Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
1.
J Card Surg ; 32(8): 479-482, 2017 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28833637

RESUMO

The valve-in-valve (viv) procedure has been shown to be effective in treating patients with a degenerated bioprosthesis who are also considered high risk or inoperable for a reoperation. We describe a case of concomitant transfemoral transcatheter viv aortic and mitral valve replacements.


Assuntos
Estenose da Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Artéria Femoral , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca/métodos , Valva Mitral/cirurgia , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter/métodos , Valva Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagem , Bioprótese/efeitos adversos , Ecocardiografia Transesofagiana , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valva Mitral/diagnóstico por imagem , Falha de Prótese , Reoperação/efeitos adversos , Risco , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
J Card Surg ; 32(11): 741-745, 2017 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29178215

RESUMO

Aortic insufficiency following left ventricular assist device implantation (LVAD) has been reported in up to 40% of patients and is associated with a worse prognosis. We describe the case of a successful transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement with a self-expanding bioprosthesis for aortic insufficiency following destination LVAD implantation.


Assuntos
Insuficiência da Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Bioprótese , Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas , Ventrículos do Coração , Coração Auxiliar , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter/métodos , Adulto , Insuficiência da Valva Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagem , Insuficiência da Valva Aórtica/terapia , Ecocardiografia Transesofagiana , Artéria Femoral , Humanos , Masculino , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
3.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol ; 24(12): 1383-7, 2013 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24028584

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Atrioventricular block (AVB) occurs commonly after valve surgery, and permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation is often required. However, the rate and time course of spontaneous recovery of AV conduction in these patients is not known. The goal of this study was to define the rate and risk factors for late high-grade AVB in patients who have PPM implantation for this indication. METHODS: Serial PPM or defibrillator interrogation data as well as demographic and operative data were reviewed from consecutive patients who had device implantation for AVB following valve surgery. Predictors of late AVB were identified with multiple regression models, and recovery of AV conduction was determined with Kaplan-Meier analyses. RESULTS: Among 98 patients included in the analysis, 58% (57/98) had evidence of late high-grade AVB, with a mean follow-up of 3.6 years. Of the 57 patients with late AVB after PPM implantation, 44 (77%) displayed pacing dependency. In multivariate analyses, persistent AVB in the immediate postoperative period was the only variable associated with late AVB (odds ratio 5.3, 95% confidence interval [2.1, 13.5], P = 0.0006). Among patients who recovered AV conduction within 1 month of surgery, 26% developed AVB during extended follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 40% of patients who received a PPM for AVB after valve surgery displayed no evidence of high-grade AVB during serial device interrogations. However, simple baseline demographic, operative, and postoperative variables are not sufficiently robust for discriminating those patients with early postoperative AVB who will not need long-term pacing following valve surgery.


Assuntos
Bloqueio Atrioventricular/terapia , Estimulação Cardíaca Artificial , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/efeitos adversos , Valvas Cardíacas/cirurgia , Marca-Passo Artificial , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Bloqueio Atrioventricular/diagnóstico , Bloqueio Atrioventricular/etiologia , Bloqueio Atrioventricular/fisiopatologia , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Desenho de Equipamento , Feminino , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Razão de Chances , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Recidiva , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 77(7): 1020-30, 2011 Jun 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21574239

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the prevalence and prognostic value regarding mortality of cTnT or cTnI elevations after nonemergent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in a large number of cohort/registry studies. BACKGROUND: Routine cardiac troponin measurement after elective PCI has been controversial among interventionalists. Recent studies have provided conflicting data in regard to predictive value of cardiac troponin-T (cTnT) and troponin-I (cTnI) elevation after non-emergent PCI. METHODS: Electronic and manual searches were conducted of all published studies reporting on the prognostic impact of cTnT or cTnI elevation after elective PCI. A meta-analysis was performed with all-cause mortality at follow-up as the primary endpoint. RESULTS: We identified 22 studies, involving 22,353 patients, published between 1998 and 2009. Postprocedural cTnT and cTnI were elevated in 25.9% and 34.3% of patients, respectively. Follow-up period ranged from 3 to 67 months (mean: 17.7 ± 14.9 months). The results showed no heterogeneity among the trials (Q-test: 25.39; I(2) : 17%; P = 0.23). No publication bias was detected (Egger's test: P = 0.16). The long-term all-cause mortality in patients with cTnI or cTnT elevation after PCI (5.8%) was significantly higher when compared to patients without cTnI or cTnT elevation (4.4%); OR 1.45 (95% CI: 1.22-1.72), P < 0.01. In addition, the postprocedural composite adverse clinical events of all-cause mortality or myocardial infarction (MI) in patients with cTnI or cTnT elevation after PCI (9.2%) was significantly higher when compared to patients without cTnI or cTnT elevation (5.3%); OR 1.77 (95% CI: 1.48-2.11), P < 0.01. CONCLUSIONS: The current meta-analysis indicates that cTnI or cTnT elevation after nonemergent PCI is indicative of an increase in long-term all-cause mortality as well as the composite adverse events of all-cause mortality and MI. Efforts to routinely monitor periprocedural cTn levels along with more intensive outpatient monitoring/treatment of patients with cTn elevations may help to improve the long-term adverse outcomes in these patients following non-emergent PCI.


Assuntos
Angioplastia Coronária com Balão , Infarto do Miocárdio/sangue , Troponina I/sangue , Troponina T/sangue , Angioplastia Coronária com Balão/efeitos adversos , Angioplastia Coronária com Balão/instrumentação , Angioplastia Coronária com Balão/mortalidade , Biomarcadores/sangue , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Infarto do Miocárdio/etiologia , Infarto do Miocárdio/mortalidade , Razão de Chances , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Stents , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Regulação para Cima
5.
JAMA Cardiol ; 2(9): 967-975, 2017 09 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28724126

RESUMO

Importance: Current comparative outcomes among black and white patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the Veterans Affairs (VA) health system are not known. Objective: To compare outcomes between black and white patients undergoing PCI in the VA health system. Design, Setting, and Participants: This study compared black and white patients who underwent PCI between October 1, 2007, and September 30, 2013, at 63 VA hospitals using data recorded in the VA Clinical Assessment, Reporting, and Tracking System for Cardiac Catheterization Laboratories (CART-CL) program. A generalized linear mixed model with a random intercept for site assessed the relative difference in odds of outcomes between black and white patients. The setting was integrated institutionalized hospital care. Excluded were all patients of other races or those with multiple listed races and those with missing data regarding race or the diagnostic cardiac catheterization. The dates of analysis were January 7, 2016, to April 17, 2017. Exposure: Percutaneous coronary intervention at a VA hospital. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was 1-year mortality. Secondary outcomes were 30-day all-cause readmission rates, 30-day acute kidney injury, 30-day blood transfusion, and 1-year readmission rates for myocardial infarction. In addition, variations in procedural and postprocedural care were examined, including the use of intravascular ultrasound, optical coherence tomography, fractional flow reserve measurements, bare-metal stents, postprocedural medications, and radial access. Results: A total of 42 391 patients (13.3% black and 98.4% male; mean [SD] age, 65.2 [9.1] years) satisfied the inclusion and exclusion criteria. In unadjusted analyses, black patients had higher rates of 1-year mortality (7.1% vs 5.9%, P < .001) as well as secondary outcomes of 30-day acute kidney injury (20.8% vs 13.8%, P < .001), 30-day blood transfusion (3.4% vs 2.7%, P < .01), and 1-year readmission rates for myocardial infarction (3.3% vs 2.7%, P = .01) compared with white patients. After adjustment for demographics, comorbidities, and procedural characteristics, odds for 1-year mortality (odds ratio, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.90-1.19) were not different between black and white patients. There were also no differences in secondary outcomes with the exception of a higher rate of adjusted 30-day acute kidney injury (odds ratio, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.10-1.36). Conclusions and Relevance: While black patients had a higher rate of mortality than white patients in unadjusted analyses, race was not independently associated with 1-year mortality among patients undergoing PCI in VA hospitals.


Assuntos
Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/cirurgia , Negro ou Afro-Americano , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/cirurgia , Estenose Coronária/cirurgia , Hospitais de Veteranos , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/métodos , População Branca , Injúria Renal Aguda/epidemiologia , Idoso , Angina Estável/cirurgia , Angina Instável/cirurgia , Transfusão de Sangue/estatística & dados numéricos , Reserva Fracionada de Fluxo Miocárdico , Humanos , Modelos Lineares , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mortalidade , Infarto do Miocárdio/epidemiologia , Infarto do Miocárdio sem Supradesnível do Segmento ST/cirurgia , Razão de Chances , Readmissão do Paciente , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios , Artéria Radial , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/cirurgia , Stents , Tomografia de Coerência Óptica , Resultado do Tratamento , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , United States Department of Veterans Affairs
6.
J Invasive Cardiol ; 28(7): E59-65, 2016 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27342207

RESUMO

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has been commercially approved in the United States for the treatment of high-risk and inoperable patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis. While TAVR has proven benefits with regard to survival and quality of life in studied populations, the procedure is also associated with several well-described complications including stroke, vascular injury, and paravalvular regurgitation. More infrequent complications are less well described. Here, we report the development of new ventricular septal defects after TAVR in 4 patients with left ventricular outflow tract calcification. We discuss imaging and post-TAVR management of these patients.


Assuntos
Estenose da Valva Aórtica , Valva Aórtica , Comunicação Interventricular , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Qualidade de Vida , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Valva Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagem , Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/diagnóstico , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/epidemiologia , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/psicologia , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Ecocardiografia/métodos , Feminino , Comunicação Interventricular/diagnóstico , Comunicação Interventricular/etiologia , Comunicação Interventricular/fisiopatologia , Comunicação Interventricular/cirurgia , Humanos , Masculino , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/diagnóstico , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/fisiopatologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/cirurgia , Reoperação/métodos , Medição de Risco/métodos , Fatores de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter/efeitos adversos , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter/métodos
7.
Am J Cardiol ; 113(2): 236-42, 2014 Jan 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24176066

RESUMO

Atrial fibrillation (AF) has been associated with worse outcomes after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute myocardial infarction. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence and impact of new-onset AF after primary PCI in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctions from the Harmonizing Outcomes With Revascularization and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction (HORIZONS-AMI) trial. HORIZONS-AMI was a large-scale, multicenter, international, randomized trial comparing different antithrombotic regimens and stents during primary PCI in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctions. Three-year ischemic and bleeding end points were compared between patients with and without new-onset AF after PCI. Of the 3,602 patients included in the HORIZONS-AMI study, 3,281 (91.1%) with sinus rhythm at initial presentation had primary PCI as their primary management strategy. Of these, new-onset AF developed in 147 (4.5%). Compared with patients without AF after PCI, patients with new-onset AF had higher 3-year rates of net adverse clinical events (46.5% vs 25.7%, p <0.0001), mortality (11.9% vs 6.3%, p = 0.01), reinfarction (16.4% vs 7.0%, p <0.0001), stroke (5.8% vs 1.5%, p <0.0001), and major bleeding (20.9% vs 8.2%, p <0.0001). By multivariate analysis, new-onset AF after PCI was a powerful independent predictor of net adverse clinical events (hazard ratio 1.74, 95% confidence interval 1.30 to 2.34, p = 0.0002) and major adverse cardiac events (hazard ratio 1.73, 95% confidence interval 1.27 to 2.36) at 3 years. In conclusion, new-onset AF after PCI for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction was associated with markedly higher rates of adverse events and mortality.


Assuntos
Fibrilação Atrial/epidemiologia , Eletrocardiografia , Infarto do Miocárdio/cirurgia , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/métodos , Stents , Idoso , Fibrilação Atrial/etiologia , Fibrilação Atrial/fisiopatologia , Canadá/epidemiologia , Angiografia Coronária , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infarto do Miocárdio/complicações , Infarto do Miocárdio/diagnóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida/tendências , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
8.
J Invasive Cardiol ; 24(11): 590-3, 2012 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23117314

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: We sought to investigate the outcomes for different treatments of pericardial effusions. BACKGROUND: The optimal initial management for symptomatic pericardial effusions remains controversial. METHODS: We performed a 3-year retrospective, single-institution study comparing open surgical drainage to percutaneous pericardiocentesis for symptomatic pericardial effusions. RESULTS: Between 2007 and 2009, a total of 193 patients underwent an initial drainage procedure for a pericardial effusion (n = 121 [62.7%] pericardiocentesis; n = 72 [37.3%] open surgical drainage). Compared to those treated with pericardiocentesis, treatment with open surgical drainage was associated with a higher complication rate (4.9% vs 26.4%; P<.0001; odds ratio [OR], 6.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.6-18.2). Treatment with pericardiocentesis was associated with a higher rate of repeat procedures to drain a recurrent effusion compared to open surgical drainage (28.9% vs 2.8%; P<.0001; OR, 14.2; 95% CI, 3.3-61.3). Thirty-day mortality (19.8% surgical group vs 18.1% pericardiocentesis group; P=.8) and long-term survival (P=.4) did not differ between the groups. CONCLUSION: There is no significant difference in overall mortality between open surgical drainage and percutaneous pericardiocentesis for symptomatic pericardial effusions. There may be more procedural complications following surgical drainage of a pericardial effusion, and a greater need for repeat procedures if the effusion is drained using pericardiocentesis.


Assuntos
Cateterismo/métodos , Drenagem/métodos , Derrame Pericárdico/terapia , Pericardiocentese/métodos , Idoso , Cateterismo/efeitos adversos , Drenagem/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Derrame Pericárdico/mortalidade , Pericardiocentese/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Torácicos/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Torácicos/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa