RESUMO
Lung cancer is responsible for one in five cancer-related deaths. Screening for lung cancer using low-dose chest CT (LDCT) is supported by several international studies targeting the at-risk population as part of an organised programme. Given the organisational challenges for the healthcare systems of the countries concerned, this involves setting up pilot screening projects. This requires close collaboration between the players involved, with a multidisciplinary approach structured around the participant, aiming to offer the expertise of the pulmonologist and the radiologist on the LDCT performed, interpreted with the help of artificial intelligence. Here we set out the elements needed to develop a screening programme, starting with the implementation of a pilot project.
Le cancer pulmonaire est responsable d'un décès lié au cancer sur cinq. Le dépistage du cancer pulmonaire par le scanner thoracique à faible dose (LDCT) est soutenu par plusieurs études internationales ciblant la population à risque dans le cadre d'un programme organisé. Vu les enjeux organisationnels pour le système de santé des pays concernés, cela passe par la mise en place de projets pilotes de dépistage. Cela requiert une collaboration étroite entre les différents acteurs, avec une approche multidisciplinaire structurée autour du participant visant à offrir l'expertise du pneumologue et du radiologue sur le LDCT effectué, interprété avec l'aide de l'intelligence artificielle. Nous exposons ici les éléments nécessaires à l'élaboration d'un programme de dépistage, en passant d'abord par la mise en place d'un projet pilote.
Assuntos
Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Humanos , Programas de Rastreamento , Projetos Piloto , Suíça/epidemiologia , Inteligência Artificial , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiologiaRESUMO
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer mortality in the developed world. Diffuse fibrosing interstitial lung disease (ILD) consist of a heterogeneous group that includes idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Diffuse ILD is a risk factor for the development of lung cancer which on its own is associated with an increased risk of morbidity and mortality. Despite common mechanisms between fibrogenesis and carcinogenesis, the underlying pathogenesis of lung cancer and fibrosis overlap is poorly understood. The clinical management of these patients remains a medical challenge requiring a multidisciplinary approach, particularly in view of the risk of acute exacerbation of fibrosing ILD following most lung cancer treatments, leading to a considerable negative outcome on overall prognosis.
Le carcinome bronchopulmonaire (CBP) est la première cause de mortalité par cancer dans les pays développés. Les pneumopathies interstitielles diffuses fibrosantes (PIDf) sont un groupe hétérogène comprenant, entre autres, la fibrose pulmonaire idiopathique. Les PIDf sont un facteur de risque de développement du CBP et sont associées à un risque accru de morbi-mortalité. Malgré des mécanismes communs entre la fibrogenèse et la carcinogenèse, la pathogenèse sous-jacente de l'association CBP et PIDf est mal comprise. La gestion clinique de ces patients est un défi médical nécessitant une prise en charge multidisciplinaire, en particulier devant les risques d'exacerbation aiguë de la PIDf grevant le pronostic.
Assuntos
Fibrose Pulmonar Idiopática , Doenças Pulmonares Intersticiais , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Humanos , Fibrose Pulmonar Idiopática/etiologia , Fibrose Pulmonar Idiopática/terapia , Pulmão/patologia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/complicações , Prognóstico , Progressão da DoençaRESUMO
Introduction: Lung cancer is the second most common cancer; however, synchronous lung cancer is rare and challenging to treat. Case Presentation: We report the case of an 80-year-old female patient who presented with two lung lesions with primary tumor characteristics, which revealed squamous cell carcinoma and synchronous adenocarcinoma after histological sampling. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis revealed a MET Exon 14 skipping mutation in squamous cell carcinoma and an epidermal growth factor receptor mutation in adenocarcinoma. Capmatinib and stereotactic radiotherapy were initiated for the adenocarcinoma with a good clinical response. Capmatinib treatment had to be discontinued because of stage 3 edema of the lower limbs, after which a left lobectomy was performed. Currently, the patient is considered to be in remission. Conclusion: This case highlights the need for histological analysis of every lung lesion with primary tumor characteristics, as well as for NGS analysis in search of specific mutations enabling the introduction of targeted therapies. mesenchymal-epithelial transition.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: In this real-world multicenter study we addressed the activity of post-progression anticancer treatments after first-line pembrolizumab in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with PD-L1 ≥50%. METHODS: Clinico-pathological data of PD-L1 ≥50% advanced NSCLCs who failed first-line pembrolizumab were collected in 14 Oncologic Centers from different European countries. Types of subsequent anticancer treatment and outcomes on salvage chemotherapy or pembrolizumab beyond progression with or without the addition of local ablative therapies were reported. RESULTS: Out of 173 patients, 100 had progressed on pembrolizumab, of which 60 patients (60%) met eligibility criteria and were treated with either salvage chemotherapy (42/60, 70%) or pembrolizumab beyond progression (18/60, 30%). Overall, median age was 66 years, 63.3% were male, 60.0% had a performance status of 0-1, 88.3% were smokers and 61.7% had adenocarcinoma histology. In patients evaluable for response, objective response rate to salvage chemotherapy was 41.9%, with no significant difference according to the type of regimen (42.9% for platinum-based and 40.0% for single-agent chemotherapy). Median progression-free survival (PFS) to salvage chemotherapy was 4.5 months. Among patients treated with pembrolizumab beyond progression, 13 out of 18 patients (72.2%) had progressive disease in ≤2 organ sites, of whom 9 (69.2%) were managed with the addition of local ablative therapies consisting of radiation at progressive lesion(s). No significant difference was noted in terms of post-progression survival between the salvage chemotherapy and the pembrolizumab beyond progression groups of patients (6.9 versus 8.1 months, respectively, P=0.08). CONCLUSIONS: In PD-L1 ≥50% advanced NSCLCs who progress on first-line pembrolizumab, salvage chemotherapy is associated with a remarkable anticancer activity, while select patients may benefit from continuation of pembrolizumab beyond progression, with the possible addition of local ablative radiotherapy in oligoprogressive cases.