Epidemiology of childhood interstitial lung disease in France: the RespiRare cohort.

INTRODUCTION: Interstitial lung disease in children (chILD) are rare and mostly severe lung diseases. Very few epidemiological data are available in limited series of patients. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence and incidence of chILD in France. METHODS: We performed within the RespiRare network a multicentre retrospective observational study in patients with chILD from 2000 to 2022 and a prospective evaluation of chILD's incidence between February 2022 and 2023. RESULTS: chILD was reported in 790 patients in 42 centres. The estimated 2022 prevalence in France was 44 /million children (95% CI 40.76 to 47.46) and the computed incidence was 4.4 /million children (95% CI 3.44 to 5.56). The median age at diagnosis was 3 months with 16.9% of familial forms. Lung biopsy and genetic analyses were performed in 23.4% and 76.9%, respectively. The most frequent chILD aetiologies in the <2 years group were surfactant metabolism disorders (16.3%) and neuroendocrine cell hyperplasia of infancy (11.8%), and in the 2-18 years group diffuse alveolar haemorrhage (12.2%), connective tissue diseases (11.4%), hypersensitivity pneumonitis (8.8%) and sarcoidosis (8.8%). The management included mainly oxygen therapy (52%), corticosteroid pulses (56%), oral corticosteroids (44%), azithromycin (27.2%), enteral nutrition (26.9%), immunosuppressants (20.3%) and hydroxychloroquine (15.9%). The 5-year survival rate was 57.3% for the patients diagnosed before 2 years and 86% between 2 and 18 years. CONCLUSION: This large and systematic epidemiological study confirms a higher incidence and prevalence of chILD than previously described. In order to develop international studies, efforts are still needed to optimise the case collection and to harmonise diagnostic and management practices.

COBRAPed cohort: Do sensitization patterns differentiate children with severe asthma from those with a milder disease?

BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether sensitization patterns differentiate children with severe recurrent wheeze (SRW)/severe asthma (SA) from those with non-severe recurrent wheeze (NSRW)/non-severe asthma (NSA). Our objective was to determine whether sensitization patterns can discriminate between children from the French COBRAPed cohort with NSRW/NSA and those with SRW/SA. METHODS: IgE to 112 components (c-sIgE) (ImmunoCAP® ISAC) were analyzed in 125 preschools (3-6 years) and 170 school-age children (7-12 years). Supervised analyses and clustering methods were applied to identify patterns of sensitization among children with positive c-sIgE. RESULTS: We observed c-sIgE sensitization in 51% of preschool and 75% of school-age children. Sensitization to house dust mite (HDM) components was more frequent among NSRW than SRW (53% vs. 24%, p < .01). Sensitization to non-specific lipid transfer protein (nsLTP) components was more frequent among SA than NSA (16% vs. 4%, p < .01) and associated with an FEV1/FVC < -1.64 z-score. Among sensitized children, seven clusters with varying patterns were identified. The two broader clusters identified in each age group were characterized by "few sensitizations, mainly to HDM." One cluster (n = 4) with "multiple sensitizations, mainly to grass pollen, HDM, PR-10, and nsLTP" was associated with SA in school-age children. CONCLUSIONS: Although children with wheeze/asthma display frequent occurrences and high levels of sensitization, sensitization patterns did not provide strong signals to discriminate children with severe disease from those with milder disease. These results suggest that the severity of wheeze/asthma may depend on both IgE- and non-IgE-mediated mechanisms.

Late-onset pulmonary complications following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in pediatric patients: a prospective multicenter study.

The primary objective of our multicenter prospective study was to describe the incidence of late-onset non-infectious pulmonary complications (LONIPCs) in children undergoing hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) using sensitive criteria for pulmonary function test (PFT) abnormalities including the non-specific pattern of airflow obstruction. Secondary objectives were to assess the factors associated with LONIPC occurrence and the sensitivity of the 2014 NIH-Consensus Criteria of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS). PFT and clinical assessment were performed prior to HCT and at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months post-HCT. LONIPC diagnosis was validated by an Adjudication Committee. The study comprised 292 children from 12 centers. Thirty-two individuals (11%, 95% CI: 8-15%) experienced 35 LONIPCs: 25 BOS, 4 interstitial lung diseases, 4 organizing pneumonia and 2 pulmonary veno-occlusive diseases. PFT abnormalities were obstructive defects (FEV1/FVC z-score < -1.645; n = 12), restrictive defects (TLC < 80% predicted, FEV1 and FVC z-scores < -1.645; n = 7) and non-specific pattern (FEV1 and FVC z-score< -1.645, FEV1/FVC z-score > -1.645, and TLC > 80% predicted; n = 8). HCT for malignant disease was the only factor associated with LONIPC (P = 0.04). The 2014 NIH-Consensus Criteria would only diagnose 8/25 participants (32%) as having BOS. In conclusion, 11% of children experienced a LONIPC in a prospective design. Clinical Trials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT02032381.

Lumacaftor/Ivacaftor Population Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients with Cystic Fibrosis: A First Step Toward Personalized Therapy.

BACKGROUND: A major breakthrough in cystic fibrosis (CF) therapy was achievedAQ1 with CFTR modulators. The lumacaftor/ivacaftor combination is indicated for the treatment of CF in pediatric patients above 6 years old. Pharmacokinetic (PK) studies of lumacaftor/ivacaftor in these vulnerable pediatric populations are AQ2crucial to optimize treatment protocols. OBJECTIVES AND METHODS: The objectives of this study were to describe the population PK (PPK) of lumacaftor and ivacaftor in children with CF, and to identify factors associated with interindividual variability. The association between drug exposure and clinical response was also investigated. RESULTS: A total of 75 children were included in this PPK study, with 191 concentrations available for each compound and known metabolites (lumacaftor, ivacaftor, ivacaftor-M1, and ivacaftor-M6). PPK analysis was performed using Monolix software. A large interindividual variability was observed. The main sources of interpatient variability identified were patient bodyweight and hepatic function (aspartate aminotransferase). Forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) was statistically associated with the level of exposure to ivacaftor after 48 weeks of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first analysis of lumacaftor/ivacaftor PPK in children with CF. These data suggest that dose adjustment is required after identifying variability factors to optimize efficacy. The use of therapeutic drug monitoring as a basis for dose adjustment in children with CF may be useful.

The expanded French compassionate programme for elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor use in people with cystic fibrosis without a F508del CFTR variant: a real-world study.

BACKGROUND: Elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor has been approved in Europe for people with cystic fibrosis with at least one F508del CFTR variant. Additionally, it is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for people with cystic fibrosis with at least one of 177 rare variants. The aims of this study were to describe the clinical response to elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor for people with cystic fibrosis without a F508del CFTR variant in France and to determine CFTR variant responsiveness to elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor based on the observed clinical response. METHODS: The French compassionate programme expanded access to elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor to people with cystic fibrosis, aged 6 years and older, without a F508del variant, excluding those with two variants previously characterised as non-responsive. Participants at France's 47 cystic fibrosis centres were given a 4-6 week trial of elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor and response was determined by a centralised committee based on evolution of clinical data, lung function, and sweat chloride concentration. Responsiveness of individual CFTR variants was derived from observed clinical responses. FINDINGS: The first compassionnate programme was launched on May 19, 2022; by March 8, 2024, 516 people with cystic fibrosis had been identified for inclusion in this real-word study: 37 were not included due to the presence of two variants previously characterised as non-responsive to elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor, and 479 (229 females [48%] and 250 males [52%]) received elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor for 4-6 weeks. Among 443 participants who received no CFTR modulator before elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor, 83 had at least one FDA-approved variant, of whom 81 (98%) were responders and continued elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor; in responders, mean absolute change in sweat chloride was -44·5 mmol/L (95% CI -39·1 to -49·8) and percentage of predicted FEV1 (ppFEV1) was 11·1 percentage points (95% CI 8·4 to 13·7; both comparisons p<0·0001). Among 360 participants with no FDA-approved variant and no previous CFTR modulator, 177 (49%) were responders; in responders, mean absolute change in sweat chloride was -20·5 mmol/L (-17·2 to -23·8) and ppFEV1 was 13·2 percentage points (11·4 to 15·0; both comparisons p<0·0001). Among 36 participants who were receiving ivacaftor before elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor, 32 (89%) continued elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor. Of 251 individual CFTR variants, 64 (28 FDA-approved) were classified as responsive or possibly responsive to elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor, and 123 (two FDA-approved) as non-responsive or possibly non-responsive to elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor. INTERPRETATION: In France, over half of the population with cystic fibrosis without a F508del variant responded to elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor, with most responders having no FDA-approved variant. The treatment period was relatively short and further research is warranted to describe the long-term safety and effectiveness of elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor in this population. FUNDING: Association Vaincre la Mucoviscidose, Société Française de la Mucoviscidose, and Filière Maladies Rares MUCO-CFTR.

A quick access to information on influenza burden and prevention in Lyon university hospital: A prospective QR code-based information campaign in 2022-2023.

BACKGROUND: Influenza vaccines are effective in decreasing hospitalizations and mortality related to influenza and its complications. However, the Vaccine Coverage Rate of influenza remains low and multifaceted efforts are required to improve it. The aim of this study was to assess the impact on influenza vaccine perception using a digital tool among outpatients and health care workers (HCWs). METHODS: A study was performed among outpatients and the HCWs of 23 hospital departments from 4 hospitals affiliated to Lyon university Hospitals (France), between October 2022 and February 2023. By scanning QR (Quick Response) codes, displayed on posters for patients, their companions, as well as in the letters sent to HCWs, users accessed anonymously to a web-application (ELEFIGHT®), which provided information on influenza and invited them to initiate a discussion on influenza prevention with their physicians during the consultation. Patients were also invited to complete a questionnaire regarding their perception of influenza vaccination before and after reading the information on ELEFIGHT®. The retention rate (RR = proportion of people who remain on the page for >2 s), the conversion rate (CR = proportion of people who click on the "Call-To-Action" button) and the absolute variation (difference in the perception before/after) and relative variation (absolute change as a percentage of the initial perception) in perception regarding influenza vaccination before and after consulting the application were calculated. RESULTS: 3791 scans were performed by 3298 patients and/or their companions with a RR of 52% and a CR of 55.1% and 253 scans by 221 HCWs with a RR of 71.2% and a CR of 115.3%. Participants spent an average of 47 s on the application. The questionnaire on influenza vaccination perception was completed by 1533 participants (46.5%); 1390 (90.7%) maintained the same position (neutral, favorable or unfavorable) on this vaccination before and after consulting the application. The relative variations in favor of vaccination were + 7.2% (unfavorable then favorable) and + 19.8% (neutral then favorable). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that a facilitated direct access to medical information through QR codes disseminated in health settings can help nudge people to foster their awareness of influenza and its prevention. Future deployments in a similar context or to other populations could be envisaged. Other vaccine-preventable and/or chronic diseases could also be the target of similar projects as part of public health programs.