Massively parallel characterization of CYP2C9 variant enzyme activity and abundance.

CYP2C9 encodes a cytochrome P450 enzyme responsible for metabolizing up to 15% of small molecule drugs, and CYP2C9 variants can alter the safety and efficacy of these therapeutics. In particular, the anti-coagulant warfarin is prescribed to over 15 million people annually and polymorphisms in CYP2C9 can affect individual drug response and lead to an increased risk of hemorrhage. We developed click-seq, a pooled yeast-based activity assay, to test thousands of variants. Using click-seq, we measured the activity of 6,142 missense variants in yeast. We also measured the steady-state cellular abundance of 6,370 missense variants in a human cell line by using variant abundance by massively parallel sequencing (VAMP-seq). These data revealed that almost two-thirds of CYP2C9 variants showed decreased activity and that protein abundance accounted for half of the variation in CYP2C9 function. We also measured activity scores for 319 previously unannotated human variants, many of which may have clinical relevance.

There and Back Again: A Perspective on 20 Years of CYP4Z1.

Cytochrome P450 (CYP)4Z1, a highly expressed CYP gene in breast cancer, was one of the last CYPs to be identified in the human genome, some 20 years ago. CYP4 enzymes typically catalyze ω-hydroxylation and metabolize ω3 and ω6 polyunsaturated fatty acids to bioactive lipid metabolites that can influence tumor growth and metastasis. These attributes of CYP4Z1 make it an attractive target for new chemotherapeutic drug design, as a potential biomarker for selection of patients that might respond favorably to drugs and for developing enzyme inhibitors as potential therapeutic agents. This review summarizes the current state of knowledge regarding the advancing biochemistry of CYP4Z1, its role in breast cancer, and the recent synthesis of selective chemical inhibitors of the enzyme. We identify gaps that need to be filled to further advance this field and present new experimental data on recombinant CYP4Z1 expression and purification of the active catalytic form. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: In breast cancer, an unmet need is the availability of highly effective therapeutic agents, especially for triple negative breast cancer. The relevance of the work summarized in this mini-review is that it identifies a new potential drug target, CYP4Z1, and discusses ways in which the gene product's catalytic activity might be modulated in order to combat this malignancy and limit its spread.

Isobutane, Isopentane, Butane, and Propane.

The Expert Panel for Cosmetic Ingredient Safety (Panel) first published the Final Report of the safety of Isobutane, Isopentane, Butane, and Propane in 1982. The Panel previously concluded that these ingredients are considered safe as cosmetic ingredients under the present conditions of concentration and use, as described in that safety assessment. Upon re-review in 2002, the Panel reaffirmed the original conclusion, as published in 2005. The Panel reviewed update frequency and concentration of use data again in 2023, in addition to newly available, relevant safety data. Considering this information, as well as the information provided in the original safety assessment and the prior re-review document, the Panel reaffirmed the 1982 conclusion for Isobutane, Isopentane, Butane, and Propane.

Modeling Pharmacokinetic Natural Product-Drug Interactions for Decision-Making: A NaPDI Center Recommended Approach.

The popularity of botanical and other purported medicinal natural products (NPs) continues to grow, especially among patients with chronic illnesses and patients managed on complex prescription drug regimens. With few exceptions, the risk of a given NP to precipitate a clinically significant pharmacokinetic NP-drug interaction (NPDI) remains understudied or unknown. Application of static or dynamic mathematical models to predict and/or simulate NPDIs can provide critical information about the potential clinical significance of these complex interactions. However, methods used to conduct such predictions or simulations are highly variable. Additionally, published reports using mathematical models to interrogate NPDIs are not always sufficiently detailed to ensure reproducibility. Consequently, guidelines are needed to inform the conduct and reporting of these modeling efforts. This recommended approach from the Center of Excellence for Natural Product Drug Interaction Research describes a systematic method for using mathematical models to interpret the interaction risk of NPs as precipitants of potential clinically significant pharmacokinetic NPDIs. A framework for developing and applying pharmacokinetic NPDI models is presented with the aim of promoting accuracy, reproducibility, and generalizability in the literature. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Many natural products (NPs) contain phytoconstituents that can increase or decrease systemic or tissue exposure to, and potentially the efficacy of, a pharmaceutical drug; however, no regulatory agency guidelines exist to assist in predicting the risk of these complex interactions. This recommended approach from a multi-institutional consortium designated by National Institutes of Health as the Center of Excellence for Natural Product Drug Interaction Research provides a framework for modeling pharmacokinetic NP-drug interactions.

An Integrative Approach to Elucidate Mechanisms Underlying the Pharmacokinetic Goldenseal-Midazolam Interaction: Application of In Vitro Assays and Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Models to Understand Clinical Observations.

The natural product goldenseal is a clinical inhibitor of CYP3A activity, as evidenced by a 40%-60% increase in midazolam area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) after coadministration with goldenseal. The predominant goldenseal alkaloids berberine and (-)-ß-hydrastine were previously identified as time-dependent CYP3A inhibitors using human liver microsomes. Whether these alkaloids contribute to the clinical interaction, as well as the primary anatomic site (hepatic vs. intestinal) and mode of CYP3A inhibition (reversible vs. time-dependent), remain uncharacterized. The objective of this study was to mechanistically assess the pharmacokinetic goldenseal-midazolam interaction using an integrated in vitro-in vivo-in silico approach. Using human intestinal microsomes, (-)-ß-hydrastine was a more potent time-dependent inhibitor of midazolam 1'-hydroxylation than berberine (KI and kinact: 8.48 µM and 0.041 minutes-1, respectively, vs. >250 µM and ∼0.06 minutes-1, respectively). Both the AUC and Cmax of midazolam increased by 40%-60% after acute (single 3-g dose) and chronic (1 g thrice daily × 6 days) goldenseal administration to healthy adults. These increases, coupled with a modest or no increase (≤23%) in half-life, suggested that goldenseal primarily inhibited intestinal CYP3A. A physiologically based pharmacokinetic interaction model incorporating berberine and (-)-ß-hydrastine successfully predicted the goldenseal-midazolam interaction to within 20% of that observed after both chronic and acute goldenseal administration. Simulations implicated (-)-ß-hydrastine as the major alkaloid precipitating the interaction, primarily via time-dependent inhibition of intestinal CYP3A, after chronic and acute goldenseal exposure. Results highlight the potential interplay between time-dependent and reversible inhibition of intestinal CYP3A as the mechanism underlying natural product-drug interactions, even after acute exposure to the precipitant. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Natural products can alter the pharmacokinetics of an object drug, potentially resulting in increased off-target effects or decreased efficacy of the drug. The objective of this work was to evaluate fundamental mechanisms underlying the clinically observed goldenseal-midazolam interaction. Results support the use of an integrated approach involving established in vitro assays, clinical evaluation, and physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling to elucidate the complex interplay between multiple phytoconstituents and various pharmacokinetic processes driving a drug interaction.

A Physiological-Based Pharmacokinetic Model Embedded with a Target-Mediated Drug Disposition Mechanism Can Characterize Single-Dose Warfarin Pharmacokinetic Profiles in Subjects with Various CYP2C9 Genotypes under Different Cotreatments.

Warfarin, a commonly prescribed oral anticoagulant medication, is highly effective in treating deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. However, the clinical dosing of warfarin is complicated by high interindividual variability in drug exposure and response and its narrow therapeutic index. CYP2C9 genetic polymorphism and drug-drug interactions (DDIs) are substantial contributors to this high variability of warfarin pharmacokinetics (PK), among numerous factors. Building a physiology-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model for warfarin is not only critical for a mechanistic characterization of warfarin PK but also useful for investigating the complicated dose-exposure relationship of warfarin. Thus, the objective of this study was to develop a PBPK model for warfarin that integrates information regarding CYP2C9 genetic polymorphisms and their impact on DDIs. Generic PBPK models for both S- and R-warfarin, the two enantiomers of warfarin, were constructed in R with the mrgsolve package. As expected, a generic PBPK model structure did not adequately characterize the warfarin PK profile collected up to 15 days following the administration of a single oral dose of warfarin, especially for S-warfarin. However, following the integration of an empirical target-mediated drug disposition (TMDD) component, the PBPK-TMDD model well characterized the PK profiles collected for both S- and R-warfarin in subjects with different CYP2C9 genotypes. Following the integration of enzyme inhibition and induction effects, the PBPK-TMDD model also characterized the PK profiles of both S- and R-warfarin in various DDI settings. The developed mathematic framework may be useful in building algorithms to better inform the clinical dosing of warfarin. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The present study found that a traditional physiology-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model cannot sufficiently characterize the pharmacokinetic profiles of warfarin enantiomers when warfarin is administered as a single dose, but a PBPK model with a target-mediated drug disposition mechanism can. After incorporating CYP2C9 genotypes and drug-drug interaction information, the developed model is anticipated to facilitate the understanding of warfarin disposition in subjects with different CYP2C9 genotypes in the absence and presence of both cytochrome P450 inhibitors and cytochrome P450 inducers.

Translating Kratom-Drug Interactions: From Bedside to Bench and Back.

Kratom is a botanical natural product belonging to the coffee family, with stimulant effects at low doses and opioid-like effects at higher doses. During the last two decades, kratom has been purported as a safer alternative to pharmaceutical and illicit drugs to self-manage pain and opioid withdrawal symptoms. Kratom alkaloids, typically mitragynine, have been detected in biologic samples from overdose deaths. These deaths are often observed in combination with other drugs and are suspected to result from polyintoxications. This review focuses on the potential for kratom to precipitate pharmacokinetic interactions with object drugs involved in these reported polyintoxications. The legal status, chemistry, pharmacology, and toxicology are also summarized. The aggregate in vitro and clinical data identified kratom and select kratom alkaloids as modulators of cytochrome P450 (P450) enzyme activity, notably as inhibitors of CYP2D6 and CYP3A, as well as P-glycoprotein-mediated efflux activity. These inhibitory effects could increase the systemic exposure to co-consumed object drugs, which may lead to adverse effects. Collectively, the evidence to date warrants further evaluation of potential kratom-drug interactions using an iterative approach involving additional mechanistic in vitro studies, well designed clinical studies, and physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling and simulation. This critical information is needed to fill knowledge gaps regarding the safe and effective use of kratom, thereby addressing ongoing public health concerns. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The botanical kratom is increasingly used to self-manage pain and opioid withdrawal symptoms due to having opioid-like effects. The legal status, chemistry, pharmacology, toxicology, and drug interaction potential of kratom are reviewed. Kratom-associated polyintoxications and in vitro-in vivo extrapolations suggest that kratom can precipitate pharmacokinetic drug interactions by inhibiting CYP2D6, CYP3A, and P-glycoprotein. An iterative approach that includes clinical studies and physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling and simulation is recommended for further evaluation of potential unwanted kratom-drug interactions.

Peanut Glycerides.

The Expert Panel for Cosmetic Ingredient Safety reviewed updated information that has become available since their original assessment from 2001, along with updated information regarding product types, and frequency and concentrations of use, and reaffirmed their original conclusion that Peanut Glycerides is safe as a cosmetic ingredient in the practices of use and concentration as described in this report.

Hexamidine and Hexamidine Diisethionate.

The Expert Panel for Cosmetic Ingredient Safety reviewed newly available studies since their original assessment in 2007, along with updated information regarding product types and concentrations of use, and confirmed that Hexamidine and Hexamidine Diisethionate are safe as cosmetic ingredients in the practices of use and concentration as described in this report if used at concentrations less than or equal to .10%.

PPG-11 and PPG-15 Stearyl Ether.

The Expert Panel for Cosmetic Ingredient Safety reviewed newly available studies since their original assessment in 2001, along with updated information regarding product types and concentrations of use, and confirmed that PPG-11 and PPG-15 Stearyl Ether are safe as cosmetic ingredients in the practices of use and concentration as described in this report.

Methyl Alcohol.

The Expert Panel for Cosmetic Ingredient Safety reviewed updated information that has become available since their original assessment from 2001, along with updated information regarding product types, and frequency and concentrations of use, and reaffirmed their original conclusion that Methyl Alcohol is safe as used to denature alcohol in the practices of use and concentration as described in this report.

Polyamino Sugar Condensate.

The Expert Panel for Cosmetic Ingredient Safety reviewed updated information that has become available since their original assessment from 1982, along with updated information regarding product types, and frequency and concentrations of use, and reaffirmed their original conclusion that Polyamino Sugar Condensate is safe for topical application to humans in the practices of use and concentration as described in this report.

Choleth-24.

The Expert Panel for Cosmetic Ingredient Safety reviewed updated information that has become available since their original assessment from 1982, along with updated information regarding product types, and frequency and concentrations of use, and reaffirmed their original conclusion that Choleth-24 is safe for topical applications to humans in the practices of use and concentration as described in this report.

Prunus Amygdalus Dulcis (Sweet Almond) Seed Meal.

The Expert Panel for Cosmetic Ingredient Safety reviewed updated information that has become available since their original assessment from 1983, along with updated information regarding product types, and frequency and concentrations of use, and reaffirmed their original conclusion that Prunus Amygdalus Dulcis (Sweet Almond) Seed Meal is safe for topical application to humans in the practices of use and concentration as described in this report.

Amyl Acetate and Isoamyl Acetate.

The Expert Panel for Cosmetic Ingredient Safety reviewed newly available studies since their original assessment in 1988, along with updated information regarding product types and concentrations of use, and confirmed that Amyl Acetate and Isoamyl Acetate are safe as cosmetic ingredients in the practices of use and concentration as described in this report.

Mink Oil.

The Expert Panel for Cosmetic Ingredient Safety reviewed updated information that has become available since their original assessment from 1998, along with updated information regarding product types, and frequency and concentrations of use, and reaffirmed their original conclusion that Mink Oil is safe as a cosmetic ingredient in the practices of use and concentration as described in this report.

Dioscorea Villosa (Wild Yam) Root Extract.

The Expert Panel for Cosmetic Ingredient Safety reviewed updated information that has become available since their original assessment from 2004, along with updated information regarding product types, and frequency and concentrations of use, and reaffirmed their original conclusion that Dioscorea Villosa (Wild Yam) Root Extract is safe as a cosmetic ingredient in the practices of use and concentration as described in this report.

PEG Soy Sterols.

The Expert Panel for Cosmetic Ingredient Safety reviewed newly available studies since their original assessment in year 2000, along with updated information regarding product types and concentrations of use, and confirmed that PEG-5, -10, -16, -25, -30, and -40 Soy Sterol are safe as cosmetic ingredients in the practices of use and concentration as described in this report.

Phytantriol.

The Expert Panel for Cosmetic Ingredient Safety reviewed updated information that has become available since their original assessment from 2007, along with updated information regarding product types, and frequency and concentrations of use, and reaffirmed their original conclusion that Phytantriol is safe as a cosmetic ingredient in the practices of use and concentration as described in this report.

Glycol Stearate and Glycol Stearate SE.

The Expert Panel for Cosmetic Ingredient Safety reviewed newly available studies since their original assessment in 1982, along with updated information regarding product types and concentrations of use, and confirmed that Glycol Stearate and Glycol Stearate SE are safe as cosmetic ingredients in the practices of use and concentration as described in this report.