti-HLA antibodies on the allograft. The effectiveness of treatments such as plasmapheresis and intravenous immunoglobulin prior to transplantation needs to be evaluated.

Development of an antibody specific to major histocompatibility antigens detectable by flow cytometry after lung transplant is associated with bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Chronic allograft rejection manifested as bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) is the leading cause of late death after lung transplantation. Although increasing evidence suggests an association between anti-human leukocyte antigens (HLA) antibodies and chronic rejection of kidney or heart allografts, the clinical significance of anti-HLA antibodies in lung recipients is less clear, especially in previously unsensitized recipients. The use of flow cytometry based panel reactive antibody (flow-PRA) provides a highly sensitive means to identify the development of de novo anti-HLA antibodies in lung recipients. METHODS: Flow-PRA testing was used to analyze the pre- and posttransplant sera in stable BOS free lung recipients who survived at least 6 months. Patients without prior sensitization as defined by a negative pretransplant flow-PRA were analyzed posttransplant for the presence of anti-HLA antibodies by flow-PRA. A proportional hazards model was used to determine the impact of anti-HLA antibody on BOS risk. RESULTS: Sera from 90 recipients at Duke University with negative pretransplant flow-PRA were tested by flow-PRA at various time points after transplant. Sera from 11% (10/90) of recipients were found to contain anti-HLA antibodies detectable by flow-PRA. Nine patients (90%) developed anti-HLA antibodies specific for donor antigens, and one patient developed anti-HLA class II antibodies, not specific to donor antigens. Among the nine patients with donor antigen specific antibodies, flow-PRA specificity analysis demonstrated eight were specific for class II antigens and one for class I antigens. In a multivariate model that controls for other BOS risk factors, a positive posttransplant flow-PRA was significantly associated with BOS grades 1,2, or 3 (hazard ratios [HR] 3.19; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.41-7.12, P=0.005) and BOS grade 2 or 3 (HR 4.08; 95% CI: 1.66-10.04, P=0.002). Four patients with de novo anti-HLA antibodies died during follow-up; all four had BOS. Among BOS patients, the presence of anti-HLA antibodies was associated with a significantly worse survival (P =0.05, log-rank test). CONCLUSIONS: Although uncommon, previously unsensitized lung transplant recipients can develop anti-HLA antibodies to donor class II antigens. The development of de novo anti-HLA antibodies significantly increases the risk for BOS, independent of other posttransplant events. Furthermore, de novo anti-HLA antibodies identify BOS patients with significantly worse survival. Additional studies are needed to determine if class II-directed anti-HLA antibodies contribute mechanistically to the chronic rejection process in lung recipients.

Anti-HLA antibody analysis and crossmatching in heart and lung transplantation.

Although the clinical significance of anti-HLA antibodies in heart and lung transplantation is less well studied than in renal transplantation, several studies have shown that heart and lung recipients transplanted in the presence of donor-specific antibodies are at increased risk for early acute rejection and have a lower graft survival. In an effort to avoid any increase in organ ischemia time, heart and lung candidates with anti-HLA antibodies have to be identified prior to transplantation and crossmatches performed with donor materials obtained prior to organ recovery. Both class I and II antibodies have been found to be associated with chronic rejection, defined in heart transplantation as transplant-related coronary artery disease (TRCAV) and in lung transplantation as obliterative bronchiolitis (OB) or bronchiolitis obliterative syndrome (BOS). Post-transplant de novo development of donor antigen-specific class II antibodies has been found to be especially deleterious, significantly increasing the risk of chronic rejection and poor graft outcome. Based on the review of studies regarding the development of anti-HLA antibodies and thoracic organ allograft rejection several conclusions can be drawn. The presence of class I and II-directed anti-HLA antibodies, detected by any method, are associated with acute and chronic rejection in heart and lung transplantation. Different therapeutic strategies have been used pre-transplantation to decrease the level of anti-HLA antibodies and post-transplantation to maintain low antibody levels or treat rejection, thereby improving graft outcome. Thus, monitoring the presence and the level of anti-HLA antibodies is prognostic of graft outcome and allows for measurement of therapeutic efficacy.